On the compositum of integral closures of valuation rings

It is well known that if $K_1,K_2$ are algebraic number fields with coprime discriminants, then the composite ring $A_{K_1}{A}_{K_2}$ is integrally closed and $K_1,K_2$ are linearly disjoint over the field of rationals, $A_{K_i}$ being the ring of algebraic integers of $K_i$. In an attempt to prove the converse of the above result, in this paper we prove that if $K_1,K_2$ are finite separable extensions of a valued field $(K,v)$ of arbitrary rank which are linearly disjoint over $K=K_1\cap K_2$ and if the integral closure $S_i$ of the valuation ring $R_v$ of v in $K_i$ is a free $R_v$-module for $i=1,2$ with $S_1{S}_2$ integrally closed, then the discriminant of either $S_1/R_v$ or of $S_2/R_v$ is the unit ideal. We quickly deduce from this result that for algebraic number fields $K_1,K_2$ linearly disjoint over $K=K_1\cap K_2$ for which $A_{K_1}{A}_{K_2}$ is integrally closed, the relative discriminants of $K_1/K$ and $K_2/K$ must be coprime.     

Some multicolor bipartite Ramsey numbers involving cycles and a small number of colors

For bipartite graphs $G_1,G_2,\dots ,G_k$, the bipartite Ramsey number $b(G_1,G_2,\dots ,G_k)$ is the least positive integer $b$ so that any coloring of the edges of $K_{b,b}$ with $k$ colors will result in a copy of $G_i$ in the $i$th color for some $i$. In this paper, our main focus will be to bound the following numbers: $b(C_{2t_1},C_{2t_2})$ and $b(C_{2t_1},C_{2t_2},C_{2t_3})$ for all $t_i\ge 3,$$b(C_{2t_1},C_{2t_2},C_{2t_3},C_{2t_4})$ for $3\le t_i\le 9,$ and $b(C_{2t_1},C_{2t_2},C_{2t_3},C_{2t_4},C_{2t_5})$ for $3\le t_i\le 5.$ Furthermore, we will also show that these mentioned bounds are generally better than the bounds obtained by using the best known Zarankiewicz-type result.     

On uniqueness of stationary solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations in exterior domains

The aim of this paper is to prove a uniqueness criterion for solutions to the stationary Navier–Stokes equation in 3-dimensional exterior domains within the class $u\in L_{3,\infty }$ with $?u\in L_{3/2,\infty }$, where $L_{3,\infty }$ and $L_{3/2,\infty }$ are the Lorentz spaces. Our criterion asserts that if $u$ and $v$ are the solutions, $u$ is small in $L_{3,\infty }$ and $u,v\in L_p$ for some $p>3$, then $u=v$. The proof is based on analysis of the dual equation with the aid of the bootstrap argument.     

Lp + Lq and Lp ∩ Lq are not isomorphic for all 1 ≤ p,q ≤ ∞, p ≠ q

We prove that if $1\le p,q\le \infty$, then the spaces $L_p+L_q$ and $L_p\cap L_q$ are isomorphic if and only if $p=q$. In particular, $L_2+L_{\infty }$ and $L_2\cap L_{\infty }$ are not isomorphic, which is an answer to a question formulated in [2].