Carbon Monoxide: A Mild and Efficient Reducing Agent towards Atomically Precise Gold Nanoclusters

In recent years, thiolate‐protected gold nanoclusters (or thiolated Au NCs) with a core size below 2 nm have emerged as a new class of multifunctional nanoparticles because of their unique molecular‐like properties and the potential to use these properties in many practical applications. A general synthesis of Au NCs may involve the use of a strong reducing agent (e.g., sodium borohydride (NaBH₄)), which often leads to the formation of mix‐sized Au NCs if no delicate control is applied. To obtain atomically precise Au NCs, additional physical or chemical selection processes (e.g., high‐resolution separation or size‐focusing) are required, which are difficult to be scaled up or are limited to only thermodynamically stable products. By introducing a milder reducing agent – carbon monoxide (CO) – both stable and metastable thiolated Au NCs, including Au_10–12, Au₁₅, Au₁₈, Au₂₅, and Au₂₉, can be synthesized in a one‐pot manner. In addition, CO reduction also enables the synthesis of a highly luminescent Au₂₂(SG)₁₈ NC. Furthermore, the intermediates of Au NC growth can be tracked in the CO‐reduction system due to the mild and readily stoppable nature of CO reduction. Therefore, the use of CO reduction may bring new flexibilities in designing synthetic strategies and understanding the growth mechanism of atomically precise Au NCs, which could contribute to a better design of functional Au NCs, further paving their way towards practical applications in various fields.     

Unraveling the Impact of Gold(I)–Thiolate Motifs on the Aggregation‐Induced Emission of Gold Nanoclusters

Aggregation‐induced emission (AIE) provides an efficient strategy to synthesize highly luminescent metal nanoclusters (NCs), however, rational control of emission energy and intensity of metal NCs is still challenging. This communication reveals the impact of surface Au^I‐thiolate motifs on the AIE properties of Au NCs, by employing a series of water‐soluble glutathione (GSH)‐coordinated Au complexes and NCs as a model ([Au₁₀SR₁₀], [Au₁₅SR₁₃], [Au₁₈SR₁₄], and [Au₂₅SR₁₈]^?, SR=thiolate ligand). Spectroscopic investigations show that the emission wavelength of Au NCs is adjustable from visible to the near‐infrared II (NIR‐II) region by controlling the length of the Au^I‐SR motifs on the NC surface. Decreasing the length of Au^I‐SR motifs also changes the origin of cluster luminescence from AIE‐type phosphorescence to Au⁰‐core‐dictated fluorescence. This effect becomes more prominent when the degree of aggregation of Au NCs increases in solution.     

Aurophilic Interactions in the Self‐Assembly of Gold Nanoclusters into Nanoribbons with Enhanced Luminescence

Aurophilic interactions (Au^I???Au^I) are crucial in directing the supramolecular self‐assembly of many gold(I) compounds; however, this intriguing chemistry has been rarely explored for the self‐assembly of nanoscale building blocks. Herein, we report on studies on aurophilic interactions in the structure‐directed self‐assembly of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles or nanoclusters (NCs, <2 nm) using [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^? (SR=thiolate ligand) as a model cluster. The self‐assembly of NCs is initiated by surface‐motif reconstruction of [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^? from short SR‐[Au^I‐SR]₂ units to long SR‐[Au^I‐SR]_x (x>2) staples accompanied by structure modification of the intrinsic Au₁₃ kernel. Such motif reconstruction increases the content of Au^I species in the protecting shell of Au NCs, providing the structural basis for directed aurophilic interactions, which promote the self‐assembly of Au NCs into well‐defined nanoribbons in solution. More interestingly, the compact structure and effective aurophilic interactions in the nanoribbons significantly enhance the luminescence intensity of Au NCs with an absolute quantum yield of 6.2 % at room temperature.     

One‐Pot Synthesis of Phenylmethanethiolate‐Protected Au20(SR)16 and Au24(SR)20 Nanoclusters and Insight into the Kinetic Control

We report two synthetic routes for concurrent formation of phenylmethanethiolate (‐SCH₂Ph)‐protected Au₂₀(SR)₁₆ and Au₂₄(SR)₂₄ nanoclusters in one‐pot by kinetic control. Unlike the previously reported methods for thiolate‐protected gold nanoclusters, which typically involve rapid reduction of the gold precursor by excess NaBH₄ and subsequent size focusing into atomically monodisperse clusters of a specific size, the present work reveals some insight into the kinetic control in gold–thiolate cluster synthesis. We demonstrate that the synthesis of ‐SCH₂Ph‐protected Au₂₀ and Au₂₄ nanoclusters can be obtained through two different, kinetically controlled methods. Specifically, route 1 employs slow addition of a relatively large amount of NaBH₄ under slow stirring of the reaction mixture, while route 2 employs rapid addition of a small amount of NaBH₄ under rapid stirring of the reaction mixture. At first glance, these two methods apparently possess quite different reaction kinetics, but interestingly they give rise to exactly the same product (i.e., the coproduction of Au₂₀(SCH₂Ph)₁₆ and Au₂₄(SCH₂Ph)₂₀ clusters). Our results explicitly demonstrate the complex interplay between the kinetic factors that include the addition speed and amount of NaBH₄ solution as well as the stirring speed of the reaction mixture. Such insight is important for devising synthetic routes for different sized nanoclusters. We also compared the photoluminescence and electrochemical properties of PhCH₂S‐protected Au₂₀ and Au₂₄ nanoclusters with the PhC₂H₄S‐protected counterparts. A surprising 2.5 times photoluminescence enhancement was observed for the PhCH₂S‐capped nanoclusters when compared to the PhC₂H₄S‐capped analogues, thereby indicating a drastic effect of the ligand that is merely one carbon shorter.     

High‐Level Incorporation of Silver in Gold Nanoclusters: Fluorescence Redshift upon Interaction with Hydrogen Peroxide and Fluorescence Enhancement with Herbicide

High‐level incorporation of Ag in Au nanoclusters (NCs) is conveniently achieved by controlling the concentration of Ag⁺ in the synthesis of bovine serum albumin (BSA)‐protected Au NCs, and the resulting structure is determined to be bimetallic Ag₂₈Au₁₀‐BSA NCs through a series of characterizations including energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy, mass spectroscopy, and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, together with density functional theory simulations. Interestingly, the Ag₂₈Au₁₀ NCs exhibit a significant fluorescence redshift rather than quenching upon interaction with hydrogen peroxide, providing a new approach to the detection of hydrogen peroxide through direct comparison of their fluorescence peaks. Furthermore, the Ag₂₈Au₁₀ NCs are also used for the sensitive and selective detection of herbicide through fluorescence enhancement. The detection limit for herbicide (0.1 nm ) is far below the health value established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; such sensitive detection was not achieved by using AuAg NCs with low‐level incorporation of Ag or by using the individual metal NCs.     

Exposing the Delocalized Cu−S π Bonds on the Au24Cu6(SPhtBu)22 Nanocluster and Its Application in Ring‐Opening Reactions

Bimetallic nanomaterials are of major importance in catalysis. A Au‐Cu bimetallic nanocluster was synthesized that is effective in catalyzing the epoxide ring‐opening reaction. The catalyst was analyzed by SCXRD and ESI‐MS and found to be Au₂₄Cu₆(SPhtBu)₂₂ (Au₂₄Cu₆ for short). Six copper atoms exclusively occupy the surface positions in two groups with three atoms for each, and each group was bonded with three thiolate ligands to give a planar motif reminiscent of a benzene ring. In the epoxide‐ring opening reaction, Au₂₄Cu₆ exhibited superior catalytic activity compared to other homometallic and Au‐Cu alloy NCs, such as Au₂₅ and Au_38?xCu_x. Control experiments and DFT calculations revealed that the π conjugation among the Cu?S bonds played a pivotal role. This study demonstrates a unique π conjugation established among the Cu?S bonds as a critical structural motif in the nanocluster, which facilitates the catalysis of a ring‐opening reaction.     

Unraveling the Impact of Gold(I)–Thiolate Motifs on the Aggregation-Induced Emission of Gold Nanoclusters

Aggregation-induced emission (AIE) provides an efficient strategy to synthesize highly luminescent metal nanoclusters (NCs), however, rational control of emission energy and intensity of metal NCs is still challenging. This communication reveals the impact of surface Au^I-thiolate motifs on the AIE properties of Au NCs, by employing a series of water-soluble glutathione (GSH)-coordinated Au complexes and NCs as a model ([Au₁₀SR₁₀], [Au₁₅SR₁₃], [Au₁₈SR₁₄], and [Au₂₅SR₁₈]⁻, SR=thiolate ligand). Spectroscopic investigations show that the emission wavelength of Au NCs is adjustable from visible to the near-infrared II (NIR-II) region by controlling the length of the Au^I-SR motifs on the NC surface. Decreasing the length of Au^I-SR motifs also changes the origin of cluster luminescence from AIE-type phosphorescence to Au⁰-core-dictated fluorescence. This effect becomes more prominent when the degree of aggregation of Au NCs increases in solution.     

Isolation and Total Structure Determination of an All‐Alkynyl‐Protected Gold Nanocluster Au144

Total structure determination of a ligand‐protected gold nanocluster, Au₁₄₄, has been successfully carried out. The composition of title nanocluster is Au₁₄₄(C≡CAr)₆₀ ( 1 ; Ar=2‐FC₆H₄‐). The cluster 1 exhibits a quasi‐spherical Russian doll‐like architecture, comprising a Au₅₄ two‐shelled Mackay icosahedron (Au₁₂@Au₄₂), which is further enclosed by a Au₆₀ anti‐Mackay icosahedral shell. The Au₁₁₄ kernel is enwrapped by thirty linear ArC≡C‐Au‐C≡CAr staple motifs. The absorption spectrum of 1 shows two bands at 560 and 620 nm. This spectrum is distinctly different from that of thiolated Au₁₄₄, which was predicted to have an almost identical metal kernel and very similar ligands arrangement in 1 . These facts indicate the molecule‐like behavior of 1 and significant involvement of ligands in the electronic structure of 1 . The cluster 1 is hitherto the largest coinage metal nanocluster with atomically precise molecular structure in the alkynyl family. The work not only addresses the concern of structural information of Au₁₄₄, which had been long‐pursued, but also provides an interesting example showing ligand effects on the optical properties of ligand protected metal nanoclusters.     

Silver Doping‐Induced Luminescence Enhancement and Red‐Shift of Gold Nanoclusters with Aggregation‐Induced Emission

A deep understanding on the luminescence property of aggregation‐induced emission (AIE) featured metal nanoclusters (NCs) is highly desired. This paper reports a systematic study on enhancing the luminescence of AIE‐featured Au NCs, which is achieved by Ag doping to engineer the size/structure and aggregation states of the Au^I‐thiolate motifs in the NC shell. Moreover, by prolonging the reaction time, the luminescence of the as‐synthesized AuAg NCs could be further tailored from orange to red, which is also due to the variation of the Au^I‐thiolate motifs of NCs. This study can facilitate a better understanding of this AIE‐featured luminescent probe and the design of other synthetic routes for this rising family of functional materials.     

Fluorescent Gold Nanoclusters with Interlocked Staples and a Fully Thiolate‐Bound Kernel

The structural features that render gold nanoclusters intrinsically fluorescent are currently not well understood. To address this issue, highly fluorescent gold nanoclusters have to be synthesized, and their structures must be determined. We herein report the synthesis of three fluorescent Au₂₄(SR)₂₀ nanoclusters (R=C₂H₄Ph, CH₂Ph, or CH₂C₆H₄^tBu). According to UV/Vis/NIR, differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and X‐ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) analysis, these three nanoclusters adopt similar structures that feature a bi‐tetrahedral Au₈ kernel protected by four tetrameric Au₄(SR)₅ motifs. At least two structural features are responsible for the unusual fluorescence of the Au₂₄(SR)₂₀ nanoclusters: Two pairs of interlocked Au₄(SR)₅ staples reduce the vibration loss, and the interactions between the kernel and the thiolate motifs enhance electron transfer from the ligand to the kernel moiety through the Au?S bonds, thereby enhancing the fluorescence. This work provides some clarification of the structure–fluorescence relationship of such clusters.     

Tuning the Accessibility and Activity of Au25(SR)18 Nanocluster Catalysts through Ligand Engineering

In this work, the effects of thiolate ligands (‐SR, e.g., chain length and functional moiety) on the accessibility and catalytic activity of thiolate‐protected gold nanoclusters (e.g., Au₂₅(SR)₁₈) for 4‐nitrophenol hydrogenation is reported. The data suggest that Au₂₅(SR)₁₈ bearing a shorter alkyl chain shows a better accessibility to the substrates (shown by shorter induction time, t₀) and a higher catalytic activity (shown by higher apparent reaction rate constant, k_app). The functional moiety of the ligands is another determinant factor, which clearly suggests that ligand engineering of Au₂₅(SR)₁₈ would be an efficient platform for fine‐tuning its catalytic properties.     

Ligand‐Stabilized and Atomically Precise Gold Nanocluster Catalysis: A Case Study for Correlating Fundamental Electronic Properties with Catalysis

We present results from our investigations into correlating the styrene‐oxidation catalysis of atomically precise mixed‐ligand biicosahedral‐structure [Au₂₅(PPh₃)₁₀(SC₁₂H₂₅)₅Cl₂]²⁺ (Au₂₅‐bi) and thiol‐stabilized icosahedral core–shell‐structure [Au₂₅(SCH₂CH₂Ph)₁₈]^? (Au₂₅‐i) clusters with their electronic and atomic structure by using a combination of synchrotron radiation‐based X‐ray absorption fine‐structure spectroscopy (XAFS) and ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy (UPS). Compared to bulk Au, XAFS revealed low Au–Au coordination, Au? Au bond contraction and higher d‐band vacancies in both the ligand‐stabilized Au clusters. The ligands were found not only to act as colloidal stabilizers, but also as d‐band electron acceptor for Au atoms. Au₂₅‐bi clusters have a higher first‐shell Au coordination number than Au₂₅‐i, whereas Au₂₅‐bi and Au₂₅‐i clusters have the same number of Au atoms. The UPS revealed a trend of narrower d‐band width, with apparent d‐band spin–orbit splitting and higher binding energy of d‐band center position for Au₂₅‐bi and Au₂₅‐i. We propose that the differences in their d‐band unoccupied state population are likely to be responsible for differences in their catalytic activity and selectivity. The findings reported herein help to understand the catalysis of atomically precise ligand‐stabilized metal clusters by correlating their atomic or electronic properties with catalytic activity.     

Alkynyl‐Protected Au23 Nanocluster: A 12‐Electron System

A 23‐gold‐atom nanocluster was prepared by NaBH₄‐mediated reduction of a solution of PhC?CAu and Ph₃PAuSbF₆ in CH₂Cl₂. The cluster composition was determined to be [Au₂₃(PhC?C)₉(Ph₃P)₆]²⁺ and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction revealed that the cluster has an unprecedented Au₁₇ kernel protected by three PhC₂‐Au‐C₂(Ph)‐Au‐C₂Ph motifs and six Ph₃P groups. The Au₁₇ core can be viewed as the fusion of two Au₁₀ units sharing a Au₃ triangle. Electronic structure analysis from DFT calculations suggests that the stability of this unusual 12‐electron cluster is a result of the splitting of the superatomic 1D orbitals under D_3h symmetry of the Au₁₇ kernel. The discovery and determination of the structure of the Au₂₃ cluster demonstrates the versatility of the alkynyl ligand in leading to the formation of new cluster compounds.     

One‐step Synthesis of AuAg Alloy Nanodots and its Electrochemical Studies towards Nitrobenzene Reduction and Sensing

Efficient, stable, and low‐cost electrocatalysts for the degradation and sensing of environment pollutants are essential components of clean environment monitoring. Here we report, one‐step synthesis and characterization of 1–3 nm diameter sized bi‐metallic AuAg nanodots (NDs) embedded in amine functionalized silicate sol‐gel matrix (SSG) and its electrochemical studies toward nitrobenzene. The SSG was used as a reducing agent as well as stabilizer for the prepared mono‐ and bi‐metallic nanoparticles (NPs). From the HRTEM, STEM‐EDS and XPS analyses, the bi‐metallic AuAg NDs were identified as an alloy and not the mixtures of Au and Ag NPs. Characteristic surface plasmon resonance (SPR) band between the Au and Ag NPs SPR absorption region was noticed for the prepared AuAg NDs. The AuAg alloy NDs with different concentrations of Au and Ag (Au₂₅Ag₇₅, Au₅₀Ag₅₀ and Au₇₅Ag₂₅ NDs) modified electrodes exhibited synergistic electrocatalytic effect than did the Au and Ag NPs towards nitrobenzene reduction and detection. Together with ultra‐small size and exceptional colloidal stability features within these SSG‐AuAg NDs pave convenient way for nanotechnology‐based catalysts development and sensor applications.     

Cytochrome c‐Capped Fluorescent Gold Nanoclusters: Imaging of Live Cells and Delivery of Cytochrome c

Cytochrome c‐capped fluorescent gold nanoclusters (Au‐NCs) are used for imaging of live lung and breast cells. Delivery of cytochrome c inside the cells is confirmed by covalently attaching a fluorophore (Alexa Fluor 594) to cytochrome c‐capped Au‐NCs and observing fluorescence from Alexa 594 inside the cell. Mass spectrometry studies suggest that in bulk water, addition of glutathione (GSH) to cytochrome c‐capped Au‐NCs results in the formation of glutathione‐capped Au‐NCs and free apo‐cytochrome c. Thus glutathione displaces cytochrome c as a capping agent. Using confocal microscopy, the emission spectra and decay of Au‐NCs are measured in live cells. From the position of the emission maximum it is shown that the Au‐NCs exist as Au₈ in bulk water and as Au₁₃ inside the cells. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer from cytochrome c–Au‐NC (donor) to Mitotracker Orange (acceptor) indicates that the Au‐NCs localise in the mitochondria of live cells.     

Observation of Body‐Centered Cubic Gold Nanocluster

The structure of nanoparticles plays a critical role in dictating their material properties. Gold is well known to adopt face‐centered cubic (fcc) structure. Herein we report the first observation of a body‐centered cubic (bcc) gold nanocluster composed of 38 gold atoms protected by 20 adamantanethiolate ligands and two sulfido atoms ([Au₃₈S₂(SR)₂₀], where R=C₁₀H₁₅) as revealed by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. This bcc structure is in striking contrast with the fcc structure of bulk gold and conventional Au nanoparticles, as well as the bi‐icosahedral structure of [Au₃₈(SCH₂CH₂Ph)₂₄]. The bcc nanocluster has a distinct HOMO–LUMO gap of ca. 1.5 eV, much larger than the gap (0.9 eV) of the bi‐icosahedral [Au₃₈(SCH₂CH₂Ph)₂₄]. The unique structure of the bcc gold nanocluster may be promising in catalytic applications.     

Basic [Au25(SCH2CH2Py)18]−⋅Na+ Clusters: Synthesis,Layered Crystallographic Arrangement,and Unique Surface Protonation

The synthesis of high‐purity and high‐yield Au₂₅ clusters protected by the basic pyridyl ethanethiol (HSCH₂CH₂Py, 4‐PyET and 2‐PyET) is presented. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction of the [Au₂₅(4‐PyET)₁₈]^??Na⁺ clusters has revealed a structure similar to that known for the phenyl ethanethiolate analogue, but with pyridyl‐N coordination to Na⁺, a more relaxed ligand shell, and a profoundly layered arrangement in the solid state. Because of the pendant Py moiety, the [Au₂₅(PyET)₁₈]^? clusters are endowed with unique (de)protonation equilibria, which has been characterized in detail by UV/Vis absorption and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. [Au₂₅(PyET)₁₈]^? clusters showed an unexpectedly H⁺‐dependent solubility that is tunable in aqueous and organic solvents. The successful synthesis of the basic Py‐terminated thiolate‐protected Au₂₅ clusters paves the way to realize a new family of metalloid clusters possessing basic properties.     

Basic [Au25(SCH2CH2Py)18]−⋅Na+ Clusters: Synthesis,Layered Crystallographic Arrangement,and Unique Surface Protonation

The synthesis of high‐purity and high‐yield Au₂₅ clusters protected by the basic pyridyl ethanethiol (HSCH₂CH₂Py, 4‐PyET and 2‐PyET) is presented. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction of the [Au₂₅(4‐PyET)₁₈]^??Na⁺ clusters has revealed a structure similar to that known for the phenyl ethanethiolate analogue, but with pyridyl‐N coordination to Na⁺, a more relaxed ligand shell, and a profoundly layered arrangement in the solid state. Because of the pendant Py moiety, the [Au₂₅(PyET)₁₈]^? clusters are endowed with unique (de)protonation equilibria, which has been characterized in detail by UV/Vis absorption and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. [Au₂₅(PyET)₁₈]^? clusters showed an unexpectedly H⁺‐dependent solubility that is tunable in aqueous and organic solvents. The successful synthesis of the basic Py‐terminated thiolate‐protected Au₂₅ clusters paves the way to realize a new family of metalloid clusters possessing basic properties.     

Solvent‐Induced Cluster‐to‐Cluster Transformation of Homoleptic Gold(I) Thiolates between Catenane and Ring‐in‐Ring Structures

Supramolecular ensembles adopting ring‐in‐ring structures are less developed compared with catenanes featuring interlocked rings. While catenanes with inter‐ring closed‐shell metallophilic interactions, such as d¹⁰–d¹⁰ Au^I–Au^I interactions, have been well‐documented, the ring‐in‐ring complexes featuring such metallophilic interactions remain underdeveloped. Herein is described an unprecedented ring‐in‐ring structure of a Au^I‐thiolate Au₁₂ cluster formed by recrystallization of a Au^I‐thiolate Au₁₀ [2]catenane from alkane solvents such as hexane, with use of a bulky dibutylfluorene‐2‐thiolate ligand. The ring‐in‐ring Au^I‐thiolate Au₁₂ cluster features inter‐ring Au^I–Au^I interactions and underwent cluster core change to form the thermodynamically more stable Au₁₀ [2]catenane structure upon dissolving in, or recrystallization from, other solvents such as CH₂Cl₂, CHCl₃, and CH₂Cl₂/MeCN. The cluster‐to‐cluster transformation process was monitored by ¹H NMR and ESI‐MS measurements. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to provide insight into the mechanism of the “ring‐in‐ring? [2]catenane” interconversions.