Divergent Gold(I)‐Catalyzed Skeletal Rearrangements of 1,7‐Enynes

The gold(I) complex catalyzed cycloisomerization and skeletal rearrangement of 1,n‐enynes (n=5–7) is a powerful methodology for the efficient synthesis of complex molecular architectures. In contrast to 1,6‐enynes, readily accessible homologous 1,7‐enynes are largely unexplored in such transformations. Here, the divergent skeletal rearrangement of all‐carbon 1,7‐enynes by catalysis with a cationic gold(I) complex is reported. Depending on electronic and steric factors, differently substituted 1,7‐enynes react via different carbocations formed from a common gold carbene intermediate to yield on the one hand novel exocyclic allenes and on the other hand tricyclic hexahydro‐anthracenes through a novel dehydrogenative Diels–Alder reaction.     

Synthesis and Study of Cationic,Two‐Coordinate Triphenylphosphine– Gold–π Complexes

Cationic, two‐coordinate triphenylphosphine–gold(I)–π complexes of the form [(PPh₃)Au(π ligand)]⁺ SbF₆^? (π ligand=4‐methylstyrene, 1? SbF₆), 2‐methyl‐2‐butene ( 3? SbF₆), 3‐hexyne ( 6? SbF₆), 1,3‐cyclohexadiene ( 7? SbF₆), 3‐methyl‐1,2‐butadiene ( 8? SbF₆), and 1,7‐diphenyl‐3,4‐heptadiene ( 10? SbF₆) were generated in situ from reaction of [(PPh₃)AuCl], AgSbF₆, and π ligand at ?78 °C and were characterized by low‐temperature, multinuclear NMR spectroscopy without isolation. The π ligands of these complexes were both weakly bound and kinetically labile and underwent facile intermolecular exchange with free ligand (ΔG^≠≈9 kcal mol^?1 in the case of 6? SbF₆) and competitive displacement by weak σ donors, such as trifluoromethane sulfonate. Triphenylphosphine–gold(I)–π complexes were thermally unstable and decomposed above ?20 °C to form the bis(triphenylphosphine) gold cation [(PPh₃)₂Au]⁺SbF₆^? ( 2? SbF₆).     

A Controlled Route to a Luminescent 3 d10–5 d10 Sulfido Cluster Containing Unique AuCu2(μ3‐S) Motifs

The first examples of gold(I) trimethylsilylchalcogenolate complexes were synthesized and their reactivity showcased in the preparation of a novel gold–copper–sulfur cluster [Au₄Cu₄S₄(dppm)₂] (dppm=bis(diphenylphosphino)methane). The unprecedented structural chemistry of this compound gives rise to interesting optoelectronic properties, including long‐lived orange luminescence in the solid state. Through time‐dependent density functional theory calculations, this emission is shown to originate from ligand‐to‐metal charge transfer facilitated by Au???Cu metallophilic bonding.     

Inorganic–Organic Heteropolyacid–Gold(I) Hybrids: Structures and Catalytic Applications

Gold(I)‐polyoxometalate hybrid complexes 1 – 4 ([PPh₃AuMeCN]_xH_4?xSiW₁₂O₄₀, x=1–4) were synthesized and characterized. The structure of the primary gold(I)–polyoxometalate 1 (x=1) was fully ascertained by XRD, FTIR, ³¹P and ²⁹Si magic‐angle spinning (MAS) NMR, mass spectroscopy, and SEM–energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDX) techniques. Moreover, this complex exhibited better catalytic activity and selectivity compared with standard, homogeneous, gold catalysts in the new rearrangement of propargylic gem‐diesters.     

Highly Cytotoxic Bioconjugated Gold(I) Complexes with Cysteine‐Containing Dipeptides

Several gold(I) complexes with cysteine‐containing dipeptides have been prepared starting from cystine by coupling different amino acids and using several orthogonal protections. The first step is the reaction of cystine, where the sulfur centre is protected as disulfide, with Boc₂O in order to protect the amino group, followed by coupling of an amino acid ester; finally the disulfide bridge is broken with mercaptoethanol to afford the dipeptide derivative. Further reaction with [AuCl(PPh₃)] gives the gold‐dipeptide‐phosphine species. Starting from these formally gold(I) thiolate–dipeptide phosphine complexes with the general formula [Au(SR)(PR₃)] different structural modifications, such as change in the type of the amino protecting group, the type of phosphine, the number of gold(I) atoms per molecule, or the use of a non‐proteinogenic conformationally restricted amino acid ester, were introduced in order to evaluate their influence in the biological activity of the final complexes. The cytotoxic activity, in vitro, of these complexes was evaluated against different tumour human cell lines (A549, MiaPaca2 and Jurkat). The complexes show an outstanding cytotoxic activity with IC₅₀ values in the very low micromolar range. Structure–activity relationship studies from the complexes open the possibility of designing more potent and promising gold(I) anticancer agents.     

Systematic Modulation of the Fluorescence Brightness in Boron‐Dipyrromethene (BODIPY)‐Tagged N‐Heterocyclic Carbene (NHC)–Gold–Thiolates

Five different highly fluorescent boron‐dipyrromethene (BODIPY)‐tagged N‐heterocyclic carbene NHC–gold halide complexes were synthesized. The substitution of the halogeno ligand by 4‐substituted aryl thiolates leads to a decrease in the brightness of the complexes. This decrease depends on the electronic nature of the thiols, being most pronounced with highly electron‐rich thiols (4‐R=NMe₂). The brightness of the gold thiolates also depends on the distance between the sulfur atom and the BODIPY moiety. The systematic variation of the electron density of [(NHC–bodipy)Au(SC₆H₄R)] (via different R groups) enables the systematic variation of the fluorescence brightness of an appended BODIPY fluorophore. Based on this and supported by DFT calculations, a photoinduced electron‐transfer quenching appears to be the dominant mechanism controlling the brightness of the appended BODIPY dye.     

Stable Anticancer Gold(III)–Porphyrin Complexes: Effects of Porphyrin Structure

In the design of physiologically stable anticancer gold(III) complexes, we have employed strongly chelating porphyrinato ligands to stabilize a gold(III) ion [Chem. Commun. 2003 , 1718; Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009 , 253, 1682]. In this work, a family of gold(III) tetraarylporphyrins with porphyrinato ligands containing different peripheral substituents on the meso‐aryl rings were prepared, and these complexes were used to study the structure–bioactivity relationship. The cytotoxic IC₅₀ values of [Au(Por)]⁺ (Por=porphyrinato ligand), which range from 0.033 to >100 μM , correlate with their lipophilicity and cellular uptake. Some of them induce apoptosis and display preferential cytotoxicity toward cancer cells than to normal noncancerous cells. A new gold(III)–porphyrin with saccharide conjugation [Au(4‐glucosyl‐TPP)]Cl ( 2 a ; H₂(4‐glucosyl‐TPP)=meso‐tetrakis(4‐β‐D ‐glucosylphenyl)porphyrin) exhibits significant cytostatic activity to cancer cells (IC₅₀=1.2–9.0 μM ) without causing cell death and is much less toxic to lung fibroblast cells (IC₅₀>100 μM ). The gold(III)–porphyrin complexes induce S‐phase cell‐cycle arrest of cancer cells as indicated by flow cytometric analysis, suggesting that the anticancer activity may be, in part, due to termination of DNA replication. The gold(III)–porphyrin complexes can bind to DNA in vitro with binding constants in the range of 4.9×10⁵ to 4.1×10⁶ dm³ mol^?1 as determined by absorption titration. Complexes 2 a and [Au(TMPyP)]Cl₅ ( 4 a ; [H₂TMPyP]⁴⁺=meso‐tetrakis(N‐methylpyridinium‐4‐yl)porphyrin) interact with DNA in a manner similar to the DNA intercalator ethidium bromide as revealed by gel mobility shift assays and viscosity measurements. Both of them also inhibited the topoisomerase I induced relaxation of supercoiled DNA. Complex 4 a , a gold(III) derivative of the known G‐quadruplex‐interactive porphyrin [H₂TMPyP]⁴⁺, can similarly inhibit the amplification of a DNA substrate containing G‐quadruplex structures in a polymerase chain reaction stop assay. In contrast to these reported complexes, complex 2 a and the parental gold(III)–porphyrin 1 a do not display a significant inhibitory effect (<10 %) on telomerase. Based on the results of protein expression analysis and computational docking experiments, the anti‐apoptotic bcl‐2 protein is a potential target for those gold(III)–porphyrin complexes with apoptosis‐inducing properties. Complex 2 a also displays prominent anti‐angiogenic properties in vitro. Taken together, the enhanced stabilization of the gold(III) ion and the ease of structural modification render porphyrins an attractive ligand system in the development of physiologically stable gold(III) complexes with anticancer and anti‐angiogenic activities.     

N‐Heterocyclic Carbene–Gold(I) Complexes Conjugated to a Leukemia‐Specific DNA Aptamer for Targeted Drug Delivery

This report describes the synthesis and characterization of novel N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC)–gold(I) complexes and their bioconjugation to the CCRF‐CEM‐leukemia‐specific aptamer sgc8c. Successful bioconjugation was confirmed by the use of fluorescent tags on both the NHC–Au^I complex and the aptamer. Cell‐viability assays indicated that the NHC–Au^I–aptamer conjugate was more cytotoxic than the NHC–gold complex alone. A combination of flow cytometry, confocal microscopy, and cell‐viability assays provided clear evidence that the NHC–Au^I–aptamer conjugate was selective for targeted CCRF‐CEM leukemia cells.     

Gold–Acetonyl Complexes: From Side‐Products to Valuable Synthons

A new synthetic strategy was devised leading to the formation of complexes, such as [Au(IPr)(CH₂COCH₃)]. The approach capitalizes on the formation of a decomposition product observed in the course of the synthesis of [Au(IPr)(Cl)]. A library of gold acetonyl complexes containing the most common N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligands has been synthesized. These acetonyl complexes are good synthons for the preparation of numerous organogold complexes. Moreover, they have proven to be precatalysts in common gold(I)‐catalyzed reactions.     

Catalytic Activity of Cationic and Neutral Silver(I)–XPhos Complexes with Nitrogen Ligands or Tolylsulfonate for Mannich and Aza‐Diels–Alder Coupling Reactions

Cationic and neutral silver(I)–L complexes (L=Buchwald‐type biaryl phosphanes) with nitrogen co‐ligands or organosulfonate counter ions have been synthesised and characterised through their structural and spectroscopic properties. At room temperature, both cationic and neutral silver(I)–L complexes are extremely active catalysts in the promotion of the single and double A³ coupling of terminal (di)alkynes, pyrrolidine and formaldehyde. In addition, the aza‐Diels–Alder two‐ and three‐component coupling reactions of Danishefsky’s diene with an imine or amine and aldehyde are efficiently catalysed by these cationic or neutral silver(I)–L complexes. The solvent influences the catalytic performance due to limited complex solubility or solvent decomposition and reactivity. The isolation of new silver(I)–L complexes with reagents as ligands lends support to mechanistic proposals for such catalytic processes. The activity, stability and metal–distal arene interaction of these silver(I)–L catalysts have been compared with those of analogous cationic gold(I) and copper(I) complexes.     

Isolation of a Non‐Heteroatom‐Stabilized Gold–Carbene Complex

Gold–carbene complexes are essential intermediates in many gold‐catalyzed organic‐synthetic transformations. While gold–carbene complexes with direct, vinylogous, or phenylogous heteroatom substitution have been synthesized and characterized, the observation in the condensed phase of electronically non‐stabilized gold–carbenes has so far remained elusive. The sterically extremely shielded, emerald‐green complex [IPr**Au=CMes₂]⁺[NTf₂]^? has now been synthesized, isolated, and fully characterized. Its absorption maximum at 642 nm, in contrast to 528 nm of the red‐purple carbocation [Mes₂CH]⁺, clearly demonstrates that gold is more than just a “soft proton”.     

Single‐Crystal‐to‐Single‐Crystal Transformation and Solvochromic Luminescence of a Dinuclear Gold(I)–(Aza‐[18]crown‐6)dithiocarbamate Compound

The treatment of [AuCl(SMe₂)] with an equimolar amount of NaO₅NCS₂ (O₅NCS₂=(aza‐[18]crown‐6)dithiocarbamate) in CH₃CN gave [Au₂(O₅NCS₂)₂] ? 2 CH₃CN ( 2? 2 CH₃CN), and its crystal structure displays a dinuclear gold(I)‐azacrown ether ring and an intermolecular gold(I) ??? gold(I) contact of 2.8355(3) Å in crystal lattices. It is noted that two other single crystals of 2 ?tert‐butylbenzene?H₂O and 2? 0.5 m‐xylene can be successfully obtained from a single‐crystal‐to‐single‐crystal (SCSC) transformation process by immersing single crystals of 2? 2 CH₃CN in the respective solvents, and both also show intermolecular gold(I) ??? gold(I) contacts of 2.9420(5) and 2.890(2)–2.902(2) Å, respectively. Significantly, the emissions of all three 2 ?solvates are well correlated with their respective intermolecular gold(I) ??? gold(I) contacts, where such contacts increase with 2? 2 CH₃CN (2.8355(3) Å)< 2? 0.5 m‐xylene (2.890(2)–2.902(2) Å)< 2? tert‐butylbenzene?H₂O (2.9420(5) Å), and their emission energies increase with 2? 2 CH₃CN (602 nm)< 2? 0.5 m‐xylene (583 nm)< 2? tert‐butylbenzene?H₂O (546 nm) as well. In this regard, we further examine the solvochromic luminescence for some other aromatics, and finally their emissions are within 546–602 nm. Obviously, the above results are mostly ascribed to the occurrence of intermolecular gold(I) ??? gold(I) contacts in 2 ?solvates, which are induced by the presence of various solvates in the solid state, as a key role to be responsible for their solvochromic luminescence.     

Insights into the Reactivity of Gold–Dithiocarbamato Anticancer Agents toward Model Biomolecules by Using Multinuclear NMR Spectroscopy

Some gold(III)–dithiocarbamato derivatives of either single amino acids or oligopeptides have shown promise as potential anticancer agents, but their capability to interact with biologically relevant macromolecules is still poorly understood. We investigated the affinity of the representative complex [Au^IIIBr₂(dtc‐Sar‐OCH₃)] (dtc: dithiocarbamate; Sar: sarcosine (N‐methylglycine)) with selected model molecules for histidine‐, methionine‐, and cysteine‐rich proteins (that is, 1‐methylimidazole, dimethylsulfide, and N‐acetyl‐L ‐cysteine, respectively). In particular, detailed mono‐ and multinuclear NMR studies, in combination with multiple ¹³C/¹⁵N enrichments, allowed interactions to be followed over time and indicated somewhat unexpected reaction pathways. Whereas dimethylsulfide proved to be unreactive, a sudden multistep redox reaction occurred in the presence of the other potential sulfur donor, N‐acetyl‐L ‐cysteine (confirmed if glutathione was used instead). On the other hand, 1‐methylimidazole underwent an unprecedented acid–base reaction with the gold(III) complex, rather than the expected coordination to the metal center by replacing, for instance, a bromide. Our results are discussed herein and compared with the data available in the literature on related complexes; our findings confirm that the peculiar reactivity of gold(III)–dithiocarbamato complexes can lead to novel reaction pathways and, therefore, to new cytotoxic mechanisms in cancer cells.     

The More Gold—The More Enantioselective: Cyclohydroaminations of γ‐Allenyl Sulfonamides with Mono‐, Bis‐, and Trisphospholane Gold(I) Catalysts

A series of chiral mono‐, di‐, and trinuclear gold(I) complexes have been prepared and used as precatalysts in the asymmetric cyclohydroamination of N‐protected γ‐allenyl sulfonamides. The stereodirecting ligands were mono‐, di‐, and tridentate 2,5‐diphenylphospholanes, which possessed C₁, C₂, and C₃ symmetry, respectively, thereby rendering the catalytic sites in the di‐ and trinuclear complexes symmetry equivalent. The C₃‐symmetric trinuclear complex displayed the highest activity and enantioselectivity (up to 95 % ee), whilst its mono‐ and dinuclear counterparts exhibited considerably lower enantioselectivities and activities. A similar trend was observed in a series of mono‐, di‐, and trinuclear 2,5‐dimethylphospholane gold(I) complexes. Aurophilic interactions were established from the solid‐state structures of the trinuclear gold(I) complexes, thereby raising the question as to whether these secondary forces were responsible for the different catalytic behavior observed.     

Room‐Temperature Columnar Mesophases in Triazine–Gold Thiolate Metal–Organic Supramolecular Aggregates

Supramolecular mono‐ and dinuclear liquid‐crystalline gold(I) aggregates have been synthesized by means of hydrogen bond interactions of 2,4,6‐triarylamino‐1,3,5‐triazine with thiolate moities of gold metalloacids [Au(PR₃)(SC₆H₄COOH)] or [μ‐(binap){Au(SC₆H₄COOH)}₂], in 1:1 and 2:1 molar ratio, respectively. All of the supramolecular aggregates display a stable columnar hexagonal mesophase (Col_h) at room‐temperature. The supramolecular arrangement within the columns consists of the one‐dimensional stacking of triazine units, with the core of the attached metallic thioacid fragments acting as the fourth branch. The phosphine‐containing moieties of the metallic thioacid protrude out in the aliphatic continuum. These complexes do not show metallophilic interactions, but this strategy appears very promising for the future design of room‐temperature LC mesophases containing interacting metallic fragments.     

Reaction of Alkynes and Azides: Not Triazoles Through Copper–Acetylides but Oxazoles Through Copper–Nitrene Intermediates

Well‐defined copper(I) complexes of composition [Tpm*^,BrCu(NCMe)]BF₄ (Tpm*^,Br=tris(3,5‐dimethyl‐4‐bromo‐pyrazolyl)methane) or [Tpa^*Cu]PF₆ (Tpa^*=tris(3,5‐dimethyl‐pyrazolylmethyl)amine) catalyze the formation of 2,5‐disubstituted oxazoles from carbonyl azides and terminal alkynes in a direct manner. This process represents a novel procedure for the synthesis of this valuable heterocycle from readily available starting materials, leading exclusively to the 2,5‐isomer, attesting to a completely regioselective transformation. Experimental evidence and computational studies have allowed the proposal of a reaction mechanism based on the initial formation of a copper–acyl nitrene species, in contrast to the well‐known mechanism for the copper‐catalyzed alkyne and azide cycloaddition reactions (CuAAC) that is triggered by the formation of a copper–acetylide complex.     

Observing Initial Steps in Gold‐Catalyzed Alkyne Transformations by Utilizing Bodipy‐Tagged Phosphine–Gold Complexes

The Pd‐catalyzed reactions of 3‐chloro‐bodipy with R₂PH (R=Ph, Cy) provide nonfluorescent bodipy–phosphines 3‐PR₂–bodipy 3 a (R=Ph) and 3 b (R=Cy; quantum yield Φ<0.001). Metal complexes such as [AgCl( 3 b )] and [AuCl( 3 b )] were prepared and shown to display much higher fluorescence (Φ=0.073 and 0.096). In the gold complexes, the level of fluorescence was found to be qualitatively correlated with the electron density at gold. Consequently, the fluorescence brightness of [AuCl( 3 b )] increases when the chloro ligand is replaced by a weakly coordinating anion, whereas upon formation of the electron‐rich complex [Au(SR)( 3 b )] the fluorescence is almost quenched. Related reactions of [AuCl( 3 b )] with [Ag]ONf)] (Nf= nonaflate) and phenyl acetylenes enable the tracking of initial steps in gold‐catalyzed reactions by using fluorescence spectroscopy. Treatment of [AuCl( 3 b )] with [Ag(ONf)] gave the respective [Au(ONf)( 3 b )] only when employing more than 2.5 equivalents of silver salt. The reaction of the “cationic” gold complex with phenyl acetylenes leads to the formation of the respective dinuclear cationic [{( 3 b )Au}₂(CCPh)]⁺ and an increase in the level of fluorescence. The rate of the reaction of [Au(ONf)( 3 b )] with PhCCH depends on the amount of silver salt in the reaction mixture; a large excess of silver salt accelerates this transformation. In situ fluorescence spectroscopy thus provides valuable information on the association of gold complexes with acetylenes.     

Self‐Assembly of a Au16 Ring via Metal–Metal Bonding Interactions

Metal–metal bonding interactions have been employed as an efficient strategy to generate a number of unique gold(I) metallo‐macrocycles with fascinating functions. The self‐assembly, crystal structure and emission property of novel nest‐like tetramer 1₄ , namely, {[Au₄(μ‐dppm)₂(μ‐dctp^2?)](BF₄)₂}₄ ? (CH₃CN)₂ (dppm=bis(diphenylphosphino)methane, dctp^2?=N,N′‐bis(dicarbodithioate)‐2,11‐diaza[3.3]paracyclophane) is reported. The complex has been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis, ¹H NMR spectroscopy, ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, and CSI‐MS spectrometry. The aggregate demonstrates the sixteen gold(I) atoms are arranged in a ring with a circumference of 50.011(68) Å generated by Au^I???Au^I attractions. UV/visible and luminescence spectroscopy revealed that this Au^I???Au^I bonded metallo‐macrocycle exhibited yellow phosphorescence.     

Bimetallic Gold(I) Complexes with Ethynyl‐Helicene and Bis‐Phosphole Ligands: Understanding the Role of Aurophilic Interactions in their Chiroptical Properties

Monometallic gold(I)‐alkynyl‐helicene complexes ( 1 a , b ) and bimetallic gold(I)‐alkynyl‐helicene architectures featuring the presence ( 2 a , b ) or absence ( 3 a , b ) of aurophilic intramolecular interactions were prepared by using different types of phosphole ligands (mono‐phosphole L1 or bis‐phospholes L2 , 3 ). The influence of the Au^I d¹⁰ metal center(s) on the electronic, photophysical, and chiroptical properties of these unprecedented phosphole‐gold(I)‐alkynyl‐helicene complexes was examined. Experimental and theoretical results highlight the importance of ligand‐to‐ligand‐type charge transfers and the strong effect of the presence or absence of Au^I–Au^I interactions in 2 a , b .     

Substituted Bisphosphanylamines as Ligands in Gold(I) Chemistry – Synthesis and Structures

Dimethyl 5‐aminoisophthalate, which is a building block of amino‐substituted tetralactam macrocycles, was used as ligand in gold(I) chemistry to form model complexes for macrocyclic gold compounds. Reaction of dimethyl 5‐aminoisophthalate with chlorodiphenylphosphine gave the diphosphine compound dimethyl 5‐[N,N‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)amino]isophthalate (dmbpaip). This compound can further be reacted with [AuCl(tht)] (tht = tetrahydrothiophene) to give the dinuclear complex [Au₂Cl₂(dmbpaip)]. In contrast, treatment of dmbpaip with [Au(tht)₂]ClO₄ resulted in the ionic compound [Au₂(dmbpaip)₂](ClO₄)₂ in which the cation forms an eight‐membered Au₂P₄N₂ heterocycle. In both gold(I) compounds Au···Au interactions are observed. All new compounds were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.