Insights into propylene/ω‐halo‐α‐alkenes copolymerization promoted by rac‐Et(Ind)2ZrCl2 and (pyridyl‐amido)hafnium catalysts

This article discussed the root causes of the interesting differences between rac‐Et(Ind)₂ZrCl₂ and dimethyl (pyridyl‐amido)hafnium in catalyzing the propylene/ω‐halo‐α‐alkene copolymerization. Confirmed by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, the larger spacial opening around the active center of rac‐Et(Ind)₂ZrCl₂ contributes to the coordination and insertion of the monomers, resulting in the higher catalytic activity, while the narrow spacial opening around the Hf center retards the chain transfer reaction, leading to the much higher molecular weights (M_ws) of the copolymers. The superior tolerability of Zr catalyst toward halogen groups might be attributed to that the dormant species generated from halogen coordination could be promptly reactivated. DFT calculations indicated the higher probability for the ω‐halo‐α‐alkene vinyl to coordinate with the Hf catalyst leading to the better ability to incorporate halogenated monomers. The high M_ws and the outstanding isotacticity achieved by the Hf catalyst determined the higher melting temperature values of the copolymers with a certain amount of halogen groups. In addition, the chain transfer schemes were employed to analyze why the presence of halogenated monomers greatly decreased the M_ws of the copolymers when rac‐Et(Ind)₂ZrCl₂ was used, while had no or little effect upon the M_ws in the copolymerization by the Hf catalyst. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2014 , 52, 3421–3428     

Copolymerization of propylene with 1,3‐butadiene using isospecific zirconocene catalysts

Poly(propylene‐ran‐1,3‐butadiene) was synthesized using isospecific zirconocene catalysts and converted to telechelic isotactic polypropylene by metathesis degradation with ethylene. The copolymers obtained with isospecific C₂‐symmetric zirconocene catalysts activated with modified methylaluminoxane (MMAO) had 1,4‐inserted butadiene units ( 1,4‐BD ) and 1,2‐inserted units ( 1,2‐BD ) in the isotactic polypropylene chain. The selectivity of butadiene towards 1,4‐BD incorporation was high up to 95% using rac‐dimethylsilylbis(1‐indenyl)zirconium dichloride (Cat‐A)/MMAO. The molar ratio of propylene to butadiene in the feed regulated the number‐average molecular weight (M_n) and the butadiene contents of the polymer produced. Metathesis degradations of the copolymer with ethylene were conducted with a WCI₆/SnMe₄/propyl acetate catalyst system. The ¹H NMR spectra before and after the degradation indicated that the polymers degraded by ethylene had vinyl groups at both chain ends in high selectivity. The analysis of the chain scission products clarified the chain end structures of the poly(propylene‐ran‐1,3‐butadiene). © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 5731–5740, 2007     

Copolymerization of 3‐buten‐1‐ol and propylene with an isospecific zirconocene/methylaluminoxane catalyst

The copolymerization of propylene and 3‐buten‐1‐ol protected with alkylaluminum [trimethylaluminum (TMA) or triisobutylaluminum] was conducted with an isospecific zirconocene catalyst [rac‐dimethylsilylbis(1‐indenyl)zirconium dichloride], combined with methylaluminoxane as a cocatalyst, in the presence of additional TMA or H₂ as the chain‐transfer reagent if necessary. The results indicated that end‐hydroxylated polypropylene was obtained in the presence of the chain‐transfer reagents because of the formation of dormant species after the insertion of the 3‐buten‐1‐ol‐based monomer followed by chain‐transfer reactions. The selectivity of the chain‐transfer reactions was influenced by the alkylaluminum protecting the comonomer and the catalyst structure. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 42: 5600–5607, 2004     

The copolymerization of propylene with higher,linear α‐olefins

Propylene was copolymerized with the linear α‐olefins 1‐octene, 1‐decene, 1‐tetradecene, and 1‐octadecene. The metallocene catalyst Me₂Si(2‐Me Benz[e]Ind)₂ZrCl₂, in conjunction with methylalumoxane as a cocatalyst, was used to synthesize the copolymers. The copolymers were characterized by ¹³C and ¹H NMR with a solvent mixture of 1,2,4‐trichlorobenzene (TCB) and benzene‐d₆ (9/1) at 100 °C. Thermal analyses were carried out to determine the melting and crystallization temperatures, whereas the molecular weights and molecular weight distributions were determined by gel permeation chromatography with TCB at 140 °C. Glass‐transition temperatures were determined with dynamic mechanical analysis. Relationships among the comonomer type and amount of incorporation and the melting/crystallization temperatures, glass‐transition temperature, crystallinity, and molecular weight were established. Moreover, up to 3.5% of the comonomer was incorporated, and there was a decrease in the molecular weight with increased comonomer content. Also, the melting and crystallization temperatures decreased as the comonomer content increased, but this relationship was independent of the comonomer type. In contrast, the values for the glass‐transition temperature also decreased with increased comonomer content, but the extent of the decrease was dependent on the comonomer type. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 4110–4118, 2000     

Precise control of microstructure of functionalized polypropylene synthesized by the ansa‐zirconocene/ MAO catalysts

We inclusively investigated polymerization behavior and structure of copolymer in the copolymerization of propylene and alkylaluminum‐protected polar allyl monomers. The control of the arrangement of polar group in the copolymer was discussed. It was proved that the location of polar group could be controlled by zirconocene catalyst and a kind of polar monomer. The indenyl or the 2‐methylindenyl ligands of zirconocene were favored to produce end‐functionalized polymers. It was also found that the trimethylaluminum‐protected allylamine and triisobutylaluminum‐protected allylmercaptan had superior ability in the synthesis of end‐functionalized polypropylene. On the other hand, the 2‐methyl‐4‐phenylindenyl ligand produced the copolymers containing both the end‐polar unit and inner‐polar unit at the polymer chains. Terpolymerization of propylene, polar allyl monomer, and 5‐hexen‐1‐ol was also conducted. The NMR study of the terpolymer revealed that both the 5‐hexen‐1‐ol and the polar allyl monomer were incorporated into the polymer chain. It has also become apparent that the polar allyl monomer units predominantly occupied the chain end, while the 5‐hexen‐1‐ol units were located at the inner of main chain. Consequently, we have achieved the synthesis of functionalized polypropylene in which the arrangement of polar group was precisely controlled. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 1738–1748, 2008     

Kinetics and mechanism of metallocene‐catalyzed olefin polymerization: Comparison of ethylene,propylene homopolymerizations,and their copolymerization

A series of ethylene, propylene homopolymerizations, and ethylene/propylene copolymerization catalyzed with rac‐Et(Ind)₂ZrCl₂/modified methylaluminoxane (MMAO) were conducted under the same conditions for different duration ranging from 2.5 to 30 min, and quenched with 2‐thiophenecarbonyl chloride to label a 2‐thiophenecarbonyl on each propagation chain end. The change of active center ratio ([C^*]/[Zr]) with polymerization time in each polymerization system was determined. Changes of polymerization rate, molecular weight, isotacticity (for propylene homopolymerization) and copolymer composition with time were also studied. [C^*]/[Zr] strongly depended on type of monomer, with the propylene homopolymerization system presented much lower [C^*]/[Zr] (ca. 25%) than the ethylene homopolymerization and ethylene–propylene copolymerization systems. In the copolymerization system, [C^*]/[Zr] increased continuously in the reaction process until a maximum value of 98.7% was reached, which was much higher than the maximum [C^*]/[Zr] of ethylene homopolymerization (ca. 70%). The chain propagation rate constant (k_p) of propylene polymerization is very close to that of ethylene polymerization, but the propylene insertion rate constant is much smaller than the ethylene insertion rate constant in the copolymerization system, meaning that the active centers in the homopolymerization system are different from those in the copolymerization system. Ethylene insertion rate constant in the copolymerization system was much higher than that in the ethylene homopolymerization in the first 10 min of reaction. A mechanistic model was proposed to explain the observed activation of ethylene polymerization by propylene addition. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55, 867–875     

Kinetics of alpha‐methylstyrene oligomerization by catalytic chain transfer

Alpha‐methylstyrene (AMS) can be effectively dimerized by a free‐radical mechanism mediated by the catalytic chain transfer (CCT). Above the ceiling temperature of AMS, 61 °C, the dimer may become almost an exclusive product with only a small percentage of impurity of AMS trimer and tetramer. Kinetics of the AMS oligomerization has two characteristic features. First, the rate of the oligomerization increases with concentration of the CCT catalyst. Second, conversion reaches a plateau at 60–70%. A kinetic scheme explained both effects. Besides AMS, para‐ and methasubstituted AMS can also be dimerized. Orthosubstituted AMS's do not oligomerize. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 1366–1376, 2002     

Influence of the cocatalyst structure on the statistical copolymerization of methyl methacrylate with bulky methacrylates using the zirconocene complex Cp2ZrMe2

Statistical copolymers of methyl methacrylate with cyclohexyl and trimethylsilyloxy ethyl methacrylate were synthesized with two different catalytic systems based on the zirconocene complex Cp₂ZrMe₂. The reactivity ratios of methyl methacrylate and these methacrylates were calculated with the Finemann–Ross, inverted Finemann–Ross, and Kelen–Tüdos graphical methods. The structural parameters of these copolymers were estimated from the calculation of the dyad monomer sequence fractions. Two different borate cocatalysts were employed, and their effect on the copolymerization process is discussed. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 3305–3314, 2005     

Influence of the catalyst on monomer insertion in the syndiospecific copolymerization of styrene and para‐methylstyrene

The effect of the kind of transition‐metal catalyst on the extent of comonomer insertion in the syndiospecific complex‐coordinative copolymerization of styrene and para‐methylstyrene has been investigated. The results for the influence of the polymerization conditions have shown that there is no real difference between solution copolymerization in toluene and solvent‐free styrene copolymerization in bulk, with respect to the reactivity ratio for para‐methylstyrene (r₂), under comparable conditions in the presence of methylaluminoxane and triisobutylaluminum and at low polymerization conversions. All the investigated catalysts lead to a preferred incorporation of para‐methylstyrene into the polymer chain in comparison with styrene and over the whole range of monomer compositions. The increasing capability of the different catalysts to provide copolymers with enhanced para‐methylstyrene concentrations can be summarized by the increasing r₂ values for the copolymerization in bulk as follows: η⁵‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl titanium trichloride < η⁵‐octahydrofluorenyl titanium trimethoxide < η⁵‐octahydrofluorenyl titanium tristrifluoroacetate < η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl titanium(N,N‐dicyclohexylamido)dichloride < η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl titanium trichloride. For a correlation between the catalyst structure and the comonomer insertion, the catalysts can be described by electronic effects (electrostatic charge of the transition‐metal atom) and steric effects (minimum structural cone angle). The results show that the steric properties of the transition‐metal complexes have the most important effect on the insertion of para‐methylstyrene into the copolymer. If the minimum structural cone angle of the ligand of the transition‐metal catalyst decreases, the incorporation of the comonomer para‐methylstyrene increases significantly. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 2061–2067, 2005     

Structure–property transition‐state model for the copolymerization of ethene and 1‐hexene with experimental and theoretical applications to novel disilylene‐bridged zirconocenes

Ethene homopolymerization and copolymerization with 1‐hexene were performed with three new tetramethyldisilylene‐bridged zirconocene catalysts with 2‐indenyl ligand ( A ), 2‐tetrahydroindenyl ligand ( B ), and tetramethyl‐cyclopentadienyl ligand ( C ) and with methylaluminoxane as a cocatalyst. Catalysts A and B showed substantial comonomer incorporation, resulting in a copolymer melting temperature more than 20° lower than that of the corresponding homopolymer. In contrast, catalyst C produced a copolymer with a low 1‐hexene content and a high melting temperature. The reduction in the molecular weight with 1‐hexene addition also correlated well with the comonomer incorporation. For all three catalysts, the homopolymer and copolymer unsaturations indicated frequent chain termination after 1‐hexene insertion and a high degree of chain‐end isomerization during the homopolymerization of ethene. The chain transfer to Al in the cocatalyst also appeared to be important. The comonomer response could be correlated with the structural properties of the catalyst, as derived from quantum chemical calculations. A linear model, calibrated against recent experiments with unbridged (Me_nC₅H_5?n)₂ZrCl₂ catalysts, suggested that the low comonomer incorporation obtained with catalyst C was caused partly by a narrow opening angle between the aromatic ligands and partly by steric hindrance in the transition state of comonomer insertion. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 41: 1622–1631, 2003     

Ethylene polymerization and copolymerization with a polar monomer using an α‐iminocarboxamide nickel complex activated by trimethylaluminum

An α‐iminocarboxamide nickel complex was activated by trimethylaluminum (TMA) and used in the polymerization of ethylene and its copolymerization with 10‐undecen‐1‐ol. The best activity was observed upon activation with 9 equiv of TMA at a temperature of 26 °C. NMR spectroscopic studies did not show 10‐undecen‐1‐ol incorporation. However, FTIR analyses suggest the incorporation of a very small amount of comonomer, which affects the glass transition temperature, the degree of branching, and the mechanical properties of the materials. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 54–59, 2008     

Pressure and trimethylaluminum effects on ethene/1‐hexene copolymerization with methylaluminoxane‐activated (1,2,4‐Me3Cp)2ZrCl2: Trimethylaluminum suppression of standard termination reactions after 1‐hexene insertion

Ethene homopolymerizations and copolymerizations with 1‐hexene were catalyzed by methylaluminoxane‐activated (1,2,4‐Me₃Cp)₂ZrCl₂. Investigations of the effects of various pressures on the homopolymerizations and copolymerizations and of the effects of different concentrations of trimethylaluminum (TMA) on the copolymerizations were performed. The characteristics of the ethene/1‐hexene copolymers agreed with expectations for changes in the ethene concentration: the incorporation of 1‐hexene decreased, whereas the melting point and crystallinity increased, with increasing pressure. The main termination mechanism of the homopolymerizations was β‐hydrogen transfer to the monomer. Termination mechanisms resulting in vinylidene unsaturations dominated in the copolymerizations. Standard termination mechanisms producing vinyl and trans‐vinylene unsaturations occurred in parallel and were not influenced by the ethene or TMA concentration. In addition, some chain transfer to TMA, producing saturated end groups after hydrolysis, occurred. Copolymerizations with different additions of TMA, with the other polymerization conditions kept constant, showed that the catalytic productivity [tons of polyethylene/(mol of Zr h)], the 1‐hexene incorporation, and the molecular weight (from gel permeation chromatography) were independent of the TMA concentration. Surprisingly, the vinylidene content decreased almost linearly with increasing TMA concentration. TMA might have coordinated to the catalytic site after 1‐hexene insertion and rotation to the β‐agostic state and, therefore, suppressed the standard termination reactions after 1‐hexene insertion. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 2584–2597, 2005     

Ethylene polymerization and copolymerization with 10‐undecen‐1‐ol using the catalyst system DADNi(NCS)2/MAO

The catalyst DADNi(NCS)₂ (DAD = (ArN?C(Me)? C(Me)?ArN); Ar = 2,6‐C₆H₃), activated by methylaluminoxane, was tested in ethylene polymerization at temperatures above 25 °C and variable Al/Ni ratio. The system was shown to be active even at 80 °C and when supported on silica. However, catalyst activity decreased. The catalyst system was also tested in ethylene and 10‐undecen‐1‐ol copolymerization at different ethylene pressures. The best activities were obtained at low polar monomer concentration (0.017 mol/L), using triisopropylaluminum (Al‐i‐Pr₃) to protect the polar monomer. The incorporation of the comonomer increased with the increase of polar monomer concentration. According to ¹³C NMR analyses, all the resulting polyethylenes were highly branched and the polar monomer incorporation decreased as ethylene pressure increased. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 45: 5199–5208, 2007     

Copper catalyzed atom transfer radical copolymerization of glycidyl methacrylate and 2‐ethylhexyl acrylate

This investigation reports the atom transfer radical copolymerization (ATRcP) of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and 2‐ethylhexyl acrylate (EHA). Poly(glycidyl methacrylate) (PGMA) has easily transformable pendant oxirane group and poly(2‐ethylhexyl acrylate) (PEHA) has very low T_g. They are the important components of coating and adhesive materials. Copolymerization of GMA and EHA was carried out in bulk and in toluene at 70 °C at different molar feed ratios using CuCl as catalyst in combination with 2,2′‐bypyridine (bpy) as well as N,N,N′,N″,N″‐pentamethyl diethylenetriamine (PMDETA) as ligand. The molecular weight (M_n) and the polydispersity index (PDI) of the polymers were determined by GPC analysis. The molar composition of the copolymers was determined by ¹H NMR analysis. The reactivity ratios of GMA (r₁) and EHA (r₂) were determined using Finemann‐Ross and Kelen‐Tudos linearization methods and those had been compared with the literature values for conventional free radical copolymerization. The thermal properties of the copolymers were studied by DSC and TGA analysis. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 47: 6526–6533, 2009     

Copolymerization of Propene and 5‐Vinyl‐2‐Norbornene: A Simple Route to Polar Poly(propylene)s

Summary: The metallocenes rac‐C₂H₄(Ind)₂ZrCl₂ ( 1 ), rac‐Me₂Si(Ind)₂ZrCl₂ ( 2 ), and rac‐Me₂Si(2‐Me‐benz[e]Ind)₂ZrCl₂ ( 3 ) efficiently copolymerize propene and 5‐vinyl‐2‐norbornene (VNB). 1 and 2 give a high VNB content and high productivities, whereas 3 gives moderate incorporation. Surprisingly, precatalysts 1 and 2 , which have very closely related structures, showed very different reactivities toward VNB, with 1 having a greater affinity for VNB than for propene. The copolymers are quantitatively converted into polyolefins with polar functionalities.

     

Nonconjugated diene homopolymerization and copolymerization with ethylene catalyzed by α‐diimine Ni(II) complex/Et2AlCl

Four nonconjugated diene comonomers 1,9‐decadiene (19DD), 6‐ethylundeca‐1,10‐diene (EUD), 1,5‐cyclooctadiene (COD) and cinene (1‐methyl‐4‐(prop‐1‐en‐2‐yl) cyclohex‐1‐ene) (CE) were used in copolymerization with ethylene catalyzed by α‐diimine Ni(II) complex ([2,6‐(iPr)₂C₆H₃N = C(CH₃)?(CH₃)C = N2,6‐(iPr)₂C₆H₃)]NiBr₂ ( 1 )) activated by Et₂AlCl. These dienes showed quite distinct copolymerization behaviors. Ethylene‐19DD copolymerization formed highly branched polyethylene with cyclic units and pendent vinyls, and a large part of crosslinked polymer when the 19DD concentration was relatively high. Using EUD as comonomer lead to evidently reduced gel formation and increased content of pendent vinyl. COD can be incorporated in the copolymer with evidently lower catalyst efficiency than the ethylene homopolymerization, and CE behaves like an inert compound as it was not incorporated in the copolymer. Homopolymerization of 19DD with the same catalyst produced polymer containing both cyclic units and pendent vinyls. The cyclic units were formed by cyclopolymerization of the inserted 19DD after several steps of chain walking. Crosslinking through the pendent vinyl took place when the initial 19DD concentration was relatively high, forming large amount of gel in the product. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55 , 1900–1909