Establishment of SI-traceable reference ranges for the content of various elements in the IMEP-9 water sample

 The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) attempts to shed light on the current state of the practice in chemical measurements. The main tool, which assists this attempt and also differentiates IMEP from similar projects, is the establishment of SI-traceable reference ranges (where possible) for the elements offered for measurement to the participants for every IMEP round. The Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM), as the founder and co-ordinator of IMEP has the responsibility of establishing the SI-traceable reference ranges. This is a large task that requires knowledge, skill and resources. IRMM collaborates with a network of reference laboratories in order to achieve the establishment of SI-traceable reference ranges in a transparent and reliable way. The IMEP reference laboratories must have demonstrated experience and have a proven and successful record in the use of primary methods of measurements (mainly isotope dilution mass spectrometry) and the application of uncertainty evaluation according to ISO/BIPM guidelines. In IMEP-9 "trace elements in water", results from 7 reference laboratories (including IRMM) were combined by IRMM to establish SI-traceable ranges for the 15 elements, which were then offered for measurement to the 200 participants worldwide. This paper does not discuss the individual contribution of the reference laboratories (this could be the subject of individual papers) but describes the procedures and criteria used in order to establish the reference ranges for the IMEP-9 samples by combining the individual contributions. All results submitted to IRMM are included, so as to make this publication as realistic as possible. Received: 31 December 1999 / Accepted: 7 March 2000     

Traceable property values of in-house reference materials

The traceability of in-house reference materials (IHRM) is discussed. It is shown that a systematic error in results of a measured value, specific to a measurement method or to a laboratory developing an IHRM, can be overcome if a comparative approach to IHRM characterization is used. A traceability chain of the value carried by the IHRM to the value carried by the reference material with higher metrological status and sufficiently similar matrix (for example, a certified reference material – CRM according to ISO Guide 30) is helpful in such a case. The chain is realized when the IHRM samples are analysed simultaneously with the CRM samples under the same conditions. This and other traceability chains necessary for the IHRM development are examined as the measurement information sources.     

Producing SI-traceable reference values for Cd, Cr and Pb amount contents in polyethylene samples from the Polymer Elemental Reference Material (PERM) project using isotope dilution mass spectrometry

 The present paper describes the certification of the amount content of Cd, Cr and Pb in two different polyethylene materials within the third phase of the Polyethylene Elemental Reference Material (PERM) project. The analytical procedure to establish the reference values for Cd, Cr and Pb amount contents in these materials is based on isotope dilution mass spectrometry used as a primary method of measurement. Cd and Pb were measured with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and Cr with positive thermal ionization-mass spectrometry. The decomposition of the polymer matrix was carried out using a high pressure asher. Reference values for amount content, traceable to the SI-system, have been obtained for these three elements in both of the polyethylene samples of PERM. For each of the certified amount content values an uncertainty budget was calculated using the method of propagation of uncertainties according to ISO and EURACHEM guidelines. The measurement procedures, as well as the uncertainty calculations, are described for all three elements. In order to keep the whole certification process as transparent as possible, the preparations of various reagents and materials as well as the sample treatment and blending are described in detail. The mass spectrometry measurements and the data treatment are also explained carefully. The various sources of uncertainty present in the procedure are displayed in the uncertainty budgets. The obtained combined uncertainties for the amount content values were less than 2% relative (k=1) for all investigated elements. The amount contents were in the μmol/kg range, corresponding to mg/kg levels. Received: 21 October 1999 / Accepted: 29 January 2000     

A practical procedure for assigning a reference value and uncertainty in the frame of an interlaboratory comparison

A method is suggested for the calculation of a reference value and its uncertainty to be used in the frame of an interlaboratory comparison (ILC). It is assumed that the reference value of the measurand is determined independently from the ILC round. It is derived from a limited set of measurement results obtained from one or several expert laboratories. The procedure involves three stages: (1) check of the experimental data and possible corrections; (2) check of the consistency of data, and possibly increase of the uncertainties in order to attain internal consistency; (3) choice between fully, partially or un-weighted mean.     

International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP); IMEP-14: Picturing the performance of analytical laboratories measuring trace elements in sediment

The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is an interlaboratory comparison scheme founded, owned and co-ordinated by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) since 1988. IMEP-14, for the first time in the series, is focusing on trace elements in sediment. Reference values for ten elements stating total concentrations and expanded uncertainties according to GUM were established. In total, 239 laboratories from 43 countries in five continents participated in the comparison, and the degree of equivalence between the results from the laboratories and the reference values is presented graphically. Identical samples were distributed to nine National Measurement Institutes within the frame of the CCQM-P15 pilot study. Participation in the IMEP-14 interlaboratory comparison was offered to laboratories in the EU new member states and acceding countries according to the IRMMs Metrology in Chemistry support programme for EU new member states and acceding countries.This revised version was published online in August 2004 with corrections to text especially to the Discussion section.     

IMEP-24 analysis of eight trace elements in toys

The International Measurement Evaluation Program (IMEP) organized the IMEP-24 interlaboratory comparison after reports in the media about high levels of lead in toys. The aim of this comparison was to verify the laboratories’ capacity to evaluate trace-element levels in a possible toy-like material according to the European Standard EN 71-3:1994. As test material, it used a former certified reference material containing levels of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead and selenium around the limits set in the standard.Four expert laboratories confirmed the reference values (Xref) for all elements but Hg, and established a reference value for Hg. The scatter of the results reported by the participants was large, as expected, but showed a close to normal distribution around the reference values for five of the eight trace elements. The spread of results was mainly attributed to sampling and sample preparation.One major issue observed in this exercise was the lack of legislative rules about how to report the result, or, more specifically, the use of the analytical correction, which was introduced in EN 71-3:1994 to achieve consistent interpretation of results and which is to be applied when values are equal to or above the maximum limits set in the standard. Its application by the participants was very inconsistent and led to problems in their evaluation. There is clearly a need for clarification and for more formal regulations with regard to result reporting in order to minimize the risk of confusion.Participants were also asked to give their opinion with regard to the acceptability of the test material for the market. The majority correctly considered the material as non-compliant. However, almost one-third incorrectly assessed the material as compliant.     

IMEP-24 analysis of eight trace elements in toys

The International Measurement Evaluation Program (IMEP) organised the IMEP-24 interlaboratory comparison after reports in the media about high levels of lead in toys. The aim of this comparison was to verify the laboratories’ capacity to evaluate trace-element levels in a possible toy-like material according to the European Standard EN 71-3:1994. As test material, it used a former certified reference material containing levels of antimony, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead and selenium around the limits set in the standard.Four expert laboratories confirmed the reference values (Xref) for all elements but Hg, and established a reference value for Hg. The scatter of the results reported by the participants was large, as expected, but showed a close to normal distribution around the reference values for five of the eight trace elements. The spread of results was mainly attributed to sampling and sample preparation.One major issue observed in this exercise was the lack of legislative rules about how to report the result, or, more specifically, the use of the analytical correction, which was introduced in EN 71-3:1994 to achieve consistent interpretation of results and which is to be applied when values are equal to or above the maximum limits set in the standard. Its application by the participants was very inconsistent and led to problems in their evaluation. There is clearly a need for clarification and for more formal regulations with regard to result reporting in order to minimise the risk of confusion.Participants were also asked to give their opinion with regard to the acceptability of the test material for the market. The majority correctly considered the material as non-compliant. However, almost one-third incorrectly assessed the material as compliant.     

Contribution to the certification of B, Cd, Mg, Pb, Rb, Sr, and U in a natural water sample for the International Measurement Evaluation Programme Round 9 (IMEP-9) using ID-ICP-MS

 The present paper describes the contribution of the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements to the certification of B, Cd, Mg, Pb, Rb, Sr, and U amount contents in a natural water sample, in round 9 of the International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP-9). The analytical procedure to establish the reference values for B, Cd, Mg, Pb, Rb, Sr, and U amount contents was based on isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry used as a primary method of measurement. Applying this procedure reference values, traceable to the SI, were obtained for the natural water sample of IMEP-9. For each of the certified amount contents presented here a total uncertainty budget was calculated using the method of propagation of uncertainties according to ISO and EURACHEM guidelines. The measurement procedures, as well as the uncertainty calculations are described for all seven elements mentioned above. In order to keep the whole certification process transparent and so traceable, the preparations of various reagents and materials as well as the sample treatment and blending, the measurements themselves, and finally the data treatment are described in detail. Explanations focus on Pb as a representative example. The total uncertainties (relative) obtained were less than 2% for all investigated elements at amount contents in the pmol/kg up to the high μmol/kg range, corresponding to low μg/kg and mg/kg levels. Received: 21 October 1999 / Accepted: 29 January 2000     

Implementing the GUM in the certification of reference materials: the revision of ISO Guide 35

The availability of certified reference materials, certified in accordance to the GUM is an important tool for the proper estimation of measurement uncertainty in routine analysis. Many CRMs may suffer from incomplete or wrongly estimated uncertainties, mainly due to lack of guidance on how to implement the GUM in the production of CRMs. In particular the inclusion of the impact of inhomogeneity and instability in the uncertainty budget is often missing. The ongoing revision of ISO Guide 35 aims to fill this gap in providing guidance how (batch) inhomogeneity and instability can be translated into measurement uncertainty. The structure of the current ISO Guide 35 has been maintained as far as possible, but major parts underwent revision to become better aligned with GUM and ISO Guide 34 (2000). Received: 9 April 2001 Accepted: 22 October 2001     

The present situation of Japanese certified reference materials registered in the COMAR database

 In the field of reference materials, COMAR (Code d'Indexation des Matériaux de Référence) is now internationally known as a reliable directory. In order to improve the quality of COMAR, a document which covers general requirements for the registration of reference material has recently been adopted by the Japanese coding centre, NITE. This paper describes the general requirements for reference materials and the current status of the COMAR database coded by the National Institute of Technology and Evaluation (NITE), Japan. The concept of the requirements is fundamentally based on the ISO Guides 30, 31, 33, 34 and 35. Certifications of reference materials are divided into the following three categories in the newly adopted document. 1. Certifications based on the results of interlaboratory comparisons 2. Certifications in accordance with the Measurement Law 3. Certifications in accordance with the measurement results of national institutions An example of an uncertainty evaluation is also presented in the paper. Received: 14 October 1996 Accepted: 3 December 1996     

Preparation and analysis of a reference material for the measurement of oxygen in copper

The preparation and analysis of the oxygen mass fraction of three pure copper reference materials (BAM-379/1, BAM-379/2, BAM-379/3) intended for the calibration of spark emission spectrometry are described here. Data of homogeneity testing and round robin certification in collaboration with 12 independent laboratories from metalworking industry and research are reported. Problems with the establishment of traceability in this special case are discussed. Received: 20 July 2001 Accepted: 13 October 2001     

IMEP-12: trace elements in water; objective evaluation of the performance of the laboratories when measuring quality parameters prescribed in the European Directive 98/83/EC

The International Measurement Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is an interlaboratory comparison scheme, founded, owned and co-ordinated by the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM) since 1988. IMEP-12, for the fourth time in the series, focused on trace elements in water and it was designed specifically to support European Commission directive 98/83/EC. Reference values for the concentration of ten elements were established with expanded uncertainties according to GUM. In total, 348 laboratories from 46 countries in five continents participated in the comparison and the degree of equivalence between the results of the laboratories and the reference values is presented graphically. Samples from the same batch were distributed to ten laboratories from European Countries, which represented their country in the framework of the EUROMET project 528. Participation in this comparison was offered to the European Co-operation for Accreditation (EA) for participation of accredited laboratories from all over Europe in the framework of the collaboration between IRMM and EA and to laboratories from the EU new member states and acceding countries in the frame of IRMM’s ‘Metrology in Chemistry support program for EU new member states and acceding countries.’     

The NATA scheme for accreditation of certifiers of reference materials

 Certified reference materials are widely used for the calibration of measuring equipment and for the evaluation or validation of measurement procedures. The use of reference materials makes possible the transfer of the values of measured or assigned quantities between testing, analytical and measurement laboratories, both nationally and internationally. There is an increasing number of reference materials producers in other countries, and a demonstration of their scientific and technical competence is now more widely considered to be a basic requirement for ensuring the quality of reference materials. This article outlines recent activities by international bodies and their culmination in a scheme of accreditation of certifiers of reference materials which has been developed by the National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia (NATA).     

Traceability of (values carried by) reference materials

 Traceability is a property of the result of a measurement. Since values carried by (reference) materials must also have been obtained, of necessity, by measurement, the definition of traceability also applies to reference materials. It is extremely helpful to give the traceability (of the origin) of a reference material a separate name, i.e. 'trackability'. An analysis of the function of values carried by reference materials, shows that they can fulfill different functions, depending on the intended use. One of the functions located outside the traceability chain – and hence not very relevant for establishing traceability – is evaluating the approximate size of the uncertainty of the measurement of an unknown sample by performing a similar measurement on a reference material, used as a 'simulated sample'. Another function is located inside the traceability chain, where the reference material is used as an added 'internal standard'. Then, the value carried by the reference material is essential for establishing the traceability of the measured value of an unknown sample. In the latter application, the reference material acts as an 'amount standard' (the certified value for amount is used). Received: 11 November 1999 / Accepted: 24 February 2000     

Preliminary study to prepare a reference material of styrene metabolites – mandelic acid and phenylglyoxylic acid – in human urine

 A preliminary batch of the reference material was prepared by freeze-drying pooled urine samples obtained from healthy persons occupationally exposed to styrene. Tests for homogeneity and stability were performed by determining urine concentrations of mandelic (MA) and phenylglyoxylic acids (PGA). The urinary MA and PGA concentrations were followed over an 8-month period using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). No changes of the concentration values were found. Pure PA and PGA from Merck and Fluka, respectively, were used for traceability purposes, because certified or standard reference materials for MA and PGA do not exist. Control material ClinChek-Urine Control (Recipe) was analysed simultaneously. The mean values of MA and PGA compared well with the means of control samples and fell within the control range. The certified values and their uncertainties were evaluated from the results of interlaboratory comparisons, homogeneity (277.0 ± 7.4 mg L⁻¹ for MA and 148.0 ± 4.7 mg L⁻¹ for FGA) and stability tests. The values are unweighted arithmetical averages of accepted results and their uncertainties are combined uncertainties enlarged by coefficient k=1, evaluated from the standard uncertainties of the interlaboratory comparison, homogeneity and stability tests. Received: 17 September 2002 Accepted: 1 November 2002 Acknowledgement This work was supported by the Internal Grant Agency of Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (Grant NJ/6784–3). Presented at CERMM-3, Central European Reference Materials and Measurements Conference: The function of reference materials in the measurement process, May 30–June 1, 2002, Rogaška Slatina, Slovenia Correspondence to I. Šperlingová     

Uncertainty calculations in the certification of reference materials

To serve as a measurement standard, a (certified) reference material must be stable. For this purpose, the material should undergo stability testing after it has been prepared. This paper looks at the statistical aspects of stability testing. Essentially, these studies can be described with analysis of variance statistics, including variant regression analysis. The latter is used in practice for both trend analysis and for the development of expressions for extrapolations. Extrapolation of stability data is briefly touched upon, as far as the combined standard uncertainty of the reference material is concerned. There are different options to validate the extrapolations made from initial stability studies, and some of them might influence the uncertainty of the reference material and/or the shelf-life. The latter is the more commonly observed consequence of what is called ’stability monitoring’. Received: 6 October 2000 Accepted: 4 December 2000     

Twenty years of the Me.Tos. Project: an Italian national external quality assessment scheme for trace elements in biological fluids

The Me.Tos. Project, started in 1983 and still running, is an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for laboratories performing specialized analyses in occupational and environmental laboratory medicine. Besides the organization of EQA exercises, initiatives for further education of the participants and the harmonization of EQA procedures at a European level are carried out. Participation in EQA schemes allows laboratories to comply with the international standards for the quality and competence of testing and clinical laboratories. The organization of the scheme includes the preparation of control materials, their distribution to the participants, according to strategies aimed to avoid identification of the samples, the statistical analysis of the results and the evaluation of laboratories' performance according to international guidelines and criteria set by the organizers. An overview of the scheme operation and the current performances of participants will be given.     

A need for clearer terminology and guidance in the role of reference materials in method development and validation

 The fact that various definitions and terminology applied to measurements in analytical chemistry are not always consistent and straightforward, by not only answering the question ”what”, but also ”how”, leads to their various interpretations. This results in non-uniform implementation of very basic and essential metrological principles in chemistry. Such a diverse situation is not conducive to the endorsement of harmonised measurements all across the world, to serve as a tool for improving the quality of life in its broadest sense for all its citizens. The discussion in this paper is focused on problems associated with terminology and definitions of ’reference material’ and ’validation’. The role of reference materials in measurement processes for purposes other than calibration and validation principles in analytical chemistry are also discussed in this paper. Where possible, potential solutions are proposed, but more often, questions of essential importance are raised in order to initiate international discussion which will hopefully lead to equally understandable answers. Received: 2 November 2002 Accepted: 3 February 2003 Acknowledgements   The author is grateful to Aleš Fajgelj for his comprehensive comments on the topic described in this paper. Sincere thanks also to Philip Taylor, Ewa Bulska, Emilia Vassileva, Miloslav Suchanek and Margreet Lauwaars for their contribution during fruitful discussions on validation. Presented at the CERMM-3, Central European Reference Materials and Measurements Conference: The function of reference materials in the measurement process, May 30–June 1, 2002, Rogaška Slatina, Slovenia Correspondence to N. Majcen     

Uncertainty calculations in the certification of reference materials 4. Characterisation and certification

The main objective of the certification of a reference material is to determine its property values including their uncertainty. In the previous parts of this series, the basis for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty of the property values has been examined, including the conversion of homogeneity and stability study data into standard uncertainties. In this final part, the determination of the property values and the modelling of the certification process is discussed. It is noted that the characterisation of a reference material can be modelled in some cases using analysis of variance statistics, but a more generally applicable model can be developed based on χ²-fitting. Furthermore, it is concluded that there is an advantage in using absolute standard uncertainties instead of relative ones when modelling the certification process. Received: 14 October 2000 Accepted: 21 January 2001