A New Peroxy‐multiflorane Triterpene Ester from the Processed Seeds of Trichosanthes kirilowii

A new peroxy‐multiflorane triterpene ester, (3α,5α,8α,20α)‐5,8‐epidioxymultiflora‐6,9(11)‐diene‐3,29‐diol 3,29‐dibenzoate ( 1 ), was isolated from the processed seeds of Trichosanthes kirilowii, together with the two known related derivatives 2 and 3 , and the two known steroids 4 and 5 . Compounds 2, 4 , and 5 were isolated from the genus Trichosanthes for the first time. The structure of compound 1 was established by NMR, HR‐MS, and CD analyses. Compounds 1 – 3 were tested for their in vitro cytotoxicity against human‐tumor cell lines (Hela, HL‐60, and MCF‐7) and anti‐inflammatory activity (LPS‐induced B lymphocyte cells) with the MTT method.     

Bisresorcinol Derivatives from Grevillea glauca

Seven new and three known bisresorcinols, grevirobstol A (=5,5′‐((6Z,9Z)‐hexadeca‐6,9‐diene‐1,16‐diyl)bisresorcinol; 8 ), 5,5′‐[(8Z)‐hexadec‐8‐ene‐1,16‐diyl]bisresorcinol ( 9 ), and 2‐methyl‐5,5′‐[8Z)‐hexadec‐8‐ene‐1,16‐diyl]bisresorcinol ( 10 ) were isolated from the stems of Grevillea glauca. The new compounds were identified on the basis of spectroscopic data as (Z)‐6,7‐didehydroglaucone A ( 1 ), glaucones A and B ( 2 and 3 , resp.), 2‐(3‐hydroxyisopentyl)bisnorstriatol ( 4 ), 2‐(3‐methylbut‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bisnorstriatol ( 5 ), 2′‐methylgrebustol A ( 6 ), and glaucane ( 7 ).     

Cyclobutanoid Amides from Piper arborescens

Two new cyclobutanoid amides, piperarborenine A (=1,1′‐{[(1α,2α,3β,4β)‐2,4‐bis(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)cyclobutane‐1,3‐diyl]dicarbonyl}bis[5,6‐dihydropyridin‐2(1H)‐one]; 1 ) and piperarborenine B (=1,1′‐{[(1α,2α,3β,4β)‐2‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐4‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)cyclobutane‐1,3‐diyl]dicarbonyl}bis[5,6‐dihydropyridin‐2(1H)‐one]; 2 ) were isolated from the stem of Piper arborescens, besides two known cyclobutanoid amides, piperarboresine (=1,1′‐{[(1α,2α,3β,4β)‐2‐(7‐methoxy‐1,3‐benzodioxol‐5‐yl)‐4‐(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)cyclobutane‐1,3‐diyl]dicarbonyl}bis[5,6‐dihydropyridin‐2(1H)‐one]; 3 ) and piplartine‐dimer A (=1,1′‐{[(1α,2α,3β,4β)‐2,4‐bis(3,4,5‐trimethoxyphenyl)cyclobutane‐1,3‐diyl]dicarbonyl}bis[5,6‐dihydropyridin‐2(1H)‐one]; 4 ). The structures of the two new compounds were determined by spectral analyses.     

Chemical Constituents from Craibiodendron yunnanense

A new triterpene, (3β,12β)‐taraxast‐20(30)‐ene‐3,12‐diol (=(3β,12β,18α,19α)‐urs‐20(30)‐ene‐3,12‐diol; 1 ), together with the known compounds ursolic acid, α‐amyrin, β‐amyrin, (2α,3β)‐2,3‐dihydroxyursa‐5,12‐dien‐28‐oic acid, (2α,3β)‐2,3,23‐trihydroxyurs‐12‐en‐28‐oic acid, (2S,3S,4R,8Z)‐1‐O‐(β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl)‐2‐{[(2R)‐2‐hydroxydocosanoyl]amino}octadec‐8‐ene‐1,3,4‐triol, and (2S,3S,4R,8Z)‐1‐O‐(β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl)‐2‐[(palmitoyl)amino]octadec‐8‐ene‐1,3,4‐triol, and quercetin 3‐(β‐D ‐glucopyranoside) were isolated from the leaves of Craibiodendron yunnanense. Their structures were established on the basis of spectral evidence. The last four compounds were identified for the first time in this plant.     

Four New Lanostane Triterpenoids from Euphorbia humifusa

Four new lanostane triterpenoids, namely (3β)‐3‐hydroxy‐24‐methylenelanost‐8‐ene‐7,11‐dione ( 1 ), (3β)‐3‐hydroxylanosta‐8,24‐diene‐7,11‐dione ( 2 ), (3β,7α)‐3,7‐dihydroxylanosta‐8,24‐dien‐11‐one ( 3 ), and (3β,11β)‐3,11‐dihydroxylanosta‐8,24‐dien‐7‐one ( 4 ) were isolated from Euphorbia humifusa, together with 2 known compounds. The structures of these new compounds were elucidated on the basis of extensive spectroscopic analysis and comparison with the related known compounds.     

Two New Sesquiterpenes from the Roots of Valeriana fauriei Briq.

A phytochemical investigation of the MeOH extract of Valeriana fauriei Briq . roots resulted in the isolation of two new sesquiterpenes, isovalerianin A (=(1β,4Z,6β,8α)‐8‐(acetyloxy)‐1,10‐dihydroxy‐6,11‐cyclogermacr‐4‐en‐15‐al=rel‐(1R,2Z,6S,7R,9R,10S)‐9‐(acetyloxy)‐6,7‐dihydroxy‐7,11,11‐trimethylbicyclo[8.1.0]undec‐2‐ene‐3‐carboxaldehyde; 1 ) and valerianin C (=(2α,3α,6α,8α)‐3‐(acetyloxy)‐2,4,8‐trihydroxyguai‐1(10)‐ene‐12,6‐lactone=rel‐(3R,3aS,4R,7S,8S,9R,9aR,9bR)‐8‐(acetyloxy)‐3a,4,5,7,8,9,9a,9b‐ octahydro‐4,7,9‐trihydroxy‐3,6,9‐trimethylazuleno[4,5‐b]furan‐2(3H)‐one; 2 ), together with six known compounds, i.e., camphor, methyl 4‐hydroxybenzoate, 2‐methoxybenzoic acid, benzoic acid, quercetin, and kaempferol. The structures of the compounds were established by detailed spectral analysis and comparison with previously reported data.     

Triumfettosterol Id and Triumfettosaponin,a New (Fatty Acyl)‐Substituted Steroid and a Triterpenoid ‘Dimer’ Bis(β‐D‐glucopyranosyl) Ester from the Leaves of Wild Triumfetta cordifolia A. Rich. (Tiliaceae)

Two new triterpenoid derivatives were isolated from the leaves of wild Triumfetta cordifolia A. Rich . and identified to be a (fatty acyl)‐substituted steroid 1 and a triterpenoid saponin ‘dimer’ 2 , named (3β)‐stigmasta‐5,22‐diene‐3,29‐diol 3‐propanoate 29‐triacontanoate and (2α,3β,19α)‐2,3,19‐trimethoxyurs‐12‐ene‐24,28‐dioic acid 24‐[(2α,3β)‐24,28‐bis(β‐D ‐glucopyranosyloxy)‐2‐hydroxy‐24,28‐dioxours‐12‐en‐3‐yl] ester, respectively. These compounds were obtained together with a mixture of known sterols (stigmasterol/β‐sitosterol=(3β,22E)‐stigmasta‐5,22‐dien‐3‐ol/(3β)‐stigmast‐5‐en‐3‐ol) and trans‐tiliroside ( 3 ). The structures 1 and 2 were determined on the basis of NMR data (¹H‐, ¹³C‐, and 2D‐NMR analyses) and mass spectrometry and confirmed by chemical transformations. The antimicrobial activities of trans‐tiliroside ( 3 ) against eight bacterial and two fungal strains were evaluated. This compound showed weak activities on some bacterial strains.     

Six New Triterpenoid Glycosides from Gynostemma pentaphyllum

Six new triterpenoid glycosides, gynosaponins I–VI ( 1 – 6 , resp.), together with three known compounds, ginseng Rb₁ ( 7 ), gypenoside XLIX ( 8 ), and gylongiposide I ( 9 ), were isolated from the aerial parts of Gynostemma pentaphyllum. Based on ESI‐MS, IR, 1D‐ and 2D‐NMR data (HMQC, HMBC, COSY, and TOCSY), the structures of the new compounds were determined as (3β,12β,20S)‐trihydroxydammar‐24‐ene 20‐O‐[α‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)]‐β‐glucopyranoside ( 1 ), (3β,12β,20S)‐trihydroxydammar‐24‐ene 20‐O‐[α‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)] [α‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→3)]‐β‐glucopyranoside ( 2 ), (3β,12β,20S)‐trihydroxydammar‐24‐ene 3‐O‐β‐glucopyranosyl‐20‐O‐[α‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)]‐β‐glucopyranoside ( 3 ), (3β,12β,20S)‐trihydroxydammar‐24‐ene 3‐O‐β‐glucopyranosyl‐20‐O‐[α‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)] [α‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→3)]‐β‐glucopyranoside ( 4 ), (3β,12β,20S)‐trihydroxydammar‐24‐ene 3‐O‐{[β‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→2)]‐β‐glucopyranosyl}‐20‐O‐[α‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)]‐β‐glucopyranoside ( 5 ), and (3β,12β,20S)‐trihydroxydammar‐24‐ene 3‐O‐{[β‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→2)]‐β‐glucopyranosyl}‐20‐O‐[α‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→2)] [α‐rhamnopyranosyl‐(1→3)]‐β‐glucopyranoside ( 6 ).     

Three New Serratane Triterpenoids from Phlegmariurus squarrosus

Three new serratane triterpenoids, (3α,14α,15α,21α)‐3,14,15,21,29‐pentahydroxyserratan‐24‐oic acid ( 1 ), (3α,21β)‐serrat‐14‐ene‐3,21,24,30‐tetraol ( 2 ), and (3α,21α)‐serrat‐14‐ene‐3,21,24,29‐tetraol ( 3 ), were isolated from Phlegmariurus squarrosus, together with eight known compounds. Their chemical structures were elucidated on the basis of in‐depth spectroscopic analyses.     

Influence of Ring Annelation on the Mode Selectivity of the Ionized Diazabicycloheptenes and Corresponding Housanes: An ESR and ENDOR Study

The tricyclic azoalkanes, (1α,4α,4aα,7aα)‐4,4a,5,6,7,7a‐hexahydro‐1,4,8,8‐tetramethyl‐1,4‐methano‐1H‐cyclopenta[d]pyridazine ( 1c ), (1α,4α,4aα,6aα)‐4,4a,5,6,6a‐pentahydro‐1,4,7,7‐tetramethyl‐1,4‐methano‐1H‐cyclobuta[d]pyridazine ( 1d ), (1α,4α,4aα,6aα)‐4,4a,6a‐trihydro‐1,4,7,7‐tetramethyl‐1,4‐methano‐1H‐cyclobuta[d]pyridazine ( 1e ), and (1α,4α,4aα,5aα)‐4,4a,5,5a‐tetrahydro‐1,4,6,6‐tetramethyl‐1,4‐methano‐1H‐cyclopropa[d]pyridazine ( 1f ), as well as the corresponding housanes, the 2,3,3,4‐tetramethyl‐substituted tricyclo[3.3.0.0^2,4]octane ( 2c ), tricyclo[3.2.0.0^2,4]heptane ( 2d ), and tricyclo[3.2.0.0^2,4]hept‐6‐ene ( 2e ), were subjected to γ‐irradiation in Freon matrices. The reaction products were identified with the use of ESR and, in part, ENDOR spectroscopy. As expected, the strain on the C‐framework increases on going from the cyclopentane‐annelated azoalkanes and housanes ( 1c and 2c ) to those annelated by cyclobutane ( 1d and 2d ), by cyclobutene ( 1e and 2e ), and by cyclopropane ( 1f ). Accordingly, the products obtained from 1c and 2c in all three Freons used, CFCl₃, CF₃CCl₃, and CF₂ClCFCl₂, were the radical cations 3c ^.+ and 2c ^.+ of 2,3,4,4‐tetramethylbicyclo[3.3.0]oct‐2‐ene and 2,3,3,4‐tetramethylbicyclo[3.3.0]octane‐2,4‐diyl, respectively. In CFCl₃ and CF₃CCl₃ matrices, 1d and 2d yielded analogous products, namely the radical cations 3d ^.+ and 2d ^.+ of 2,3,4,4‐tetramethylbicyclo[3.2.0]hept‐2‐ene and 2,3,3,4‐tetramethylbicyclo[3.2.0]heptane‐2,4‐diyl. The radical cations 3c ^.+ and 3d ^.+ and 2c ^.+ and 2d ^.+ correspond to their non‐annelated counterparts 3a ^.+ and 3b ^.+, and 2a ^.+ and 2b ^.+ generated previously under the same conditions from 2,3‐diazabicyclo[2.2.1]hept‐2‐ene ( 1a ) and bicyclo[2.1.0]pentane ( 2a ), as well as from their 1,4‐dimethyl derivatives ( 1b and 2b ). However, in a CF₂ClCFCl₂ matrix, both 1d and 2d gave the radical cation 4d ^.+ of 2,3,3,4‐tetramethylcyclohepta‐1,4‐diene. Starting from 1e and 2e , the radical cations 4e ^.+ and 4e′ ^.+ of the isomeric 1,2,7,7‐ and 1,6,7,7‐tetramethylcyclohepta‐1,3,5‐trienes appeared as the corresponding products, while 1f was converted into the radical cation 4f ^.+ of 1,5,6,6‐tetramethylcyclohexa‐1,4‐diene which readily lost a proton to yield the corresponding cyclohexadienyl radical 4f ^.. Reaction mechanisms leading to the pertinent radical cations are discussed.     

Lignans from the Bark of Magnolia kobus

The Et₂O‐soluble fraction from the bark of Magnolia kobus led to the isolation of two new lignans, (+)‐(7α,7′α,8α,8′α)‐3′,4,4′,5,5′‐pentamethoxy‐7,9′: 7′,9‐diepoxylignan‐3‐ol ( 1 ) and (+)‐(7α,7′α,8α,8′α)‐4,5‐dimethoxy‐3′,4′‐(methylenedioxy)‐7,9′: 7′,9‐diepoxylignan‐3‐ol ( 2 ), along with five known lignans 3 – 7 . Their structures were established on the basis of various spectroscopic analyses including 1D‐ (¹H, ¹³C, and DEPT) and 2D‐NMR (COSY, NOESY, HMQC, and HMBC) and by comparison of their spectral data with those of related compounds.     

Neoclerodane Diterpenes from Amoora stellato‐squamosa

From the twigs of Amoora stellato‐squamosa, five new neoclerodane diterpenes have been isolated and characterized, methyl (13E)‐2‐oxoneocleroda‐3,13‐dien‐15‐oate (=methyl (2E)‐3‐methyl‐5‐[(1S,2R,4aR,8aR)‐1,2,3,4,4a,7,8,8a‐octahydro‐1,2,4a,5‐tetramethyl‐7‐oxo‐naphthalen‐1‐yl]pent‐2‐enoate; 1 ), (13E)‐2‐oxoneocleroda‐3,13‐dien‐15‐ol (=(4aR,7R,8S,8aR)‐1,2,4a,5,6,7,8,8a‐octahydro‐8‐[(E)‐5‐hydroxy‐3‐methylpent‐3‐enyl]‐4,4a,7,8‐tetramethylnaphthalen‐2(1H)‐one; 2 ), (3α,4β,13E)‐neoclerod‐13‐ene‐3,4,15‐triol (=(1R,2R,4aR, 5S,6R,8aR)‐decahydro‐5‐[(E)‐5‐hydroxy‐3‐methylpent‐3‐enyl]‐1,5,6,8a‐tetramethylnaphthalene‐1,2‐diol; 3 ), (3α,4β,13E)‐4‐ethoxyneoclerod‐13‐ene‐3,15‐diol (=(1R,2R,4aR,5S,6R,8aR)‐1‐ethoxydecahydro‐5‐[(E)‐5‐hydroxy‐3‐methylpent‐3‐enyl]‐1,5,6,8a‐tetramethylnaphthalen‐2‐ol; 4 ), and (3α,4β,14RS)‐neoclerod‐13(16)‐ ene‐3,4,14,15‐tetrol (=(1R,2R,4aR,5S,6R,8aR)‐decahydro‐5‐[3‐(1,2‐dihydroxyethyl)but‐3‐enyl]‐1,5,6,8a‐tetramethylnaphthalene‐1,2‐diol; 5 ), together with two known compounds, (13E)‐neocleroda‐3,13‐diene‐15,18‐diol ( 6 ) and (13S)‐2‐oxoneocleroda‐3,14‐dien‐13‐ol ( 7 ).     

Modulating the preferred O—H...O hydrogen‐bonding motif in a conformationally constrained environment through hydroxy‐group derivatization

The crystal structures of three conformationally locked esters, namely the centrosymmetric tetrabenzoate of all‐axial perhydronaphthalene‐2,3,4a,6,7,8a‐hexaol, viz.trans‐4a,8a‐dihydroxyperhydronaphthalene‐2,3,6,7‐tetrayl tetrabenzoate, C₃₈H₃₄O₁₀, and the diacetate and dibenzoate of all‐axial perhydronaphthalene‐2,3,4a,8a‐tetraol, viz. (2R*,3R*,4aS*,8aS*)‐4a,8a‐dihydroxyperhydronaphthalene‐2,3‐diyl diacetate, C₁₄H₂₂O₆, and (2R*,3R*,4aS*,8aS*)‐4a,8a‐dihydroxyperhydronaphthalene‐2,3‐diyl dibenzoate, C₂₄H₂₆O₆, have been analyzed in order to examine the preference of their supramolecular assemblies towards competing inter‐ and intramolecular O—H...O hydrogen bonds. It was anticipated that the supramolecular assembly of the esters under study would adopt two principal hydrogen‐bonding modes, namely one that employs intermolecular O—H...O hydrogen bonds (mode 1) and another that sacrifices those for intramolecular O—H...O hydrogen bonds and settles for a crystal packing dictated by weak intermolecular interactions alone (mode 2). Thus, while the molecular assembly of the two crystalline diacyl derivatives conformed to a combination of hydrogen‐bonding modes 1 and 2, the crystal packing in the tetrabenzoate preferred to follow mode 2 exclusively.     

Three New Neolignans and One New Phenylpropanoid from the Leaves and Stems of Toona ciliata var. pubescens

Three new neolignans, (7S,8S,7′E)‐4,9‐dihydroxy‐3,7,3′,9′‐tetramethoxy‐8,4′‐oxyneolign‐7′‐ene ( 1 ), (7R,8S,7′E)‐4, 9‐dihydroxy‐3,7,3′,9′‐tetramethoxy‐8,4′‐oxyneolign‐7′‐ene ( 2 ), (7S,8S,7′E)‐5, 9‐dihydroxy‐3,7,3′,5′,9′‐pentamethoxy‐8,4′‐oxyneolign‐7′‐ene ( 3 ), and one new phenylpropanoid, threo‐5‐hydroxy‐3,7‐dimethoxyphenylpropane‐8,9‐diol ( 4 ), were isolated from the leaves and stems of Toona ciliata var. pubescens. Their structures were determined on the basis of spectroscopic analysis, especially 2D‐NMR, HR‐ESI‐MS, and CD data. The antiproliferative activities of these compounds against four tumor cell lines (A549, Colo 205, QGY‐7703, and LOVO) were also evaluated by MTT (=(3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyl‐2H‐tetrazolium bromide) method.     

Cholinesterase‐Inhibiting New Steroidal Alkaloids from Sarcococca hookeriana of Nepalese Origin

Bioassay‐guided phytochemical investigation of Sarcococca hookeriana has resulted in the isolation and structure elucidation of five new pregnane‐type steroidal alkaloids: (?)‐hookerianamide A (=(2β,3β,4β,20S)‐20‐(dimethylamino)‐3‐[(3‐methylbut‐2‐enoyl)amino]‐5α‐pregn‐16‐ene‐2,4‐diol; 1 ), (+)‐hookerianamide B (=(2α,3β,4β,20S)‐4‐acetoxy‐20‐(dimethylamino)‐3‐[(3‐methylbut‐2‐enoyl)amino]‐5α‐pregnan‐2‐ol; 2 ), (?)‐hookerianamide C (=(2β,3β,20S)‐2‐acetoxy‐20‐(dimethylamino)‐3‐[(3‐methylbut‐2‐enoyl)amino]‐5α‐pregnane; 3 ), (?)‐hookerianamine A (=(3β,20S)‐20‐(dimethylamino)‐3‐(methylamino)‐5α‐pregn‐14‐ene; 4 ), and (+)‐phulchowkiamide A (=(3β,20S)‐20‐(methylamino)‐3‐[(2‐methylbut‐2‐enoyl)amino]‐5α‐pregn‐2‐en‐4‐one; 5 ). These compounds, as well as the two chemically derived acetyl derivatives 6 and 7 , displayed cholinesterase inhibition in a concentration‐dependent manner.     

Artabotryols A – E,New Lanostane Triterpenes from the Seeds of Artabotrys odoratissimus

Six new lanostane triterpenes, artabotryols A, B, C1, C2, D, and E ( 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 4 , and 5 , resp.) have been isolated from the seeds of Artabotrys odoratissimus (Annonaceae). Their structures have been established as (3α,22S,25R)‐3‐hydroxy‐22,26‐epoxylanost‐8‐en‐26‐one ( 1 ), (3α,22S,25R)‐22,26‐epoxylanost‐8‐ene‐3,26‐diol ( 2 ), (3α,22S,25R,26R)‐26‐methoxy‐22,26‐epoxylanost‐8‐en‐3‐ol ( 3a ), (3α,22S,25R, 26S)‐26‐methoxy‐22,26‐epoxylanost‐8‐en‐3‐ol ( 3b ), (3α,22S,25R)‐3,22‐dihydroxylanost‐8‐en‐26‐oic acid ( 4 ) and (3α,7α,11α,22S,25R)‐3,7,11‐trihydroxy‐22,26‐epoxylanost‐8‐en‐26‐one ( 5 ) by spectroscopic studies and chemical correlations.     

Three New Sesquiterpenes from Laggera pterodonta

A new eremophilane sesquiterpene, (2β)‐2‐deoxo‐2‐methoxytessaric acid ( 1 ), and two new eudesmane sesquiterpenes, (3β,10α)‐3‐methoxyleudesma‐4,11(13)‐dien‐12‐oic acid ( 2 ) and (3α,4β,8α)‐4‐(acetyloxy)‐3‐(2,3‐dihydroxy)‐2‐methyl‐1‐oxobutoxy‐8‐hydroxyeudesm‐7(11)‐eno‐12,8‐lactone ( 3 ), along with the ten known compounds 4 – 13 were isolated from the aerial parts of Laggera pterodonta. The structures of the new compounds were elucidated by spectroscopic analyses, including 2D‐NMR data.     

Hydrolytic Reaction of Plant Extracts to Generate Molecular Diversity: New Dammarane Glycosides from the Mild Acid Hydrolysate of Root Saponins of Panax notoginseng

Molecular diversity was generated by hydrolyzing the crude root saponins of Panax notoginseng (Burk .) F. H. Chen under mild acidic condition (AcOH/EtOH 1 : 1). From the acid hydrolysate, five new dammarane glycosides, named notoginsenoside T₁ (=(3β,6α,12β,20E,23RS)‐24,25‐epoxy‐6‐[(β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl)oxy]‐dammar‐20(22)‐ene‐3,12,23‐triol; 1 ), notoginsenoside T₂ (=(3β,6α,12β,20E,23RS)‐24,25‐epoxy‐6‐[(β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl)oxy]‐23‐methoxydammar‐20(22)‐ene‐3,12‐diol; 2 ), notoginsenoside T₃ (=(3β,6α,12β,20S)‐6‐[(β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl)oxy]‐20‐ethoxydammar‐24‐ene‐3,12‐diol; 3 ), notoginsenoside T₄ (=(3β,6α,12β,20S,22E,24RS)‐6‐[(β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl)oxy]dammar‐22‐ene‐3,12,20,24,25‐pentol; 4 ), and notoginsenoside T₅ (=(3β,6α,12β, 24E)‐6‐[(β‐D ‐xylopyranosyl‐(1→2)‐β‐D ‐glucopyranosyl)oxy]dammara‐20(21),24‐diene‐3,12‐diol; 5 ), were isolated, together with 15 known dammarane glycosides, and their structures were elucidated on the basis of spectroscopic evidence. Among the known compounds, ginsenosides Rg₃ and Rh₁ were isolated as major constituents, in addition to ginsenosides Rg₅, Rh₄, and a mixture of (20R)‐ and (20S)‐25‐hydroxyginsenoside Rh₁, all of which were obtained from P. notoginseng for the first time.     

Uncommon Sesquiterpenoids and New Triterpenoids from Jatropha neopauciflora (Euphorbiaceae)

Eight new terpenoids ( 1 – 8 ) were isolated from the bark of Jatropha neopauciflora, together with eight known compounds. The new isolates include the sesquiterpenoids (1R,2R)‐diacetoxycycloax‐4(15)‐ene ( 1 ); (1R,2R)‐dihydroxycycloax‐4(15)‐ene ( 2 ), (2R)‐δ‐cadin‐4‐ene‐2,10‐diol ( 3 ), (2R)‐δ‐cadina‐4,9‐dien‐2‐ol ( 4 ), (1R,2R)‐dihydroxyisodauc‐4‐en‐14‐ol ( 5 ) and its acetonide 6 (artifact), as well as the two triterpenoids (3β,16β)‐16‐hydroxylup‐20(29)‐en‐3‐yl (E)‐3‐(4‐hydroxyphenyl)prop‐2‐enoate ( 7 ) and (3β,16β)‐16‐hydroxyolean‐18‐en‐3‐yl (E)‐3‐(4‐hydroxyphenyl)prop‐2‐enoate ( 8 ). The structures of these compounds were established by extensive 1D‐ and 2D‐NMR spectroscopic methods, and their absolute configurations were determined by circular‐dichroism (CD) experiments, and by X‐ray crystallographic analysis (compound 7 ; Fig. 3). A plausible biosynthesis of the sesquiterpenoids 1 – 5 is proposed (Scheme), starting from (?)‐germacrene D as the common biogenetic precursor.     

Chemical Constituents of the Leaves of Desmos cochinchinensis var. fulvescens Ban

A phytochemical investigation of MeOH extract of Desmos cochinchinensis var. fulvescens Ban afforded two new compounds, 1β,7α‐dihydroxyeudesman‐4‐one ( 1 ) and 5αH‐megastigm‐7‐ene‐3α,4α,6β,9‐tetrol ( 2 ), together with nine known terpenoids. The structures of the new compounds were elucidated by 1D‐ and 2D‐NMR spectroscopic analysis. Their relative configurations were assigned by NOESY experiments.