Novel Copolymers of Trisubstituted Ethylenes and Styrene. 8. Fluoro Ring-Substituted Ethyl 2-Cyano-1-oxo-3-phenyl-2-propenylcarbamates

Electrophilic trisubstituted ethylenes, fluoro ring-substituted ethyl 2-cyano-1-oxo-3-phenyl-2-propenylcarbamates, RC₆H₃CH = C(CN)CONHCO₂C₂H₅(where R is 4-F-3-CH₃, 2-CF₃, 4-CF₃, 2,4-diF, 2,5-diF, 2,6-diF, 3,4-diF, and 3,5-diF), were prepared and copolymerized with styrene. The monomers were synthesized by the piperidine catalyzed Knoevenagel condensation of ring-substituted benzaldehydes and N-cyanoacetylurethane, and characterized by CHN analysis, IR, ¹H- and ¹³C-NMR. All the ethylenes were copolymerized with styrene (M₁) in solution with radical initiation (ABCN) at 70°C. The compositions of the copolymers were calculated from nitrogen analysis and the structures were analyzed by IR, ¹H- and ¹³C-NMR. The order of relative reactivity (1/r ₁) for the monomers 4-CF₃ (5.4) > 2,6-diF (2.0) > 2,4-diF (1.7) > 2,5-diF (1.0) > 2-CF₃ (0.8) > 3,4-diF (0.5) > 3,5-diF (0.4) > 4-F-3-CH₃ (0.3). High T _g of the copolymers in comparison with that of polystyrene indicates decrease in chain mobility of the copolymer due to the high dipolar character of the trisubstituted ethylene structural unit. Decomposition of the copolymers in nitrogen occurred in two steps, first in 270–420°C with residue (5–13% wt), which then decomposed in the 420–650°C range.     

Preparation and photochemical properties of polymethacrylic esters of para-acylated 2-phenoxyethanols

For studying the photochemistry of carbonyl chromophores in the side-chain, methacrylic esters of para-acylated 2-phenoxyethanols (CH₂ = C(CH₃) · CO · O · CH₂ · CH₂O · C₆H₄ · CO · R), soluble copolymers with styrene and soluble homopolymers were prepared. Comparison of low temperature emission spectra of model compounds, homopolymers and copolymers doped in polystyrene film indicated some interaction between the excited and the ground state structural units in homopolymers. Quantum yield of main chain scission of copolymers of styrene with monomers 1–3 (R = CH₃, C₂H₅, C₆H₅) at 313 nm radiation in benzene were about 10^?4; the cross-linking was the main reaction for copolymer styrene/monomer 4 (R = C₆H₅CH₂). On exposure of copolymers styrene/monomers 1–4 and polystyrene doped with model compounds in film to 313 nm radiation in air, accelerated photo-oxidation occurs as well as cross-linking. Only chromophores of monomers 3 and 4 were effective as sensitizers of photochemical addition of maleic anhydride to benzene by radiation with γ > 340 nm. The difference in the efficiency between model compounds and copolymers on the one hand and a homopolymer on the other hand is due to self-quenching.     

Blends of poly(2,6–dimethyl–1,4–phenylene oxide) with styrene copolymers

Binary blends of poly(2,6–dimethyl–1,4–phenylene oxide) (PPE) with various styrene copolymers were investigated. Poly(styrene–co–acrylonitrile) (SAN), poly[styrene–co–(methyl methacrylate)] (SMMA), poly[styrene–co–(acrylic acid)] (SAA) and poly[styrene–co–(maleic anhydride)] (SMA) are only miscible with PPE when the amount of comonomer is rather small. From calculated binary interaction densities it can be concluded that the strong repulsion between PPE and comonomer limits miscibility. In blends of PPE with SAN, as well as with ABS, the inter-facial tension between the blend components is significantly reduced upon addition of polystyrene–block–poly–(methyl methacrylate) diblock copolymers (PS–b–PMMA) and polystyrene–block–poly (ethylene–co–butylene)–block–poly–(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymers (PS–b–PEB–b–PMMA). They show a profound influence on morphology, phase adhesion and mechanical blend properties.     

Blends of styrene/maleic anhydride copolymers with polymethacrylates

The phase behavior of a series of styrene/maleic anhydride (SMA) copolymers with various polyacrylate and polymethacrylate homopolymers has been investigated using various techniques. None of the polyacrylates are miscible with SMA copolymers. Poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) and poly(n-propyl methacrylate) (PnPMA), are miscible with these copolymers over a certain range of maleic anhydride contents; whereas, the higher methacrylates apparently have no region of miscibility. For PEMA and PnPMA, the miscibility windows extend through 0% MA; hence, polystyrene is miscible with these polymethacrylates although the lower critical solution temperature is quite low. The exothermic heat of mixing styrene and ester analogs found here supports the observed miscibility of polystyrene with ethyl, n-propyl, and cyclohexyl (reported elsewhere) methacrylates. Lattice fluid interaction parameters for styrene-methacrylate obtained from the cloud points of these blends agree quite well with the Flory—Huggins parameters obtained from copolymer miscibility windows.     

Interface stabilization and micelle formation in blends with a block copolymer

The phase separation behavior of ternary blends of two homopolymers, PMMA and PS, and a block copolymer of styrene and methylmethacrylate, P(S-b-MMA), was studied. The homopolymers were of equal chain length and were kept at equal amounts. Two copolymers were used with blocks of equal length, which exceeded or equaled that of the homopolymer chains. Varied was the copolymer contentf. Films were cast from toluene, which is a nonselective solvent. The morphologies of the cast films were compared with the structure of the critical fluctuations in solution, which were calculated in mean field approximation. The axis of blend compositionsf can be divided into parts of dominating macrophase and microphase separation. Above a transition concentrationf _o, all copolymer chains are found in phase interfaces. Belowf _o, part of them form micelles within the homopolymer phases.     

Novel Copolymers of Styrene. 12. Halogen Ring-Substituted Methyl 2-Cyano-3-Phenyl-2-Propenoates

Electrophilic trisubstituted ethylenes, halogen ring-substituted methyl 2-cyano-3-phenyl-2-propenoates, RPhCH=C(CN)CO₂CH₃ (where R is 3-Br-4-CH₃O, 5-Br-2-CH₃O, 2-F-5-CH₃, 2-F-6-CH₃, 4-F-3-CH₃, 4-F-3-PhO, 2-F-5-I, 2-F-6-I, 2-F₃C, 4-F₃C) were prepared and copolymerized with styrene. The monomers were synthesized by the piperidine catalyzed Knoevenagel condensation of ring-substituted benzaldehydes and methyl cyanoacetate, and characterized by CHN analysis, IR, ¹H and ¹³C-NMR. All the ethylenes were copolymerized with styrene (M₁) in solution with radical initiation (ABCN) at 70°C. The compositions of the copolymers were calculated from nitrogen analysis and the structures were analyzed by IR, ¹H and ¹³C-NMR. The order of relative reactivity (1/r ₁) for the monomers is 2-F-5-CH₃ (6.4) > 4-F-3-PhO (5.6) > 4-F₃C (4.8) > 3-Br-4-CH₃O (3.7) > 2-F-5-I (3.6) > 2-F₃C (2.2) > 2-F-6-I (2.1) > 5-Br-2-CH₃O (1.9) > 4-F-3-CH₃ (1.8) > 2-F-6-CH₃ (1.2). Relatively high T _g of the copolymers in comparison with that of polystyrene indicates a decrease in chain mobility of the copolymer due to the high dipolar character of the trisubstituted ethylene monomer unit. Decomposition of the copolymers in nitrogen occurred in two steps, first in the 200-500°C range with residue (2–21% wt), which then decomposed in the 500–800°C range.     

Properties of polystyrene-poly(methylmethacrylate) random and diblock copolymers in dilute and semidilute solutions

Solution properties for random and diblock copolymers of polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) have been measured by dynamic and total intensity light scattering in solvents of differing quality. The results are compared with the corresponding properties for PS and PMMA homopolymers of similar molecular weight, in order to determine if interactions between unlike monomers are significant. The hydrodynamic radius (R_h) and diffusion second virial coefficient (k_d) for the random copolymer are found to be larger than the corresponding values for the homopolymers in a solvent which is near-theta for the two homopolymers, whereas no such effect is observed for the block copolymer. This suggests that most intrachain interactions occur a relatively short distance along the chain backbone. In a mutual good solvent R_h and k_d of the random copolymer are comparable to the average of the values for the homopolymers, indicating that in a good solvent monomer/solvent interactions dominate over monomer/monomer interactions. For an isolated diblock copolymer in a mutual good solvent, there is no evidence that interactions between unlike monomers lead to additional expansion of the entire molecule, as measured by R_h, nor expansion of the individual blocks as probed by light scattering with one block optically masked. However, at low but finite concentration there is evidence (the coefficients of the binary interaction terms in the viscosity and the mutual diffusion coefficient, and the second and third virial coefficients) that a weak ordering effect may exist in block copolymer solutions, far from the conditions where microphase separation occurs. Finally, measurements of ternary polymer-polymer-solvent solutions show no dependence on monomer composition or monomer distribution for the tracer diffusion of probe PS-PMMA copolymers in a PMMA/toluene matrix. This indicate that the frictional interaction is largely unaffected by interactions between unlike monomers. However, there is evidence that the thermodynamic interaction is more unfavorable between a random copolymer and the homopolymer matrix than between a diblock and the matrix. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

A study of the blending of ethylene–styrene copolymers differing in the copolymer styrene content: Miscibility considerations

Blends of two or more ethylene–styrene (ES) copolymers that differed primarily in the comonomer composition of the copolymers were studied. Available thermodynamic models for copolymer–copolymer blends were utilized to determine the criteria for miscibility between two ES copolymers differing in styrene content and also between ES copolymers and the respective homopolymers, polystyrene and linear polyethylene. Model estimations were compared with experimental observations based primarily on melt‐blended ES/ES systems, particularly via the analysis of the glass‐transition (T_g ) behavior from differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and solid‐state dynamic mechanical spectroscopy. The critical comonomer difference in the styrene content at which phase separation occurred was estimated to be about 10 wt % for ES copolymers with a molecular weight of about 10⁵ and was in general agreement with the experimental observations. The range of ES copolymers that could be produced by the variation of the comonomer content allowed the study of blends with amorphous and semicrystalline components. Crystallinity differences for the blends, as determined by DSC, appeared to be related to the overlapping of the T_g of the amorphous component with the melting range of the semicrystalline component and/or the reduction in the mobility of the amorphous phase due to the presence of the higher T_g of the amorphous blend component. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 2976–2987, 2000     

Dependence of flory-Huggins χ parameters on the copolymer composition for solutions of poly(methyl methacrylate-ran-n-butyl methacrylate) in cyclohexanone

Intermolecular interactions in random copolymer systems depend on the copolymer composition as being observed as a miscibility window in the random copolymer blends. The copolymer composition dependencies of the Flory-Huggins χ parameter and the heats of mixing ▵H_M(∞) at infinite dilution were studied for the solutions of poly(methyl methacrylate-ran-n-butyl methacrylate) (MMAnBMA) in cyclohexanone (CHN). The copolymer composition dependencies of χ obtained from osmotic pressures and of ▵H_M(∞) measured with a microcalorimeter were concave curves. This suggests that the random copolymers MMAnBMA interact with CHN more attractively than do the homopolymers PMMA and PnBMA. This is caused by the repulsion effect between the MMA and nBMA segments. The equation-of-state theory extended to the random copolymer systems by us reproduced fairly well these thermodynamic properties. The χ parameter for the PMMA/PnBMA blends was calculated using the equation-of-state theory with the MMA/nBMA intersegmental parameters employed for the above random copolymer solutions in CHN. The χ value calculated thus was in satisfactory agreement with that obtained from the random copolymer solutions using the Flory-Huggins theory extended to multicomponent systems. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Novel Copolymers of Styrene and Some Ring-substituted 2-Phenyl-1,1-dicyanoethylenes

Novel copolymers of trisubstituted ethylene monomers, ring-substituted 2-phenyl-1,1-dicyanoethylenes, RC₆H₄CH = C(CN)2 (where R is 2-F, 2-CN, 3-CN, 4-CN, 3-C₆H₅O, 4-C₆H₅O, 2-C₆H₅CH₂O, 3-C₆H₅CH₂O, 4-C₆H₅CH₂O, 4-CH₃CO₂, 4-CH₃CONH, 4-(CH₃)₂N) and styrene were prepared by solution copolymerization in the presence of a radical initiator (ABCN) at 70°C. The composition of the copolymers was calculated from nitrogen analysis, and the structures were analyzed by IR, ¹H and ¹³C-NMR. The order of relative reactivity (1/r ₁) for the monomers is 4-(CH₃)₂N (3.35) > 4-C₆H₅CH₂O (3.1) > 2-C₆H₅CH₂O (1.77) > 3-C₆H₅CH₂O (1.72) > 4-C₆H₅O (1.70) > 4-CH₃CO₂ (1.58) > 2-F (1.11) > 3-C₆H₅O (0.90) > 3-CN (0.88) > 2-CN (0.86) > 4-CH₃CONH (0.84) > 4-CN (0.76). Relatively high T_g of the copolymers in comparison with that of polystyrene indicates a decrease in chain mobility of the copolymer due to the high dipolar character of the trisubstituted ethylene monomer unit. Decomposition of the copolymers in nitrogen occurred in two steps, first in the 200–500°C range with residue (1–10% wt), which then decomposed in the 500–800°C range.     

Compatibility studies of styrene and hydroxyl containing styrene copolymers with poly(ethylene oxide)

Copolymers of styrene with vinylphenyl trifluoromethyl carbinol, p-vinylphenyl trifluoromethyl carbinol, vinylphenyl hexafluorodimethyl carbinol, and p-vinylphenol are conditionally compatible with poly(ethylene oxide), depending on their composition and blending ratios, whereas copolymers of styrene and vinylphenyl methyl carbinol are much less compatible with poly(ethylene oxide), as determined by T_g criteria and differential scanning calorimetry. The crystallinity of poly(ethylene oxide) is changed in the copolymer/poly(ethylene oxide) blends, as indicated by depressions of the poly(ethylene oxide) melting point. Hydrogen-bond formation has been studied in two selected blends by infrared (IR) spectroscopy. Hydrogen bonding dissociation and reassociation as a function of temperature are reported. The conformation changes of poly(ethylene oxide) in the blends, the interaction between copolymer and poly(ethylene oxide) as well as in the reference blend, polystyrene/poly(ethylene oxide), are also investigated.     

Anionic copolymerization of [60]fullerene with styrene initiated by sodium naphthalene

The novel C₆₀–styrene copolymers with different C₆₀ contents were prepared in sodium naphthalene-initiated anionic polymerization reactions. Like the pure polystyrene, these copolymers exhibited the high solvency in many common organic solvents, even for the copolymer with high C₆₀ content. In the polymerization process of C₆₀ with styrene an important side reaction, i.e., reaction of C₆₀ with sodium naphthalene, would occur simultaneously, whereas crosslinking reaction may be negligible. ¹³C-NMR results provided an evidence that C₆₀ was incorporated covalently into the polystyrene backbone. In contrast to pure polystyrene, the TGA spectrum of copolymer containing ∼ 13% of C₆₀ shows two plateaus. The polystyrene chain segment in copolymer decomposed first at 300–400°C. Then the fullerene units reptured from the corresponding polystyrene fragments attached directly to the C₆₀ cores at 500–638°C. XRD evidence indicates that the degree of order of polymers increases with the fullerene content increased in terms of crystallography. Incorporation of C₆₀ into polystyrene results in the formation of new crystal gratings or crystallization phases. In addition, it was also found that [60]fullerene and its polyanion salts [C₆₀ⁿ⁻(M⁺)_n, M = Li, Na] cannot be used to initiate the anionic polymerization of some monomers such as acrylonitrile and styrene, etc.© 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 36: 2653–2663, 1998     

Novel Copolymers of Styrene. 8. Some Ring-Disubstituted Ethyl 2-Cyano-3-Phenyl-2-Propenoates

Electrophilic trisubstituted ethylenes, ring-disubstituted ethyl 2-cyano-3-phenyl-2-propenoates, RPhCH?C(CN)CO₂C₂H₅ (where R is 3-Br-4-CH₃O, 5-Br-2-CH₃O, 3-F-2- CH₃, 3-F-4-CH₃, 4-F-2-CH₃, 4-F-3-CH₃, 5-F-2-CH₃, 2-Cl-5-NO₂, 2-Cl-6-NO₂, 4-Cl-3- NO₂) were prepared and copolymerized with styrene. The monomers were synthesized by the piperidine catalyzed Knoevenagel condensation of ring-disubstituted benzaldehydes and ethyl cyanoacetate, and characterized by CHN analysis, IR, ¹H and ¹³C-NMR. All the ethylenes were copolymerized with styrene (M₁) in solution with radical initiation (ABCN) at 70°C. The composition of the copolymers was calculated from nitrogen analysis, and the structures were analyzed by IR, ¹H and ¹³C-NMR. The order of relative reactivity (1/r ₁) for the monomers is 5-Br-2-CH₃O (1.02) > 4-Cl-3-NO₂ (0.93) > 3-F-4-CH₃ (0.81) > 2-Cl-6-NO₂ (0.77) > 2-Cl-5-NO₂ (0.71) > 3-Br-4-CH₃O (0.66) > 4-F-3-CH₃ (0.60) > 3-F-2-CH₃ (0.38) > 4-F-2-CH₃ (0.31) > 5-F-2-CH₃ (0.16). Relatively high T_g of the copolymers in comparison with that of polystyrene indicates a decrease in chain mobility of the copolymer due to the high dipolar character of the trisubstituted ethylene monomer unit. Decomposition of the copolymers in nitrogen occurred in two steps, first in the 250–500°C range with residue (2–26% wt.), which then decomposed in the 500–800°C range.     

Donor–acceptor complexes in copolymerization. XLIX. Cationic polymerization of donor monomers in presence of polar solvents and acrylic monomers. A revised mechanism for polymerization of comonomer complexes

α-Methylstyrene (MS) and isobutyl vinyl ether (VE) readily polymerize, styrene (S) polymerizes to a small extent, and isobutylene (IB), butadiene (BD), and isoprene (IP) fail to polymerize in the presence of catalytic amounts of AlCl₃ when propionitrile, ethyl propionate, and methyl isobutyrate are used as reaction media. MS polymerizes readily and S polymerizes with difficulty in the presence of AlCl₃ to yield homopolymers when acrylonitrile (AN) is present and copolymers with ethyl acrylate (EA) and methyl methacrylate (MMA). VE readily homopolymerizes, while IB, BD, and IP fail to polymerize in the presence of AlCl₃ and the acrylic monomers. VE readily homopolymerizes, S and MS polymerize to a very small extent, and IB, BD, and IP do not polymerize in the presence of ethylaluminum sesquichloride (EASC) in polar solvents. VE readily homopolymerizes in the presence of EASC and the acrylic monomers. MS polymerizes to a small extent in the presence of EASC and the acrylic monomers to yield equimolar copolymers with EA and MMA and a mixture of cationic homopolymer and equimolar copolymer with AN. S yields equimolar copolymers in low yield in the presence of EASC and the acrylic monomers. IB, BD, and IP in the presence of EASC do not polymerize to any significant extent when EA is present, form AN-rich copolymers and yield poly(methyl methacrylate) in the presence of MMA. A revised mechanism is presented for the formation of cationic, radical, random, and alternating copolymers as well as alternating copolymer graft copolymers in the copolymerization of donor and acceptor monomers.     

Styrene and isoprene friction factors in styrene–isoprene matrices

Monomeric friction factors, Ξ, for polystyrene (PS), polyisoprene (PI), and a polystyrene–polyisoprene (SI) diblock copolymer have been determined as a function of temperature in four poly(styrene-b-isoprene-b-styrene-b-isoprene) tetrablock copolymer matrices. The Rouse model has been used to calculate the friction factors from tracer diffusion coefficients measured by forced Rayleigh scattering. Within the experimental temperature range the tetrablock copolymers are disordered, allowing for measurement of the diffusion coefficient in matrices with average compositions determined by the tetrablock copolymers (23, 42, 60, and 80% styrene by volume). Remarkably, for a given matrix composition the styrene and isoprene friction factors are essentially equivalent. Furthermore, at a constant interval from the system glass transition temperature, T_g, all of the friction factors (obtained from homopolymer, diblock copolymer, and tetrablock copolymer dynamics) agree to within an order of magnitude. This is in marked contrast to results for miscible polymer blends, where the individual components generally have distinct composition dependences and magnitudes at constant T − T_g. The homopolymer friction factors in the tetrablock matrices were systematically slightly higher than those of the diblock, which in turn were slightly higher than those of the homopolymers in their respective melts, when all compared at constant T − T_g. This is attributed to the local spatial distribution of styrene and isoprene segments in the tetrablocks, which presents a nonuniform free energy surface to the tracer molecules. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 36: 3079–3086, 1998     

Alternating copolymer of styrene–acrylonitrile obtained with vanadium-based complex catalyst in presence of monomers

Vanadium-based catalyst complexes prepared in the presence of monomers have been used for the copolymerization of styrene and acrylonitrile. VOCl₃–Al(i-C₄H₉)₃ catalyst system seems to yield an alternating copolymer. The copolymers are easily soluble in DMF and have low softening points.     

Synthesis of arborescent styrene homopolymers and copolymers from epoxidized substrates

The synthesis of arborescent styrenic homopolymers and copolymers was achieved by anionic polymerization and grafting. Styrene and p‐(3‐butenyl)styrene were first copolymerized using sec‐butyllithium in toluene, to generate a linear copolymer with a weight‐average molecular weight M_w = 4000 and M_w/M_n = 1.05. The pendant double bonds of the copolymer were then epoxidized with m‐chloroperbenzoic acid. A comb‐branched (or arborescent generation G0) copolymer was obtained by coupling the epoxidized substrate with living styrene‐p‐(3‐butenyl)styrene copolymer chains with M_w ≈ 5000 in a toluene/tetrahydrofuran mixture. Further cycles of epoxidation and coupling reactions while maintaining M_w ≈ 5000 for the side chains yielded arborescent copolymers of generations G1–G3. A series of arborescent styrene homopolymers was also obtained by grafting M_w ≈ 5000 polystyrene side chains onto the linear and G0–G2 copolymer substrates. Size exclusion chromatography measurements showed that the graft polymers have low polydispersity indices (M_w/M_n = 1.02–1.15) and molecular weights increasing geometrically over successive generations. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem, 2012     

Microphase separation in poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene) (ABS) studied with paramagnetic spin probes. I. Electron spin resonance spectra

Microphase separation in poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene) (ABS) was studied as a function of the butadiene content and method of preparation with electron spin resonance (ESR) spectra of nitroxide spin probes. Results for the ABS polymers were evaluated by comparison with similar studies of the homopolymers polybutadiene (PB), polystyrene (PS), and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and the copolymers poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) and poly(styrene‐co‐butadiene) (SB). Two spin probes were selected for this study: 10‐doxylnonadecane (10DND) and 5‐doxyldecane (5DD). The probes varied in size and were selected because their hydrocarbon backbone made them compatible with the polymers studied. The ESR spectra were measured in the temperature range 120–420 K and were analyzed in terms of line shapes, line widths, and hyperfine splitting from the ¹⁴N nucleus; the appearance of more than one spectral component was taken as an indication of microphase separation. Only one spectral component was detected for 10DND in PB, PS, and PAN and in the copolymers SAN and SB. In contrast, two spectral components differing in their dynamic properties were detected for both probes in the three types of ABS samples studied and were assigned to spin probes located in butadiene‐rich domains (the fast component) and SAN‐rich domains (the slow component). The behavior of the fast component in ABS prepared by mass polymerization suggested that the low‐T_g (glass‐transition‐temperature) phase was almost pure PB. The corresponding phase in ABS prepared by emulsion grafting also contained styrene and acrylonitrile monomers. A redistribution of the spin probes on heating occurred with heating near the T_g of the SAN phase, suggesting that the ABS polymers as prepared were not in thermodynamic equilibrium. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 40: 415–423, 2002; DOI 10.1002/polb.10109     

Novel Copolymers of Styrene. 3. Some Ring-Substituted Butyl 2-Cyano-3-Phenyl-2-Propenoates

Novel trisubstituted ethylenes, ring-substituted butyl 2-cyano-3-phenyl-2-propenoates, RPhCH=C(CN)CO₂C₄H₉ (where R is 2-C₆H₅CH₂O, 3-C₆H₅CH₂O, 4-C₆H₅CH₂O, 4-CH₃COO, 3-CH₃CO, 4-CH₃CO, 4-CH₃CONH, 2-CN, 3-CN, 4-CN, 4-(CH₃)₂N, 4-(C₂H₅)₂N) were prepared and copolymerized with styrene. The monomers were synthesized by the piperidine catalyzed Knoevenagel condensation of ring-substituted benzaldehydes and butyl cyanoacetate, and characterized by CHN analysis, IR, ¹H and ¹³C-NMR. All the ethylenes were copolymerized with styrene (M₁) in solution with radical initiation (ABCN) at 70°C. The compositions of the copolymers were calculated from nitrogen analysis and the structures were analyzed by IR, ¹H and ¹³C-NMR. The order of relative reactivity (1/r₁) for the monomers is 4-C₆H₅CH₂O (6.39) > 2-C₆H₅CH₂O (2.06) > 3-CH₃CO (1.86) > 3-C₆H₅CH₂O (1.78) > 4-CH₃COO (1.58) > 3-CN (1.47) > 4-CN (1.21) > 4-(C₂H₅)₂N (1.19) > 4-(CH₃)₂N (1.18) > 2-CN (1.04) > 4-CH₃CO (0.71) > 4-CH₃CONH (0.63). Decomposition of the copolymers in nitrogen occurred in two steps, first in the 200–500°C range with residue (3.6–9.5% wt), which then decomposed in the 500–800°C range.     

Intramolecular interactions in poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile)/poly(ε-caprolactone) blends

Specific interactions in blends of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(styrene-co-acry-lonitrile) (SAN) were studied as a function of copolymer composition and blend ratio by using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). It was shown that miscibility occurred within a certain range of copolymer compositions because the presence of PCL reduced the thermodynamically unfavorable repulsion between styrene and acrylonitrile segments in the random copolymer. This effect was observed in terms of a shift to higher frequencies in the 700 cm^-1 γ-CH out-of-plane deformation vibration absorption of styrene and in the approximately 2236 cm^?1 C?N stretching frequency band in acrylonitrile segments. Specific intermolecular interactions between SAN and PCL were not observed in this study. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.