Synthese und Molekülstruktur von [{Cp′(μ‐η1 : η5‐C5H3Me)Mo(μ‐AlRH)}2] (Cp′ = C5H4Me,R = iBu,Et)

Synthesis and Molecular Structure of [{Cp′(μ‐η¹ : η⁵‐C₅H₃Me)Mo(μ‐AlRH)}₂] (Cp′ = C₅H₄Me, R = ⁱBu, Et) [Cp′₂MoH₂] reacts with HAlR₂ to give [{Cp′(μ‐η¹ : η⁵‐C₅H₃Me)Mo(μ‐AlRH)}₂] (Cp′ = C₅H₄Me, R = ⁱBu ( 1 ), Et ( 2 )). Crystal structure determinations were carried out on [Cp′₂MoH₂] and 1 . 1 exhibits a direct Mo–Al bond (2.636(2) Å).     

Zur Reaktivität von Titanocenkomplexen [Ti(Cp′)2(η2‐Me3SiC≡CSiMe3)] (Cp′ = Cp,Cp*) gegenüber Benzoldicarbonsäuren

On the Reactivity of Titanocene Complexes [Ti(Cp′)₂(η²‐Me₃SiC≡CSiMe₃)] (Cp′ = Cp, Cp*) towards Benzenedicarboxylic Acids Titanocene complexes [Ti(Cp′)₂(BTMSA)] ( 1a , Cp′ = Cp = η⁵‐C₅H₅; 1b , Cp′ = Cp* = η⁵‐C₅Me₅; BTMSA = Me₃SiC≡CSiMe₃) were found to react with iodine and methyl iodide yielding [Ti(Cp′)₂(μ‐I)₂] ( 2a / b ; a refers to Cp′ = Cp and b to Cp′ = Cp*), [Ti(Cp′)₂I₂] ( 3a / b ) and [Ti(Cp′)₂(Me)I] ( 4a / b ), respectively. In contrast to 2a , complex 2b proved to be highly moisture sensitive yielding with cleavage of HCp* [{Ti(Cp*)I}₂(μ‐O)] ( 7 ). The corresponding reactions of 1a / b with p‐cresol and thiophenol resulted in the formation of [Ti(Cp′)₂{O(p‐Tol)}₂] ( 5a / b ) and [Ti(Cp′)₂(SPh)₂] ( 6a / b ), respectively. Reactions of 1a and 1b with 1,n‐benzenedicarboxylic acids (n = 2–4) resulted in the formation of dinuclear titanium(III) complexes of the type [{Ti(Cp′)₂}₂{μ‐1,n‐(O₂C)₂C₆H₄}] (n = 2, 8a / b ; n = 3, 9a / b ; n = 4, 10a / b ). All complexes were fully characterized analytically and spectroscopically. Furthermore, complexes 7 , 8b , 9a ·THF, 10a / b were also be characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses.     

Pentafulvenkomplexe des Titans — Synthese,Struktur und Fluktuierendes Verhalten von Cp′Ti{η6‐C5H4=C(p‐Tol)2}Cl (Cp′ = Cp*, Cp)

Complexes of Titanium — Synthesis, Structure, and Fluxional Behaviour of CpTi{η⁶‐C₅H₄=C(p‐Tol)₂}Cl (Cp′ = Cp*, Cp) The reaction of Cp′TiCl₃ (C′ = Cp* or Cp) with magnesium and 6, 6‐di‐para‐tolylpentafulvene generates good yields of pentafulvene complexes Cp*Ti{η⁶‐C₅H₄=C(p‐Tol)₂}Cl ( 4 ) and CpTi{η⁶‐C₅H₄=C(p‐Tol)₂}Cl ( 5 ), respectively. The crystal and molecular structure of 4 have been determined from X‐ray data and exhibits compared to known η⁶‐pentafulvene complexes an unusual large Ti—C(p‐Tol)₂ (Fv)‐distance (2.535(5)Å) evoked by the bulky substituents at the exocyclic carbon. Dynamic ¹H‐NMR and spin saturation transfer experiments point out a rotation of the fulvene ligand around the Ti—Ct2 axis (Ct2 = centroid of the fulvene ring carbon atoms) with an activation barrier ΔG^≠_C = 60.6 ± 0.5 kJ mol⁻¹ (T_C = 314 ± 2 K). For 5 this barrier is significantly larger. Analogous dynamic behaviour is well known for diene complexes, but to our knowledge, it is here first‐time described for a pentafulvene complex.     

Synthese und Molekülstruktur des heterobimetallischen sulfidoacetato‐verbrückten Zr,Mo‐Komplexes [Cp°2Zr(OOCCH2S‐κ2O,S)(μ‐O‐OOCCH2S‐κ1O, κ2O′, S)(MoCp′2)] (Cp° = C5EtMe4, Cp′ = C5MeH4)

Synthesis and Molecular Structure of the Heterobimetallic Sulfidoacetato‐bridged Zr, Mo Complex [Cp°₂Zr(OOCCH₂S‐κ²O, S)(μ‐O‐OOCCH₂S‐κ¹O, κ²O′, S)(MoCp′₂)] (Cp° = C₅EtMe₄, Cp′ = C₅MeH₄) The reaction of [Cp°₂Zr(OOCCH₂SH‐κ¹O)(OOCCH₂SH‐κ²O, O′)] with [Cp′₂MoH₂] yields the dinuclear Zr^IV/Mo^IV complex [Cp°₂Zr(OOCCH₂S‐κ²O, S)(μ‐O‐OOCCH₂S‐κ¹O, κ²O′, S)(MoCp′₂)] ( 1 ) (Cp° = C₅EtMe₄, Cp′ = C₅MeH₄). For comparison of NMR data, [Cp′₂Mo(OOCCH₂S‐κ²O, S)] ( 2 ) was prepared from [Cp′₂MoH₂] and mercaptoacetic acid. 1 and 2 were characterized spectroscopically (¹H, ¹³C NMR and IR) and a crystal structure determination was carried out on 1 .     

Unerwartete Reduktion von [Cp*TaCl4(PH2R)] (R = But,Cy, Ad,Ph, 2,4,6‐Me3C6H2; Cp* = C5Me5) durch Reaktion mit DBU – Molekülstruktur von [(DBU)H][Cp*TaCl4] (DBU = 1,8‐Diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec‐7‐en)

Unexpected Reduction of [Cp*TaCl₄(PH₂R)] (R = Bu^t, Cy, Ad, Ph, 2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂; Cp* = C₅Me₅) by Reaction with DBU – Molecular Structure of [(DBU)H][Cp*TaCl₄] (DBU = 1,8‐diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec‐7‐ene) [Cp*TaCl₄(PH₂R)] (R = Bu^t, Cy, Ad, Ph, 2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂ (Mes); Cp* = C₅Me₅) react with DBU in an internal redox reaction with formation of [(DBU)H][Cp*TaCl₄] ( 1 ) (DBU = 1,8‐diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec‐7‐ene) and the corresponding diphosphane (P₂H₂R₂) or decomposition products thereof. 1 was characterised spectroscopically and by crystal structure determination. In the solid state, hydrogen bonding between the (DBU)H cation and one chloro ligand of the anion is observed.     

Mononuclear Carbene Dithiolate [Ni(NHX)(′S2C ′)] Complexes with HNX = HNPiPr3 or HNSPh2 Coligands (′S2C ′ 2– = 1,3‐ImidazolidinylN,N′‐bis(2‐benzenethiolate)(2–))

Cleavage reactions of the dinuclear [{Ni(′S₂C ′)}₂] · DMF (′S₂C ′ ^2– = 1,3‐imidazolidinyl‐N,N′‐bis(2‐benzenethiolate)(2–)) with HNPiPr₃ or HNSPh₂ yielded the mononuclear complexes [Ni(NHPiPr₃)(′S₂C ′)] ( 1 ) and [Ni(NHSPh₂)(′S₂C ′)] ( 2 ) which have been completely characterized. The nickel‐carbene‐dithiolate [Ni(′S₂C ′)] moiety is one of the very rare complex fragments that are able to coordinate both HNPR₃ or HNSR₂. IR spectra and X‐ray structure determinations show that 1 and 2 exhibit intramolecular N–H…S(thiolate) hydrogen bonds. Geometric parameters and NMR spectroscopic data of 1 and 2 are compatible with N–X single bonds and ylidic structures of the HNPiPr₃ and HNSPh₂ ligands. Comparison of Ni–N distances in diamagnetic and paramagnetic [Ni(NHSPh₂)] complexes was rendered possible through the X‐ray structure determination of the homoleptic [Ni(NHSPh₂)₆]Cl₂ ( 3 ) which formed as minor by‐product in the synthesis of 2 .     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Synthese und strukturelle Studien von Aluminiumdialkylaminen und ‐amiden: N‐Chiralität von (CH3)3AlNHRR′ und cis‐trans‐Isomerie an X2AlNRR′ (X = CH3, Cl,H)

Synthesis and Structural Studies of Aluminum Dialkylamines and Dialkylamides: N‐Chirality of (CH₃)₃AlNHRR′ and cis‐trans ‐Isomerism at X₂AlNRR′ (X = CH₃, Cl, H) Aluminum dialkylamines and dialkylamides were prepared from Al(CH₃)₃ and NH(CH₃)R′ (R′: –C₂H₅, –^tC₄H₉) and characterized by elemental analyses, ¹H‐, ¹³C‐, and ²⁷Al‐NMR spectroscopy. The crystal structures of [(CH₃)₂AlN(CH₃)(–^tC₄H₉)]₂ ( IV ), [Cl₂AlN(CH₃)(C₂H₅)]₂ ( V ), and [H₂AlN(CH₃)(C₂H₅)]_∞ ( VI‐trans and VI‐cis ) are discussed.     

Sekundäre Hydroxyalkylphosphane: Synthese und Charakterisierung mono‐, bis‐ und trisalkoxyphosphan‐substituierter Zirconiumkomplexe und des heterobimetallischen Dreikernkomplexes [Cp2Zr{O(CH2)3PHMes(AuCl)}2]

Secondary Hydroxyalkylphosphanes: Synthesis and Characterization of Mono‐, Bis‐ and Trisalkoxyphosphane‐substituted Zirconium Complexes and the Heterobimetallic Trinuclear Complex [Cp₂Zr{O(CH₂)₃PHMes(AuCl)}₂] The secondary hydroxyalkylphosphanes RPHCH₂OH [R = 2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂ (Mes) ( 1 ), 2,4,6‐ⁱPr₃C₆H₂ (Tipp) ( 2 )], 1‐AdPH‐2‐OH‐cyclo‐C₆H₁₀ ( 3 ) and RPH(CH₂)₃OH [R = Ph ( 4 ), Mes ( 5 ), Tipp ( 6 ), Cy ( 7 ), ^tBu ( 8 )] were obtained from primary phosphanes RPH₂ and formaldehyde ( 1 , 2 ) or from LiPHR and cyclohexene oxide ( 3 ) or trimethylene oxide ( 4 ‐ 8 ). Starting from 5 or 7 and [Cp^R₂ZrMe₂] [Cp^R = C₅EtMe₄ (Cp°), C₅H₅ (Cp), C₅MeH₄ (Cp′)], the monoalkoxyphosphane‐substituted zirconocene complexes [Cp^R₂Zr(Me){O(CH₂)₃PHMes}] [Cp^R = Cp° ( 9 ), Cp ( 10 )] were prepared. With [Cp^R₂ZrCl₂], the bisalkoxyphosphane‐substituted complexes [Cp′₂Zr{O(CH₂)₃PHMes}₂] ( 11 ) and [Cp₂Zr{O(CH₂)₃PHCy}₂] ( 12 ) are obtained, and with [Tp^RZrCl₃], the trisalkoxyphosphane‐substituted zirconium complexes [Tp^RZr{O(CH₂)₃PHMes}₃] [Tp^R = trispyrazolylborato (Tp) ( 13 ), Tp^R = tris(3,5‐dimethyl)pyrazolylborato (Tp*) ( 14 )] are prepared. The reaction of 5 with [AuCl(tht)] (tht = tetrahydrothiophene) yielded the mononuclear complex [AuCl{PHMes(CH₂)₃OH}] ( 15 ). The trinuclear complex [Cp₂Zr{O(CH₂)₃PHMes(AuCl)}₂] ( 16 ) was obtained from [Cp₂ZrCl₂] and 15 . Compounds 1 ‐ 16 were characterized spectroscopically (¹H‐, ³¹P‐, ¹³C‐NMR; IR; MS) and compound 2 also by crystal structure determination. The bis‐ and trisalkoxyphosphane‐substituted complexes 11‐14 and 16 were obtained as mixtures of two diastereomers which could not be separated.     

Molecular Structures of Mononuclear Rhodium Complexes Containing the Polydentate Ligand Tri(1‐cyclohepta‐2,4,6‐trienyl)phosphane,P(C7H7)3. Classification according to the 31P Chemical Shifts

The olefinic phosphane P(C₇H₇)₃ ( 5 ) behaves as a tetradentate tripod ligand in [RhCl{P(η²‐C₇H₇)₃}] ( 6 ), using all 3 cyclohepta‐2,4,6‐trienyl substituents as η²‐coordinating side‐arms. Nucleophilic displacement of the one‐electron chloro ligand by halides or pseudohalides to give [RhX{P(η²‐C₇H₇)₃}] (X = Br ( 7a ), I ( 7b ), N₃ ( 7c ), NCO ( 7d )) leaves the basket‐like framework [Rh{P(η²‐C₇H₇)₃}] intact. Reactions of 6 with three‐electron ligands result in decomplexation of one cyclohepta‐2,4,6‐trienyl ring and formation of [Rh(L³){P(C₇H₇)(η²‐C₇H₇)₂}] (L³ = acetylacetonate ( 8 ), 2‐carboethoxy cyclopentanonate ( 8a )), reactions of 6 with five‐electron ligands such as η⁵‐C₅H₅ cause decomplexation of two olefinic side‐arms to give [Rh(L⁵){P(C₇H₇)₂(η²‐C₇H₇)}] (L⁵ = η⁵‐C₅H₅ (Cp) ( 9 ), η⁵‐C₅H₄^tBu ( 9a )). The last remaining chelate ring in 9 is opened by pressure‐carbonylation to give the adduct [Rh(Cp)(CO){P(C₇H₇)₃}] ( 10 ) or by oxidative addition of halogens to form [Rh(Cp)X₂{P(C₇H₇)₃}] (X = Br, I). The full set of ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, and ¹⁰³Rh NMR data is given for the prototype complexes 7a , 8 , 9 , and 10 , and the molecular geometries of the [Rh{P(C₇H₇)₃}] fragments are compared on the basis of the X‐ray structural determinations of 6 , 8 , 8a , 9 , 9a , and 10 . The chemical shifts δ(³¹P) provide a reliable parameter for the prediction of the molecular structures of the rhodium complexes in solution.     

Synthese und Insertionsreaktionen von Cp2′HfCl{As(SiMe3)2} (Cp′ = C5H4Me)

Synthesis and Insertion Reactions of Cp₂′HfCl{As(SiMe₃)₂} (Cp′ = C₅H₄Me) The reaction of Cp₂′HfCl₂ (Cp′ = C₅H₄Me) with Li(THF)_2,5As(SiMe₃)₂ (1 : 1) at room temperature gives the terminal hafnocene arsenido complex Cp₂′HfCl{As(SiMe₃)₂} ( 1 ) in high yield. 1 inserts CS₂ and PhNC into the Hf? As bond yielding Cp₂′HfCl{η²-S₂CAs(SiMe₃)₂} ( 2 ) and Cp₂′HfCl{η²-N(Ph)CAs(SiMe₃)₂} ( 3 ). The thermally sensitive complexes 1–3 were characterised spectroscopically and crystal structure determinations were carried out on 1 and 3 which shows the η² bonding mode of the N(Ph)CAs(SiMe₃)₂ ligand in the latter.     

[CpR(OC)Mo(μ‐η2:2‐P2)2FeCpR′] als Edukt für heterobimetallische Zweikerncluster mit P2‐ und CnRnP4‐n‐Liganden (n = 1, 2)

[Cp^R(OC)Mo(μ‐η^2:2‐P₂)₂FeCp^R′] as Educt for Heterobimetallic Dinuclear Clusters with P₂ and C_nR_nP_4‐n Ligands (n = 1, 2) The cothermolysis of [Cp^R(OC)Mo(μ‐η^2:2‐P₂)₂FeCp^R′] ( 1 ) and tBuC≡P ( 2 ) as well as PhC≡CPh ( 3 ) affords the heterobimetallic triple‐decker like dinuclear clusters [(Cp'''Mo)(Cp*′Fe)(P₃CtBu)(P₂)] ( 4 ), Cp''' = C₅H₂tBu₃‐1,2,4, Cp*′ = C₅Me₄Et, and [(Cp*Mo)(Cp*Fe)(P₂C₂Ph₂)(P₂)] ( 5 ) with a bridging tri‐ and diphosphabutadiendiyl ligand. 4 and 5 have been characterized additionally by X‐ray crystallography.     

Synthesis and Structure of the Tetrameric [Cp*V(μ‐F)2]4 (Cp* = C5Me5); Preparation of the Imido Molybdenum Fluoride [(2,6‐i‐Pr2C6H3N)2MoF2] · THF and the Structural Investigation of [(2,6‐i‐Pr2C6H3N)6Mo4(μ3‐F)2Me2(μ‐O)4]

Treating [Cp*V(μ‐Cl)₂]₃ (Cp* = C₅Me₅) and [(2,6‐i‐Pr₂C₆H₃N)₂MoMe₂], respectively, with Me₃SnF afforded the title compounds [Cp*V(μ‐F)₂]₄ ( 1 ) and [(2,6‐i‐Pr₂C₆H₃N)₂MoF₂] · THF ( 2 ). 1 has a tetrameric structure, in which four V atoms can be regarded as being arranged at the vertices of a distorted tetrahedron, with four long edges bridged by one F atom and each of the other two short edges bridged by two F atoms with a mean V–F bond length of 2.00 Å. A hydrolyzed product of 2 , [(2,6‐i‐Pr₂C₆H₃N)₆Mo₄(μ₃‐F)₂Me₂(μ‐O)₄] ( 3 ) was characterized by elemental analyses and X‐ray single crystal study. The X‐ray diffraction analysis reveals that 3 has a unique tetranuclear structure, containing two five and two six coordinated Mo atoms connecting each other by four μ‐O and two μ₃‐F atoms. The geometries around the two Mo atoms can be described having distorted trigonal bipyramidal and distorted octahedral coordination spheres, respectively. The Mo–(μ‐O) bond lengths are 1.813 Å (average) for five coordinated Mo atoms and 2.030 Å (average) for those of six coordinated, respectively, indicating an additional π bonding between five coordinated Mo atoms and the μ‐O atoms. The Mo–(μ₃‐F) distances range from 2.291 to 2.352 Å.     

Organometallic Molybdenum(V) Complexes with Primary Phosphine Ligands. Syntheses,Spectroscopic Properties and Molecular Structures of [Cp°MoCl4(PH2R)] (R = But, 1‐Ad,Cy, Ph, 2, 4, 6‐Me3C6H2, 2, 4, 6‐Pri3C6H2, Cp° = C5EtMe4)

[Cp°MoCl₄] (Cp° = C₅EtMe₄) reacts with primary phosphines PH₂R to give the paramagnetic phosphine complexes [Cp°MoCl₄(PH₂R)] [Cp° = C₅EtMe₄, R = Bu^t ( 1 ), 1‐Ad (1‐Ad = 1‐adamantyl; 2 ), Cy ( 3 ), Ph ( 4 ), Mes (Mes = 2, 4, 6‐Me₃C₆H₂; 5 ), Tipp (Tipp = 2, 4, 6‐Prⁱ₃C₆H₂; 6 )]. 1 — 6 were characterized spectroscopically (IR, MS), and X‐ray crystal structures were determined for 1 — 4 and 6 . EPR investigations in liquid and frozen solution confirmed the presence of Mo^V species, and the data were used to analyze the spin‐density distribution in the first coordination sphere. Complexes 3 and 4 react with two equivalents of NEt₃ with formation of [Cp°MoCl₂(η³‐P₄Cy₄H)] ( 7 ) and [Cp°₂Mo₂(μ‐Cl)₂(μ‐P₄Ph₄)] ( 8 ), respectively, in low yield. Complexes 7 and 8 were characterized by X‐ray crystallography.     

Molekül‐ und Kristallstruktur von Bis[chloro(μ‐phenylimido)(η5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)tantal(IV)](Ta–Ta), [{TaCl(μ‐NPh)Cp*}2]

Molecular and Crystal Structure of Bis[chloro(μ‐phenylimido)(η⁵‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)tantalum(IV)](Ta–Ta), [{TaCl(μ‐NPh)Cp*}₂] Despite the steric hindrance of the central atom in [TaCl₂(NPh)Cp*] (Ph = C₆H₅, Cp* = η⁵‐C₅(CH₃)₅), caused by the Cp* ligand, the imido‐ligand takes a change in bond structure when this educt is reduced to the binuclear complex [{TaCl(μ‐NPh)Cp*}₂] in which tantalum is stabilized in the unusual oxidation state +4.     

2,2′‐Anhydro‐1‐(3′,5′‐di‐O‐acetyl‐β‐D‐arabinofuranosyl)uracil,a cyclouridine nucleoside with a C4′‐endo furanosyl conformation

2,2′‐Anhydro‐1‐(3′,5′‐di‐O‐acetyl‐β‐D‐arabinofuranosyl)uracil, C₁₃H₁₄N₂O₇, was obtained by refluxing 2′,3′‐O‐(methoxymethylene)uridine in acetic anhydride. The structure exhibits a nearly perfect C4′‐endo (⁴E) conformation. The best four‐atom plane of the five‐membered furanose ring is O—C—C—C, involving the C atoms of the fused five‐membered oxazolidine ring, and the torsion angle is only −0.4 (2)°. The oxazolidine ring is essentially coplanar with the six‐membered uracil ring [r.m.s. deviation = 0.012 (5) Å and dihedral angle = −3.2 (3)°]. The conformation at the exocyclic C—C bond is gauche–trans which is stabilized by various C—H...π and C—O...π interactions.     

Untersuchungen zur Darstellung von [CpxSb{M(CO)5}2] (Cpx = Cp,Cp*; M = Cr,W)

Investigations of the Synthesis of [Cp^xSb{M(CO)₅}₂] (Cp^x = Cp, Cp*; M = Cr, W) The reaction of CpSbCl₂ with [Na₂{Cr₂(CO)₁₀}] leads to the chlorostibinidene complex [ClSb{Cr(CO)₅}₂(thf)] ( 1 ), whereas the reaction of CpSbCl₂ with [Na₂{W₂(CO)₁₀}] results in the formation of the complexes [ClSb{W(CO)₅}₃] ( 2 ), [Na(thf)][Cl₂Sb{W(CO)₅}₂] ( 3 ), [ClSb{W(CO)₅}₂(thf)] ( 4 ) and [Sb₂{W(CO)₅}₃] ( 5 ). The stibinidene complex [CpSb{Cr(CO)₅}₂] ( 6 ) is obtained by the reaction of [ClSb{Cr(CO)₅}₂] with NaCp, while its Cp* analogue [Cp*Sb{Cr(CO)₅}₂] ( 7 ) is formed via the metathesis of Cp*SbCl₂ with [Na₂{Cr₂(CO)₁₀}]. The products 2 , 3 , 4 and 7 are additionally characterised by X‐ray structure analyses.     

Synthese und Struktur von η1‐Phosphaallyl‐, η1‐Arsaallylund η1‐Stibaallyleisen‐Komplexen [(η5‐C5Me5)(CO)2Fe–E(SiMe3)C(OSiMe3)=CPh2] (E = P,As, Sb)

Syntheses and Structures of η¹‐Phosphaallyl, η¹‐Arsaallyl, and η¹‐Stibaallyl Iron Complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)C(OSiMe₃)=CPh₂] (E = P, As, Sb) The reaction of equimolar amounts of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 a : E = P; 1 b : As; 1 c : Sb) and diphenylketene afforded the η¹‐phosphaallyl‐, η¹‐arsaallyl‐, and η¹‐stibaallyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)C(OSiMe₃)=CPh₂] ( 2 a : E = P; 2 b : As; 2 c : Sb). The molecular structures of 2 b and 2 c were elucidated by single crystal X‐ray analyses.     

Dreiecksdodekaedrische Heterotri‐ und ‐tetrametall‐Eisen–Ruthenium‐Cluster mit CpR‐ und Pn‐Liganden (n = 5, 4)

Triangulated Dodecahedral Heterotrimetallic‐ and ‐tetrametallic Iron–Ruthenium Clusters with Cp^R and P_n Ligands (n = 5, 4) The cothermolysis of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐P₅)] ( 1 ) and [{Cp″(OC)₂Ru}₂](Ru–Ru) ( 2 ), Cp″ = C₅H₃But₂‐1,3, affords low yields of [Cp″Ru(η⁵‐P₅)] ( 3 ) and [{Cp″Ru}₂P₄] ( 4 ) as well as the triangulated dodecahedral hetero‐ and homotrimetallic clusters [{Cp″Ru}₂{Cp*Fe}P₅] ( 5 ), [{Cp″Ru}₃P₅] ( 6 ), [{Cp*Fe}₂{Cp″Ru}P₅] ( 7 ) and the tetranuclear compound [{Cp″Ru}₃{Cp*Fe}P₄] ( 8 ). X‐ray crystallographic studies show that the P₅ ligand in the distorted M₂M′P₅‐triangulated dodecahedra of 5 and 7 offers an unusual novel coordination mode derived from the educt 1 .     

Chlorido(dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate‐κ2N,N′)(η5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)rhodium(III) chloride 1‐hydroxypyrrolidine‐2,5‐dione disolvate

The title complex, [Rh(C₁₀H₁₅)Cl(C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₄)]Cl·2C₄H₅NO₃, has been synthesized by a substitution reaction of the precursor [bis(2,5‐dioxopyrrolidin‐1‐yl) 2,2′‐bipyridine‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate]chlorido(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)rhodium(III) chloride with NaOCH₃. The Rh^III cation is located in an RhC₅N₂Cl eight‐coordinated environment. In the crystal, 1‐hydroxypyrrolidine‐2,5‐dione (NHS) solvent molecules form strong hydrogen bonds with the Cl⁻ counter‐anions in the lattice and weak hydrogen bonds with the pentamethylcyclopentadienyl (Cp*) ligands. Hydrogen bonding between the Cp* ligands, the NHS solvent molecules and the Cl⁻ counter‐anions form links in a V‐shaped chain of Rh^III complex cations along the c axis. Weak hydrogen bonds between the dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate ligands and the Cl⁻ counter‐anions connect the components into a supramolecular three‐dimensional network. The synthetic route to the dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate‐containing rhodium complex from the [bis(2,5‐dioxopyrrolidin‐1‐yl) 2,2′‐bipyridine‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate]rhodium(III) precursor may be applied to link Rh catalysts to the surface of electrodes.