Komplexchemie P‐reicher Phosphane und Silylphosphane. XXII. Die Bildung von [η2‐{tBu–P=P–SiMe3}Pt(PR3)2]aus (Me3Si)tBuP–P=P(Me)tBu2 und [η2‐{C2H4}Pt(PR3)2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXII. The Formation of [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PR₃)₂] from (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ and [η²‐{C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P = P(Me)^tBu₂ reacts with [η²‐{C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] yielding [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PR₃)₂]. However, there is no indication for an isomer which would be the analogue to the well known [η²‐{^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₃)₂]. The syntheses and NMR data of [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PPh₃)₂] and [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PMe₃)₂] as well as the results of the single crystal structure determination of [η²‐{^tBu–P=P–SiMe₃}Pt(PPh₃)₂] are reported.     

Über Bildung und Reaktionen der CH2Li‐Derivate von tBu2P–P=P(CH3)tBu2 und (Me3Si)tBuP–P=P(CH3)tBu2

Formation and Reactions of the CH₂Li‐Derivatives of ^tBu₂P–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ and (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ With ⁿBuLi, (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 1 ) and ^tBu₂P–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 2 ) yield (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(CH₂Li)^tBu₂ ( 3 ) and ^tBu₂P–P=P(CH₂Li)^tBu₂ ( 4 ), wich react with Me₃SiCl to give (Me₃Si)^tBuP–P=P(CH₂–SiMe₃)^tBu₂ ( 5 ) and ^tBu₂P–P=P(CH₂–SiMe₃)^tBu₂ ( 6 ), respectively. With ^tBu₂P–P(SiMe₃)–P^tBuCl ( 7 ), compound 3 forms 5 as well as the cyclic products [H₂C–P(^tBu)₂=P–P(^tBu)–P^tBu] ( 8 ) and [H₂C–P(^tBu)₂=P–P(P^tBu₂)–P(^tBu)] ( 9 ). Also 3 forms 8 with ^tBuPCl₂. The cleavage of the Me₃Si–P‐bond in 1 by means of C₂Cl₆ or N‐bromo‐succinimide yields (Cl)^tBuP–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 10 ) or (Br)^tBuP–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 11 ), resp. With LiP(SiMe₃)₂, 10 forms (Me₃Si)₂P–P(^tBu)–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 12 ), and Et₂P–P(^tBu)–P=P(CH₃)^tBu₂ ( 13 ) with LiPEt₂. All compounds are characterized by ³¹P NMR Data and mass spectra; the ylide 5 and the THF adduct of 4 additionally by X‐ray structure analyses.     

Zum Einfluß der PR3‐Liganden auf Bildung und Eigenschaften der Phosphinophosphiniden‐Komplexe [{η2‐tBu2P–P}Pt(PR3)2] und [{η2‐tBu2P1–P2}Pt(P3R3)(P4R′3)]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes XXI The Influence of the PR₃ Ligands on Formation and Properties of the Phosphinophosphinidene Complexes [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PR₃)₂] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³R₃)(P⁴R′₃)] (R₃P)₂PtCl₂ and C₂H₄ yield the compounds [{η²‐C₂H₄}Pt(PR₃)₂] (PR₃ = PMe₃, PEt₃, PPhEt₂, PPh₂Et, PPh₂Me, PPh₂ⁱPr, PPh₂^tBu and P(p‐Tol)₃); which react with ^tBu₂P–P=PMe^tBu₂ to give the phosphinophosphinidene complexes [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PMe₃)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PEt₃)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPhEt₂)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂Et)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂Me)₂], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂ⁱPr], [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₂^tBu)₂] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(P(p‐Tol)₃)₂]. [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₃)₂] reacts with PMe₃ and PEt₃ as well as with ^tBu₂PMe, PⁱPr₃ and P(c‐Hex)₃ by substituting one PPh₃ ligand to give [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me₃)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Ph₃)(P⁴Me₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Et₃)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me^tBu₂)(P⁴Ph₃)], [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³ⁱPr₃)(P⁴Ph₃)] and [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³(c‐Hex)₃)(P⁴Ph₃)]. With ^tBu₂PMe, [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(P(p‐Tol)₃)₂] forms [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Me^tBu₂)(P⁴(p‐Tol)₃)]. The NMR data of the compounds are given and discussed with respect to the influence of the PR₃ ligands.     

Reaktionen von tBu2P–P=P(Me)tBu2 mit (Et3P)2NiCl2 und [{η2‐C2H4}Ni(PEt3)2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XXIII. Reactions of ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ with (Et₃P)₂NiCl₂ and [{η²‐C₂H₄}Ni(PEt₃)₂] ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ ( 1 ) forms with (Et₃P)₂NiCl₂ ( 2 ) and Na(Nph) the [μ‐(1,3 : 2,3‐η‐^tBu₂P₄^tBu₂){Ni(PEt₃)Cl}₂] ( 3 ) as main product. Using Na/Hg instead as reducing agent the Ni⁰ compounds [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Ni(PEt₃)₂] ( 4 ), [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P=P–P^tBu₂}Ni(PEt₃)₂] ( 5 ) and [(Et₃P)Ni(μ‐P^tBu₂)]₂ ( 6 ) with four‐membered Ni₂P₂ ring result. [{η²‐C₂H₄}Ni(PEt₃)₂] yields with 1 also 4 . The compounds were characterized by ¹H and ³¹P{¹H} NMR investigations and 3 also by a single crystal X‐ray analysis. It crystallizes triclinic in the space group P 1 with a = 1129.4(2), b = 1256.8(3), c = 1569.5(3) pm, α = 72.44(3)°, β = 70.52(3)° and γ = 74.20(3)°.     

Reaktionen von tBu2P?PP(Br)tBu2 mit Phosphanen. Ein Weg zu unterschiedlich substituierten Phosphinophosphiniden-Phosphoranen

Reactions of ^tBu₂P? P?P(Br)^tBu₂ with Phosphanes A Route to Variously Substituted Phosphinophosphinidene-phosphoranes ^tBu₂P? P?P(Br)^tBu₂ 1 reacts with PR₃ [R₃ = Et₃, ^tBu₃, Ph₃, (NMe₂)₃, (NEt₂)₃, (NEt₂)₂Me, Me₂SiMe₃] according to ^tBu₂P? P?P(Br)^tBu₂ + PR₃ → ^tBu₂P? P?PR₃ + ^tBu₂PBr While 1 decomposes above ?30°C yielding ^tBu₂PBr and the cyclophosphanes (^tBu₂P)₃P₃ and (^tBu₂P)₄P₄, there is no condensation to give any cyclophosphanes from the intermediately formed ^tBu₂P? P in the presence of PR₃. The chlorophosphanes ^tBu₂PCl, ^tBuPPhCl, (Et₂N)₂PCl and Ph₂PCl as well as (CF₃)₂PBr react quite analogously to the above equation yielding ^tBu₂P? P?P(Cl)^tBu₂, ^tBu₂P? P?P^tBuPhCl, ^tBu₂P? P?P(NEt₂)₂Cl and ^tBu₂P? P?P(NEt₂)₂Br.     

Bildung und Strukturen von [{η2‐tBu2P–P=P–PtBu2}Pt(PR3)2]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XVIII. Syntheses and Structures of [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P=P–P^tBu₂}Pt(PR₃)₂] ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ reacts with [{η²‐C₂H₄} · Pt(PR₃)₂] as well as with [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PR₃)₂] yielding [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P=P–P^tBu₂}Pt(PR₃)₂]; PR₃ = PMe₃ 3 a , PEtPh₂ 3 b , 1/2 dppe 3 c , PPh₃ 3 d , P(p‐Tol)₃ 3 e . All compounds are characterized by ¹H and ³¹P NMR spectra, for 3 b and 3 d also crystal structure determinations were performed. 3 b crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (No. 2) with a = 1212.58(7), b = 1430.74(8), c = 1629.34(11) pm, α = 77.321(6), β = 70.469(5), γ = 87.312(6)°. 3 d crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (No. 2) with a = 1122.60(9), b = 1355.88(11), c = 2025.11(14) pm, α = 83.824(9), β = 82.498(9), γ = 67.214(8)°.     

[Co(g5‐Me5C5)(g3‐tBu2PPCH–CH3)] aus [Co(g5‐Me5C5)(g2‐C2H4)2] und tBu2P–P=P(Me)tBu2

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XVII [1] [Co(g⁵‐Me₅C₅)(g³‐^tBu₂PPCH–CH₃)] from [Co(g⁵‐Me₅C₅)(g²‐C₂H₄)₂] and ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅)(η³‐^tBu₂PPCH–CH₃)] 1 is formed in the reaction of [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅)(η²‐C₂H₄)₂] 2 with ^tBu₂P–P 4 (generated from ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ 3 ) by elimination of one C₂H₄ ligand and coupling of the phosphinophosphinidene with the second one. The structure of 1 is proven by ³¹P, ¹³C, ¹H NMR spectra and the X‐ray structure analysis. Within the ligand ^tBu₂P¹P²C¹H–CH₃ in 1 , the angle P1–P2–C1 amounts to 90°. The Co, P1, P2, C1 atoms in 1 look like a „butterfly”︁. The reaction of 2 with a mixture of ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ 3 and ^tBu–C?P 5 yields [Co(η⁵‐Me₅C₅){η⁴‐(^tBuCP)₂}] 6 and 1 . While 6 is spontaneously formed, 1 appears only after complete consumption of 5 .     

Der thermische Zerfall des tBu2P?PP(Me)tBu2

The Thermal Decomposition of ^tBu₂P? P?P(Me)^tBu₂ The thermal decomposition of ^tBu₂P? P?P(Me)^tBu₂ 2 in C₆H₆ at 20°C is detectable after 10 h; ^tBu₂PMe, (^tBu₂P)₂PH and small amounts of the cyclotetraphosphanes P₄(P^tBu₂)₄ and P₄(P^tBu₂)₂ are formed. At 70°C (14 h) 83% of 2 are decomposed, and even 96% after 74 h. The main products are ^tBu₂PMe (68%) and P₄(P^tBu₂)₄ (20%). With 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene as a trapping reagent ^tBu₂PMe (62%) is still the main product, however, P₄(P^tBu₂)₄ is no longer found, but 1,2-bis(di-tert-butylphosphino)-4,5-dimethyl-1,2-diphosphacyclohexene-4 (22%) is formed instead. Also with cyclohexene ^tBu₂PMe (78%) remains the major product besides P₄(P^tBu₂)₄ (9%) and small amounts of the trapping product 7-di-tert-butylphosphino-7-phosphabicyclo[4.1.0]heptane. Thus, the thermal decomposition of 2 at 70°C proceeds very similar to that of ^tBu₂P? P?P(Br)^tBu₂ at ?30°C and starts yielding and the phosphinophosphinidene ^tBu₂P? P. In CH₂Cl₂ the decomposition of 2 includes the chlorination of the ylidic molecule.     

Reactions of tBu2P–PLi–PtBu2 with [(Et3P)2MCl2] (M = Ni,Pd, Pt). Synthesis and Properties of [(1,2‐η‐tBu2P=P–PtBu2)M(PEt3)Cl] (M=Ni,Pd)

^tBu₂P–PLi–P^tBu₂·2THF reacts with [cis‐(Et₃P)₂MCl₂] (M = Ni, Pd) yielding [(1,2‐η‐^tBu₂P=P–P^tBu₂)Ni(PEt₃)Cl] and [(1,2‐η‐^tBu₂P=P–P^tBu2)Pd(PEt₃)Cl], respectively. ^tBu₂P– PLi–P^tBu₂ undergoes an oxidation process and the ^tBu₂P–P–P^tBu₂ ligand adopts in the products the structure of a side‐on bonded 1,1‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2‐(di‐tert‐butylphosphino)diphosphenium cation with a short P–P bond. Surprisingly, the reaction of ^tBu₂P–PLi–P^tBu₂·2THF with [cis‐(Et₃P)₂PtCl₂] does not yield [(1,2‐η‐^tBu₂P=P–P^tBu₂)Pt(PEt₃)Cl].     

Reaktionen des tBu(Me3Si)P?P(Li)?P(tBu)2 mit CH3Cl und 1,2-Dibromethan

Reactions of tBu(Me₃Si)P? P(Li)? P(tBu)₂ with CH₃Cl and 1,2-Dibromoethane tBu(Me₃Si)P? P(Li)? P(tBu)₂ · 0.95 THF 1 with CH₃Cl (?70°C) yields tBu(Me₃Si)P? P = P(Me)(tBu)₂ 2 at ?70°C, with 1,2-Dibromoethane tBu(Me₃Si)P? PBr? P(tBu)₂ 3 (main product) and tBu(Me₃Si)P? P?P(Br)tBu₂ 4. 3 eliminates Me₃SiBr yielding the cyclotetraphosphane {tBuP? P[P(tBu)₂]}₂ 5 .     

[Co4P2(PtBu2)2(CO)8] und [{Co(CO)3}2P4tBu4] aus Co2(CO)8 und tBu2P–P=P(Me)tBu2

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XIX. [Co₄P₂(P^tBu₂)₂(CO)₈] and [{Co(CO)₃}₂P₄^tBu₄] from Co₂(CO)₈ and ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ Co₂(CO)₈ reacts with ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ yielding the compounds [Co₄P₂(P^tBu₂)₂(CO)₈] ( 1 ) and [{η^2tBu₂P=P–P=P^tBu₂}{Co(CO)₃}₂] ( 2 a ) cis, ( 2 b ) trans. In 1 , four Co and two P atoms form a tetragonal bipyramid, in which two adjacent Co atoms are μ₂‐bridged by ^tBu₂P groups. Additionally, two CO groups are linked to each Co atom. In 2 a and 2 b , each of the Co(CO)₃ units is η²‐coordinated to the terminal P₂ units resulting in the cis‐ and trans‐configurations 2 a and 2 b . 1 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pnnm (No. 58) with a = 879,41(5), b = 1199,11(8), c = 1773,65(11) pm. 2 a crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n (No. 14) with a = 875,97(5), b = 1625,36(11), c = 2117,86(12) pm, β = 91,714(7)°. 2 b crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 (No. 2) with a = 812,00(10), b = 843,40(10), c = 1179,3(2) pm, α = 100,92(2)°, β = 102,31(2)°, γ = 102,25(2)°.     

Reaktionen von (tBu)2P?PP(Br)tBu2 mit LiP(SiMe3)2, LiPMe2 und LiMe,LitBu, LinBu

Reactions of (tBu)₂P? P?P(Br)tBu₂ with LiP(SiMe₃)₂, LiPMe₂ and LiMe, LitBu and LinBu The reactions of (tBu)₂P? P?P(Br)tBu₂ 1 with LiP(SiMe₃)₂ 2 yield (Me₃Si)₂P? P(SiMe₃)₂ 4 and P[P(tBu)₂]₂P(SiMe₃)₂ 5 , whereas 1 with LiPMe₂ 2 yields P₂Me₄ 6 and P[(tBu)₂]₂PMe₂ 7 . 1 with LiMe yields the ylid tBu₂P? P?P(Me)tBu₂ (main product) and [tBu₂P]₂PMe 15 . In the reaction of 1 with tBuLi [tBu₂P]₂PH 11 is the main product and also tBuP? P?P(R)tBu₂ 21 is formed. The reaction of 1 with nBuLi leads to [tBu₂P]₂PnBu 17 (main product) and tBu₂P? P?P(nBu)tBu₂ 22 (secondary product).     

Komplexchemie P-reicher Phosphane und Silylphosphane. XIV. Phosphinophosphiniden tBu2P?P als Ligand in den Pt-Komplexen [η2-{tBu2P?P}Pt(PPh3)2] und [η2-{tBu2P?P}Pt(PEtPh2)2]

Coordination Chemistry of P-rich Phosphanes and Silylphasphanes. XIV. The Phosphinophosphinidene ^tBu₂P? P as a Ligand in the Pt Complexes [η²-{^tBu₂P? P}Pt(PPh₃)₂] and [η²-{^tBu₂P? P}Pt(PEtPh₂)₂] [η²-{^tBu₂P? P}Pt(PPh₃)₂ 1 and [η²-{^tBu₂P? P}Pt(PEtPh₂)₂] 2 are the first complex compounds of ^tBu₂P? P 5 . They are formed in the reaction of ^tBu₂P? P ? P(Me)^tBu₂ 3 with [η²-{H₂C ? CH₂}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 6 or [η²-{H₂C ? CH₂}Pt(PEtPh₂)₂] 7 , respectively. Compound 1 is less stable than 2 and reacts on to [η²-{^tBu₂P? P} Pt(PPh₃)(P^tBu₂Me)] 10 with the coincidently formed ^tBu₂PMe. The molecular structures of 1 and 2 were derived from their ¹H and ³¹P-NMR spectra, 2 was additionally characterized by a X ray structure determination. 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n with a = 1222.36(7) pm, b = 1770.7(1) pm, c = 1729.7(1) pm, β = 108.653(6)°.     

Einfluß der Chelatbildner dppe und dppp auf die Bildung und die Eigenschaften der Pt-Komplexe des tBu2P–P

Coordination Chemistry of P-rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XV. Influence of the Chelate Compounds dppe and dppp on Formation and Properties of the Pt Complexes of ^tBu₂P–P The chelating ligands dppe and dppp replace the PPh₃ groups in [η²-{^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 1 yielding [η²-{^tBu₂P–P}Pt(dppe)] 2 and [η²-{^tBu₂P–P}Pt(dppp)] 8 . However, they don't replace the phosphinophosphinidene ligand ^tBu₂P–P. dppm does not react at all with 1 . [η²-{H₂C=CH₂}Pt(dppe)] 3 yields in the presence of ^tBu₂P–P=P(Me)^tBu₂ 4 exclusively Pt(dppe)₂ 5 and elemental Pt; no 2 could be detected. Similarly, [η²-{H₂C=CH₂}Pt(dppp)] 7 reacts with 4 to give mainly Pt(dppp)₂ 9 and Pt; [η²-{tBu₂PP}Pt(PPh₃)₂] 8 is present only as a minor product. [η²-{^tBu₂P–P}Pt(dppe)] 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c (no. 14) with a = 1834.40(10) pm, b = 1679.70(10) pm, c = 1125.79(6) pm, β = 103.963(5)°.     

Review: Chemistry of the phosphinophosphinidene tBu2P?P,a novel π‐electron ligand

In reactions with transition metal compounds, ^tBu₂P? P?P(X)^tBu₂ (X = Br, Me) acts mainly as a precursor of the ^tBu₂P? P ligand, whereas ^tBu(Me₃Si)P? P?P(Me)^tBu₂ acts as a precursor of the (Me₃Si)P?P^tBu ligand. Up to now, only Pt(0) d¹⁰ ML₂ metal centres were found to be able to stabilize the ^tBu₂P? P group in ‘pure form’ by means of η²‐coordination (side on). Several compounds of the [{η² ? ^tBu₂P? P}Pt(PR₃)₂] type were sufficiently stable to be isolated and characterized; however, not all of them gave single crystals suitable for X‐ray structure determinations. The X‐ray structures of these compounds and of [{µ ? (1,2:2 ? η ? ^tBu₂P? P)Pt(PR₃)₂} {M(CO)₅}] strongly suggest the ethene‐like form of 1,1‐di‐tert‐butyldiphosphene in these complexes. Such a form is also in agreement with RI DFT calculations with SVP basis for free ^tBu₂P? P. However, in trapping experiments with cyclic olefins and cyclic dienes ^tBu₂P? P exhibits, to some extent, electrophilic ‘singlet carbene’ properties. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Phosphinophosphiniden-Phosphorane tBu2P?P = P(R)tBu2 aus Li(THF)2[η2-(tBu2P)2P] und Alkylhalogeniden

The Phosphinophosphinidene-phosphoranes ^tBu₂P? P = P(R)^tBu₂ from Li(THF)₂[η²-(^tBu₂P)₂P] and Alkyl Halides We report the formation of ^tBu₂P? P = P(R)^tBu₂ a and (^tBu₂)₂PR b (with R = Me, Et, ⁿPr, ⁱPr, ⁿBu, PhCH₂, H₂C = CH? CH₂ and CF₃) reactions of Li(THF)₂[η²-(^tBu₂P)₂P] 2 with MeCl, MeI, EtCl, EtBr, ⁿPrCl, ⁿPrBr, ⁱPrCl, ⁿBuBr, PhCH₂Cl, H₂C = CH? CH₂Cl or CF₃Br. In THF solutions the ylidic compounds a predominate, whereas in pentane the corresponding triphosphanes b are preferrably formed. With ClCH₂? CH = CH₂ only b is produced; CF₃Br however yields both ^tBu₂P? P = P(Br)^tBu₂ and ^tBu₂P? P = P(CF₃)^tBu₂, but no b . The ratio of a:b is influenced by the reaction temperature, too. The compounds ^tBu₂P? P = P(Et)^tBu₂ 4a and (^tBu₂P)₂PEt 4 b , e. g., are produced in a ratio of 4:3 at ?70°C in THF, and 1:1 at 20°C; whereas 1:1 is obtained at ?70°C in pentane, and 1:2 at 20°C. Neither ^tBuCl nor H₂C = CHCl react with 2 . The compounds a decompose thermally or under UV irradiation forming ^tBu₂PR and the cyclophosphanes (^tBu₂P)_nP_n.     

Neue phosphidoverbrückte Mehrkernkomplexe des Ag und Zn. Die Kristallstrukturen von [Ag3(PPh2)3(PnBu2tBu)3], [Ag4(PPh2)4(PR3)4] (PR3 = PMenPr2, PnPr3), [Ag4(PPh2)4(PEt3)4]n, [Zn4(PPh2)4Cl4(PRR2)2] (PRR′2 = PMenPr2, PnBu3, PEt2Ph), [Zn4(PhPSiMe3)4Cl4(C4H8O)2] und [Zn4(PtBu2)4Cl4]

New Phosphido-bridged Multinuclear Complexes of Ag and Zn. The Crystal Structures of [Ag₃(PPh₂)₃(PⁿBu₂^tBu)₃], [Ag₄(PPh₂)₄(PR₃)₄] (PR₃ = PMeⁿPr₂, PⁿPr₃), [Ag₄(PPh₂)₄(PEt₃)₄]_n, [Zn₄(PPh₂)₄Cl₄(PRR′₂)₂] (PRR′₂ = PMeⁿPr₂, PⁿBu₃, PEt₂Ph), [Zn₄(PhPSiMe₃)₄Cl₄(C₄H₈O)₂] and [Zn₄(P^tBu₂)₄Cl₄] AgCl reacts with Ph₂PSiMe₃ in the presence of tertiary Phosphines (PⁿBu₂^tBu, PMeⁿPr₂, PⁿPr₃ and PEt₃) to form the multinuclear complexes [Ag₃(PPh₂)₃(PⁿBu₂^tBu)₃] 1 , [Ag₄(PPh₂)₄(PR₃)₄] (PR₃ = PMeⁿPr₂ 2 , PⁿPr₃ 3 ) and [Ag₄(PPh₂)₄(PEt₃)₄]_n 4 . In analogy to that ZnCl₂ reacts with Ph₂PSiMe₃ and PRR′₂ to form the multinuclear complexes [Zn₄(PPh₂)₄Cl₄(PRR′₂)₂] (PRR′₂ = PMeⁿPr₂ 5 , PⁿBu₃ 6 , PEt₂Ph 7 ). Further it was possible to obtain the compounds [Zn₄(PhPSiMe₃)₄Cl₄(C₄H₈O)₂] 8 and [Zn₄(P^tBu₂)₄Cl₄] 9 by reaction of ZnCl₂ with PhP(SiMe₃)₂ and ^tBu₂PSiMe₃, respectively. The structures were characterized by X-ray single crystal structure analysis. Crystallographic data see “Inhaltsübersicht”.     

Bildung und Struktur des [{η2‐tBu2P–P}Pt(PHtBu2)(PPh3)]

Coordination Chemistry of P‐rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XX Formation and Structure of [{η²‐^tBu₂P–P}Pt(PH^tBu₂)(PPh₃)] [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³Ph₃)(P⁴Ph₃)] ( 2 ) reacts with ^tBu₂PH exchanging only the P³Ph₃ group to give [{η²‐^tBu₂P¹–P²}Pt(P³H^tBu₂)(P⁴Ph₃)] ( 1 ). The crystal stucture determination of 1 together with its ³¹P{¹H} NMR data allow for an unequivocal assignment of the coupling constants in related Pt complexes. 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 (no. 2) with a = 1030.33(15), b = 1244.46(19), c = 1604.1(3) pm, α = 86.565(17)°, β = 80.344(18)°, γ = 74.729(17)°.     

Zur Bildung und Struktur der Phosphinophosphiniden-phosphorane tBu2P?PP(Me)tBu2 1, tBu(Me3Si)P?PP(Me)tBu2 2 und tBu2P?PP(Br)tBu2 3

Synthesis and Structure of Phosphinophosphinidene-phosphoranes tBu₂P? P?P(Me)tBu₂ 1, tBu(Me₃Si)P? P?P(Me)tBu₂ 2, and tBu₂P? P?P(Br)tBu₂ 3 A new method for the synthesis of 1 and 2 (Formulae see ?Inhaltsübersicht”?) is reported based on the reaction of 5 with substitution reagents (Me₂SO₄ or CH₃Cl). The results of the X-ray structure determination of 1 and 2 are given and compared with those of 3 . While in 3 one P? P distance corresponds to a double bond and the other P? P distance to a single bond (difference 12.5 pm) the differences of the P? P distances in 1 and 2 are much smaller: 5.28 pm in 1 , 4.68 pm in 2 . Both 1 and 2 crystallize monoclinic in the space group P2₁/n (Z = 4). 2 additionally contains two disordered molecules of the solvent pentane in the unit cell. Parameters of 1 : a = 884.32(8) pm, b = 1 924.67(25) pm, c = 1 277.07(13) pm, β = 100.816(8)°, and of 2 : a = 1 101.93(12) pm, b = 1 712.46(18) pm, c = 1 395.81(12) pm, β = 111.159(7)°, all data collected at 143 K. The skeleton of the three P atoms is bent (PPP angle 100.95° for 1 , 100.29° for 2 and 105.77° for 3 ). Ab initio SCF calculations are used to discuss the bonding situation in the molecular skeleton of the three P atoms of 1 and 3 . The results show a significant contribution of the ionic structure R₂P? P(^?)? P(⁺)(X)R₂. The structure with (partially) charged P atoms is stabilized by bulky polarizable groups R (as tBu) as compared to the fully covalent structure R₂P? P(X)? PR₂.     

Sterically Tuned P‐Phosphanylamino Phosphaalkenes (Me3Si)2C=PN(R)PPh2 and (iPrMe2Si)2C=PN(R)PPh2

Deprotonation of the aminophosphanes Ph₂PN(H)R 1a – 1h [R = tBu ( 1a ), 1‐adamantyl ( 1b ), iPr ( 1c ), CPh₃ ( 1d ), Ph ( 1e ), 2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂ (Mes) ( 1f ), 2,4,6‐tBu₃C₆H₂ (Mes*) ( 1g ), 2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃ (DIPP) ( 1h )], followed by reactions of the phosphanylamide salts Li[Ph₂PNR] 2a , 2b , 2g , and 2h with the P‐chlorophosphaalkene (Me₃Si)₂C=PCl, and of 2a – 2g with (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PCl, gave the isolable P‐phosphanylamino phosphaalkenes (Me₃Si)₂C=PN(R)PPh₂ 3a , 3b , 3g , and (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(R)PPh₂ 4a – 4g . ³¹P NMR spectra, supported by X‐ray structure determinations, reveal that in compounds 2a , 2b , 3a , and 3b , with bulky N‐alkyl groups the Si₂C=P–N–P skeleton is non‐planar (orthogonal conformation), whereas 3g , 3h , and 4g with bulky N‐aryl groups exhibit planar conformations of the Si₂C=P–N–P skeleton. Solid 3g and 4g exhibit cisoid orientation of the planar C=P–N–C units (planar I) but in solid 3h the transoid rotamer is present (planar II). From 3g , 4d , and 4g mixtures of rotamers were detected in solution by pairs of ³¹P NMR patterns ( 3h : line broadening).