Puzzle-based learning in engineering mathematics: students’ attitudes

The article reports on the results of two case studies on the impact of the regular use of puzzles as a pedagogical strategy in the teaching and learning of engineering mathematics. The intention of using puzzles is to engage students’ emotions, creativity and curiosity and also to enhance their generic thinking skills and lateral thinking ‘outside the box’. Students’ attitudes towards this pedagogical strategy are evaluated via short questionnaires with two groups of university students taking a second-year engineering mathematics course. Students’ responses to the questionnaire are presented and analyzed in the paper.     

Investigating students’ perceptions of graduate learning outcomes in mathematics

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to explore the perceptions mathematics students have of the knowledge and skills they develop throughout their programme of study. It addresses current concerns about the employability of mathematics graduates by contributing much needed insight into how degree programmes are developing broader learning outcomes for students majoring in mathematics. Specifically, the study asked students who were close to completing a mathematics major (n = 144) to indicate the extent to which opportunities to develop mathematical knowledge along with more transferable skills (communication to experts and non-experts, writing, working in teams and thinking ethically) were included and assessed in their major. Their perceptions were compared to the importance they assign to each of these outcomes, their own assessment of improvement during the programme and their confidence in applying these outcomes. Overall, the findings reveal a pattern of high levels of students’ agreement that these outcomes are important, but evidence a startling gap when compared to students’ perceptions of the extent to which many of these – communication, writing, teamwork and ethical thinking – are actually included and assessed in the curriculum, and their confidence in using such learning.     

How can self-regulated learning support the problem solving of third-grade students with mathematics anxiety?

The study compares 140 third-grade Israeli students (lower and higher achievers) who were either exposed to self-regulated learning (SRL) supported by metacognitive questioning (the MS group) or received no direct SRL support (the N_MS group). We investigated: (a) mathematical problem solving performance; (b) metacognitive strategy use in three phases of the problem-solving process; and (c) mathematics anxiety. Findings indicated that the MS students showed greater gains in mathematical problem solving performance than the N_MS students. They reported using metacognitive strategies more often, and showed a greater reduction in anxiety. In particular, the lower MS achievers showed these gains in the basic and complex tasks, in strategy use during the on-action phase of the problem solving process and a decrease in negative thoughts. The higher achievers showed greater improvement in transfer tasks and an increase in positive thoughts towards mathematics. Both the theoretical and practical implications of this study are discussed.     

Post-primary students’ images of mathematics: findings from a survey of Irish ordinary level mathematics students

A questionnaire survey was carried out as part of a PhD research study to investigate the image of mathematics held by post-primary students in Ireland. The study focused on students in fifth year of post-primary education studying ordinary level mathematics for the Irish Leaving Certificate examination – the final examination for students in second-level or post-primary education. At the time this study was conducted, ordinary level mathematics students constituted approximately 72% of Leaving Certificate students. Students were aged between 15 and 18 years. A definition for ‘image of mathematics’ was adapted from Lim and Wilson, with image of mathematics hypothesized as comprising attitudes, beliefs, self-concept, motivation, emotions and past experiences of mathematics. A questionnaire was composed incorporating 84 fixed-response items chosen from eight pre-established scales by Aiken, Fennema and Sherman, Gourgey and Schoenfeld. This paper focuses on the findings from the questionnaire survey. Students’ images of mathematics are compared with regard to gender, type of post-primary school attended and prior mathematical achievement.     

Inquiry-based learning in mathematics and science: a comparative baseline study of teachers’ beliefs and practices across 12 European countries

In the European educational context, reports by expert groups have identified the necessity of a renewed pedagogy in schools to overcome deficits in science and mathematics teaching and to raise the standards of scientific and mathematical literacy. Inquiry-based learning (IBL) is considered the method of choice. However, it remains open to what extent IBL is actually used in day-to-day teaching. In the study presented here we elaborate—from the perspective of teachers—the current status of IBL in day-to-day teaching. Further, we explore what problems teachers anticipate when implementing IBL. In order to gain insight into the wide spectrum of practices in mathematics and science teaching in relation to IBL, a baseline study using teacher questionnaires was carried out in the 12 participating countries. We present selected results from this study that for the first time provides an overview of teachers’ beliefs and their reports on the current use of IBL practices in a European context. The results facilitate a cross-cultural comparison on the potentials and challenges of implementing IBL from the perspective of practicing teachers. Furthermore, the study reveals considerable differences between the teaching of mathematics and science subjects. The findings of the baseline study can serve as a reference line against which the impact of interventions to improve the quality of teaching and learning can be evaluated.     

Characteristics of good mathematics teaching in Singapore grade 8 classrooms: a juxtaposition of teachers’ practice and students’ perception

This paper examines the instructional approaches of three competent grade 8 mathematics teachers. It also examines their students’ perception of the lessons they taught as well as characteristics of good lessons. The findings of teachers’ practice and students’ perception are juxtaposed to elicit characteristics of good teaching in Singapore grade 8 classrooms. With limitation, the findings of the paper suggests that good mathematics teaching in Singapore schools centres around building understanding and is teacher-centred but student focused. Some characteristic features of good lessons are that their instructional cycles have specific instructional objectives such that subsequent cycles incrementally build on the knowledge. The examples used in such lessons are carefully selected and vary in complexity from low to high. Teachers actively monitor their student’s understanding during seatwork, by moving from desk to desk guiding those with difficulties and selecting appropriate student work for subsequent whole-class review and discussion. Finally, during such lessons teachers reinforce their students’ understanding of knowledge expounded during whole-class demonstration by detailed review of student work done in class or as homework.     

Students’ experiences with mathematics teaching and learning: listening to unheard voices

This study documents students’ views about the nature of mathematics, the mathematics learning process and factors within the classroom that are perceived to impact upon the learning of mathematics. The participants were senior secondary school students. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used to understand the students’ views about their experiences with mathematics learning and mathematics classroom environment. Interviews of students and mathematics lesson observations were analysed to understand how students view their mathematics classes. A questionnaire was used to solicit students’ views with regards to teaching approaches in mathematics classes. The results suggest that students consider learning and understanding mathematics to mean being successful in getting the correct answers. Students reported that in the majority of cases, the teaching of mathematics was lecture-oriented. Mathematics language was considered a barrier in learning some topics in mathematics. The use of informal language was also evident during mathematics class lessons.     

Israeli Jewish and Arab students’ gendering of mathematics

In English-speaking, Western countries, mathematics has traditionally been viewed as a “male domain”, a discipline more suited to males than to females. Recent data from Australian and American students who had been administered two instruments [Leder & Forgasz, in Two new instruments to probe attitudes about gender and mathematics. ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE), ERIC document number: ED463312, 2002] tapping their beliefs about the gendering of mathematics appeared to challenge this traditional, gender-stereotyped view of the discipline. The two instruments were translated into Hebrew and Arabic and administered to large samples of grade 9 students attending Jewish and Arab schools in northern Israel. The aims of this study were to determine if the views of these two culturally different groups of students differed and whether within group gender differences were apparent. The quantitative data alone could not provide explanations for any differences found. However, in conjunction with other sociological data on the differences between the two groups in Israeli society more generally, possible explanations for any differences found were explored. The findings for the Jewish Israeli students were generally consistent with prevailing Western gendered views on mathematics; the Arab Israeli students held different views that appeared to parallel cultural beliefs and the realities of life for this cultural group.     

Facilitating parental engagement in school mathematics and science through inquiry-based learning: an examination of teachers’ and parents’ beliefs

This study examined teachers’ and parents’ beliefs on the implementation of inquiry-based modeling activities as a means to facilitate parental engagement in school mathematics and science. The study had three objectives: (a) to describe teachers’ beliefs about inquiry-based mathematics and science and parental engagement; (b) to describe parents’ beliefs about inquiry-based mathematics and science and their engagement in inquiry-based problem solving; and (c) to explore the impact of an inquiry-based learning environment comprising a model-eliciting activity and Twitter. The research involved three sixth-grade teachers and 32 parents from one elementary school. Teachers and parents participated in workshops, followed by the implementation of a model-eliciting activity in two classrooms. Three teachers and six parents participated in semi-structured interviews. Teachers reported positive beliefs on parental engagement in the mathematics and science classrooms and the potential positive role of parents in implementing innovative problem-solving activities. Parents expressed strong beliefs on their engagement and welcomed the inquiry-based modeling approach. Based on the results of this aspect of a four-year longitudinal design, implications for parental engagement in inquiry-based mathematics and science teaching and learning and further research are discussed.     

Do students really understand what an ordinary differential equation is?

Differential equations (DEs) are important in mathematics as well as in science and the social sciences. Thus, the study of DEs has been included in various courses in different departments in higher education. The importance of DEs has attracted the attention of many researchers who have generally focussed on the content and instruction of DEs. However, DEs are complex issues that students may find difficulty to understand. The limited research in this literature points to the need for more studies on students’ conceptions, and understanding of DEs and their basic concepts. The objective of this study is to fill this need by revealing the understanding, difficulties and weaknesses of the students who are successful in algebraic solutions, in relation to the concepts of DEs and their solutions. For this purpose, 77 students were asked 13 DE questions (6 of them about algebraic solution, and the rest about interpreting DEs and their solutions). From an analysis of the students’ answers, it was concluded that the students who were quite successful in algebraic solutions, indeed did not fully understand the related concepts, and they had serious difficulties in relation to these concepts.     

Declining participation in post-compulsory secondary school mathematics: students’ views of and solutions to the problem

We analysed multivariable calculus students' meanings for domain and range and their generalisation of that meaning as they reasoned about the domain and range of multivariable functions. We found that students' thinking about domain and range fell into three broad categories: input/output, independence/dependence, and/or as attached to specific variables. We used Ellis' actor-oriented generalisations framework to characterise how students generalised their meanings for domain and range from single-variable to multivariable functions. This framework focuses on the process of generalisation – what students see as similar between ideas in multiple contexts. We found that students generalised their meanings for domain and range by relating objects, extending their meanings, using general principles and rules, and using/modifying previous ideas. Our findings suggest that the domain and range of multivariable functions is a topic instructors should explicitly address.     

Cross-national comparisons of mathematics curriculum materials: what might we learn?

In most of the world, there is a broad public interest in cross-national comparisons. Despite the myriad difficulties inherent in such comparisons, and despite the fact that most studies explicitly acknowledge limited generalizability, news media representatives, policy makers, politicians and educators often take the findings at face value as providing solid scientific evidence of the achievement of students in the countries studied. This often leads in turn to superficial commentaries and unhelpful recommendations. Our task as scholars of mathematics education is to demonstrate the nuanced complexity of such comparisons. The papers in this issue of ZDM succeed in this regard. Using a range of scholarly perspectives (mathematical, psychological and socio-cultural), the authors offer many insightful observations regarding curriculum and curriculum materials in East Asian countries (especially China) and the USA, with careful attention to the central role of curriculum in the teaching and learning of mathematics in schools. In this commentary study I discuss a few of these insights and develop one illustrative example of how cross-national comparative analyses such as these could be used to sensibly inform policy discussions related to changes in mathematics curriculum, teaching, or teacher preparation.     

The textbook-in-use: students’ utilization schemes of mathematics textbooks related to self-regulated practicing

This paper presents a qualitative study on how students make use of their mathematics textbooks for practicing. The study was carried out in two German secondary schools with 74 students (44 in 6th and 30 in 12th grade). Students’ utilization of textbooks for practicing is analyzed using the theoretical framework of instrumental genesis. The results indicate that students’ choices of contents from the book for practicing can be categorized into three utilization schemes: position-dependent practicing, block-dependent practicing, and salience-dependent practicing. In terms of position-dependent practicing the relative position of the textbook’s contents to teacher-mediated sections guides the students’ choice. Block-dependent practicing relates to the use of contents from the book that belong to particular blocks. Finally, salience-dependent practicing is a utilization scheme of the book where students’ choice is guided by perceptual salience of the book contents. These findings both show how textbook users are influenced by the way mathematics is presented in textbooks and provide insights into students’ conceptions of practicing mathematics.     

Chinese elementary mathematics teachers’ knowledge in mathematics and pedagogy for teaching: the case of fraction division

In this study, we investigated the extent of knowledge in mathematics and pedagogy that Chinese practicing elementary mathematics teachers have and what changes teaching experience may bring to their knowledge. With a sample of 18 mathematics teachers from two elementary schools, we focused on both practicing teachers’ beliefs and perceptions about their own knowledge in mathematics and pedagogy and the extent of their knowledge on the topic of fraction division. The results revealed a gap between these teachers’ limited knowledge about the curriculum they teach and their solid mathematics knowledge for teaching, as an example, fraction division. Moreover, senior teachers used more diverse strategies that are concrete in nature than junior teachers in providing procedural justifications. The results suggested that Chinese practicing teachers benefit from teaching and in-service professional development for the improvement of their mathematics knowledge for teaching but not their knowledge about mathematics curriculum.     

Cross-national studies on the teaching and learning of mathematics: where do we go from here?

While the prevailing research interest in East–West comparative studies still seems to be on explaining the superior performance of East Asian students, the time has come for researchers from both areas to focus on what countries can learn from one another. This commentary cites some of the most significant lessons learned from the papers in this special issue and asks additional research questions that might be worth pursuing. However, learning does not end in articulating similarities and differences between cultures and adopting the best practices that these cultures offer. It is hoped that countries will continue to work for increased partnerships and collaboration, greater understanding, and deeper appreciation of individual countries’ uniqueness with the end goal of improving the quality of mathematics teaching and learning for all.     

Fifth-grade students�� approaches to and beliefs of mathematics word problem solving: a large sample Hungarian study

Mathematical word problems used in Verschaffel et al.??s (Learning and Instruction 7:339?C359, 1994) study were applied in several follow-up studies. The goal of the present study was to replicate and extend the results of this line of research in a large sample of Hungarian students using an alternative set of data-gathering and data-analysis techniques. 4,037 students forming a nationwide representative sample of the Hungarian fifth-grade student population (aged 10?C11) completed the test. The test contained five word problems from the list of 10 P(??problematic)-items from Verschaffel et al.??s test. In contrast to all previous research in this domain, we used a multiple-choice format, where three options were given for each task: (a) routine-based, non-realistic answer, (b) numerical response that does take into account realistic considerations, (c) a realistic solution stating that the task cannot be solved. The hypotheses of this study were: (1) Students?? responses will confirm previous results, i.e. upper elementary school students prefer to respond to P-items by means of the routine-based answer; (2) Most students will demonstrate a more or less consistent preference for a given answer type (a, b or c) over problems; (3) Students?? school math marks will have low correlation indices with students?? achievement on these word problems. Our results confirm student??s overall tendency to follow non-realistic approaches when doing school word problem solving. The tendency even holds when confronting students with various kinds of realistic answers. Our results show that students demonstrate response patterns over problems, and that the correlation with math school performance is significant but small.     

Metaphor or Met-Before? The effects of previouos experience on practice and theory of learning mathematics

While the general notion of ‘metaphor’ may offer a thoughtful analysis of the nature of mathematical thinking, this paper suggests that it is even more important to take into account the particular mental structures available to the individual that have been built from experience that the individual has ‘met-before.’ The notion of ‘met-before’ offers not only a principle to analyse the changing meanings in mathematics and the difficulties faced by the learner—which we illustrate by the problematic case of the minus sign—it can also be used to analyse the met-befores of mathematicians, mathematics educators and those who develop theories of learning to reveal implicit assumptions that support our thinking in some ways and act as impediments in others.     

Polish teachers’ conceptions of and approaches to the teaching of linear equations to grade six students: an exploratory case study

In this article we present an exploratory case study of six Polish teachers’ perspectives on the teaching of linear equations to grade six students. Data, which derived from semi-structured interviews, were analysed against an extant framework and yielded a number of commonly held beliefs about what teachers aimed to achieve and how they would achieve them. In general, teachers’ aims were procedural fluency founded on students understanding the equals sign as a relational rather than an operational entity and the balance scale as a representation supportive of students’ understanding of an equation as the equivalence of two expressions. The analyses also indicated that the ways teachers proposed to conduct their lessons, whereby they pose single problems for individual work before inviting whole class sharing of solutions, resonates with the didactical traditions found in other East and Central European countries previously influenced by the Soviet Union.