Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Enhancement of the Efficacy of Metronidazole Against Entamoeba histolytica by Complexation with Palladium(II), Platinum(II), or Copper(II)

Reaction of trans‐[PdCl₂(DMSO)₂], cis‐[PtCl₂(DMSO)₂], and [Cu(OAc)₂]⋅H₂O with metronidazole (mnz) leads to the formation of new complexes, i.e., trans‐[PdCl₂(mnz)₂] ( 1 ), trans‐[PtCl₂(mnz)₂] ( 2 ), and trans‐[Cu₂(OAc)₄(mnz)₂] ( 3 ), respectively. Complexes 1 – 3 crystallize all in the centrosymmetric monoclinic space group P2₁/c with Z=8. Unit‐cell parameters for these complexes are: 1 , a=7.1328(14) Å, b=20.699(4) Å, c=7.1455(14) Å, and β=116.17(3)°; 2 , a=6.9169(14) Å, b=21.853(4) Å, c=6.7218(13) Å, and β=110.79(3)°; 3 , a=9.1663(18) Å, b=19.129(4) Å, c=8.9446(18) Å, and β=116.44(3)°. The complexes 1 and 2 maintain an ideal square‐planar geometry. In complex 3 , the H₂O molecules of the starting complex are replaced by metronidazole while maintaining a dimeric structure of [Cu(OAc)₂]. Each Cu ion has an ideal octahedral structure, though distortion occurs in the equatorial position where the acetato ligands are attached. The Cu Cu separation of 2.6343(8) Å indicates considerable metal‐metal interaction. The testing of the antiamoebic activity of these complexes against the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica suggests that compound 1 – 3 might be endowed with important antiamoebic properties since they showed IC₅₀ values in a μM range better than metronidazole (Table 2). Thus, compound 1 displayed more effective amoebicidal activity than metronidazole (IC₅₀ values of 0.103 μM vs. 1.50 μM , resp.).     

Conformational change induced by hydration: trans‐dichloro­bis­[(1R,2R,3R,5S)‐(–)‐isopinocampheylamine]palladium(II) and trans‐dichloro­bis[(1S,2S,3S,5R)‐(+)‐isopinocampheylamine]palladium(II) hemihydrate

The title compounds, trans‐dichloro­bis[(1R,2R,3R,5S)‐(−)‐2,6,6‐trimethyl­bicyclo­[3.1.1]heptan‐3‐amine]palladium(II), [PdCl₂(C₁₀H₁₉N)₂], and trans‐dichloro­bis[(1S,2S,3S,5R)‐(+)‐2,6,6‐trimethyl­bicyclo­[3.1.1]heptan‐3‐amine]palladium(II) hemihydrate, [PdCl₂(C₁₀H₁₉N)₂]·0.5H₂O, present different arrangements of the amine ligands coordinated to Pd^II, viz. antiperiplanar in the former case and (−)anticlinal in the latter. The hemihydrate is an inclusion compound, with a Pd coordination complex and disordered water mol­ecules residing on crystallographic twofold axes. The crystal structure for the hemihydrate includes a short Pd⋯Pd separation of 3.4133 (13) Å.     

Syntheses,Characterization, and Crystal Structures of a Dinuclear Complex and Coordination Polymer of Mercury(II) with Schiff Base Ligands containing N3 and N4 Donors

Two dinuclear mercury(II) iodide compounds, [Hg₂(L)(I)₄] ( 1 ) and [(L′)Hg(μ‐I)₂HgI₂]_n ( 2 ) [L = N,N′‐bis(phenyl(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylene)propane‐1,2‐diamine and L′ = N‐(phenyl(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylene)propane‐1,2‐diamine] were synthesized and characterized. The molecular structures of [Hg₂(L)(I)₄] ( 1 ) and [(L′)Hg(μ‐I)₂HgI₂]_n ( 2 ), which were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, indicate that each Hg^II in 1 has a distorted tetrahedral environment around the metal atom with a HgN₂I₂ chromophore, whereas in 2 one mercury(II) atom adopts a distorted tetrahedral arrangement with a HgI₄ chromophore and the other has a distorted square pyramidal environment with HgN₃I₂ chromophore. In the solid state, compound 2 consists of a 1D coordination polymer structure.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and Structures of Palladium(II) and Platinum(II) Complexes Containing N,N‐Bis(diphenylphos­phanyl)Naphthylamine

The reaction of 1‐naphthylamine with two equivalents of chlorodiphenylphosphine in the presence of triethylamine gave the ligand C₁₀H₇‐1‐N(PPh₂)₂ ( 1 ). Reaction of 1 with PdCl₂(CH₃CN)₂ or PtCl₂(cod) (1:1 molar ratio) afforded the complexes cis‐[PdCl₂{C₁₀H₇‐1‐N(PPh₂)₂}] ( 2 ) and cis‐[PtCl₂{C₁₀H₇‐1‐N(PPh₂)₂}] ( 3 ), respectively. Compounds 1 – 3 were identified and characterized by multinuclear NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR) and IR spectroscopy. Crystal structure determinations of complexes 2 and 3 were carried out.     

Two new isostructural mercury(II) complexes involving the N‐heterocyclic 1‐[(benzotriazol‐1‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐1,3‐imidazole ligand: syntheses,structures and properties

The unsymmetrical N‐heterocyclic ligand 1‐[(benzotriazol‐1‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐1,3‐imidazole (bmi) has three potential N‐atom donors and can act in monodentate or bridging coordination modes in the construction of complexes. In addition, the bmi ligand can adopt different coordination conformations, resulting in complexes with different structures due to the presence of the flexible methylene spacer. Two new complexes, namely bis{1‐[(benzotriazol‐1‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐1,3‐imidazole‐κN ³}dibromidomercury(II), [HgBr₂(C₁₀H₉N₅)₂], and bis{1‐[(benzotriazol‐1‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐1,3‐imidazole‐κN ³}diiodidomercury(II), [HgI₂(C₁₀H₉N₅)₂], have been synthesized through the self‐assembly of bmi with HgBr₂ or HgI₂. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction shows that both complexes are mononuclear structures, in which the bmi ligands coordinate to the Hg^II ions in monodentate modes. In the solid state, both complexes display three‐dimensional networks formed by a combination of hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions. The IR spectra and PXRD patterns of both complexes have also been recorded.     

Synthesis,characterization, molecular docking,biological activity and density functional theory studies of novel 1,4‐naphthoquinone derivatives and Pd(II), Ni(II) and Co(II) complexes

Two novel heterocyclic ligands, 2‐[(5‐fluoro‐1,3‐benzothiazol‐2‐yl)amino]naphthalene‐1,4‐dione (HL¹) and 2‐[(5‐methyl‐1,3‐benzothiazol‐2‐yl)amino]naphthalene‐1,4‐dione (HL²), and their Pd(II), Ni(II) and Co(II) complexes were prepared and characterized using ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, infrared and UV–visible spectroscopic techniques, elemental analysis, magnetic susceptibility, thermogravimetry and molar conductance measurements. The infrared spectral data showed that the chelation behaviours of the ligands towards the transition metal ions were through one of the carbonyl oxygen and deprotonated nitrogen atom of the secondary amine group. Molar conductance results confirmed that the complexes are non‐electrolytes in dimethylsulfoxide. The geometries of the complexes were deduced from magnetic susceptibility and UV–visible spectroscopic results. Second‐order perturbation analysis using density functional theory calculation revealed a stronger intermolecular charge transfer between ligand and metal ion in [NiL¹(H₂O)₂(CH₃COO‐)] and CoL¹ compared to the other complexes. The in vitro antibacterial activity of the compounds against some clinically isolated bacteria strains showed varied activities. [NiL¹(H₂O)₂(CH₃COO‐)] exhibited the best antibacterial results with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 50 μg mL^?1. The molecular interactions of the compounds with various drug targets of some bacterial organisms were established in a bid to predict the possible mode of antibacterial action of the compounds. The ferrous ion chelating ability of the ligands indicated that HL¹ is a better Fe²⁺ ion chelator, with an IC₅₀ of 29.79 μg mL^?1, compared to HL² which had an IC₅₀ of 98.26 μg mL^?1.     

Heterodinuclear Ruthenium(II) Complexes of the Bridging Ligand 1,6,7,12‐Tetraazaperylene with Iron(II), Cobalt(II), Nickel(II), as well as Palladium(II) and Platinum(II)

The first heterodinuclear ruthenium(II) complexes of the 1,6,7,12‐tetraazaperylene (tape) bridging ligand with iron(II), cobalt(II), and nickel(II) were synthesized and characterized. The metal coordination sphere in this complexes is filled by the tetradentate N,N′‐dimethyl‐2,11‐diaza[3.3](2,6)‐pyridinophane (L‐N₄Me₂) ligand, yielding complexes of the general formula [(L‐N₄Me₂)Ru(µ‐tape)M(L‐N₄Me₂)](ClO₄)₂(PF₆)₂ with M = Fe {[ 2 ](ClO₄)₂(PF₆)₂}, Co {[ 3 ](ClO₄)₂(PF₆)₂}, and Ni {[ 4 ](ClO₄)₂(PF₆)₂}. Furthermore, the heterodinuclear tape ruthenium(II) complexes with palladium(II)‐ and platinum(II)‐dichloride [(bpy)₂Ru(μ‐tape)PdCl₂](PF₆)₂ {[ 5 ](PF₆)₂} and [(dmbpy)₂Ru(μ‐tape)PtCl₂](PF₆)₂ {[ 6 ](PF₆)₂}, respectively were also prepared. The molecular structures of the complex cations [ 2 ]⁴⁺ and [ 4 ]⁴⁺ were discussed on the basis of the X‐ray structures of [ 2 ](ClO₄)₄ · MeCN and [ 4 ](ClO₄)₄ · MeCN. The electrochemical behavior and the UV/Vis absorption spectra of the heterodinuclear tape ruthenium(II) complexes were explored and compared with the data of the analogous mono‐ and homodinuclear ruthenium(II) complexes of the tape bridging ligand.     

Ligand‐forced dimerization of copper(I)–olefin complexes bearing a 1,3,4‐thiadiazole core

As an important class of heterocyclic compounds, 1,3,4‐thiadiazoles have a broad range of potential applications in medicine, agriculture and materials chemistry, and were found to be excellent precursors for the crystal engineering of organometallic materials. The coordinating behaviour of allyl derivatives of 1,3,4‐thiadiazoles with respect to transition metal ions has been little studied. Five new crystalline copper(I) π‐complexes have been obtained by means of an alternating current electrochemical technique and have been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and IR spectroscopy. The compounds are bis[μ‐5‐methyl‐N‐(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)‐1,3,4‐thiadiazol‐2‐amine]bis[nitratocopper(I)], [Cu₂(NO₃)₂(C₆H₉N₃S)₂], (1), bis[μ‐5‐methyl‐N‐(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)‐1,3,4‐thiadiazol‐2‐amine]bis[(tetrafluoroborato)copper(I)], [Cu₂(BF₄)₂(C₆H₉N₃S)₂], (2), μ‐aqua‐bis{μ‐5‐[(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)sulfanyl]‐1,3,4‐thiadiazol‐2‐amine}bis[nitratocopper(I)], [Cu₂(NO₃)₂(C₅H₇N₃S₂)₂(H₂O)], (3), μ‐aqua‐(hexafluorosilicato)bis{μ‐5‐[(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)sulfanyl]‐1,3,4‐thiadiazol‐2‐amine}dicopper(I)–acetonitrile–water (2/1/4), [Cu₂(SiF₆)(C₅H₇N₃S₂)₂(H₂O)]·0.5CH₃CN·2H₂O, (4), and μ‐benzenesulfonato‐bis{μ‐5‐[(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)sulfanyl]‐1,3,4‐thiadiazol‐2‐amine}dicopper(I) benzenesulfonate–methanol–water (1/1/1), [Cu₂(C₆H₅O₃S)(C₅H₇N₃S₂)₂](C₆H₅O₃S)·CH₃OH·H₂O, (5). The structure of the ligand 5‐methyl‐N‐(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)‐1,3,4‐thiadiazol‐2‐amine (Mepeta ), C₆H₉N₃S, was also structurally characterized. Both Mepeta and 5‐[(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)sulfanyl]‐1,3,4‐thiadiazol‐2‐amine (Pesta ) (denoted L ) reveal a strong tendency to form dimeric {Cu₂L ₂}²⁺ fragments, being attached to the metal atom in a chelating–bridging mode via two thiadiazole N atoms and an allylic C=C bond. Flexibility of the {Cu₂(Pesta )₂}²⁺ unit allows the Cu^I atom site to be split into two positions with different metal‐coordination environments, thus enabling the competitive participation of different molecules in bonding to the metal centre. The Pesta ligand in (4) allows the Cu^I atom to vary between water O‐atom and hexafluorosilicate F‐atom coordination, resulting in the rare case of a direct Cu^I…FSiF₅²⁻ interaction. Extensive three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding patterns are formed in the reported crystal structures. Complex (5) should be considered as the first known example of a Cu^I(C₆H₅SO₃) coordination compound. To determine the hydrogen‐bond interactions in the structures of (1) and (2), a Hirshfeld surface analysis has been performed.     

A novel three‐dimensional copper(II) coordination polymer with 1,4‐bis(1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐ylmeth­yl)benzene and thio­cyanate

In the title complex, poly[copper(II)‐di‐μ₂‐thio­cyanato‐μ₂‐1,4‐bis­(1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐ylmeth­yl)benzene], [Cu(NCS)₂(C₁₂H₁₂N₆)]_n, the Cu^II atom lies on an inversion centre in a tetra­gonally distorted octa­hedral environment. Four N atoms from thio­cyanate and 1,4‐bis­(1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐ylmeth­yl)benzene (bbtz) ligands fill the equatorial positions, and S atoms from symmetry‐related thio­cyanate ligands fill the axial positions. The benzene ring of the bbtz ligand lies about an inversion centre. Single thio­cyanate bridges link the Cu^II atoms into two‐dimensional sheets containing an unprecedented 16‐membered [Cu₄(μ‐NCS‐N:S)₄] ring. The bbtz ligands further link the two‐dimensional sheets into a three‐dimensional network.     

Organoruthenium (II) complexes featuring pyrazole‐linked Schiff base ligands: Crystal structure,DNA/BSA interactions,cytotoxicity and molecular docking

Half‐sandwiched ruthenium (II) arene complexes with piano stool‐like geometry with the general formula [(p‐cymene)RuClL¹] and [(p‐cymene)RuClL²] [where L¹ = (Z)‐N′‐((1,3‐diphenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)methylene)furan‐2‐carbohydrazide and L² = (Z)‐N′‐((1,3‐diphenyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐4‐yl)methylene)thiophene‐2‐carbohydrazide] were synthesized and characterized. The single crystal X‐ray data revealed that the complexes belong to the same crystal system (monoclinic) with octahedral geometry, where the ruthenium atom is surrounded by hydrazone ligand coordinated through ON atoms, one chloride labile co‐ligand and the remaining three coordination sites covered by an electron cloud of p‐cymene moiety. The interaction between the complexes and DNA/bovine serum albumin (BSA) was evaluated using absorption and emission titration methods showing intercalative modes of interaction. The DNA cleavage ability of the complexes was checked by agarose gel electrophoresis method exhibiting the destruction of DNA duplex arrangement. To understand the interaction between ruthenium complex and DNA/BSA molecule, molecular docking studies were performed. In vitro cytotoxicity of the complexes was examined by the 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay on human lung cancer cell line, A549, and found that at lower IC₅₀, cell growth inhibition has occurred. Similarly, the IC₅₀ values of the complexes treated with cancerous cell lines have produced a significant amount of lactase dehydrogenase and nitrite content in the culture medium, which were evaluated as apoptosis‐inducing factors, suggesting that the ruthenium (II) arene hydrazone complexes with pyrazole ligands have promising anticancer activities.     

A novel three‐dimensional cadmium(II) coordination polymer incorporating 1,4‐bis­(1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐ylmethyl)­benzene and thio­cyanate

In the title complex, poly[cadmium(II)‐μ₂‐1,4‐bis­(1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐ylmeth­yl)benzene‐di‐μ₂‐thio­cyanato], [Cd(NCS)₂(C₁₂H₁₂N₆)]_n, the Cd^II atom lies on an inversion centre in a distorted octa­hedral environment. Four N atoms from the thio­cyanate and 1,4‐bis­(1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐ylmeth­yl)benzene (bbtz) ligands occupy the equatorial positions, and two S atoms from symmetry‐related thio­cyanate ligands occupy the axial positions. The benzene ring of the bbtz ligand lies about an inversion centre. Single thio­cyanate bridges link the Cd^II atoms into two‐dimensional sheets containing novel 16‐membered [Cd₄(μ‐NCS‐N:S)₄] rings. The bbtz ligands further link these two‐dimensional sheets into an unprecedented covalent three‐dimensional network for the cadmium–thio­cyanate system.     

Three new enanti­omerically pure ferrocenylphosphole compounds

The absolute configurations of three new enanti­omerically pure ferrocenylphosphole compounds, namely (2S,4S,S_Fc)‐4‐methoxy­methyl‐2‐[2‐(9‐thioxo‐9λ⁵‐phosphafluoren‐9‐yl)­ferro­cenyl]‐1,3‐dioxane, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₃H₂₂O₃PS)], (III), (S_Fc)‐[2‐(9‐thioxo‐9λ⁵‐phosphafluoren‐9‐yl)ferrocenyl]methanol, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₈H₁₄OPS)], (V), and (S_Fc)‐diphenyl[2‐(9‐thioxo‐9λ⁵‐phosphafluoren‐9‐yl]ferrocenylmethyl]phosphine, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₃₀H₂₃P₂)], (VIII), have been unambiguously established. All three ligands contain a planar chiral ferrocene group, bearing a dibenzo­phos­phole and either a dioxane, a methanol or a diphenyl­phosphino­methane group on the same cyclopentadienyl. In compound (V), the occurrence of O—H⋯S and C—H⋯S hydrogen bonds results in the formation of a two‐dimensional network parallel to (001). The geometry of the ferrocene frameworks agrees with related reported structures.     

Two complexes of PtIV and AuIII with 2,2′‐dipyridylamine and 2,2′‐dipyridylaminide ligands

Two noble metal complexes involving ancillary chloride ligands and chelating 2,2′‐bipyridylamine (Hdpa) or its deprotonated derivative (dpa), namely [bis(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)amine]tetrachloridoplatinum(IV), [PtCl₄(C₁₀H₉N₃)], and [bis(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)aminido]dichloridogold(III), [AuCl₂(C₁₀H₈N₃)], are presented and structurally characterized. The metal atom in the former has a slightly distorted octahedral coordination environment, formed by four chloride ligands and two pyridyl N atoms of Hdpa, while the metal atom in the latter has a slightly distorted square‐planar coordination environment, formed by two chloride ligands and two pyridyl N atoms of dpa. The difference in conjugation between the pyridine rings in normal and deprotonated 2,2′‐dipyridylamine is discussed on the basis of the structural features of these complexes. The influence of weak interactions on the supramolecular structures of the complexes, providing one‐dimensional chains of [PtCl₄(C₁₀H₉N₃)] and dimers of [AuCl₂(C₁₀H₈N₃)], are discussed.     

Structural characterization of the derivatives of bis{[2,6‐(dimethylamino)methyl]phenyl} selenide with palladium(II) and mercury(II)

The intramolecularly coordinated homoleptic diorgano selenide bis{2,6‐bis[(dimethylamino)methyl]phenyl} selenide, C₂₄H₃₈N₄Se or R₂Se, where R is 2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃, 14 , was synthesized and its ligation reactions with Pd^II and Hg^II precursors were explored. The reaction of 14 with SO₂Cl₂ and K₂PdCl₄ resulted in the formation of the meta C—H‐activated dipalladated complex {μ‐2,2′‐bis[(dimethylamino)methyl]‐4,4′‐bis[(dimethylazaniumyl)methyl]‐3,3′‐selanediyldiphenyl‐κ⁴C¹,N²:C^1′,N^2′}bis[dichloridopalladium(II)], [Pd₂Cl₄(C₂₄H₃₈N₄Se)] or [{R(H)PdCl₂}₂Se], 15 . On the other hand, when ligand 14 was reacted with HgCl₂, the reaction afforded a dimercurated selenolate complex, {μ‐bis{2,6‐bis[(dimethylamino)methyl]benzeneselanolato‐κ⁴N²,Se:Se,N⁶}‐μ‐chlorido‐bis[chloridomercury(II)], [Hg₂(C₁₂H₁₉N₂Se)Cl₃] or RSeHg₂Cl₃, 16 , where two Hg^II ions are bridged by selenolate and chloride ligands. In palladium complex 15 , there are two molecules located on crystallographic twofold axes and within each molecule the Pd moieties are related by symmetry, but there are still two independent Pd centers. Mercury complex 16 results from the cleavage of one of the Se—C bonds to form a bifurcated SeHg₂ moiety with the formal charge on the Se atom being ?1. In addition, one of the Cl ligands bridges the two Hg atoms and there are two terminal Hg—Cl bonds. Each Hg atom is in a distorted environment which can be best described as a T‐shaped base with the bridging Cl atom in an apical position, with several angles close to 90° and with one angle much larger and closer to 180°.     

Syntheses and Structures of Homo‐ and Heterobimetallic Complexes Containing a (Cyclopentadienone)rhodium(I) Fragment

The reaction of [RhCl(η⁴‐Ph₂R₂C₄CO)]₂ (R=Ph, 2‐naphthyl) with the dimeric complexes [RuCl₂(p‐cymene)]₂ p‐cymene=1‐methyl‐4‐(1‐methylethyl)benzene, [RuCl₂(1,3,5‐Et₃C₆H₃)]₂, [MCl₂(Cp*)]₂ (M=Rh, Ir; Cp*=1,2,3,4,5‐pentamethylcyclopenta‐2,4‐dien‐1‐yl), [RuCl₂(CO)₃]₂, [RuCl₂(dcypb)(CO)]₂ (dcypb=butane‐1,4‐diylbis[dicyclohexylphosphine]), [(dppb)ClRu(μ‐Cl)₂(μ‐OH₂)RuCl(dppb)] (dppb=butane‐1,4‐diylbis[diphenylphosphine]), and [(dcypb)(N₂)Ru(μ‐Cl)₃RuCl(dcypb)] was investigated. In all cases, mixed, chloro‐bridged complexes were formed in quantitative yield (see 5 – 8, 9 – 16, 18, 19, 21 , and 22 ). The six new complexes 5, 8, 9, 13, 15 , and 22 were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis (Figs. 1–3).     

rac‐1‐[(2‐Methoxyethyl)sulfanyl]‐2‐[(2‐methoxyethyl)sulfinyl]benzene and its PdCl2 complex

As an extension of recent findings on the recovery of palladium with dithioether extractants, single crystals of the chelating vicinal thioether sulfoxide ligand rac‐1‐[(2‐methoxyethyl)sulfanyl]‐2‐[(2‐methoxyethyl)sulfinyl]benzene, C₁₂H₁₈O₃S₂, (I), and its square‐planar dichloridopalladium complex, rac‐dichlorido{1‐[(2‐methoxyethyl)sulfanyl]‐2‐[(2‐methoxyethyl)sulfinyl]benzene‐κ²S,S′}palladium(II), [PdCl₂(C₁₂H₁₈O₃S₂)], (II), have been synthesized and their structures analysed. The molecular structure of (II) is the first ever characterized involving a dihalogenide–Pd^II complex in which the palladium is bonded to both a thioether and a sulfoxide functional group. The structural and stereochemical characteristics of the ligand are compared with those of the analogous dithioether compound [Traeger et al. (2012). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 2341–2352]. The sulfinyl O atom suppresses the electron‐pushing and mesomeric effect of the S—C...;C—S unit in ligand (I), resulting in bond lengths significantly different than in the dithioether reference compound. In contrast, in complex (II), those bond lengths are nearly the same as in the analogous dithioether complex. As observed previously, there is an interaction between the central Pd^II atom and the O atom that is situated above the plane.     

Synthesis and characterization of mononuclear palladium(II) and platinum(II), dinuclear palladium(I) and platinum(I), and heterobimetallic (Pt-Hg or Pt-Ag) complexes containing 1,1-bis-(diphenylphosphino)ethane as ligand

Summary The complex [Pd(dpmMe)₂]Cl₂ [dpmMe = 1,1-bis-(diphenylphosphino) ethane] was prepared from [PdCl₂-(PhCN)₂], whilst [Pd₂X₂(-dpmMe)₂] complexes were prepared from [PdCl₂PhCN₂] and [Pd(PPh₃)₄] (X = Cl), [PdBr( ³-C₃H₅)]₂ (X = Br), or [Pd₂Cl₂(-dpmMe)₂] (X = I). Reaction of [Pd₂Cl₂(-dpmMe)₂] with MeO₂C-C523-01CCO₂Me(L) gave the A-frame complex [PdCl₂(-L) (-dpmMe)₂]. The complexes [PtCl₂(dpmMe)] and [Pt(dpmMe)₂]Cl₂ were prepared from [PtCl₂(Bu ^t CN)₂]. Treatment of either [PtCl₂(dpmMe)] with PhC523-02CLi or [Pt(dpmMe)₂]Cl₂ with MeONa gave [Pt(Ph₂PCMe· PPh₂)₂]. Reaction of [PtCl₂(Bu ^t CN)₂] with [Pt(PPh₃)₄] and dpmMe gave a mixture of [Pt₂Cl₂(-dpmMe)₂] and [PtCl₂(dpmMe)]. The heterobimetallic complexes [Pt(C523-03CPh)₂ (-dpmMe)₂MX] (MX = HgCl₂ or AgCl) were made from the reaction of [Pt(dpmMe)₂]Cl₂ with Hg(C523-04CPh)₂ or Ag(C523-05CPh), respectively. Reaction of the Pt-Hg complex with Na₂S gave [Pt(C523-06CPh)₂ ( ¹-dpmMe)₂]. Oxidative addition of MeI to [PtMe₂· (dpmMe)] gave two Pt^IV isomers of the formula [PtMe₃I(dpmMe)].     

Chiral one‐ and two‐dimensional silver(I)–biotin coordination polymers

Reaction of biotin {C₁₀H₁₆N₂O₃S, HL; systematic name: 5‐[(3aS,4S,6aR)‐2‐oxohexahydro‐1H‐thieno[3,4‐d]imidazol‐4‐yl]pentanoic acid} with silver acetate and a few drops of aqueous ammonia leads to the deprotonation of the carboxylic acid group and the formation of a neutral chiral two‐dimensional polymer network, poly[[{μ₃‐5‐[(3aS,4S,6aR)‐2‐oxohexahydro‐1H‐thieno[3,4‐d]imidazol‐4‐yl]pentanoato}silver(I)] trihydrate], {[Ag(C₁₀H₁₅N₂O₃S)]·3H₂O}_n or {[Ag(L)]·3H₂O}_n, (I). Here, the Ag^I cations are pentacoordinate, coordinated by four biotin anions via two S atoms and a ureido O atom, and by two carboxylate O atoms of the same molecule. The reaction of biotin with silver salts of potentially coordinating anions, viz. nitrate and perchlorate, leads to the formation of the chiral one‐dimensional coordination polymers catena‐poly[[bis[nitratosilver(I)]‐bis{μ₃‐5‐[(3aS,4S,6aR)‐2‐oxohexahydro‐1H‐thieno[3,4‐d]imidazol‐4‐yl]pentanoato}] monohydrate], {[Ag₂(NO₃)₂(C₁₀H₁₆N₂O₃S)₂]·H₂O}_n or {[Ag₂(NO₃)₂(HL)₂]·H₂O}_n, (II), and catena‐poly[bis[perchloratosilver(I)]‐bis{μ₃‐5‐[(3aS,4S,6aR)‐2‐oxohexahydro‐1H‐thieno[3,4‐d]imidazol‐4‐yl]pentanoato}], [Ag₂(ClO₄)₂(C₁₀H₁₆N₂O₃S)₂]_n or [Ag₂(ClO₄)₂(HL)₂]_n, (III), respectively. In (II), the Ag^I cations are again pentacoordinated by three biotin molecules via two S atoms and a ureido O atom, and by two O atoms of a nitrate anion. In (I), (II) and (III), the Ag^I cations are bridged by an S atom and are coordinated by the ureido O atom and the O atoms of the anions. The reaction of biotin with silver salts of noncoordinating anions, viz. hexafluoridophosphate (PF₆⁻) and hexafluoridoantimonate (SbF₆⁻), gave the chiral double‐stranded helical structures catena‐poly[[silver(I)‐bis{μ₂‐5‐[(3aS,4S,6aR)‐2‐oxohexahydro‐1H‐thieno[3,4‐d]imidazol‐4‐yl]pentanoato}] hexafluoridophosphate], {[Ag(C₁₀H₁₆N₂O₃S)₂](PF₆)}_n or {[Ag(HL)₂](PF₆)}_n, (IV), and catena‐poly[[[{5‐[(3aS,4S,6aR)‐2‐oxohexahydro‐1H‐thieno[3,4‐d]imidazol‐4‐yl]pentanoato}silver(I)]‐μ₂‐{5‐[(3aS,4S,6aR)‐2‐oxohexahydro‐1H‐thieno[3,4‐d]imidazol‐4‐yl]pentanoato}] hexafluoridoantimonate], {[Ag(C₁₀H₁₆N₂O₃S)₂](SbF₆)}_n or {[Ag(HL)₂](SbF₆)}_n, (V), respectively. In (IV), the Ag^I cations have a tetrahedral coordination environment, coordinated by four biotin molecules via two S atoms, and by two carboxy O atoms of two different molecules. In (V), however, the Ag^I cations have a trigonal coordination environment, coordinated by three biotin molecules via two S atoms and one carboxy O atom. In (IV) and (V), neither the ureido O atom nor the F atoms of the anion are involved in coordination. Hence, the coordination environment of the Ag^I cations varies from AgS₂O trigonal to AgS₂O₂ tetrahedral to AgS₂O₃ square‐pyramidal. The conformation of the valeric acid side chain varies from extended to twisted and this, together with the various anions present, has an influence on the solid‐state structures of the resulting compounds. The various O—H...O and N—H...O hydrogen bonds present result in the formation of chiral two‐ and three‐dimensional networks, which are further stabilized by C—H...X (X = O, F, S) interactions, and by N—H...F interactions for (IV) and (V). Biotin itself has a twisted valeric acid side chain which is involved in an intramolecular C—H...S hydrogen bond. The tetrahydrothiophene ring has an envelope conformation with the S atom as the flap. It is displaced from the mean plane of the four C atoms (plane B) by 0.8789 (6) Å, towards the ureido ring (plane A). Planes A and B are inclined to one another by 58.89 (14)°. In the crystal, molecules are linked via O—H...O and N—H...O hydrogen bonds, enclosing R₂²(8) loops, forming zigzag chains propagating along [001]. These chains are linked via N—H...O hydrogen bonds, and C—H...S and C—H...O interactions forming a three‐dimensional network. The absolute configurations of biotin and complexes (I), (II), (IV) and (V) were confirmed crystallographically by resonant scattering.     

Synthesis and Cytotoxicity of Arene‐Ru Compounds Containing 4‐Nitroaniline or 2‐Halogenated 4‐Nitroaniline

The compounds [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)RuCl₂(4‐nitroaniline)] and [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)RuCl₂(2‐halogen‐4‐nitroaniline)] were synthesized and characterized by various means. The [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)RuCl₂(4‐nitroaniline)] and [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)RuCl₂(2‐fluoro‐4‐nitroaniline)] compounds were determined by X‐ray diffraction, appearing in a distorted piano‐stool type of arrangement with similar bond lengths and angles around the ruthenium. The compounds exhibited moderate to strong in vitro cytotoxicity against A549 and MCF‐7 human cancer cells. Substitution of heavy halogen atom on the ortho position of para‐nitroaniline weakened the cytotoxicity against both of MCF‐7 and A549, except the cases of fluorine substitution for hydrogen atom regarding A549 and bromine substitution for chlorine atom regarding MCF‐7, which showed minor deviation.     

Chloro(η6‐p‐cymene)(phosphoramidite)ruthenium(II), a 16‐Electron Fragment Stabilized by an η2‐Aryl–Metal Interaction,and Its Use in Asymmetric Cyclopropanation

Chloride abstraction from the half‐sandwich complexes [RuCl₂(η⁶‐p‐cymene)(P*‐κP)] ( 2a : P* = (S_a,R,R)‐ 1a = (1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl bis[(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl)]phosphoramidite; 2b : P* = (S_a,R,R)‐ 1b = (1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl bis[(1R)‐(1‐(1‐naphthalen‐1‐yl)ethyl]phosphoramidite) with (Et₃O)[PF₆] or Tl[PF₆] gives the cationic, 18‐electron complexes dichloro(η⁶‐p‐cymene){(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl {(1R)‐1‐[(1,2‐η)‐phenyl]ethyl}[(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP}ruthenium(II) hexafluorophosphate ( 3a ) and [Ru(S)]‐dichloro(η⁶‐p‐cymene){(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl {(1R)‐1‐[(1,2‐η)‐naphthalen‐1‐yl]ethyl}[(1R)‐1‐(naphthalen‐1‐yl)ethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP)ruthenium(II) hexafluorophosphate ( 3b ), which feature the η²‐coordination of one aryl substituent of the phosphoramidite ligand, as indicated by ¹H‐, ¹³C‐, and ³¹P‐NMR spectroscopy and confirmed by an X‐ray study of 3b . Additionally, the dissociation of p‐cymene from 2a and 3a gives dichloro{(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl [(1R)‐(1‐(η⁶‐phenyl)ethyl][(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP)ruthenium(II) ( 4a ) and di‐μ‐chlorobis{(1S_a)‐[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diyl [(1R)‐1‐(η⁶‐phenyl)ethyl][(1R)‐1‐phenylethyl]phosphoramidite‐κP}diruthenium(II) bis(hexafluorophosphate) ( 5a ), respectively, in which one phenyl group of the N‐substituents is η⁶‐coordinated to the Ru‐center. Complexes 3a and 3b catalyze the asymmetric cyclopropanation of α‐methylstyrene with ethyl diazoacetate with up to 86 and 87% ee for the cis‐ and the trans‐isomers, respectively.