First Stabilization of 14‐Electron Rhodium(I) Complexes by Hemichelation

Hemichelation is emerging as a new mode of coordination where non‐covalent interactions crucially contribute to the cohesion of electron‐unsaturated organometallic complexes. This study discloses an unprecedented demonstration of this concept to a Group 9 metal, that is, Rh^I. The syntheses of new 14‐electron Rh^I complexes were achieved by choosing the anti‐[(η⁶:η⁶‐fluorenyl){Cr(CO)₃}₂] anion as the ambiphilic hemichelating ligand, which was treated with [{Rh(nbd)Cl}₂] (nbd=norbornadiene) and [{Rh(CO)₂Cl}₂]. The new T‐shaped Rh^I hemichelates were characterized by analytical and structural methods. Investigations using the methods of the DFT and electron‐density topology analysis (NCI region analysis, QTAIM theory) confirmed the closed‐shell, non‐covalent and attractive characters of the interaction between the Rh^I center and the proximal Cr(CO)₃ moiety. This study shows that, by appropriate tuning of the electronic properties of the ambiphilic ligand, truly coordination‐unsaturated Rh^I complexes can be synthesized in a manageable form.     

Cationic RhI Complexes of Azulenes and Their Catalytic Activity on the Formation of Heptalene-1,2-dicarboxylates from Dimethyl Acetylenedicarboxylate and Azulenes

[Rh¹(η⁵-azulene)(cod)]⁺BF complexes 3a–g (cod = (Z,Z)-cycloocta-1,5-diene) have been synthesized by reaction of [Rh¹(cod)]⁺BF in THF with the corresponding azulenes 1a–g (Table 1). The structure of [Rh¹(cod)(η⁵-guaiazulene)]⁺BF ( 3a ) has been determined by X-ray diffraction analysis (Fig. 1 and 2). The Rh-atom is oriented above the five-membered ring of the azulene with almost equal Rh? C distances to all five C-atoms of the ring. The (Z,Z)-cycloocta-1,5-diene ring occurs in two enantiomorphic distorted (C_2v → C₂) tub conformations in the crystals (Fig. 3). In CDCl₃ solution, the cod ligand in the complexes 3 shows a dynamic behavior on the ¹H-NMR time scale which is best explained by rotation of the cod ligand relative to the azulene ligands around an imaginary cod? Rh? azulene axis. The new complexes 3 catalyze the formation of heptalene-1,2-dicarboxylates 2 from dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (ADM) and the corresponding azulenes 1 just as effectively as [RuH₂(PPh₃)₄] and the analogous [RhH(PPh₃)₄] complex in MeCN solution (Table 3). On grounds of simplicity, 3 can be generated in situ, when [RhCl(cod)]₂ is applied as catalyst (Table 3).     

Rhodium Complexes Containing O‐Bonded NHxMe2−xCHO (x=0, 1, 2): X‐Ray Structure of [Rh(PPh3)3(OCHNHMe)]ClO4

Displacement of norbornadiene (nbd; bicyclo[2.2.1]hepta‐2,5‐diene) from [Rh(PPh₃)₂(nbd)]ClO₄ by hydrogenation in the presence of PPh₃ and formamide or Me‐substituted derivatives, results in the formation of O‐bonded formamide complexes [Rh(PPh₃)₃(OCHNH_xMe_2−x)]ClO₄ (x=0, 1, 2) rather than N‐bonded derivatives. These have been characterised by spectroscopic measurements and, in the case of [Rh(PPh₃)₃(OCHNHMe)]ClO₄, by X‐ray crystallography. All undergo oxidative addition with H₂, and the rates of ligand exchange in the Rh^I and Rh^III complexes have been determined by magnetisation‐transfer measurements.     

Facile Synthesis and Versatile Reactivity of an Unusual Cyclometalated Rhodium(I) Pincer Complex

The synthesis of the reactive PN(C^H) ligand 2‐di(tert‐butylphosphanomethyl)‐6‐phenylpyridine ( 1^H ) and its versatile coordination to a Rh^I center is described. Facile C?H activation occurs in the presence of a (internal) base, thus resulting in the new cyclometalated complex [Rh^I(CO)(κ³‐P,N,C‐ 1 )] ( 3 ), which has been structurally characterized. The resulting tridentate ligand framework was experimentally and computationally shown to display dual‐site proton‐responsive reactivity, including reversible cyclometalation. This feature was probed by selective H/D exchange with [D₁]formic acid. The addition of HBF₄ to 3 leads to rapid net protonolysis of the Rh?C bond to produce [Rh^I(CO)(κ³‐P,N,(C?H)‐ 1 )] ( 4 ). This species features a rare aryl C?H agostic interaction in the solid state, as shown by X‐ray diffraction studies. The nature of this interaction was also studied computationally. Reaction of 3 with methyl iodide results in rapid and selective ortho‐methylation of the phenyl ring, thus generating [Rh^I(CO)(κ²‐P,N‐ 1^Me )] ( 5 ). Variable‐temperature NMR spectroscopy indicates the involvement of a Rh^III intermediate through formal oxidative addition to give trans‐[Rh^III(CH₃)(CO)(I)(κ³‐P,N,C‐ 1 )] prior to C?C reductive elimination. The Rh^III–trans‐diiodide complex [Rh^I(CO)(I)₂(κ³‐P,N,C‐ 1 )] ( 6 ) has been structurally characterized as a model compound for this elusive intermediate.     

Structural Chemistry of Chiral Complexes. NMR and X-ray studies on Rh1 compounds of (S)-1-[bis(p-methylphenyl)phosphino]-2-[(p-methoxybenzyl)amino]-3-methylbutane

The Rh¹(diolefin)complexes [Rh(nbd)( 2 )][PF₆] [Rh(1,5-cod)( 2 )][PF₆], and [Rh((Z)-α -acetamidocinnamic acid)( 2 )][PF₆] ( 2 = the chiral P,N-ligand (S)-1-[bis(p-methylphenyl)phospino]-2-[p-methoxybenzyl)amino]-3-methylbutane have been prepared and characterized. These complexes exit as a mixture of isomers arising from different five-membered-ring conformations and diastereoisomers due to both the prochiral nitrogen and olefin ligands. The three-dimensional solutions structures of these complexes have been studied with the specific aim of understanding how the chiral pocket is built. Aspects of the exchange dynamics and their possible relevance to homogeneous hydrogenation are discussed The solid-state structure for the nbd complex, [Rh(nbd)( 2 )][PF₆], as well as detailed one- and two-dimensional ³¹P-, ¹³C-, and ¹H-NMR results are presented.     

Reactions of Dienes with a Mo(0) Complex with Tetraphosphine Coligand [Mo(P4)(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)] (P4 = Meso‐o‐C6H4(PPhCH2CH2PPh2)2)

Reaction of tetraphosphine complex [Mo(κ⁴‐P4)(Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂)] (1; P4 = meso‐o‐C₆H₄‐(PPhCH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂) with E‐1,3‐pentadiene in toluene at 60 °C gave the η⁴‐diene complex [Mo(η⁴‐E‐1,3‐pentadiene)(κ⁴‐P4)] (2), which is present as a mixture of two isomers due to the orientation of the Me group in the diene ligand. Treatment of 1 with Z‐1,3‐pentadien also resulted in the formation of 2 as the sole product after heating the reaction mixture at 90 °C. Whereas the reaction of 1 with 1,3‐cyclohexadiene at 60 °C afforded the η⁴‐diene complex [Mo(η⁴‐cyclohexadiene)(κ⁴‐P4)] (6), that with cyclopentadiene led to the C‐H bond scission product [η⁵‐C₅H₅)MoH(κ³‐P4)] (7). Detailed structures were determined by X‐ray crystallography for 2, 6,and 7, and fluxional feature of 6 in solution was clarified based on the VT‐NMR studies.     

Polymerization of 3‐ethynylthiophene with homogeneous and heterogeneous Rh catalysts

3‐Ethynylthiophene (3ETh) was polymerized with Rh(I) complexes: [Rh(cod)acac], [Rh(nbd)acac], [Rh(cod)Cl]₂, and [Rh(nbd)Cl]₂ (cod is η²:η²‐cycloocta‐1,5‐diene and nbd η²:η²‐norborna‐2,5‐diene), used as homogeneous catalysts and with the last two complexes anchored on mesoporous polybenzimidazole (PBI) beads: [Rh(cod)Cl]₂/PBI and [Rh(nbd)Cl]₂/PBI used as heterogeneous catalysts. All tested catalyst systems give high‐cis poly(3ETh). In situ NMR study of homogeneous polymerizations induced with [Rh(cod)acac] and [Rh(nbd)acac] complexes has revealed: (i) a transformation of acac ligands into free acetylacetone (Hacac) occurring since the early stage of polymerization, which suggests that this reaction is part of the initiation, (ii) that the initiation is rather slow in both of these polymerization systems, and (iii) a release of cod ligand from [Rh(cod)acac] complex but no release of nbd ligand from [Rh(nbd)acac] complex during the polymerization. The stability of diene ligand binding to Rh‐atom in [Rh(diene)acac] catalysts remarkably affects only the molecular weight but not the yield of poly(3ETh). The heterogeneous catalyst systems also provide high‐cis poly(3ETh), which is of very low contamination with catalyst residues since a leaching of anchored Rh complexes is negligible. The course of heterogeneous polymerizations is somewhat affected by limitations arising from the diffusion of monomer inside catalyst beads. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 46: 2776–2787, 2008     

Iodination of cyclo‐E5‐Complexes (E=P,As)

In a high‐yield one‐pot synthesis, the reactions of [Cp*M(η⁵‐P₅)] (M=Fe ( 1 ), Ru ( 2 )) with I₂ resulted in the selective formation of [Cp*MP₆I₆]⁺ salts ( 3 , 4 ). The products comprise unprecedented all‐cis tripodal triphosphino‐cyclotriphosphine ligands. The iodination of [Cp*Fe(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 6 ) gave, in addition to [Fe(CH₃CN)₆]²⁺ salts of the rare [As₆I₈]^2? (in 7 ) and [As₄I₁₄]^2? (in 8 ) anions, the first di‐cationic Fe‐As triple decker complex [(Cp*Fe)₂(μ,η^5:5‐As₅)][As₆I₈] ( 9 ). In contrast, the iodination of [Cp*Ru(η⁵‐As₅)] ( 10 ) did not result in the full cleavage of the M?As bonds. Instead, a number of dinuclear complexes were obtained: [(Cp*Ru)₂(μ,η^5:5‐As₅)][As₆I₈]_0.5 ( 11 ) represents the first Ru‐As₅ triple decker complex, thus completing the series of monocationic complexes [(Cp^RM)₂(μ,η^5:5‐E₅)]⁺ (M=Fe, Ru; E=P, As). [(Cp*Ru)₂As₈I₆] ( 12 ) crystallizes as a racemic mixture of both enantiomers, while [(Cp*Ru)₂As₄I₄] ( 13 ) crystallizes as a symmetric and an asymmetric isomer and features a unique tetramer of {AsI} arsinidene units as a middle deck.     

Catalytic diversity of diene complexes of niobium and tantalum on polymerizations of ethylene,norbornene, and methyl methacrylate

Half‐metallocene diene complexes of niobium and tantalum catalyzed three‐types of polymerization: (1) the living polymerization of ethylene by niobium and tantalum complexes, MCl₂(η⁴‐1,3‐diene)(η⁵‐C₅R₅) ( 1‐4 ; M = Nb, Ta; R = H, Me) combined with an excess of methylaluminoxane; (2) the stereoselective ring opening metathesis polymerization of norbornene by bis(benzyl) tantalum complexes, Ta(CH₂Ph)₂(η⁴‐1,3‐butadiene)(η⁵‐C₅R₅) ( 11 : R = Me; 12 : R = H) and Ta(CH₂Ph)₂(η⁴‐o‐xylylene)(η⁵‐C₅Me₅) ( 16 ); and (3) the polymerization of methyl methacrylate by butadiene‐diazabutadiene complexes of tantalum, Ta(η²‐RN=CHCH=NR)(η⁴‐1,3‐butadiene)(η⁵‐C₅Me₅) ( 25 : R = p‐methoxyphenyl; 26 : R = cyclohexyl) in the presence of an aluminum compound ( 24 ) as an activator of the monomer.     

Polymerization of substituted acetylenes by various rhodium catalysts: Comparison of catalyst activity and effect of additives

This research deals with comparison of the activity of various Rh catalysts in the polymerization of monosubstituted acetylenes and the effect of various amines used in conjunction with [Rh(nbd)Cl]₂ in the polymerization of phenylacetylene. A zwitterionic Rh complex, Rh⁺(nbd)[(η⁶‐C₆H₅)B^?(C₆H₅)₃] ( 3 ), was able to polymerize phenylacetylene ( 5a ), t‐butylacetylene ( 5b ), N‐propargylhexanamide ( 5c ) and n‐hexyl propiolate ( 5d ), and displayed higher activity than the other catalysts examined, that is [Rh(nbd)Cl]₂ ( 1 ), [Rh(cod)(O‐o‐cresol)]₂ ( 2 ), and Rh‐vinyl complex ( 4 ). Monomers 5a and 5c polymerized virtually quantitatively or in fair yields with all these catalysts, while monomer 5b was polymerizable only with catalyts 3 and 4 . Monomer 5d did not polymerize in high yields with these Rh complexes. The catalytic activity tended to decrease in the order of 3 > 4 > 2 > 1 . Although polymerization of 5a did not proceed at all in toluene with [Rh(nbd)Cl]₂ alone, it smoothly polymerized in the presence of various amines as cocatalysts. The polymerization rate as well as the molecular weight of polymer depended on the basicity and steric bulkiness of amines. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 4530–4536, 2005     

Microwave‐Assisted Synthesis and Transformations of Cationic CpRu(II)(naphthalene) and CpRu(II)(naphthoquinone) Complexes

Details of the direct synthesis of cationic Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐arene) complexes from ruthenocene using microwave heating are reported. Developed for the important catalyst precursor [Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐1‐4,4a,8a‐naphthalene)][PF₆] reaction time could be shortened from three days to 15 min. The method was extended to [Ru(II)(η⁶‐benzene)(η⁵‐Cp)][PF₆], [Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐toluene)][PF₆], [Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐mesitylene)][PF₆], [Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐hexamethylbenzene)][PF₆], [Ru(II)(η⁵Cp)(η⁶‐indane)][PF₆], [Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐2,6‐dimethylnaphthalene)][PF₆], and [Ru(II)(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁶‐pyrene)][PF₆]. 1‐methylnaphthalene and 2,3‐dimethylnaphthalene afforded mixtures of regioisomeric complexes. [Ru(Cp)(CH₃CN)₃][PF₆], derived from the naphthalene precursor provided access to the cationic RuCp complexes of naphthoquinone, tetralindione, 1,4‐dihydroxynaphthalene, and 1,4‐dimethoxynaphthalene. Reduction of the tetralindione complex afforded selectively the endo,endo diol derivative. X‐Ray structures of five complexes are reported.     

Synthesis of Citronellal by RhI‐Catalysed Asymmetric Isomerization of N,N‐Diethyl‐Substituted Geranyl‐ and Nerylamines or Geraniol and Nerol in the Presence of Chiral Diphosphino Ligands,under Homogeneous and Supported Conditions

For the asymmetric isomerization of geranyl‐ or neryldiethylamine ((E)‐ or (Z)‐ 1 , resp.) and allyl alcohols geraniol or nerol ((E)‐ or (Z)‐ 2 , resp.) to citronellal ( 4 ) in the presence of a [Rh^I(ligand)cycloocta‐1,5‐diene)]⁺ catalyst, the atropic ligands 5 – 11 are compared under homogeneous and polymer‐supported conditions with the non‐C₂‐symmetrical diphosphino ferrocene ligands 12 – 16 . The ^tBu‐josiphos ligand 13 or daniphos ligand 19 , available in both antipodal series, already catalyse the reaction of (E)‐ 1 at 20° (97% e.e.) and favourably compare with the binap ligand 5 (see Table 1). Silica‐gel‐ or polymer‐supported diphosphino ligands usually afford similar selectivity as compared to the corresponding ligands applied under homogeneous conditions, but are generally less reactive. In this context, a polymer‐supported ligand of interest is the polymer‐anchored binap (R)‐ 6 , in terms of reactivity, selectivity, and recoverability, with a turnover of more than 14400.     

New Chromium Enolates

Three new (η²‐acrylate)(η⁶‐arene)dicarbonylchromium complexes are reported. They were obtained either by CO/acrylate exchange in [Cr(η⁶‐benzene)(CO)₃] ( 1 ) via the photolytically generated η²‐cyclooctene intermediate or by arene exchange in [Cr(η²‐methyl acrylate)(η⁶‐benzene)(CO)₂] ( 3 ) (Scheme 1). On crystallization, [Cr(η²‐methyl acrylate)(η⁶‐o‐xylene)(CO)₂] ( 5 ) underwent partial resolution. The degree of this resolution was analyzed via X‐ray crystal‐structure determination (Fig. 1) and was correlated to the CD spectra in solution (Fig. 6), thus allowing the assignment of the absolute configuration. The reaction of [Cr(η²‐acrylate)(η⁶‐benzene)(CO)₂] complexes with cyclopentad‐1,3‐diene or 1H‐indene afforded new (η⁶‐cyclopenta‐2,4‐dien‐1‐yl)‐ or (η⁶‐1H‐inden‐1‐yl)(η³‐oxaallyl)chromium complexes (Scheme 2). A mechanism is proposed that involves arene‐ligand substitution by the diene ligand, initiated by haptotropic rearrangement of the acrylate from a η²‐ to a η⁴‐coordination mode, followed by hydride migration from the diene to the acrylate (Scheme 3). An X‐ray crystal‐structure determination of [Cr(CO)₂(η⁵‐1H‐inden‐1‐yl){η³‐CH(CH₂CF₃)C(O)OEt}] ( 8 ) reveals a metal enolate that is best described as η³‐oxaallyl species (Fig. 2). A shorter, more‐efficient route to the [Cr(η⁵‐1H‐inden‐1‐yl)(η³‐oxaallyl)] complexes was devised via the reaction of [Cr(CO)₂(η²‐cyclooctene)(η⁶‐1H‐indene)] with methyl acrylate (Scheme 4).     

The addition of small molecules to (η-C5H5)2Rh2(CO)(CF3C2CF3) : I. The coordinative-addition of CO,CNR, and some group V donor ligands

Treatment of the μ(η¹)-alkyne complex (η-C₅H₅)₂Rh₂(CO)₂(CF₃C₂CF₃) with trimethylamine-N-oxide results in mono-decarbonylation to give the μ(η²)- alkyne complex (η-C₅H₅)₂Rh₂(μ-CO)(CF₃C₂CF₃). Coordinative addition of a variety of ligands L to the monocarbonyl complex has been achieved at room temperature, and stable adducts (η-C₅H₅)₂Rh₂(CO)L(CF₃C₂CF₃) (L  CO, CNBu^t, PPh₃, PMePh₂, P(OMe)₃, AsPh₃, PF₃ and PF₂(NEt₂)) have been fully characterized by infrared and NMR spectroscopy. In each complex, there is a μ(η¹)-attachment of the hexafluorobut-2-yne and a trans-arrangement of CO and L. The spectroscopic data establish that there is rapid scrambling of CO and L when L  CNBu^t. An unstable adduct is formed when (η-C₅H₅)₂Rh₂(μ-CO)(CF₃C₂CF₃) is dissolved in pyridine.     

Diminished electron density in the Vaska‐type rhodium(I) complex trans‐[Rh(NCBH3)(CO)(PPh3)2]

Vaska‐type complexes, i.e. trans‐[RhX(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (X is a halogen or pseudohalogen), undergo a range of reactions and exhibit considerable catalytic activity. The electron density on the Rh^I atom in these complexes plays an important role in their reactivity. Many cyanotrihydridoborate (BH₃CN⁻) complexes of Group 6–8 transition metals have been synthesized and structurally characterized, an exception being the rhodium(I) complex. Carbonyl(cyanotrihydridoborato‐κN)bis(triphenylphosphine‐κP)rhodium(I), [Rh(NCBH₃)(CO)(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂], was prepared by the metathesis reaction of sodium cyanotrihydridoborate with trans‐[RhCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂], and was characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis and IR, ¹H, ¹³C and ¹¹B NMR spectroscopy. The X‐ray diffraction data indicate that the cyanotrihydridoborate ligand coordinates to the Rh^I atom through the N atom in a trans position with respect to the carbonyl ligand; this was also confirmed by the IR and NMR data. The carbonyl stretching frequency ν(CO) and the carbonyl carbon ¹J_C–Rh and ¹J_C–P coupling constants of the C_ipso atoms of the triphenylphosphine groups reflect the diminished electron density on the central Rh^I atom compared to the parent trans‐[RhCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂] complex.     

Rapid intramolecular interactions between organic isocyanates and hexafluorobut-2-yne on a dirhodium centre; X-ray crystal structure of (η-C5H5)2Rh2 {μ2(η3-C(CF3)C(CF3)C(O)N(Ph)}

Complexes of formula (η-C₅H₅₂Rh₂{CF₃C₂CF₃ · RNCO} have been prepared by three methods, from reactions between organic isocyanates and (η-C₅H₅)₂Rh₂(CO)(CF₃C₂CF₃) or (η-C₅H₅)₂Rh₂(CO)₂(CF₃C₂CF₃); by treatment of (η-C₅H₅)₂Rh₂(CO)(CF₃C₂CF₃) with organic azides; and by oxidation with Me₃NO of the organic isocyanide in (η-C₅H₅)₂Rh₂(CO)(CNR)(CF₃C₂CF₃). The crystal and molecular structure of the complex (η-C₅H₅)₂Rh₂{CF₃C₂CF₃ · RNCO} with R = Ph has been determined from single crystal X-ray diffraction data. This reveals that the isocyanate has condensed with the hexafluorobut-2-yne to form an amide ligand of the form C(CF₃)C(CF₃)C(=O)N(R); this bridges the two rhodium atoms in a μ₂η³-manner.     

Pyridine‐Enhanced Head‐to‐Tail Dimerization of Terminal Alkynes by a Rhodium–N‐Heterocyclic‐Carbene Catalyst

A general regioselective rhodium‐catalyzed head‐to‐tail dimerization of terminal alkynes is presented. The presence of a pyridine ligand (py) in a Rh–N‐heterocyclic‐carbene (NHC) catalytic system not only dramatically switches the chemoselectivity from alkyne cyclotrimerization to dimerization but also enhances the catalytic activity. Several intermediates have been detected in the catalytic process, including the π‐alkyne‐coordinated Rh^I species [RhCl(NHC)(η²‐HC?CCH₂Ph)(py)] ( 3 ) and [RhCl(NHC){η²‐C(tBu)?C(E)CH?CHtBu}(py)] ( 4 ) and the Rh^III–hydride–alkynyl species [RhClH{? C?CSi(Me)₃}(IPr)(py)₂] ( 5 ). Computational DFT studies reveal an operational mechanism consisting of sequential alkyne C? H oxidative addition, alkyne insertion, and reductive elimination. A 2,1‐hydrometalation of the alkyne is the more favorable pathway in accordance with a head‐to‐tail selectivity.     

High Yield Synthesis,Molecular Structure,and Reactions of the 16‐Electron Norbornadiene Complex, [WI2(CO)2(nbd)]

Reaction of equimolar amounts of [WI₂(CO)₃(NCMe)₂] and norbornadiene (nbd) in toluene at 95 °C for 3h gave the 16‐electron crystallographically characterised complex, [WI₂(CO)₂(nbd)] (1) in 96 % yield. The structure of 1 has a distorted octahedral geometry, with the two cis‐ iodo ligands opposite to the two alkene groups in the equatorial plane, with the carbonyl groups in the axial sites. Treatment of 1 with two equivalents of PhC₂Ph in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature afforded the bis(alkyne) complex [WI₂(CO)₂(η²—PhC₂Ph)₂] (2) . Equimolar quantities of 1 and 4, 4′‐bipyridine react in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature to yield the seven‐coordinate complex, [WI₂(CO)₂(4, 4′‐bipyridine)(nbd)] (3) .     

Halide and complex halogeno anions as salts of oxinate chelates of titanium(IV)

(η⁵-Cyclopentadienyl)(η⁵-pyrrolyl)titanium(IV) dichloride, (η⁵-indenyl)-(η⁵-pyrrolyl)titanium(IV) dichloride and (η⁵-cyclopentadienyl)(η⁵-indenyl)-titanium(IV) dichloride, when treated with 8-hydroxyquinoline (oxine) in aqueous medium form ionic derivatives of the type, [(η⁵-R)(η⁵-R′)TiL]⁺ Cl^- (R = C₅H₅, C₉H₇, R′ = C₄H₄N; R = C₅H₅, R′ = C₉H₇; L is the conjugate base of (oxine). A number of halide and complex halogeno anions present in aqueous solution were isolated as salts of these ionic complexes giving derivatives of the type, [(η⁵-R)(η⁵-R′)TiL]⁺ X^- (X = Br^-, I^-, ZnCl₃(H₂O)^-, CdCl₄^2-, HgCl₃^-). Conductivity measurements in nitrobenzene solution indicate that these complexes are electrolytes. Both the IR and ¹H NMR spectral studies demonstrate that the ligand L is chelating. Consequently there is tetrahedral coordination about the titanium(IV) ion.     

Syntheses and structural characterizations of the octahedral boride clusters [Rh2Ru4H(CO)16−2x (nbd) x B] (x=1,2) and gold(I) phosphine derivatives (nbd=norbornadiene)

The reaction of less than one equivalent of [Rh₂Cl₂(nbd)₂] with [Ru₄H(CO)₁₂BH]⁻, which contains a semi-interstitial boron atom, yields the heterometallic boride clustercis-[Rh₂Ru₄H(CO)₁₂(nbd)₂B] which has been characterized by spectroscopic and X-ray diffraction methods. The cluster has an octahedral core, consistent with an 86 electron count. Deprotonation yields the conjugate basecis-[Rh₂Ru₄(CO)₁₂(nbd)₂B]⁻ which has been isolated and fully characterized as the [(Ph₃P)₂N]⁺ salt. There is little structural perturbation upon going fromcis-[Rh₂Ru₄H(CO)₁₂(nbd)₂B] tocis-[Rh₂Ru₄(CO)₁₂(nbd)₂B]⁻ and neither cluster shows a tendency for the formation of thetrans skeletal isomer in contrast to the analogous carbonyl clustercis-[Rh₂Ru₄(CO)₁₆B]⁻. If the reaction of [Rh₂Cl₂(nbd)₂] with [Ru₄H(CO)₁₂BH]⁻ is allowed to proceed for 30 min and [R ₃PAuCl] (R=Ph, C₆H₁₁, 2-MeC₆H₄) is then added, the clusterscis-[Rh₂Ru₄(CO)₁₂(nbd)₂B(AuPR₃)] andcis-[Rh₂Ru₄(CO)₁₄(nbd)B(AuPR₃)] are formed in yields that are dependent upon the initial reaction period. The single crystal structures ofcis-[Rh₂Ru₄(CO)₁₂(nbd)₂B(AuPPh₃)] andcis-[Rh₂Ru₄(CO)₁₄(nbd)B(AuPPh₃)] are reported. In contrast to their all-carbonyl analoguescis-[Rh₂Ru₄(CO)₁₆B(AuPR ₃)] (R=Ph or C₆H₁₁), the nbd derivatives do not undergocis →trans skeletal isomerism.