Refined functional equations stemming from cubic,quadratic and additive mappings

Let n ≥ 2 be an integer. In this paper, we investigate the generalized Hyers-Ulam stability problem for the following functional equation f（n-1∑j=1 xj＋2xn）＋f（n-1∑j=1 xj-2xn）＋8 n-1∑j=1f（xj）=2f（n-1∑j=1 xj） ＋4 n-1∑j=1[f（xj＋xn）＋f（xj-xn）] which contains as solutions cubic, quadratic or additive mappings.     

Projektive Skalen,Tschebyscheff-Polynome und Fibonacci-Zahlen

Summary. Let $\widehat{\widehat T}_n$ and $\overline U_n$ denote the modified Chebyshev polynomials defined by $\widehat{\widehat T}_n (x) = {T_{2n + 1} \left(\sqrt{x + 3 \over 4} \right) \over \sqrt{x + 3 \over 4}}, \quad \overline U_{n}(x) = U_{n} \left({x + 1 \over 2}\right) \qquad (n \in \mathbb{N}_{0},\ x \in \mathbb{R}).$ For all $n \in \mathbb{N}_{0}$ define $\widehat{\widehat T}_{-(n + 1)} = \widehat{\widehat T}_n$ and $\overline U_{-(n + 2)} = - \overline U_n$, furthermore $\overline U_{-1} = 0$. In this paper, summation formulae for sums of type $\sum\limits^{+\infty}_{k = -\infty} \mathbf a_{\mathbf k}(\nu; x)$ are given, where $\bigl(\mathbf a_{\mathbf k}(\nu; x)\bigr)^{-1} = (-1)^k \cdot \Bigl( x \cdot \widehat{\widehat T}_{\left[k + 1 \over 2\right] - 1} (\nu) +\widehat{\widehat T}_{\left[k + 1 \over 2\right]}(\nu)\Bigr) \cdot \Bigl(x \cdot \overline U_{\left[k \over 2\right] - 1} (\nu) + \overline U_{\left[k \over 2\right]} (\nu)\Bigr)$ with real constants $ x, \nu $. The above sums will turn out to be telescope sums. They appear in connection with projective geometry. The directed euclidean measures of the line segments of a projective scale form a sequence of type $(\mathbf a_{\mathbf k} (\nu;x))_{k \in \mathbb{Z}}$ where $ \nu $ is the cross-ratio of the scale, and x is the ratio of two consecutive line segments once chosen. In case of hyperbolic $(\nu \in \mathbb{R} \setminus] - 3,1[)$ and parabolic $\nu = -3$ scales, the formula $\sum\limits^{+\infty}_{k = -\infty} \mathbf a_{\mathbf k} (\nu; x) = {\frac{1}{x - q_{{+}\atop(-)}}} - {\frac{1}{x - q_{{-}\atop(+)}}} \eqno (1)$ holds for $\nu > 1$ (resp. $\nu \leq - 3$), unless the scale is geometric, that is unless $x = q_+$ or $x = q_-$. By $q_{\pm} = {-(\nu + 1) \pm \sqrt{(\nu - 1)(\nu + 3)} \over 2}$ we denote the quotient of the associated geometric sequence.

     

Solvability of a higher-order multi-point boundary value problem at resonance

Based on the coincidence degree theory of Mawhin, we get a new general existence result for the following higher-order multi-point boundary value problem at resonance

THE ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOUR OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

AIn this paper, the author obtains the following results:(1) If Taylor coeffiients of a function satisfy the conditions:(i),(ii),(iii)A_k=O(1/k) the for any h>0 the function φ(z)=exp{w(z)} satisfies the asymptotic equality the case h>1/2 was proved by Milin.(2) If f(z)=z α_2z~2 …∈S~* and,then for λ>1/2     

THROREMS OF DISTORTION FOR SCHLICHT FUNCTIONS

Let \[f(z) = z + \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {{a_n}{z^n} \in S} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} and{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} \log \frac{{f(z) - f(\xi )}}{{z - \xi }} - \frac{{z\xi }}{{f(z)f(\xi )}} = \sum\limits_{m,n = 1}^\infty {{d_{m,n}}{z^m}{\xi ^n},} \], we denote \[{f_v} = f({z_v})\] , \[\begin{array}{l} {\varphi _\varepsilon }({z_u}{z_v}) = {\left| {\frac{{{f_u} - {f_v}}}{{{z_u} - {z_v}}}} \right|^\varepsilon }\frac{1}{{(1 - {z_u}{{\bar z}_v})}},\g_m^\varepsilon (z) = - {F_m}(\frac{1}{{f(z)}}) + \frac{1}{{{z^m}}} + \varepsilon {{\bar z}^m}, \end{array}\], where \({F_m}(t)\) is a Faber polynomial of degree m. Theorem 1. If \[f(z) \in S{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} and{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} \sum\limits_{u,v = 1}^N {{A_{u,v}}{x_u}{{\bar x}_v} \ge 0} \] and then \[\begin{array}{l} \sum\limits_{u,v = 1}^N {{A_{u,v}}{\lambda _u}{{\bar \lambda }_v}} {\left| {\frac{{{f_u} - {f_v}}}{{{z_u} - {z_v}}}} \right|^\varepsilon }\exp \{ \alpha {F_l}({z_u},{z_v})\} \ \le \sum\limits_{u,v = 1}^N {{A_{u,v}}{\lambda _u}{{\bar \lambda }_v}} \varphi _\varepsilon ^\alpha ({z_u}{z_v})l = 1,2,3, \end{array}\], where \[\begin{array}{l} {F_1}({z_u},{z_v}) = \frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\frac{1}{n}} g_n^\varepsilon ({z_u})\bar g_n^\varepsilon ({z_v}),\{F_2}({z_u},{z_v}) = \frac{1}{{1 + {\varepsilon _n}R{d_{n,n}}}}Rg_n^\varepsilon ({z_u})Rg_n^\varepsilon ({z_v}),\{F_3}({z_u},{z_v}) = \frac{1}{{1 - {\varepsilon _n}R{d_{n,n}}}}Rg_n^\varepsilon ({z_u})Rg_n^\varepsilon ({z_v}). \end{array}\] The \[F({z_u},{z_v}) = \frac{1}{2}{g_1}({z_u}){{\bar g}_2}({z_v})\] is due to Kungsun. Theorem 2. If \(f(z) \in S\) ,then \[P(z) + \left| {\sum\limits_{u,v = 1}^N {{A_{u,v}}{\lambda _u}{{\bar \lambda }_v}} {{\left| {\frac{{{f_u} - {f_v}}}{{{z_u} - {z_v}}}\frac{{{z_u}{z_v}}}{{{f_u}{f_v}}}} \right|}^\varepsilon }} \right| \le \sum\limits_{u,v = 1}^N {{\lambda _u}{{\bar \lambda }_v}} \frac{1}{{1 - {z_u}{{\bar z}_v}}}\], where \[\begin{array}{l} P(z) = \frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\frac{1}{n}} {G_n}(z),\{G_n}(z) = {\left| {\left| {\sum\limits_{n = 1}^N {{\beta _u}({F_n}(\frac{1}{{f({z_u})}}) - \frac{1}{{z_u^n}})} } \right| - \left| {\sum\limits_{n = 1}^N {{\beta _u}z_u^n} } \right|} \right|^2}, \end{array}\], \(P(z) \equiv 0\) is due to Xia Daoxing.     

On the Springer''s Conjecture of the Coefficients of Univalent Meromorphic Functions

Let $\sigma$ denote the family of univalent functions $\[F(z) = z + \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\frac{{{b_n}}}{{{z^n}}}} \]$ in l< |z| <\infty if G(w) is the inverse of a function $F(z) \in \sigma ^'$, the expansion of G(w) in some neighborhood of w=\infty is $\[G(w) = w - \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\frac{{{B_n}}}{{{w^n}}}} \]$ It is well known that |B_1|\leq 1 for any F(z) \in \sigma ^'. Springer^[1] proved that | B_3| \leq 1 and conjectured that $\[|{B_{2n - 1}}| \le \frac{{(2n - 2)!}}{{n!(n - 1)!}}{\rm{ }}(n = 3,4, \cdots )\]$ (1) Kubota^[2] proved (1) for n=3, 4, 5. Schober^[3] proved (1) for n = 6, 7. Ren Fuyao[4,5] has verified (1) for n=6, 7, 8. In this article we are going to verify (1) for n=9.     

Criterion of polynomial increase of a function and its derivatives

ДОкАжАНО, ЧтО Дль тОгО, ЧтОБы Дльr РАж ДИФФЕРЕНцИРУЕМОИ НА пРОМЕжУткЕ [А, + ∞) ФУНкцИИf сУЩЕстВОВА л тАкОИ МНОгОЧлЕН (1) $$P(x) = \mathop \Sigma \limits_{\kappa = 0}^{r - 1} a_k x^k ,$$ , ЧтО (2) $$\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to + \infty } (f(x) - P(x))^{(k)} = 0,k = 0,1,...,r - 1,$$ , НЕОБхОДИМО И ДОстАтО ЧНО, ЧтОБы схОДИлсь ИН тЕгРАл (3) $$\int\limits_a^{ + \infty } {dt_1 } \int\limits_{t_1 }^{ + \infty } {dt_2 ...} \int\limits_{t_{r - 1} }^{ + \infty } {f^{(r)} (t)dt.}$$ ЕслИ ЁтОт ИНтЕгРАл сх ОДИтсь, тО Дль кОЁФФИц ИЕНтОВ МНОгОЧлЕНА (1) ИМЕУт МЕс тО ФОРМУлы $$\begin{gathered} a_{r - m} = \frac{1}{{(r - m)!}}\left( {\mathop \Sigma \limits_{j = 1}^m \frac{{( - 1)^{m - j} f^{(r - j)} (x_0 )}}{{(m - j)!}}} \right.x_0^{m - j} + \hfill \\ + ( - 1)^{m - 1} \left. {\mathop \Sigma \limits_{l = 0}^{m - 1} \frac{{x_0^l }}{{l!}}\int\limits_a^{ + \infty } {dt_1 } \int\limits_{t_1 }^{ + \infty } {dt_2 ...} \int\limits_{t_{m - l - 1} }^{ + \infty } {f^{(r)} (t_{m - 1} )dt_{m - 1} } } \right),m = 1,2,...,r. \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$ ДОстАтОЧНыМ, НО НЕ НЕОБхОДИМыМ Усл ОВИЕМ схОДИМОстИ кРА тНОгО ИНтЕгРАлА (3) ьВльЕтсь схОДИМОсть ИНтЕгРАл А \(\int\limits_a^{ + \infty } {x^{r - 1} f^{(r)} (x)dx}\)      

A NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITION FOR THE OSCILLATION OF HIGHER-ORDER NEUTRAL EQUATIONS WITH SEVERAL DELAYS

Consider the higher-order neutral delay differential equationd~t/dt~n(x(t)+sum from i=1 to lp_ix(t-τ_i)-sum from j=1 to mr_jx(t-ρ_j))+sum from k=1 to Nq_kx(t-u_k)=0,(A)where the coefficients and the delays are nonnegative constants with n≥2 even. Then anecessary and sufficient condition for the oscillation of (A) is that the characteristicequationλ~n+λ~nsum from i=1 to lp_ie~(-λτ_i-λ~n)sum from j=1 to mr_je~(-λρ_j)+sum from k=1 to Nq_ke~(-λρ_k)=0has no real roots.     

On analytic continuation of a hypergeometric series using the Euler-Knopp transformation

The Euler-Knopp transformation is considered in terms of the problems of regularity and acceleration of the rate of convergence. The object of study is the hypergeometric series

Existence and Multiplicity of Solutions for Impulsive Fractional Differential Equations

In this paper, we study the existence of solutions for the following impulsive fractional boundary-value problem:

$$\begin{aligned} {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} - \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t} \Big (\frac{1}{2} {}_0D_t^{\alpha - 1} ({}_0^c D_t^\alpha u (t) ) - \frac{1}{2} {}_tD_T^{\alpha - 1} ({}_t^c D_T^\alpha u (t)) \Big ) = \lambda u (t) + f (t, u (t)), &{} t \ne t_j, \;\;\text {a.e.}\;\; t \in [0, T],\\ \Delta \Big (\frac{1}{2} {}_0D_t^{\alpha - 1} ({}_0^c D_t^\alpha u (t_j) ) - \frac{1}{2} {}_tD_T^{\alpha - 1} ({}_t^c D_T^\alpha u (t_j)) \Big ) = I_j (u (t_j)), &{} j = 1, 2, \ldots , n,\\ u (0) = u (T) = 0, \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}$$

where \(\alpha \in (1/2, 1]\), \(0 = t_0< t_1< t_2< \cdots< t_n< t_{n +1} = T\), \(\lambda \) is a parameter and \(f :[0, T] \times {\mathbb {R}} \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) and \(I_j : {\mathbb {R}} \rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\), \(j = 1, \ldots , n\) are continuous functions and

$$\begin{aligned}&\Delta \left( \frac{1}{2} {}_0D_t^{\alpha - 1} ({}_0^c D_t^\alpha u (t_j) ) - \frac{1}{2} {}_tD_T^{\alpha - 1} ({}_t^c D_T^\alpha u (t_j)) \right) \\&\quad = \frac{1}{2} {}_0D_t^{\alpha - 1} ({}_0^c D_t^\alpha u (t_j^+) ) - \frac{1}{2} {}_tD_T^{\alpha - 1} ({}_t^c D_T^\alpha u (t_j^+) \\&\qquad -\, \frac{1}{2} {}_0D_t^{\alpha - 1} ({}_0^c D_t^\alpha u (t_j^-) ) - \frac{1}{2} {}_tD_T^{\alpha - 1} ({}_t^c D_T^\alpha u (t_j^-) ,\\&\frac{1}{2} {}_0D_t^{\alpha - 1} ({}_0^c D_t^\alpha u (t_j^+) ) - \frac{1}{2} {}_tD_T^{\alpha - 1} ({}_t^c D_T^\alpha u (t_j^+)) \nonumber \\&\quad = \lim _{t \rightarrow t_j^+} \left( \frac{1}{2} {}_0D_t^{\alpha - 1} ({}_0^c D_t^\alpha u (t) ) - \frac{1}{2} {}_tD_T^{\alpha - 1} ({}_t^c D_T^\alpha u (t))\right) ,\\&\frac{1}{2} {}_0D_t^{\alpha - 1} ({}_0^c D_t^\alpha u (t_j^-) ) - \frac{1}{2} {}_tD_T^{\alpha - 1} ({}_t^c D_T^\alpha u (t_j^-)) \\&\quad = \lim _{t \rightarrow t_j^-} \left( \frac{1}{2} {}_0D_t^{\alpha - 1} ({}_0^c D_t^\alpha u (t) ) - \frac{1}{2} {}_tD_T^{\alpha - 1} ({}_t^c D_T^\alpha u (t))\right) . \end{aligned}$$

By using critical point theory and variational methods, we give some new criteria to guarantee that the impulsive problems have at least one solution and infinitely many solutions.

     

Some approximation theorems for modified Bernstein-Durrmeyer operators

The modified Bernstein-Durrmeyer operators discussed in this paper are given byM_nf≡M_n(f,x)=(n+2)P_(n,k)∫_0~1p_n+1.k(t)f(t)dt,whereWe will show,for 0<α<1 and 1≤p≤∞     

On boundary values of solutions of the dirichlet problem for second order elliptic equation

The paper suggests some conditions on the lower order terms, which provide that the solution of the Dirichlet problem for the general elliptic equation of the second order

On some problems involving Hardy’s function

Some problems involving the classical Hardy function

$p=-1$的Hardy型不等式的最佳常数

For p＞1,many improved or generalized results of the well-known Hardy's inequality have been established.In this paper,by means of the weight coefficient method,we establish the following Hardy type inequality for P=-1:n∑i=1(1/ii∑j=1aj)-1＜2n∑i=1(1-π2-9/3i)ai-1,Cn such that the inequality ∑ni=1(1/i∑ij=1 aj)-1≤Cn∑ni=1ai-1 holds.Moreover,by means of the Mathematica software,we give some examples.     

Multiple positive solutions for semi-positone <Emphasis Type="Italic">m</Emphasis>-point boundary value problems

In this article, we establish the existence of at least two positive solutions for the semi-positone m-point boundary value problem with a parameter u (t) + λf (t, u) = 0, t ∈ (0, 1), u (0) = sum (biu (ξ i )) from i=1 to m-2, u(1)= sum (aiu(ξ i )) from i=1 to m-2, where λ > 0 is a parameter, 0 < ξ 1 < ξ 2 < ··· < ξ m 2 < 1 with 0 相似文献   

ON THE GENERALIZED POLYNOMIALS OF L. V. KANTOROVITCH AND THEIR ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIORS

In this article we generahze the polynomials of Kantorovitch \({P_n}(f)\) . Let \({B_n}\) be a sequence of linear operators from C[a,b] into \({H_n}\), if \[f(t) \in L[a,b],F(u) = \int_a^u {f(t)dt} ,{A_n}(f(t),x) = \frac{d}{{dx}}{B_{n + 1}}(F(u),x)\], here \({B_n}\)satisfy\[\begin{array}{l} (a):{B_n}(1,x) \equiv 1,{B_n}(u,x) \equiv x;\(b):for{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} g(u) \in C[a,b]{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} we{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} have{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {B_n}(g(u),b) = g(b). \end{array}\]. we call such \({A_n}(f)\) generalized polynomials of Kantorovitch (denoted by \({A_n}(f) \in K\) ). Let \[\begin{array}{l} {\varepsilon _n}({W^2};x)\mathop = \limits^{def} \mathop {\sup }\limits_{f \in {W^2}} \left| {{A_n}(f(t),x) - f(x) - f'(x)({A_n}(t,x) - x)} \right|,\{\varepsilon _n}{({W^2}{L^p})_{{L^p}}}\mathop = \limits^{def} \mathop {\sup }\limits_{f \in {W^2}{L^p}} {\left\| {{A_n}(f(t),x) - f(x) - f'(x)({A_n}(t,x) - x)} \right\|_p}. \end{array}\] We have proved the following results: Let An he a sequence of linear continuous operators of type \[C[a,b] \Rightarrow C[a,b],{D_n}(x,z)\mathop = \limits^{def} {A_n}(\left| {t - z} \right|,x) - \left| {x - z} \right| - ({A_n}(t,x) - x)Sgn(x - z),{A_n}(1,x) = 1\] then (1):\({\varepsilon _n}({W^2};x) = \frac{1}{2}\int_a^b {\left| {{D_n}(x,z)} \right|} dz\), (2): Moreover, if \({A_n}\) be a sequence of linear positive operators, then for \(\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {a \le x \le b}\{a \le z \le b} \end{array}} \right]\) ,we have \({D_n}(x,z) \ge 0\), and \({\varepsilon _n}({W^2};x) = \frac{1}{2}{A_n}({(t - x)^2},x)\). Let \({A_n}(f) \in K\) be a sequence of linear positive operators,\[{R_n}{(z)_L} = \frac{1}{2}\int_a^b {\left| {{D_n}(x,z)} \right|} dx\],then \[{R_n}{(z)_L} = \frac{1}{2}\left[ {{B_{n + 1}}({u^2},z) - {z^2}} \right]\] and \[{\varepsilon _n}{({W^2}L)_L}{\rm{ = }}\frac{1}{2}\left\| {{B_{n + 1}}({u^2},z) - {z^2}} \right\|\]. Let \[{g_n} = \frac{1}{2}\mathop {\max }\limits_{a \le x \le b} {A_n}({(t - x)^2},x),{h_n} = \frac{1}{2}\mathop {\max }\limits_{a \le z \le b} \left[ {{B_{n + 1}}({u^2},z) - {z^2}} \right],\] then \[{\varepsilon _n}{({W^2}{L^p})_{{L^p}}} \le {g_n}^{1 - \frac{1}{p}}{h_n}^{\frac{1}{p}}(1 < p < \infty ).\]     

Studies on a multi-point boundary value problem for second order differential equation with <Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis>-Laplacian

The existence of at least one solution of the following multi-point boundary value problem

WEAK TRAVELLING WAVE FRONT SOLUTIONS OF GENERALIZED DIFFUSION EQUATIONS WITH REACTION

The author demonstrate that the two-point boundary value problem {p′(s)=f′(s)-λp^β(s)for s∈(0,1);β∈(0,1),p(0)=p(1)=0,p(s)&gt;0 if s∈(0,1),has a solution(λ^-，p^-（s）),where |λ^-| is the smallest parameter,under the minimal stringent restrictions on f(s), by applying the shooting and regularization methods. In a classic paper, Kohmogorov et.al.studied in 1937 a problem which can be converted into a special case of the above problem. The author also use the solution(λ^-,p^-(s)) to construct a weak travelling wave front solution u(x,t)=y(ξ),ξ=x-Ct,C=λ^-N/(N+1),of the generalized diffusion equation with reaction δ/δx（k（u）|δu/δx|^n-1 δu/δx)-δu/δt=g（u），where N&gt;0,k(s)&gt;0 a.e.on(0,1),and f(a):=n+1/N∫0ag(t)k^1/N(t)dt is absolutely continuous ou[0,1],while y(ξ) is increasing and absolutely continuous on (-∞,+∞) and (k(y(ξ))|y′(ξ)|^N)′=g(y(ξ))-Cy′(ξ)a.e.on(-∞，+∞）,y(-∞)=0,y(+∞)=1.     

Optimal recovery methods for the integral on classes of differentiable functions

Найдены методы восст ановления интеграла по информации $$I\left( f \right) = \left\{ {f^{(j)} \left( {x_i } \right)\left( {j = 0, ..., \gamma _i - 1; i = 1, ..., n; 1 \leqq \gamma _i \leqq r; \gamma _i + ... + \gamma _n \leqq N} \right.} \right\},$$ оптимальные на класс ахW _p ^r ,r=1,2,...; 1≦p≦∞. Это позволило, в частност и, получить наилучшие для классаW _p ^r квадратурные форму лы вида $$\mathop \smallint \limits_0^1 f\left( x \right)dx = \mathop \Sigma \limits_{i = 1}^n \mathop \Sigma \limits_{j = 1}^{\gamma _i - 1} a_{ij} f^{(j)} \left( {x_i } \right) + \mathop \Sigma \limits_{j = 1}^{[{r \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {r 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}]} b_j f^{(2j - 1)} \left( 0 \right) + \mathop \Sigma \limits_{k = 1}^{[{r \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {r 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}]} c_k f^{(2k - 1)} \left( 1 \right) + R\left( f \right)$$ И $$\mathop \smallint \limits_0^1 f\left( x \right)dx = af\left( 0 \right) + \mathop \Sigma \limits_{i = 1}^n \mathop \Sigma \limits_{j = 0}^{\gamma _i - 1} a_{ij} f^{(j)} \left( {x_i } \right) + bf\left( 1 \right) + \mathop \Sigma \limits_{j = 1}^{[{r \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {r 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}]} b_j f^{(2j - 1)} \left( 0 \right) + \mathop \Sigma \limits_{k = 1}^{[{r \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {r 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}]} c_k f^{(2k - 1)} \left( 1 \right) + R\left( f \right).$$