trans‐4‐Bromo‐ONN‐azoxy­benzene at 100 K

The crystal structure of the α isomer of trans‐4‐bromo­azoxy­benzene [systematic name: trans‐1‐(bromophenyl)‐2‐phenyl­diazene 2‐oxide], C₁₂H₉BrN₂O, has been determined by X‐ray dif­frac­tion. The geometries of the two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit are slightly different and are within ∼0.02 Å for bond lengths, ∼2° for angles and ∼3° for torsion angles. The azoxy bridges in both mol­ecules have the typical geometry observed for trans‐azoxy­benzenes. The crystal network contains two types of planar mol­ecules arranged in columns. The torsion angles along the Ar—N bonds are only 7 (2)°, on either side of the azoxy group.     

Orthorhombic polymorphs of two trans‐4‐aminoazoxybenzenes

The two isomeric compounds 4‐amino‐ONN‐azoxy­benzene [or 1‐(4‐amino­phenyl)‐2‐phenyl­diazene 2‐oxide], i.e. the α isomer, and 4‐amino‐NNO‐azoxy­benzene [or 2‐(4‐amino­phenyl)‐1‐phenyl­diazene 2‐oxide], i.e. the β isomer, both C₁₂H₁₁N₃O, crystallized from a polar solvent in orthorhombic space groups, and their crystal and molecular structures have been determined using X‐ray diffraction. There are no significant differences in the bond lengths and valence angles in the two isomers, in comparison with their monoclinic polymorphs. However, the conformations of the mol­ecules are different due to rotation along the Ar—N bonds. In the α isomer, the benzene rings are twisted by 31.5 (2) and 14.4 (2)° towards the plane of the azoxy group; the torsion angles along the Ar—N bond in the β isomer are 24.3 (3) and 23.5 (3)°. Quantum‐mechanical calculations indicate that planar conformations are energetically favourable for both isomers. The N—H?O hydrogen bonds observed in both networks may be responsible for the deformation of these flexible mol­ecules.     

p‐Cresyl 2,3‐an­hydro‐5‐deoxy‐5‐phthal­imido‐1‐thio‐α‐d‐lyxo­furan­oside

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₂₀H₁₇NO₄S, (I), was determined in order to compare the solution and solid‐state conformations. The mol­ecule was synthesized as a building block for incorporation into oligosaccharides comprised of conformationally restricted furan­ose residues. The furan­ose ring adopts an envelope conformation with the ring O atom displaced above the plane (an ^OE conformation). The pseudorotational phase angle (P) is 88.6° and the puckering amplitude (τ_m) is 31.5°. The C₂—C₁—S—C(Ph) torsion angle is ?163.2 (2)°, which places the aglycone in the exo‐anomeric effect preferred position. The C1—S—C14 bond angle is 99.02 (13)° and the plane of the cresyl moiety is oriented nearly parallel to the four in‐plane atoms of the furan­ose ring envelope. The orientation about the C4—C5 bond is gauche–gauche [Bock & Duus (1994). J. Carbohydr. Chem. 13 , 513–543].     

Conformations of methoxy(hydroxy)-substituted benzenes and benzaldehydes in the gas phase

The electronic structure ofo-methoxy(hydroxy)-substituted benzenes has been investigated by the combined use of photoelectron spectroscopy and molecular orbital calculations by means of the semi-empirical AM1 method. Absorption bands in the PE spectra have been assigned, the dependence of someπ-orbital energies on the molecular conformation has been found, and the estimation of the mean torsion angle of the OCH₃-group with the plane of the benzene ring has been carried out. The results obtained show that the gas-phase conformations of the heavy-atom framework of guaiacol and vanillin molecules are planar. For veratrole and veratraldehyde, nonplanar conformations with mean torsion angles ϕ ≈ 80° and 55°, respectively, have been observed. Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 10, pp. 1757–1760, October, 1993.     

Cyclic imides and an open‐chain amide carboxylic acid from the facile reaction of cis‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐carboxylic anhydride with the isomeric monofluoroanilines

The structures of the cyclic imides cis‐2‐(2‐fluorophenyl)‐3a,4,5,6,7,7a‐hexahydroisoindole‐1,3‐dione, C₁₄H₁₄FNO₂, (I), and cis‐2‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐3a,4,5,6,7,7a‐hexahydroisoindoline‐1,3‐dione, C₁₄H₁₄FNO₂, (III), and the open‐chain amide acid rac‐cis‐2‐[(3‐fluorophenyl)carbamoyl]cyclohexane‐1‐carboxylic acid, C₁₄H₁₆FNO₃, (II), are reported. Cyclic imides (I) and (III) are conformationally similar, with comparable ring rotations about the imide N—C_ar bond [the dihedral angles between the benzene ring and the five‐membered isoindole ring are 55.40 (8)° for (I) and 51.83 (7)° for (III)]. There are no formal intermolecular hydrogen bonds involved in the crystal packing of either (I) or (III). With the acid (II), in which the meta‐related F‐atom substituent is rotationally disordered (0.784:0.216), the amide group lies slightly out of the benzene plane [the interplanar dihedral angle is 39.7 (1)°]. Intermolecular amide–carboxyl N—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interactions between centrosymmetrically related molecules form stacks extending down b, and these are linked across c by carboxyl–amide O—H...O hydrogen bonds, giving two‐dimensional layered structures which lie in the (011) plane. The structures reported here represent examples of compounds analogous to the phthalimides or phthalanilic acids and have little precedence in the crystallographic literature.     

1,3,5‐Triiodo‐2,4,6‐trimethylbenzene at 293 K

In the structure of tri­iodo­mesityl­ene (1,3,5‐tri­iodo‐2,4,6‐tri­methyl­benzene), C₉H₉I₃, at 293 K, the benzene ring is found to be significantly distorted from ideal D_6h symmetry; the average endocyclic angles facing the I atoms and the methyl groups are 123.8 (3) and 116.2 (3)°, respectively. The angle between the normal to the molecular plane and the normal to the (100) plane is 5.1°. No disorder was detected at 293 K. The thermal motion was investigated by a rigid‐body motion tensor analysis. Intra‐ and intermolecular contacts are described and topological differences compared with the isomorphous compounds tri­chloro­mesityl­ene and tri­bromo­mesityl­ene are discussed.     

4‐Fluoro‐2‐(phospho­no­methyl)­benzene­sulfonic acid monohydrate

The title compound, C₇H₈FO₆PS·H₂O, contains both phospho­nic and sulfonic acid functionalities. An extensive network of O—H?O hydrogen bonds is present in the crystal structure. The three acidic protons are associated with the phospho­nate group. Two protons experience typical hydrogen‐bond contacts with the sulfonate‐O atoms, while the third has a longer covalent bond of 1.05 (3) Å to the phospho­nate‐O atom and a short hydrogen‐bond contact of 1.38 (3) Å to the water O atom (all O—H?O angles are in the range 162–175°). The sulfonate group is positioned so that one S—O bond is nearly coplanar with the phenyl ring [torsion angle O—S—C—C ?8.6 (2)°]. The phospho­nate group is oriented approximately perpendicular to the ring [torsion angle P—C—C—C 99.2 (2)°] with one P—O bond anti to the benzyl C—C bond. The mol­ecules pack in layers in the b–c plane with the water mol­ecules in between adjacent pairs of inverted layers.     

Two trans‐4‐aminoazoxybenzenes

Two isomeric trans‐4‐amino­azoxy­benzenes, trans‐1‐(4‐amino­phenyl)‐2‐phenyl­diazene 2‐oxide (α, C₁₂H₁₁N₃O) and trans‐2‐(4‐amino­phenyl)‐1‐phenyl­diazene 2‐oxide (β, C₁₂H₁₁N₃O), have been characterized by X‐ray diffraction. The α isomer is almost planar, having torsion angles along the C_aryl—N bonds of only 4.9 (2) and 8.0 (2)°. The relatively short C_aryl—N bond to the non‐oxidized site of the azoxy group [1.401 (2) Å], together with the significant quinoid deformation of the respective phenyl ring, is evidence of conjugation between the aromatic sextet and the π‐electron system of the azoxy group. The geometry of the β isomer is different. The non‐substituted phenyl ring is twisted with respect to the NNO plane by ca 50°, whereas the substituted ring is almost coplanar with the NNO plane. The non‐oxidized N atom in the β isomer has increased sp³ character, which leads to a decrease in the N—N—C bond angle to 116.8 (2)°, in contrast with 120.9 (1)° for the α isomer. The deformation of the C—C—C angles (1–2°) in the phenyl rings at the substitution positions is evidence of the different character of the oxidized and non‐oxidized N atoms of the azoxy group. In the crystal structures, mol­ecules of both isomers are arranged in chains connected by weak N—H?O (α and β) and N—H?N (β) hydrogen bonds.     

Methoxy[meso‐5,10,15,20‐tetrakis(2,6‐difluorophenyl)porphyrinato]­iron(III), [Fe(TDFPP)(OCH3)]

The crystal structure of the title compound, [Fe(C₄₄H₂₀F₈N₄)(CH₃O)], has been determined. The Fe atom lies 0.485 (1) Å out of the plane of the four N atoms to which it is coordinated and from the inversion centre at the origin of the unit cell. The methoxy group is axially coordinated to the Fe atom with O—Fe—N angles of 106.3 (2) and 102.4 (2)°, a C—O—Fe angle of 128.3 (5)° and an Fe—O distance of 1.788 (5) Å. Di­fluoro­phenyl rings are tilted from the porphyrin (por) plane with torsion angles of ?68.1 (6) and 77.7 (5)° across the two C_por—­C—C—C_ar systems.     

Structures of Ni(II), Pd(II) and Cu(II) complexes with 1,2-<Emphasis Type="Italic">bis</Emphasis>(5,5,5-trifluoro-4-oxopent-2-en-2-amino)benzene

A new fluorine-containing tetradentate ligand 1,2-bis(5,5,5-trifluoro-4-oxopent-2-en-2-amino)benzene and its complexes with Ni(II), Pd(II) and Cu(II) are characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. It is found that the enaminoketone fragments of the ligand are identical in bond lengths and angles; they are almost planar, and make the angles of 51.3° to the plane of the benzene ring. The structures of Ni(II), Pd(II), and Cu(II) complexes are similar and have a saddle-shape configuration. The metal ions have square planar coordination and are located almost in the center of the N₂O₂ square. The average M-N bond lengths are longer than M-O ones by 0.014 Å and 0.034 Å for the Ni(II) and Cu(II) complexes respectively, while in the Pd(II) complex, M-O is longer than M-N by 0.029 Å. The average chelate angles N-M-O in the complexes are: N-Ni-O 95.12°; N-Pd-O 95.68°; N-Cu-O 93.88°.     

Studies on the reactions of (η5cyclopentadienyl)dicarbonylcobalt with phenyl-1-naphthylacetylene and with phenyl-2-naphthylacetylene,and an X-ray crystallographic determination of one of the products: (η5cyclopentadienyl)-[η4-3,3-di-(1-naphthyl)-2,4diphenylcyclobutadiene]cobalt

The reactions of (η⁵-C₅H₅)Co(CO)₂ with both phenyl-1-naphthylacetylene and phenyl-2-naphthylacetylene have been shown to produce all four possible η⁵-cyclobutadiene-cobalt complexes and all six possible η⁴-cyclopentadienone-cobalt derivatives. The structures of the η⁴-cyclobutadiene-cobalt complexes have been assigned on the basis of proton NMR and mass spectral studies, and unequivocally established by means of an X-ray diffraction investigation for one of the isomers as (η⁵-cyclopentadienyl)[η⁴-1,3-di(1-naphthyl)-2,4-diphenylcyclobutadiene]cobalt. This compound is triclinic, a = 10.88(2), b = 15.710(6), c = 8.728(4) Å, α = 95.09(4)°, β = 101.94(2)°, γ = 86.93(3)°. The space group is P$\text{1}$ with Z = 2. The structure was solved by Patterson and Fourier methods and refined by full-matrix least squares methods (4128 reflections above 3σ) to a final R = 0.036. Bond distances and angles are normal but the cyclobutadiene ring is not quite planar. One of the atoms is 0.047 Å out of the plane of the other three apparently to relieve steric stress. The two phenyl rings are almost coplanar with the cyclobutadiene ring (torsion angles 3.9 and 20.4°) while the naphthyl rings are almost perpendicular to it (torsion angles 63.8, 64°).     

2,4‐Dibromo‐3‐methoxy‐6‐nitrobenz­aldeyde: effect of substituents on ring geometry

In the title compound, C₈H₅Br₂NO₄, the endocyclic angles of the ring deviate significantly from the ideal value of 120°. The substituents deviate from the plane of the ring, with large twist angles for the aldehyde, nitro and methoxy groups. The geometry of the mol­ecule in the crystal is compared with that of the isolated mol­ecule, as given by a self‐consistent field molecular‐orbital Hartree–Fock calculation. Only weak hydrogen bonds of the C—H?Br and C—H?O types are present in the crystal structure.     

[η6‐1‐Chloro‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)benzene](η5‐cyclopentadienyl)iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate and (η5‐cyclopentadienyl){2‐[η6‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)phenyl]phenol}iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate

In the complex salt [η⁶‐1‐chloro‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)benzene](η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl)iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₀H₁₂ClN)]PF₆, (I), the complexed cyclopentadienyl and benzene rings are almost parallel, with a dihedral angle between their planes of 2.3 (3)°. In a related complex salt, (η⁵‐cyclopentadienyl){2‐[η⁶‐2‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐yl)phenyl]phenol}iron(II) hexafluoridophosphate, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₆H₁₇NO)]PF₆, (II), the analogous angle is 5.4 (1)°. In both complexes, the aromatic C atom bound to the pyrrolidine N atom is located out of the plane defined by the remaining five ring C atoms. The dihedral angles between the plane of these five ring atoms and a plane defined by the N‐bound aromatic C atom and two neighboring C atoms are 9.7 (8) and 5.6 (2)° for (I) and (II), respectively.     

β‐Turn Analogues in Model αβ‐Hybrid Peptides: Structural Characterization of Peptides Containing β2,2Ac6c and β3,3Ac6c Residues

The effect of gem‐dialkyl substituents on the backbone conformations of β‐amino acid residues in peptides has been investigated by using four model peptides: Boc‐Xxx‐β^2,2Ac₆c(1‐aminomethylcyclohexanecarboxylic acid)‐NHMe (Xxx=Leu ( 1 ), Phe ( 2 ); Boc=tert‐butyloxycarbonyl) and Boc‐Xxx‐β^3,3Ac₆c(1‐aminocyclohexaneacetic acid)‐NHMe (Xxx=Leu ( 3 ), Phe ( 4 )). Tetrasubstituted carbon atoms restrict the ranges of stereochemically allowed conformations about flanking single bonds. The crystal structure of Boc‐Leu‐β^2,2Ac₆c‐NHMe ( 1 ) established a C₁₁ hydrogen‐bonded turn in the αβ‐hybrid sequence. The observed torsion angles (α(?≈?60°, ψ≈?30°), β(?≈?90°, θ≈60°, ψ≈?90°)) corresponded to a C₁₁ helical turn, which was a backbone‐expanded analogue of the type III β turn in αα sequences. The crystal structure of the peptide Boc‐Phe‐β^3,3Ac₆c‐NHMe ( 4 ) established a C₁₁ hydrogen‐bonded turn with distinctly different backbone torsion angles (α(?≈?60°, ψ≈120°), β(?≈60°, θ≈60°, ψ≈?60°)), which corresponded to a backbone‐expanded analogue of the type II β turn observed in αα sequences. In peptide 4 , the two molecules in the asymmetric unit adopted backbone torsion angles of opposite signs. In one of the molecules, the Phe residue adopted an unfavorable backbone conformation, with the energetic penalty being offset by a favorable aromatic interaction between proximal molecules in the crystal. NMR spectroscopy studies provided evidence for the maintenance of folded structures in solution in these αβ‐hybrid sequences.     

Cyclo­decyl 4‐nitro­phenyl­acetate

Cyclodecyl 4‐nitrophenylacetate, C₁₈H₂₅NO₄, has its ten‐membered ring in the expected diamond‐lattice boat–chair–boat [2323] conformation, with the substituent 4‐nitro­phenyl­acet­oxy group in the BCB IIIe position. The ester unit has the expected Z conformation, with an O=C—O—C torsion angle of −0.3 (3)°, and the connection to the benzene ring is nearly perpendicular to the ester, with an O=C—C—C torsion angle of 85.5 (2)°. An inter­molecular contact exists between the ester C atom and a nitro O atom, having a C⋯O distance of 2.909 (2) Å.     

Estimation of the conformation of 2-hydroxy-4,6-dimethylbenzophenone and 2,4,6-trimethoxybenzophenone from electronic absorption spectra and PPP LCI ca

The twisting effect of benzene rings on the electronic spectra of derivatives of benzophenone (BPh), 2-hydroxy-4,6-dimethylbenzophenone (2-OH-4,6-diCH₃BPh) and 2,4,6-trimethoxybenzophenone (2,4,6-triOCH₃BPh) has been interpreted by the PPP method. The effect of structure, protonation, ionization and interaction with proton-acceptor solvent on the twisting of aromatic rings is discussed. The following twist angles of substituted ring (θ_I) and unsubstituted ring (θ_II) in 2-OH-4,6-diCH₃BPh were found: neutral form in cyclohexane θ_I = 39°–48°, θ_II = ?30°–(?45°); neutral form in ethanol θ_I = 66°–72°, θ_II = ?30°–0°; protonized form θ_I = 64°–6°, θ_II = ?30°–0°; ionized form θ_I = 66°–74°, θ_II = ?30°–0°. In the neutral form of 2,4,6-triOCH₃PBh the substituted ring is twisted by angle θ_I ~ 70° while in the protonated form the unsubstituted ring is twisted by angle θ_II ~ 60° and the substituted one is coplanar with the CO group.     

3,5‐Di­amino‐6‐(2‐fluoro­phenyl)‐1,2,4‐triazine–di­methyl­form­amide (1/1)

The title compound, C₉H₈FN₅·C₃H₇NO, contains two independent complexes in the asymmetric unit, each consisting of one 3,5‐di­amino‐6‐(2‐fluoro­phenyl)‐1,2,4‐triazine mol­ecule and one di­methyl­form­amide solvent mol­ecule. One triazine mol­ecule is disordered over two conformations within the crystal, the occupancies being 62 (1) and 38 (1)%. The phenyl ring of this mol­ecule resolves into two conformations rotated by almost 180° about the bridging bond between the two rings, while the triazine rings approximately superimpose on each other. The triazine mol­ecules of the asymmetric unit differ in the dihedral angles between their respective phenyl and triazine ring planes, these being 57.6 (2)° for the fully occupied, and 76.9 (6) and 106.8 (8)° for the partially occupied mol­ecules. An extensive network of hydrogen bonds maintains the crystal structure.     

Gas electron diffraction and quantum chemical study of the structure of a 2-nitrobenzenesulfonyl chloride molecule

A combined gas electron diffraction and quantum chemical (B3LYP/6-311+G**, B3LYP/cc-pVTZ, B3LYP/cc-pVTZ, midix (Cl), and MP2/cc-pVTZ) study of the structure of a 2-NO₂-C₆H₄-SO₂Cl molecule is performed. It is found experimentally that at a temperature of 345(5) K the gas phase contains two conformers of the C ₁ symmetry. Conformer I with a nearly perpendicular arrangement of the S-Cl bond with respect to the benzene ring plane (the C(NO₂)-C-S-Cl torsion angle is 84(3)°) is contained predominantly (69(12)%). In conformer II, the S-Cl bond is located near the benzene ring plane (the C(NO₂)-C-S-Cl angle is 172(3)°). The following experimental internuclear distances (Å) are obtained for conformer I: r _h1(C-H) = 1.064(15), r _h1(C-C)_av = 1.397(3), r _h1(C-S) = 1.761(6), r _h1(S-O)_av = 1.426(4), r _h1(S-Cl) = 2.043(5), r _h1(N-O)_av = 1.222(4), r _h1(C-N) = 1.485(16). In both conformers, the NO₂ group is turned by more than 30° relative to the benzene ring plane.     

Conformation and hydrogen bonding for the bicyclic compound 3‐thiabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane‐6,7‐dicarboxylic acid 3,3‐dioxide

The initial goal of this work was to verify the geometry of the product of a photochemical reaction, viz. the title compound, C₈H₁₀O₆S, (II). Our crystallographic study firmly establishes the cis–anti–cis nature of the substituents on the cyclobutane ring. The geometry is also designated as exo, where exo signifies that the five‐membered ring is on the opposite side of the central cyclobutane ring from the carboxylic acid substituents. The structure determination reveals two molecules, A and B, in the asymmetric unit that display substantially different conformations of the bicyclic core: the cyclobutane ring puckering angles are 22 and 3°, and the sulfolane ring conformations are twist (S‐exo) and envelope (S‐endo). Intrigued by this variation, we then compared the conformations of other molecules in the Cambridge Structural Database that have sulfolane rings fused to cyclobutane rings. In this class of compound, there are five examples of saturated cyclobutane rings, with ring puckering angles ranging from 3 to 35°. The sulfolane rings were more similar: four of the six molecules exhibit envelope conformations with S‐endo, as in molecule B of (II). Despite the conformational differences, the hydrogen‐bonding scheme for both molecules is similar: carboxyl –OH groups form hydrogen bonds with carboxyl and sulfone O atoms. Alternating A and B molecules joined by hydrogen bonds between sulfone O atoms and carboxyl –OH groups form parallel chains that extend in the ac plane. Other hydrogen bonds between the carboxyl groups link the chains along the b axis.     

Naphthalene complexes: V. Arene exchange reactions in naphthalenechromium complexes

Di-η⁶-naphthalenechromium(0) (1) reacts at 150°C with benzene to yield (η⁶-naphthalene)(η⁶-benzene)chromium(0) (3) in 76% yield. In the presence of THF, 1 undergoes Lewis base catalyzed arene exchange at 80°C. Reactions of 1 with substituted arenes yield the mixed sandwich complexes 4 and 6–10 (arene = 1,4-C₆H₄Me₂, 1,3,5-C₆H₃Me₃, C₆Me₆, 1,4-C₆H₄(OMe)₂, 1,4-C₆H₄F₂ and 1,4-C₁₀H₆Me₂). In all but one case (with 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene) exchange of a single naphthalene ligand is observed. In marked contrast to the lability of 1, dimesitylenechromium(0) (5) is inert to arene displacement in benzene up to 240°C. The molecular structure of 3 has been determined by X-ray crystallography. The crystal data are as follows: a 7.784(1), b 13.411(2), c 22.772(5) Å, Z = 8, space group Pbca. The structure was refined to a R_w value of 0.043. The naphthalene ligand in 3 is nearly planar and parallel to the approximately eclipsed benzene ring. Metal atom-ring distances are 1.631(9) and 1.611(4) Å for naphthalene and benzene, respectively. Catalyzed and uncatalyzed naphthalene exchanges in the sandwich complex are compared to the analogous reactions with the Cr(CO)₃ complex 2. Naphthalene exchange in 2 in benzene is 10³ to 10⁴ times faster than arene exchange in other arenetricarbonylchromium compounds. The mild conditions for Lewis base catalyzed naphthalene exchange make 2 a good precursor of other arenetricarbonylchromium compounds. Examples include the Cr(CO)₃ complexes of styrene, benzocyclobutene, 1-ethoxybenzocyclobutene, 1,8-dimethoxy-9,10-dihydroanthracene and 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene.