Towards a finite N = 2 susy GUT

We consider finite, N = 2 supersymmetric GUTs based on gauge groups SU(n) and SO(n). As an example, we discuss a semirealistic model based on SO(12). We argue that in finite, N = 2 supersymmetric GUTs, gauge symmetry breaking should occur dynamically. We present a heuristic picture in which this is induced by soft, finiteness preserving SUSY breaking terms. The bound states formed cause a very rapid evolution of the SO(12) coupling constant and break SO(12) into SU(4)×SU(3)_C×U(1).     

Radiative gauge symmetry breaking in supersymmetric flipped SU(5)

The radiative breaking of the SU(5)×U(1) symmetry in the flipped SU(5) model recently proposed by Antoniadis et al. is studied using renormalization group techniques. It is shown that gaugino masses can only be the dominant source of supersymmetry breaking at the Planck scale if the U(1) gaugino mass M₁ is at least 10 times larger than the SU(5) gaugino mass M₅. If M₁≅M₅ at the Planck scale, non-vanishing trilinear soft breaking terms (“A-terms”) are needed already at the Planck scale. In both cases consequences for the sparticle spectrum at the weak scale are discussed.     

The Majoron and left-handed neutrino masses in SU(5)

We consider the spontaneous breaking of B?L in SU(5) in connection with left-handed neutrino masses. We show that the ensuing Goldstone boson, “the majoron”, is harmless. The low-energy predictions are the same as in the SU(2)_L × U(1) majoron model which, in particular, predicts the existence of doubly and singly charged scalars, with masses ?250 GeV and with a mass ratio of √2. Going to SU(5), one would expect these scalars to escape to the grand unified mass. This does not happen and, surprisingly, even the ratio √2 is preserved.     

Hierarchy of quark masses in the isotopic doublets in N=1 supergravity models

In the framework of some generic softly broken SUSY models we study the SU (2) × U(1) breaking by radiative corrections, starting with the Yukawa couplings which at the Planck scale M_P satisfy h^t = h^b. Physically acceptable solutions exist with the heirarchy of VEVs: ν₂/ν₁ ≈ m_t/m_b provided m_t ⩾ 50 GeV. When the SUSY breaking is driven only by the gaugino mass the solutions uniquely predict ν₂=O(10)ν₁ and the top mass in the range 50–65 GeV. Also, the mass ratio in the second quark generation can be accounted for.     

Small Dirac neutrino mass and left-right symmetry

We analyze the possibility of generating light Dirac neutrinos at the tree level in a left-right symmetric scenario. We present a minimal extension of the standard SU(2) _L × SU(2) _R × U(1) _Y′ model where the above result is achieved through a “see-saw” like mechanism induced by the minimization of the Higgs potential. The Dirac neutrinos thus obtained are naturally light; indeed we show that the scheme is stable under radiative corrections. The neutrino mass is inversely related to the scale of parity breaking, which may naturally be in the TeV range, leading to new phenomenology in an interesting energy domain.     

Proton decay in locally supersymmetric GUT

Proton decay is studied in the supergravity model with “the hidden sector” as the source of supersymmetry breaking. Each dimension-five operator is found to accompany ΔB ≠ 0 four-scalar interactions. The Higgs fermion exchange for loop diagrams at low energies can be as important as the gauge fermion exchange, if the associated Yukawa coupling is significant as suggested by the radiatively induced SU(2) × U(1) breaking mechanism. The experimental bound for p → K⁰μ⁺ gives the lower bound of the order of 10¹⁶ GeV for the mass of the baryon-number violating Higgs particle.     

SU(3) ⊗ SU(2) ⊗ U(1) from D = 11 supergravity

In this paper we show that D = 11 supergravity admits an infinite discrete class of solutions having the phenomenological group SU(3) ? SU(2) ? U(1) as a symmetry of the internal space M₇. These solutions lead, in dimensional reduction, to SU(3) ? SU(2) ? U(1) gauge fields.In general all these spaces produce a complete breaking of supersymmetry except in one case where N = 2 supersymmetry survives. The parameter which classifies the solutions is a rational number q/p which describes the embedding of the stability subgroup SU(2) ? U(1) ? U(1) of M₇ in SU(3) ? SU(2) ? U(1). For all q/p ≠ 1 the holonomy group is SO(7) and all supersymmetries are broken. For q/p = 1 the holonomy group is SU(3) and two supersymmetries survive. In this last case we can also find a solution with internal photon curl $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha \beta \gamma \delta }}\text{≠ 0}$. It breaks all sypersymmetries.     

Hydrogen atom on null-plane and Melosh transformation

The null-plane dynamics of hydrogen-like atoms is studied in approximations depending on c, the velocity of light, being large. Neglecting terms in the Hamiltonian of order c^?3 (relative to electron rest energy) a symmetry SU (2)_W appears which is analogous to the SU (6)_W of hadron classification. This symmetry, if accurate, would dictate zero ground state magnetic moment. The symmetry is broken by terms of third order, which can, however, be transformed a way by the appropriate approximation to the Melosh transformation. There then emerges a better symmetry, SU (2)_M, broken only at fourth order. The ground state magnetic moment acquires its usual non-relativistic value. The symmetry SU (2)_M corresponds to a subgroup of a symmetry [U (2) × U (2)]_FW which appears in the old Foldy-Wouthuysen approach when spin-orbit coupling is neglected. As well as “current” and “constituent” pictures, “classification” pictures are distinguished; it is to one of the latter that the Melosh transformation transforms.     

Is U(1)H a good family symmetry?

We analyze U(1)_H as a horizontal symmetry and its possibilities to explain the known elementary-fermion masses. We find that only two candidates, in the context of SU(3)_c ? SU(2)_L ? U(1)_Y ? U(1)_H nonsuper-symmetric, are able to fit the experimental result m_b«m_t. identity, but it is a common prejudice to assume that the appropriate family symmetry may explain this fact as a consequence of (i) and (ii). In what follows we will enlarge the SM gauge group with an extra U(1)_H horizontal local gauge symmetry (the simplest multi-family continuous symmetry we can think of). We then show that the structure SU(3)_c ? SU(2)_L ? U(1)_Y ? U(1)_H by itself is able to explain (ii), and that the simplest supersymmetric (SUSY) extension of this model without a μ-term can not cope with (ii).     

Z0 decay into neutralinos and the Higgs fermion mass mH

The Z⁰ decay width into neutralinos is calculated in the minimal supersymmetrics SU(2) × U(1) model. In some region of the parameters space “jet(s) + missing” and “ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ + missing” events at SPS are predicted with a ratio 5 : 1. If neutralino signals are not found at LEP and SLC, we can get a lower bound on m_H independently of all other parameters.     

Fermion mass hierarchy based onN=8 supergravity

A possible mechanism is proposed to realize fermion mass hierarchy based on the superunification model of Ellis et al. In addition to the usual fermion (F)—Higgs (B) coupling, “non-renormalizable” interactions such as(1/(M _p ) ⁿ )(F) ² (B) ⁿ⁺¹ are introduced. It is assumed that three kinds of Higgs scalars respectively develop v.e.v. of orderM _P ,M _X andM _W , corresponding to the symmetry breaking pattern ofSU(8)→SU(5)→SU(3)×SU(3)×U(1)→SU(3)×U(1). As a result, fermions acquire their masses of orderM _w ,M _W (M _X /M _P) andM _W (M _X /M _P )². An example of the model is presented which shows nice feature of hierarchical mass patterns.     

On the structure of the low energy superpotential in superstring theory

We show that after the gauge symmetry breaking of the E₆ grand unified group to the H=SU(3)^c×SU(2)_L×U(1)_Y× U(1)_E subgroup by the Hosotany mechanism a number of additional Yukawa terms not present in a decomposition of 27×27×27 may appear in the low energy superpotential. Some of these terms cause a rapid proton decay.     

Symmetry breaking in a supersymmetric model of strong and electroweak interactions

We describe a supersymmetric model of strong and electroweak interactions based on the gauge groupSU(3)×SU(2)×U(1)×?(1). We concentrate on the pattern of the spontaneous symmetry breaking by the tree level scalar potential. It is possible to break the?(1) factor at superlarge energies relative to the simultaneous breaking scale ofSU(2)×U(1) and supersymmetry. The model has?(1) anomalies. Attempts to make an anomaly-free model based on the groupE ₆ are described. We also comment on possible modifications of the?(1) anomaly problem due to gravitational effects.     

Quarks and leptons

We review the physics of quarks and leptons within the framework of gauge theories for the weak and electromagnetic interactions. The Weinberg-Salam SU(2) × U(1) theory is used as a “reference point” but models based on larger gauge groups, especially SU(2)_L × SU(2)_R × U(1), are discussed. We distinguish among thre “generations” of fundamental fermions: The first generation (e^?, ν_e, u, d), the second generation (μ^?, ν_μ, c, s) and the third generation (τ^?, ν_τ, t, b). For each generation we discuss the classification of all fermions, the charged and neutral weak currents, possible right-handed currents, parity and CP-violation, fermion masses and Cabibbo-like angles and related problems. We review theoretical ideas as well as experimental evidence, emphasizing open theoretical problems and possible experimental tests. The possibility of unifying the weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions in a grand unification scheme is reviewed. The problems and their possible solutions are presented, generation by generation, but a brief subject-index (following the table of contents) enables the interested reader to follow any specific topic throughout the three generations.     

Composite description for quarks and leptons from a geometrical picture of complementarity

We propose a geometrical formulation of complementarity between the Higgs phase and the confining phase of a non-abelian gauge theory, introducing local “vierbein” fields to provide for a one-to-one mapping between the states of the two phases. We investigate the gauge structure when a subgroup of the global symmetry is also gauged. The formalism is used to build up a composite model based on a SU(4) of subcolor complementary to a Pati-Salam SU(4), and allowing for dynamical symmetry breaking of SU(2)_L ? U(1).     

Prospects for supersymmetric SO(10) models with an intermediate mass scale

We investigate possible patterns of SO(10) gauge symmetry breaking compatible with supersymmetry, limiting ourselves to the cases with one intermediate breaking scale. It is found that the one where a 54 representation breaks SO(10) into a Pati-Salam group SU(4)_C×SU(2)_L×SU(2)_R and the one where a 210 breaks it into SU(3)_C× U(1)_C×SU(2)_L×SU(2)_R are the most preferable patterns when supersymmetry is taken into account. Two models with the Pati-Salam intermediate symmetry are studied in more detail.     

Cosmological constant in a model with superstring-inspired E 6 unification and shadow θ-particles

We have developed the concept of parallel existence of the ordinary (O-) and mirror (M-), or shadow (Sh-) worlds. In the first part of the paper we consider a mirror world with broken mirror parity and the breaking E ₆→SU(3)³ in both worlds. We show that in this case the evolutions of coupling constants in the O- and M-worlds are not identical, having different parameters for similar evolutions. E ₆ unification, inspired by superstring theory, restores the broken mirror parity at the scale ～10¹⁸ GeV. With the aim to explain the tiny cosmological constant, in the second part we consider the breakings: E ₆→SO(10)×U(1) _Z in the O-world, and E′₆→SU(6)′×SU(2)′ _θ in the Sh-world. We assume the existence of shadow θ-particles and the low-energy symmetry group SU(3)′ _C ×SU(2)′ _L ×SU(2)′ _θ ×U(1)′ _Y in the shadow world, instead of the Standard Model. The additional non-Abelian SU(2)′ _θ group with massless gauge fields, “thetons”, has a macroscopic confinement radius 1/Λ′ _θ . The assumption that Λ′ _θ ≈2.3?10^?3 eV explains the tiny cosmological constant given by recent astrophysical measurements. In this way the present work opens the possibility to specify a grand unification group, such as E ₆, from cosmology.     

Nonabelian electric and magnetic flux in unified SU(5) gauge theory

We study the long-distance behaviour of pure unified SU(5) gauge theory in the limit when the electroweak subgroup is unbroken. We show that the symmetry breaking pattern SU(5)→SU(3)_c×SU(2)×U(1)_Y, with SU(3)_c and SU(2) ×U(1)_Y realized, respectively, in confining and coulombic phases, is a possible dynamical phase of the SU(5) theory. The proof relies on showing that the duality equation of 't Hooft, relating the electric and magnetic flux, is exactly satisfied for the above symmetry breaking pattern. The infrared structure of SU(5), broken down to SU(3)_c×SU(2)×U(1)_Y, is not self-dual.     

SU(2) × U(1) breaking by vacuum misalignment

Currently two scenarios exist which explain SU(2) × U(1) breaking: the Higgs mechanism, and standard hypercolor schemes. In this paper, a third scenario called “oblique hypercolor” is proposed. A hyperquark condensate is formed which, although kinematically allowed to point in an SU(2) × U(1) preserving direction, is forced by Yukawa interactions of the hyperquarks to misalign by a small angle, breaking SU(2) × U(1). The low energy spectrum involves normal fermions with correct masses, a partially composite Higgs boson, and physical charged scalars.     

Chiral anomalies and constraints on the gauge group in higher-dimensional supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories

Chiral anomalies for gauge theories in any even dimension are computed and the results applied to supersymmetric theories in D = 6, 8 and 10. For D = 8 there is an anomalous chiral U(1) invariance, just as in D = 4, except for certain special groups. For D = 6 and D = 10 there is no anomalous chiral U(1) symmetry, but the gauge current is anomalous except for certain “anomaly-free” groups. For D = 6 the group is thereby constrained to be one of {SU(2), SU(3), exceptional}, while for D = 10 it is constrained to be one of {SU(n) n ≤ 5, USp(4), E₈}.