Kinetics and mechanism of the silane decomposition

The homogeneous gas-phase decomposition kinetics of silane has been investigated using the single-pulse shock tube comparative rate technique (T = 1035–1184?K, P_total ≈? 4000 Torr). The initial reaction of the decomposition SiH₄ \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm SiH}_{\rm 4} \mathop \to \limits^1 {\rm SiH}_{\rm 2} + {\rm H}_{\rm 2} $\end{document} SiH₂ + H₂ is a unimolecular process in its pressure fall-off regime with experimental Arrhenius parameters of logk₁ (sec^?1) = 13.33 ± 0.28–52,700 ± 1400/2.303RT. The decomposition has also been studied at lower temperatures by conventional methods. The results confirm the total pressure effect, indicate a small but not negligible extent of induced reaction, and show that the decomposition is first order in silane at constant total pressures. RRKM-pressure fall-off calculations for four different transition-state models are reported, and good agreement with all the data is obtained with a model whose high-pressure parameters are logA₁ (sec^?1) = 15.5, E_1(∞) = 56.9 kcal, and ΔE^0±₀(1) = 55.9 kcal. The mechanism of the decomposition is discussed, and it is concluded that hydrogen atoms are not involved. It is further suggested that silylene in the pure silane pyrolysis ultimately reacts with itself to give hydrogen: 2SiH₂ → (Si₂H₄)* → (SiH₃SiH)* → Si₂H₂ + H₂. The mechanism of H ? D exchange absorbed in the pyrolysis of SiD₄-hydrocarbon systems is also discussed.     

[C3H3O]+ ions; reacting and non-reacting configurations

Three [C₃H₃O]⁺ ion structures have been characterized. The most stable of these is \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} = {\rm CH} - \mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + = {\rm O} $\end{document} its heat of formation ΔH_f was measured as 749±5 kJ mol^?1. In the μs time frame this ion fragments exclusively by loss of CO, a process which also dominates its collisional activation mass spectrum. The other stable [C₃H₃O]⁺ structures, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}\equiv \mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + - {\rm CHOH} $\end{document} and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} = {\rm C} = \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } - {\rm OH}, $\end{document}, were generated from some acetylenic and allenic precursor ions; their heats of formation were estimated to be 830 and 880 kJ mol^?1 respectively. The former ion was also produced by the gas phase protonation of propynal. These ions show loss of C₂H₂ and CO in both their metastable ion and collisional activation mass spectra. The broad Gaussian-type metastable peak for the loss of CO was shown to consist of two components corresponding to gragmentations having different activation energies.     

The vinyloxonium cation, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm CH}_{\rm 2} = {\rm CH - }\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2}$\end{document}, a stable [C2H5O]+ species in the gas phase

The charge stripping mass spectra of [C₂H₅O]⁺ ions permit the clear identification of four distinct species: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm CH}_{\rm 3} - {\rm O - }\mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2}$\end{document}, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm CH}_{\rm 3} - \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H - OH}$\end{document}, and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm CH}_{\rm 2} = {\rm CH - }\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2}$\end{document}. The latter, the vinyloxonium ion, has not been identified before. It is generated from ionized n-butanol and 1,3-propanediol. Its heat of formation is estimated to be 623±12 kJ mol^?1. The charge stripping method is more sensitive to these ion structures than conventional collisional activation, which focuses attention on singly charged fragment ions.     

A Modified Kinetic Model for the Peroxydisulfate-Iodide Reaction

One kinetic model for the oxidation of iodide ion by peroxydisulfate ion in aqueous solution is proposed. The reaction is regarded as \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} {\rm S}_2 {\rm O}_8^{2 -} + {\rm I}^ - {\rm IS}_2 {\rm O}_8^{3 -} \end{document}, followed by the reaction \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} {\rm IS}_2 {\rm O}_8^{3 -} + {\rm I}l_2 + 2{\rm SO}_4^{2 -} \end{document}. If the initial rates V are obtained from the formation of the iodine molecules, the reaction rate constant k₁ and the ratio k₂/k_-1 can be estimated by plotting the values of [S₂O₈^2?][I^?]/V against that of 1/[I^?]. The extrapolated value for k₁ is 2.20×10^?2 L/mol-sec and k₂/k_-1 is calculated to be 4.25×10² mol/L at 27°C in a solution with an ionic strength of 0.420.     

The gas-phase pyrolysis of alkyl nitrites. III. Isopropyl nitrite

The rate of decomposition of isopropyl nitrite (IPN) has been studied in a static system over the temperature range of 130–160°C. For low concentrations of IPN (1–5 × 10^?5M), but with a high total pressure of CF₄ (～0.9 atm) and small extents of reaction (～1%), the first-order rates of acetaldehyde (AcH) formation are a direct measure of reaction (1), since k₃ » k₂(NO): \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm IPN}\begin{array}{rcl} 1 \\ {\rightleftarrows} \\ 2 \\ \end{array}i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^. + {\rm NO},i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^. \stackrel{3}{\longrightarrow} {\rm AcH} + {\rm Me}. $\end{document} Addition of large amounts of NO (～0.9 atm) in place of CF₄ almost completely suppressed AcH formation. Addition of large amounts of isobutane – t-BuH – (～0.9 atm) in place of CF₄ at 160°C resulted in decreasing the AcH by 25%. Thus 25% of \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} $\end{document} were trapped by the t-BuH (4): \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^. + t - {\rm BuH} \stackrel{4}{\longrightarrow} i - \Pr {\rm OH} + (t - {\rm Bu}). $\end{document} The result of adding either NO or t-BuH shows that reaction (1) is the only route for the production of AcH. The rate constant for reaction (1) is given by k₁ = 10^{16.2±0.4–41.0±0.8}/θ sec^?1. Since (E₁ + RT) and ΔH°₁ are identical, within experimental error, both may be equated with D(i-PrO-NO) = 41.6 ± 0.8 kcal/mol and E₂ = 0 ± 0.8 kcal/mol. The thermochemistry leads to the result that \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \Delta H_f^\circ (i - {\rm Pr}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} ) = - 11.9 \pm 0.8{\rm kcal}/{\rm mol}. $\end{document} From ΔS°₁ and A₁, k₂ is calculated to be 10^10.5±0.4M^?1·sec^?1. From an independent observation that k₆/k₂ = 0.19 ± 0.03 independent of temperature we find E₆ = 0 ± 1 kcal/mol and k₆ = 10^9.8+0.4M^?;1·sec^?1: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^. + {\rm NO} \stackrel{6}{\longrightarrow} {\rm M}_2 {\rm K} + {\rm HNO}. $\end{document} In addition to AcH, acetone (M₂K) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) are produced in approximately equal amounts. The rate of M₂K formation is markedly affected by the ratio S/V of different reaction vessels. It is concluded that the M₂K arises as the result of a heterogeneous elimination of HNO from IPN. In a spherical reaction vessel the first-order rate of M₂K formation is given by k₅ = 10^9.4–27.0/θ sec^?1: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm IPN} \stackrel{5}{\longrightarrow} {\rm M}_2 {\rm K} + {\rm HNO}. $\end{document} IPA is thought to arise via the hydrolysis of IPN, the water being formed from HNO. This elimination process explains previous erroneous results for IPN.     

The role of charge-site location in fragmenting ions. 1—[CH3 CHXCOOCH3]+˙ and [CH2XCH2 COOCH3]+˙ ions and the structures of daughter ions derived from the loss of X (X = I,Br, Cl and CH3)

The structures of the m/z 87, [C₄H₇O₂]⁺, ions generated by dissociative ionization of CH₃CGXCOOCH₃ and XCH₂CH₂COOCH₃ (X = CH₃, Cl, Br, and I) have been investigated via their unimolecular and collisionally activated fragmentations and by apperance energy measurements. For both precursors loss of X = CH₃ produced, via H atom transfer, ions of structure \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH_2 = CH}\mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } \left({{\rm OH}} \right){\rm OCH}_{\rm 3} $\end{document} (a), ΔH_f = 386 kj mol^?1. In marked contrast, loss of I^˙ from ionized CH₃CHICOOCH₃ and ICH₂CH₂COOCH₃ proceeded without rearrangement to yield respectively ions of structure \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH_3}\mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } {{\rm HCOOCH_3}} $\end{document} (b), ΔH_f = 480 kJ mol^?1 and (c), ΔH_f = 450 kJ mol^?1. These different fragmentation behaviours are explained via photoelectron spectra which show that the formal charge site in the precursor ion is at the carbonyl oxygen when X = CH₃ but at the halogen atom when X = I. The precursor molecules X = Cl and Br display both of the above characteristics, CH₃CHXCOOCH₃ yielding mixtures of a and b and XCH₂CH₂COOCH₃ producing a and c ions.     

Pyrolysis of dimethyl peroxide

By using isobutane (t-BuH) as a radical trapit has been possible to study the initial step in the decomposition of dimethyl peroxide (DMP) over the temperature range of 110–140°C in a static system. For low concentrations of DMP (2.5 × 10^?5?10^?4M) and high pressures of t?BuH (～0.9 atm) the first-order homogeneous rate of formation of methanol (MeOH) is a direct measure of reaction (1): \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm DMP}\mathop \to \limits^1 2{\rm Me}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .},{\rm Me}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} + t{\rm - BuH}\mathop \to \limits^4 {\rm MeOH} + t{\rm -}\mathop {\rm B}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm u}$\end{document}. For complete decomposition of DMP in t-BuH, virtually all of the DMP is converted to MeOH. Thus DMP is a clean thermal source of Me\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .}$\end{document}. In the decomposition of pure DMP complications arise due to the H-abstraction reactions of Me\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .}$\end{document} from DMP and the product CH₂O. The rate constant for reaction (1) is given by k₁ = 10^15.5?37.0/θ sec^?1, very similar to other dialkyl peroxides. The thermochemistry leads to the result D(MeO? OMe) = 37.6 ± 0.2 kcal/mole and /H(Me\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .}$\end{document}) = 3.8 ± 0.2 kcal/mole. It is concluded that D(RO? OR) and D(RO? H) are unaffected by the nature of R. From ΔS and A₁, k₂ is calculated to be 10^10.3±0.5 M^?1· sec^?1: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$2{\rm Me}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} \mathop \to \limits^2 {\rm DMP}$\end{document}. For complete reaction, trace amounts of t-BuOMe lead to the result k₂ ～ 10⁹ M^?1 ·sec^?1: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$2t{\rm - Bu}\mathop \to \limits^5$\end{document} products. From the relationship k₆ = 2(k₂k_5a)^1/2 and with k_5a = 10^8.4 M^?1 · sec^?1, we arrive at the result k₆ = 10^9.7 M^?1 · sec^?1: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$2t{\rm - u}\mathop {\rm B}\limits^{\rm .} \to (t{\rm - Bu)}_{\rm 2}{\rm,}t{\rm -}\mathop {\rm B}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm u} + {\rm Me}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} \mathop \to \limits^6 t{\rm - BuOMe}$\end{document}.     

Structures and relative energies of gas-phase [C2H7N]+˙ radical cations

Ab initio molecular orbital calculations with split-valence plus polarization basis sets and incorporating electron correlation and zero-point energy corrections have been used to examine possible equilibrium structures on the [C₂H₇N]⁺˙ surface. In addition to the radical cations of ethylamine and dimethylamine, three other isomers were found which have comparable energy, but which have no stable neutral counterparts. These are \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm H}_{\rm 2} {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm N}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 3} $\end{document}, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm H}\mathop {\rm N}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 3} $\end{document}and\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \mathop {\rm N}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm C}\limits^. {\rm H}_{\rm 2} {\rm }, $\end{document} with calculated energies relative to the ethylamine radical cation of ?33, ?28 and 4 kJ mol^?1, respectively. Substantial barriers for rearrangement among the various isomers and significant binding energies with respect to possible fragmentation products are found. The predictions for \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^. {\rm H}_{\rm 2} {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm N}\limits^ + {\rm H}_{\rm 3} $\end{document} and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm H}\mathop {\rm N}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 3}$\end{document} are consistent with their recent observation in the gas phase. The remaining isomer, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \mathop {\rm N}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm H}_{\rm 2} {\rm },$\end{document}is also predicted to be experimentally observable.     

Thermische Zerfallsreaktionen von Nitroverbindungen in Stosswellen. III: Dissoziation von 1-Nitropropan und 2-Nitropropan

The pyrolysis of 1- and 2-nitropropane highly diluted in Ar has been studied in shock waves at temperatures K 915 < T < 1200 K and total gas concentrations 7 · 10^?6 mol cm^?3 < [Ar] < 1.5 · 10^?4 mol cm^?3. The reactions behind the shock waves have been followed by recording light absorption-time profiles of the decomposing molecules and the produced NO₂ Under the conditions of the experiments, the primary reaction step in both cases is the C? N bond:fission: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \begin{array}{rcl} {\rm 1} - {\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 7} {\rm NO}_{\rm 2} {\rm (} + {\rm M)} &\to & n - {\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 7} + {\rm NO}_{\rm 2} {\rm (} + {\rm M)\quad k} = 2.3 \cdot 10^{15} {\rm exp }(- 55{\rm kcal mol}^{ - 1} /{\rm RT}){\rm s}^{ - 1} \\ 2 - {\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 7} {\rm NO}_{\rm 2} {\rm (} + {\rm M)} &\to & i - {\rm C}_{\rm 3} {\rm H}_{\rm 7} + {\rm NO}_{\rm 2} {\rm (} + {\rm M)\quad k} = 2.4 \cdot 10^{15} {\rm exp }(- 54{\rm kcal mol}^{ - 1} /{\rm RT}){\rm s}^{ - 1} \\ \end{array} $\end{document} (first order rate constants k measured at concentrations of [Ar] ? 10^?4 mol cm^?3). At these concentrations the reactions are near to the high pressure limit. By varying the Ar-concentrations over one order of magnitude, only a slight pressure dependence was found. Reaction mechanisms which account for NO₂ removal are discussed.     

Stable [C2H7O2]+ isomers: Experimental and theoretical evidence for the existence of protonated peroxides and proton-bound dimers in the gas phase

Evidence is presented for the gas phase generation of at least eight stable isomeric [C₂H₇O₂]⁺ ions. These include energy-rich protonated peroxides (ions \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm CH}_2 {\rm O}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2} $\end{document} (e), \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm (H)OH} $\end{document} (f) and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm O}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm (H)CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm (g)),} $\end{document} (g)), proton-bound dimers (ions \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm CH = O} \cdot \cdot \cdot \mathop {\rm H}\limits^{\rm 3} \cdot \cdot \cdot {\rm OH}_{\rm 2} $\end{document} (h) and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH2 = O} \cdot \cdot \cdot \mathop {\rm H}\limits^{\rm + } \cdot \cdot \cdot {\rm HOCH}_{\rm 3} $\end{document} (i)) and hydroxy-protonated species (ions \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} {\rm (OH)CH}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2} (a), $\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm CH(OH)}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2} $\end{document} (b) and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm OCH}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2} $\end{document} (c)). The important points of the present study are (i) that these ions are prevented by high barriers from facile interconversion and (ii) that both electron-impact- and proton-induced gas phase decompositions seem to proceed via multistep reactions, some of which eventually result in the formation of proton-bound dimers.     

The gas-phase pyrolysis of alkyl nitrites. II. s-butyl nitrite

The rate of decomposition of s-butyl nitrite (SBN) has been studied in the absence (130–160°C) and presence (160–200°C) of NO. Under the former conditions, for low concentrations of SBN (6 × 10^?5 ? 10^?4M) and small extents of reaction (～1.5%), the first-order homogeneous rates of acetaldehyde (AcH) formation are a direct measure of reaction (1) since k_3c » k₂(NO): . Unlike t-butyl nitrite (TBN), d(AcH)/dt is independent of added CF₄ (～0.9 atm). Thus k_3c is always » k₂ (NO) over this pressure range. Large amounts of NO (～0.9 atm) (130–160°C) completely suppress AcH formation. k₁ = 10^16.2–40.9/θ sec^?1. Since (E₁ + RT) and ΔH°₁ are identical, within experimental error, both may be equated with D(s-BuO-NO) = 41.5 ± 0.8 kcal/mol and E₂ = 0 ± 0.8 kcal/mol. The thermochemistry leads to the result ΔH°_f (s-\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm Bu}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .}$\end{document}) = ? 16.6 ± 0.8 kcal/mol. From ΔS°₁ and A₁, k₂ is calculated to be 10^10.4 M^?1 · sec^?1, identical to that for TBN. From an independent observation that k₆/k₂ = 0.26 ± 0.01 independent of temperature, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm s - Bu}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} + {\rm NO}\mathop \to \limits^{\rm 6} {\rm MEK} + {\rm HNO}$\end{document}, we find E₆ = 0 ± 1 kcal/mol and k₆ = 10^9.8M^?1 · sec^?1. Under the conditions first cited, methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) is also a product of the reaction, the rate of which becomes measurable at extents of conversion >2%. However, this rate is ～0.1 that of AcH formation. Although MEK formation is affected by the ratio S/V for different reaction vessels, in a spherical reaction vessel, this MEK arises as the result of an essentially homogeneous first-order 4-centre elimination of HNO. \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm SBN}\mathop \to \limits^{\rm 5} {\rm MEK} + {\rm HNO}$\end{document}; k₅ = 10^12.8–35.8/θ sec^?1. Sec-butyl alcohol (SBA), formed at a rate comparable to MEK, is thought to arise via the hydrolysis of SBN, the water being formed from HNO. The rate of disappearance of SBN, that is, d(MEK + SBA + AcH)/dt, is given by k_global = 10^15.7–39.6/θ sec^?1. In NO (～1 atm) the rate of formation of MEK was about twice that in the absence of NO, whereas the SBA was greatly reduced. This reaction was also affected by the ratio S/V of different reaction vessels. It was again concluded that in a spherical reaction vessel, the rate of MEK formation was essentially homogeneous and first order. This rate is given by k_obs = 10^12.9–35.4/θ sec^?1, very similar to k₅. However, although it is clear that the rate of formation of MEK is doubled in the presence of NO, the value for k_obs makes it difficult to associate this extra MEK with the disproportionation of s-\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm Bu}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .}$\end{document} and NO: s-\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$s{\rm - Bu}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} + {\rm NO}\mathop \to \limits^{\rm 6} {\rm MEK} + {\rm HNO}$\end{document}. NO at temperatures of 130–160°C completely suppresses AcH formation. AcH reappears at higher temperatures (165–200°C), enabling k_3c to be determined. Ignoring reaction (6), d(AcH)/dt = k₁k₃ (SBN )/[k_3c + k₂(NO)]; k_3c = 10^14.8–15.3/θ sec^?1. Inclusion of reaction (6) into the mechanism makes very little difference to the result. Reaction (3c) is expected to be a pressure-dependent process.     

Equilibrium sublimation and thermodynamic properties of SnSe and SnSe2

Knudsen effusion studies of the sublimation of polycrystalline SnSe and SnSe₂, prepared by annealing and chemical vapor transport reactions, respectively, have been carried out using vacuum microbalance techniques in the temperature ranges 736–967 K and 608–760 K, respectively. From experimental mass-loss data for the sublimation reaction SnSe(s) = SnSe(g), the recommended values for the heat of formation and absolute entropy of SnSe(s) were calculated to be ΔH°_298,f = ?86.4 ± 9.9 kJ · mol^?1 and S°₂₉₈ = 89.0 ± 7.1 J · K^?1 · mol^?1. From mass-loss data for the decomposition reaction \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm SnSe}_{\rm 2} ({\rm s)} = {\rm SnSe(s)} + \frac{1}{{\rm x}}{\rm Se}_{\rm x} ({\rm g) (x} = 2 - 8) $\end{document}, the recommended values for the heat of formation and absolute entropy of SnSe₂(s) were determined to be ΔH°_298,f = ?118.1 ± 15.1 kJ · mol^?1 and S°₂₉₈ = 111.8 ± 11.8 J · K^?1 mol^?1.     

Rate constants for alkyl radical recombination. II. The isopropyl radical

Products of radical combination from the free-radical buffer system \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$${{\rm R}^{\rm .} + {\rm R}^{\rm '} {\rm I}\mathop {\leftrightharpoons}\limits^{{\rm K}_{{\rm RR}}}{\rm RI} + {\rm R}^{'}}$$\end{document}. have been analyzed for the two cases, R = Me, R′ = iPr and R = Et, R′ = iPr. Results are consistent with the previously examined system where R = Me, R′ = Et, and give a value of k_P for iPr· combination of 10^8.6±1.1 M^?1 sec^?1.     

High temperature polymers. I.—Sulfone ether diamines as intermediates for tractable high temperature polymers

A useful synthesis of a series of new aromatic sulfone ether diamines, H₂NC₆H₄O\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\hbox{---}\hskip-5pt[\ {\rm C}_{\rm 2} {\rm H}_{\rm 4} {\rm SO}_{\rm 2} {\rm C}_{\rm 6} {\rm H}_{\rm 4} \hbox{--} {\rm ORO}\hbox{---}\hskip-5pt ]_n {\rm OC}_{\rm 6} {\rm H}_{\rm 4} {\rm SO}_{\rm 2} {\rm C}_{\rm 6} {\rm H}_{\rm 4} \hbox{---} {\rm OC}_{\rm 6} {\rm H}_{\rm 4} {\rm NH}_{\rm 2} $\end{document}, where n = 0, 1, 2…, which increases the tractability of polyimides, polyamide-imides, and polyamides, was developed. These diamines were prepared by condensing various proportions of sodium p-aminophenate, sodium bisphenates, and dichlorodiphenyl sulfone. The synthetic procedures are now refined to the point where simply coagulating these diamines into water yields high purity polymer-grade sulfone ether diamines. The latter have good tractability; and in some cases, it is possible to extrude and injection-mold these high temperature polymers.     

Kinetics of the gas-phase reaction of acetone with iodine: Heat of formation and stabilization energy of the acetonyl radical

The kinetics of the gas-phase reaction CH₃COCH₃ + I₂ ? CH₃COCH₂I + HI have been measured spectrophotometrically in a static system over the temperature range 340–430°. The pressure of CH₃COCH₃ was varied from 15 to 330 torr and of I₂ from 4 to 48 torr, and the initial rate of the reaction was found to be consistent with \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_3 {\rm COCH}_3 + {\rm I}^{\rm .} \stackrel{1}{\rightarrow}{\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm COCH} + {\rm HI} $\end{document} as the rate-determining step. An Arrhenius plot of the variation of k₁ with temperature showed considerable scatter of the points, depending on the conditioning of the reaction vessel. After allowance for surface catalysis, the best line drawn by inspection yielded the Arrhenius equation, log [k₁/(M^?1 sec^?1)] = (11.2 ± 0.8) – (27.7 θ 2.3)/θ, where θ = 2.303 R T in kcal/mole. This activation energy yields an acetone C? H bond strength of 98 kcal/mole and δH (CH₃CO?H₂) radical = ?5.7 ± 2.6 kcal/mole. As the acetone bond strength is the same as the primary C? H bond strength in isopropyl alcohol, there is no resonance stabilization of the acetonyl radical due to delocalization of the radical site. By contrast, the isoelectronic allyl resonance energy is 10 kcal/mole, and reasons for the difference are discussed in terms of the π-bond energies of acetone and propene.     

Bifunctional even-electron ions. II. Fragmentation behaviour of aliphatic ω-hydroxy and ω-methoxy methoxonium ions

Bifunctional methoxonium ions \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm R} -\mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + ({\rm OCH}_3 ) - ({\rm CH}_2 )_{\rm n} - {\rm OH}({\rm b}) $\end{document} and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm R} - \mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + ({\rm OCH}_3 ) - ({\rm CH}_2 )_{\rm n} - {\rm OCH}_3 ({\rm c}) $\end{document} (c) show as the main reactions those caused by functional group interaction, as has already been found for the analogous hydroxonium ions (g). Although there are similarities in the fragmentation behaviour of the isomeric ions b and g, their fragmentation pathways are different, proving b and g as distinct species. The dominant primary fragmentation for b and c is loss of CH₃OH. The hydrogen migrations prior to this reaction have been established by deuterium labelling. The findings on the fragmentation behaviour of the bifunctional methoxonium ions have been extended to the general behaviour of hydroxy and alkoxy substituted alkoxonium ions.     

Methyl thiirane: Kinetic gas-phase titration of sulfur atoms in SX OY systems

The reaction SO + SO →l S + SO₂(2) was studied in the gas phase by using methyl thiirane as a titrant for sulfur atoms. By monitoring the C₃H₆ produced in the reaction \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm S} + {\rm CH}_3\hbox{---} \overline {{\rm CH\hbox{---}CH}_2\hbox{---} {\rm S}} \to {\rm S}_2 + {\rm C}_3 {\rm H}_6 (7) $\end{document}, we determined that k₂ ? 3.5 × 10^?15 cm³/s at 298 K.     

The gas-phase pyrolysis of alkyl nitrites. IV. Ethyl nitrite

The rate of decomposition of methyl nitrite (MN) has been studied in the presence of isobutane-t-BuH-(167-200°C) and NO (170-200°C). In the presence of t-BuH (～0.9 atm), for low concentrations of MN (～10^?4M) and small extents of reaction (4-10%), the first-order homogeneous rates of methanol (MeOH) formation are a direct measure of reaction (1) since k₄(t-BuH) »k₂(NO): . The results indicate that the termination process involves only \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ t - {\rm Bu\, and\, NO:\,\,}t - {\rm Bu} + {\rm NO\stackrel{e}{\longrightarrow}} $\end{document} products, such that k_e ～ 10¹⁰ M^?1 ～ sec^?1.Under these conditions small amounts of CH₂O are formed (3-8% of the MeOH). This is attributed to a molecular elimination of HNO from MN. The rate of MeOH formation shows a marked pressure dependence at low pressures of t-BuH. Addition of large amounts of NO completely suppresses MeOH formation. The rate constant for reaction (1) is given by k₁ = 10^{15.8°0.6-41.2°1}/· sec^?1. Since (E₁ + RT) and ΔH^Δ₁ are identical, within experimental error, both may be equated with D(MeO - NO) = 41.8 + 1 kcal/mole and E₂ = 0 ± 1 kcal/mol. From ΔS¹₁ and A₁, k₂ is calculated to be 10^10.1°0.6M^?1 · sec^?1, in good agreement with our values for other alkyl nitrites. These results reestablish NO as a good radical trap for the study of the reactions of alkoxyl radicals in particular. From an independent observation that k₆/k₂ = 0.17 independent of temperature, we conclude that \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ E_6 = 0 \pm 1{\rm kcal}/{\rm mol\, and\,}\,k_6 = 10^{9.3} M^{- 1} \cdot {\rm sec}^{- 1} :{\rm MeO} + {\rm NO}\stackrel{6}{\longrightarrow}{\rm CH}_2 {\rm O} + {\rm HNO} $\end{document}. From the independent observations that k₂:k_2→: k_6→ was 1:0.37:0.04, we find that k_2→ = 10^9.7M^?1 ? sec^?1 and k_6→ = 10^8.7M^?1 ? sec^?1. In addition, the thermodynamics lead to the result In the presence of NO (～0.9 atm) the products are CH₂O and N₂O (and presumably H₂O) such that the ratio N₂O/CH₂O ～ 0.5. The rate of CH₂O formation was affected by the surface-to-volume ratio s/v for different reaction vessels, but it is concluded that, in a spherical reaction vessel, the CH₂O arises as the result of an essentially homogeneous first-order, fourcenter elimination of \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm HNO}:{\rm MN\stackrel{5}{\longrightarrow}CH}_{\rm 2} {\rm O} + {\rm HNO} $\end{document}. The rate of CH₂O formation is given by k₅ = 10^{13.6°0.6-38.5-1}/? sec^?1.     

Kinetics and mechanism of the reactions of the superoxide ion in solutions. II. The kinetics of protonation of the superoxide ion by water and ethanol

The rate constants for the protonation of “free” (that is, solvated) superoxide ions by water and ethanol are equal to 0.5–3.5 ×10^?3M^?1·s^?1 in DMF and AN at 20º. It has been found that the protonation rates for the ion pairs of \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm O}_{\rm 2}^{\overline {\rm .} }$\end{document} with the Bu₄N⁺ cation are much slower than those for “free” \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm O}_{\rm 2}^{\overline {\rm .} }$\end{document}. It is suggested that the effects of aprotic solvents on the protonation rates of \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm O}_{\rm 2}^{\overline {\rm .} }$\end{document} are mainly due to the fact that the proton donors form solvated complexes of different stability in these solvents.     

Living reversible anonic polymerization of N,N-diethylamine-1,3,2-dioxaphosphorinan

Polymerization of the cyclic amide of P^III is described for the first time. The N,N-diethylamine-1,3,2-dioxaphosphorinan was shown to give living reversible polymerization with anionic initiators. Lithium and sodium derivatives were found to be inactive. ¹H-, ¹³C-, and ³¹P-NMR indicated that the polymer strictly reflects the monomer structure and is formed without any isomerization, the polymer chain being $\rlap{--} ({\rm OP}\left( {{\rm NR}_{\rm 2} } \right){\rm O(CH}_{\rm 2} \rlap{--} )_3 )_n $. Initiation involves attack of the anion on the P atom. From the dependence of the equilibrium monomer concentration on temeprature ΔH_1s = 1.5 ± 0.2 kcal·mol^?1 and ΔS_1s = 4.6 ± 0.6 cal·mol^?1·°K^?1.