A Remark on Hamiltonian Cycles

Let G be an undirected and simple graph on n vertices. Let ω, α and χ denote the number of components, the independence number and the connectivity number of G. G is called a 1-tough graph if ω(G – S) ? |S| for any subset S of V(G) such that ω(G ? S) > 1. Let σ₂ = min {d(v) + d(w)|v and w are nonadjacent}. Note that the difference α - χ in 1-tough graph may be made arbitrary large. In this paper we prove that any 1-tough graph with σ₂ > n + χ - α is hamiltonian.     

Chromaticity of triangulated graphs

It is shown here that a connected graph G without subgraphs isomorphic to K₄ is triangulated if and only if its chromatic polynomial P(G,λ) equals λ(λ ? 1)^m(λ ? 2)^r for some integers m ≧ 1, r ≧ 0. This result generalizes the characterization of Two-Trees given by E.G. Whitehead [“Chromaticity of Two-Trees,” Journal of Graph Theory 9 (1985) 279–284].     

The maximum interval number of graphs with given genus

The interval number of a graph G, denoted i(G), is the least positive integer t such that G is the intersection graph of sets, each of which is the union of t compact real intervals. It is known that every planar graph has interval number at most 3 and that this result is best possible. We investigate the maximum value of the interval number for graphs with higher genus and show that the maximum value of the interval number of graphs with genus g is between ?√g? and 3 + ?√3g?. We also show that the maximum arboricity of graphs with genus g is either 1 + ?√3g? or 2 + ?√3g?.     

On the interval number of a chordal graph

The interval number of a (simple, undirected) graph G is the least positive integer t such that G is the intersection graph of sets, each of which is the union of t real intervals. A chordal (or triangulated) graph is one with no induced cycles on 4 or more vertices. If G is chordal and has maximum clique size ω(G) = m, then i(G) ? [1 + o(1)]m/log₂ m and this result is best possible, even for split graphs (chordal graphs whose complement is also chordal).     

Path covers of weighted graphs

Let (G, w) denote a simple graph G with a weight function w : E(G) ← {0, 1, 2}. A path cover of (G, w) is a collection of paths in G such that every edge e is contained in exactly w(e) paths of the collection. For a vertex v, w(v) is the sum of the weights of the edges incident with v; v is called an odd (even) vertex if w(v) is odd (even). We prove that if every vertex of (G, w) is incident with at most one edge of weight 2, then (G, w) has a path cover P such that each odd vertex occurs exactly once, and each even vertex exactly twice, as an end of a path of P. We also prove that if every vertex of (G, w) is even, then (G, w) has a path cover P such that each vertex occurs exactly twice as an end of a path of P. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Recognizing connectedness from vertex‐deleted subgraphs

Let G be a graph of order n. The vertex‐deleted subgraph G ? v, obtained from G by deleting the vertex v and all edges incident to v, is called a card of G. Let H be another graph of order n, disjoint from G. Then the number of common cards of G and H is the maximum number of disjoint pairs (v, w), where v and w are vertices of G and H, respectively, such that G ? v?H ? w. We prove that if G is connected and H is disconnected, then the number of common cards of G and H is at most ?n/2? + 1. Thus, we can recognize the connectedness of a graph from any ?n/2? + 2 of its cards. Moreover, we completely characterize those pairs of graphs that attain the upper bound and show that, with the exception of six pairs of graphs of order at most 7, any pair of graphs that attains the maximum is in one of four infinite families. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 67:285‐299, 2011     

Maximum pebbling number of graphs of diameter three

Given a configuration of pebbles on the vertices of a graph G, a pebbling move consists of taking two pebbles off some vertex v and putting one of them back on a vertex adjacent to v. A graph is called pebbleable if for each vertex v there is a sequence of pebbling moves that would place at least one pebble on v. The pebbling number of a graph G is the smallest integer m such that G is pebbleable for every configuration of m pebbles on G. We prove that the pebbling number of a graph of diameter 3 on n vertices is no more than (3/2)n + O(1), and, by explicit construction, that the bound is sharp. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

Regular graphs having the same path layer matrix

The path layer matrix (or path degree sequence) of a graph G contains quantitative information about all paths in G. Elements (i,j) in this matrix is the number of simple paths in G having initial vertex v, and length j. For every r ≥ 3, pairs of nonisomorphic r-regular graphs having the same path layer matrix are presented.     

Pan-connectedness of graphs with large neighborhood unions

Let G be a simple graph with n vertices. For any v ? V(G){v \in V(G)} , let N(v)={u ? V(G): uv ? E(G)}{N(v)=\{u \in V(G): uv \in E(G)\}} , NC(G) = min{|N(u) èN(v)|: u, v ? V(G){NC(G)= \min \{|N(u) \cup N(v)|: u, v \in V(G)} and uv \not ? E(G)}{uv \not \in E(G)\}} , and NC₂(G) = min{|N(u) èN(v)|: u, v ? V(G){NC_2(G)= \min\{|N(u) \cup N(v)|: u, v \in V(G)} and u and v has distance 2 in E(G)}. Let l ≥ 1 be an integer. A graph G on n ≥ l vertices is [l, n]-pan-connected if for any u, v ? V(G){u, v \in V(G)} , and any integer m with l ≤ m ≤ n, G has a (u, v)-path of length m. In 1998, Wei and Zhu (Graphs Combinatorics 14:263–274, 1998) proved that for a three-connected graph on n ≥ 7 vertices, if NC(G) ≥ n − δ(G) + 1, then G is [6, n]-pan-connected. They conjectured that such graphs should be [5, n]-pan-connected. In this paper, we prove that for a three-connected graph on n ≥ 7 vertices, if NC ₂(G) ≥ n − δ(G) + 1, then G is [5, n]-pan-connected. Consequently, the conjecture of Wei and Zhu is proved as NC ₂(G) ≥ NC(G). Furthermore, we show that the lower bound is best possible and characterize all 2-connected graphs with NC ₂(G) ≥ n − δ(G) + 1 which are not [4, n]-pan-connected.     

ON A CONJECTURE ON nTH ORDER DEGREE REGULAR GRAPHS

Abstract

For n a positive integer and v a vertex of a graph G, the nth order degree of v in G, denoted by deg_nv, is the number of vertices at distance n from v. The graph G is said to be nth order regular of degree k if, for every vertex v of G, deg_nv = k. The following conjecture due to Alavi, Lick, and Zou is proved: For n ≥ 2, if G is a connected nth order regular graph of degree 1, then G is either a path of length 2n—1 or G has diameter n. Properties of nth order regular graphs of degree k, k ≥ 1, are investigated.     

Claw Conditions for Heavy Cycles in Weighted Graphs

A graph is called a weighted graph when each edge e is assigned a nonnegative number w(e), called the weight of e. For a vertex v of a weighted graph, d^w(v) is the sum of the weights of the edges incident with v. For a subgraph H of a weighted graph G, the weight of H is the sum of the weights of the edges belonging to H. In this paper, we give a new sufficient condition for a weighted graph to have a heavy cycle. A 2-connected weighted graph G contains either a Hamilton cycle or a cycle of weight at least c, if G satisfies the following conditions: In every induced claw or induced modified claw F of G, (1) max{d^w(x),d^w(y)} c/2 for each non-adjacent pair of vertices x and y in F, and (2) all edges of F have the same weight.     

On the rank spread of graphs

For a simple graph G?=?(𝒱, ?) with vertex-set 𝒱?=?{1,?…?,?n}, let 𝒮(G) be the set of all real symmetric n-by-n matrices whose graph is G. We present terminology linking established as well as new results related to the minimum rank problem, with spectral properties in graph theory. The minimum rank mr(G) of G is the smallest possible rank over all matrices in 𝒮(G). The rank spread r _v (G) of G at a vertex v, defined as mr(G)???mr(G???v), can take values ??∈?{0,?1,?2}. In general, distinct vertices in a graph may assume any of the three values. For ??=?0 or 1, there exist graphs with uniform r _v (G) (equal to the same integer at each vertex v). We show that only for ??=?0, will a single matrix A in 𝒮(G) determine when a graph has uniform rank spread. Moreover, a graph G, with vertices of rank spread zero or one only, is a λ-core graph for a λ-optimal matrix A in 𝒮(G). We also develop sufficient conditions for a vertex of rank spread zero or two and a necessary condition for a vertex of rank spread two.     

On the parity of crossing numbers

For an integer n ? 1, a graph G has an n-constant crossing number if, for any two good drawings ? and ?′ of G in the plane, μ(?) ≡ μ(?′) (mod n), where μ(?) is the number of crossings in ?. We prove that, except for trivial cases, a graph G has n-constant crossing number if and only if n = 2 and G is either K_p or K_q,r, where p, q, and r are odd.     

An upper bound on the size of a largest clique in a graph

A graph is point determining if distinct vertices have distinct neighborhoods. The nucleus of a point-determining graph is the set G^O of all vertices, v, such that G–v is point determining. In this paper we show that the size, ω(G), of a maximum clique in G satisfies ω(G) ? 2|π (G)^O|, where π(G) (the point determinant of G) is obtained from G by identifying vertices which have the same neighborhood.     

On double and multiple interval graphs

In this paper we discuss a generalization of the familiar concept of an interval graph that arises naturally in scheduling and allocation problems. We define the interval number of a graph G to be the smallest positive integer t for which there exists a function f which assigns to each vertex u of G a subset f(u) of the real line so that f(u) is the union of t closed intervals of the real line, and distinct vertices u and v in G are adjacent if and only if f(u) and f(v)meet. We show that (1) the interval number of a tree is at most two, and (2) the complete bipartite graph K_{m, n} has interval number ?(mn + 1)/(m + n)?.     

Cycles in bipartite graphs and an application in number theory

Let G = G(A, B) be a bipartite graph with |A| = u, |B| = v, and let / be a positive integer. In this paper we prove the following result: If v ≤ u, uv ≤ n, m = |E(G)|, and m ≥ max{180/u, 20/n^{1/2(1+(1/l))},} then G contains a C_2/. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

The interval number of a planar graph: Three intervals suffice

Suppose each vertex of a graph G is assigned a subset of the real line consisting of at most t closed intervals. This assignment is called a t-interval representation of G when vertex v is adjacent to vertex w if and only if some interval for v intersects some interval for w. The interval number i(G) of a graph G is the smallest number t such that G has a t-interval representation. It is proved that i(G) ≤ 3 whenever G is planar and that this bound is the best possible. The related concepts of displayed interval number and depth-r interval number are discussed and their maximum values for certain classes of planar graphs are found.     

Roman domination subdivision number of graphs

A Roman dominating function on a graph G = (V, E) is a function f : V ? {0, 1, 2}f : V \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2\} satisfying the condition that every vertex v for which f(v) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex u for which f(u) = 2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value w(f) = ?_{v ? V} f(v)w(f) = \sum_{v\in V} f(v). The Roman domination number of a graph G, denoted by _gR(G)_{\gamma R}(G), equals the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on G. The Roman domination subdivision number sd_gR(G)sd_{\gamma R}(G) is the minimum number of edges that must be subdivided (each edge in G can be subdivided at most once) in order to increase the Roman domination number. In this paper, first we establish upper bounds on the Roman domination subdivision number for arbitrary graphs in terms of vertex degree. Then we present several different conditions on G which are sufficient to imply that $1 \leq sd_{\gamma R}(G) \leq 3$1 \leq sd_{\gamma R}(G) \leq 3. Finally, we show that the Roman domination subdivision number of a graph can be arbitrarily large.     

Independence number,connectivity, and r-factors

We show that if r ? 1 is an odd integer and G is a graph with |V(G)| even such that k(G) ? (r + 1)²/2 and (r + 1)²α(G) ? 4rk(G), then G has an r-factor; if r ? 2 is even and G is a graph with k(G) ? r(r + 2)/2 and (r + 2)α(G) ? 4k(G), then G has an r-factor (where k(G) and α(G) denote the connectivity and the independence number of G, respectively).     

[a,b]-factorization of a graph

Let a and b be integers such that 0 ? a ? b. Then a graph G is called an [a, b]-graph if a ? d_G(x) ? b for every x ? V(G), and an [a, b]-factor of a graph is defined to be its spanning subgraph F such that a ? d_F(x) ? b for every vertex x, where d_G(x) and d_F(x) denote the degrees of x in G and F, respectively. If the edges of a graph can be decomposed into [a.b]-factors then we say that the graph is [2a, 2a]-factorable. We prove the following two theorems: (i) a graph G is [2a, 2b)-factorable if and only if G is a [2am,2bm]-graph for some integer m, and (ii) every [8m + 2k, 10m + 2k]-graph is [1,2]-factorable.