A DFT/TDDFT Investigation of Excited State Dynamical Mechanism of (E)‐1‐((2,2‐Diphenylhydrazono)methyl)naphthalen‐2‐ol

The excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) mechanism of a new compound (E )‐1‐((2,2‐diphenylhydrazono)methyl)naphthalen‐2‐ol ( EDMN ) sensor, reported and synthesized by Mukherjee et al . [Sensors Actuat. B‐Chem . 2014, 202 , 1190], is investigated in detail theoretically. The calculations on primary bond lengths, bond angles, and the corresponding infrared (IR) vibrational spectra and hydrogen‐bond energy involved in intramolecular hydrogen bond between the S₀ and S₁ states confirm that the intramolecular hydrogen bond is strengthened in the S₁ state, which reveals the tendency of ESIPT reaction. The fact that the experimental absorption and emission spectra are well reproduced demonstrates the rationality and effectiveness of the time‐dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) level of theory we adopt here. Furthermore, intramolecular charge transfer based on the frontier molecular orbitals (MOs) gives indication of the ESIPT reaction. The constructed potential energy curves of both the S₀ and S₁ states while keeping the O─H distance of EDMN fixed at a series of values are used to illustrate the ESIPT process. The lower barrier of ~3.934 kcal/mol in the S₁ state potential energy curve (lower than the 8.254 kcal/mol in the S₀ state) provides the transfer mechanism.     

Ethyl 3‐[1‐(5,5‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐1,3,2‐dioxaphosphorin‐2‐yl)propan‐2‐ylidene]carbazate: a combined X‐ray and density functional theory (DFT) study

In the title compound, C₁₁H₂₁N₂O₅P, one of the two carbazate N atoms is involved in the C=N double bond and the H atom of the second N atom is engaged in an intramolecular hydrogen bond with an O atom from the dimethylphosphorin‐2‐yl group, which is in an uncommon cis position with respect to the carbamate group. The cohesion of the crystal structure is also reinforced by weak intermolecular hydrogen bonds. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the B3LYP/6‐311++g(2d,2p) level revealed the lowest energy structure to have a Z configuration at the C=N bond, which is consistent with the configuration found in the X‐ray crystal structure, as well as a less stable E counterpart which lies 2.0 kcal mol⁻¹ higher in potential energy. Correlations between the experimental and computational studies are discussed.     

Sequential C−H Borylation and N‐Demethylation of 1,1′‐Biphenylamines: Alternative Route to Polycyclic BN‐Heteroarenes

Described herein is an unprecedented access to BN‐polyaromatic compounds from 1,1′‐biphenylamines by sequential borane‐mediated C(sp²)?H borylation and intramolecular N‐demethylation. The conveniently in situ generated Piers’ borane from a borinic acid reacts with a series of N,N‐dimethyl‐1,1′‐biphenyl‐2‐amines in the presence of PhSiH₃ to afford six‐membered amine‐borane adducts bearing a C(sp²)?B bond at the C2′‐position. These species undergo an intramolecular N‐demethylation with a B(C₆F₅)₃ catalyst to provide BN‐isosteres of polyaromatics. According to computational studies, a stepwise ionic pathway is suggested. Photophysical characters of the resultant BN‐heteroarenes shown them to be distinctive from those of all‐carbon analogues.     

Bis(2‐amino­pyridine‐κN1)(benzoato‐κO)silver(I)

In the title compound, [Ag(C₇H₅O₂)(C₅H₆N₂)₂], the Ag^I atom is tricoordinated by two independent pyridine N atoms and one benzoate O atom in a nearly planar geometry. An intramolecular N—H⃛O hydrogen bond forms an S(8) graph ring. The packing is built from molecular layers stabilized by two types of N—H⃛O hydrogen bond. Intermolecular Ag⃛N and intramolecular Ag⃛O contacts were also observed, together with three weak intermolecular C—H⃛π interactions.     

An X‐ray crystallographic and density functional theory study of (3Z)‐4‐(5‐ethylsulfonyl‐2‐hydroxyanilino)pent‐3‐en‐2‐one and (3Z)‐4‐(5‐tert‐butyl‐2‐hydroxyanilino)pent‐3‐en‐2‐one

The Schiff base enaminones (3Z)‐4‐(5‐ethylsulfonyl‐2‐hydroxyanilino)pent‐3‐en‐2‐one, C₁₃H₁₇NO₄S, (I), and (3Z)‐4‐(5‐tert‐butyl‐2‐hydroxyanilino)pent‐3‐en‐2‐one, C₁₅H₂₁NO₂, (II), were studied by X‐ray crystallography and density functional theory (DFT). Although the keto tautomer of these compounds is dominant, the O=C—C=C—N bond lengths are consistent with some electron delocalization and partial enol character. Both (I) and (II) are nonplanar, with the amino–phenol group canted relative to the rest of the molecule; the twist about the N(enamine)—C(aryl) bond leads to dihedral angles of 40.5 (2) and −116.7 (1)° for (I) and (II), respectively. Compound (I) has a bifurcated intramolecular hydrogen bond between the N—H group and the flanking carbonyl and hydroxy O atoms, as well as an intermolecular hydrogen bond, leading to an infinite one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded chain. Compound (II) has one intramolecular hydrogen bond and one intermolecular C=O...H—O hydrogen bond, and consequently also forms a one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded chain. The DFT‐calculated structures [in vacuo, B3LYP/6‐311G(d,p) level] for the keto tautomers compare favourably with the X‐ray crystal structures of (I) and (II), confirming the dominance of the keto tautomer. The simulations indicate that the keto tautomers are 20.55 and 18.86 kJ mol⁻¹ lower in energy than the enol tautomers for (I) and (II), respectively.     

7‐Amino‐5‐methyl‐2‐phenyl‐6‐(phenyldiazenyl)pyrazolo[1,5‐a]pyrimidine crystallizes with Z′ = 2: pseudosymmetry and the formation of complex sheets built from N—H...N and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds

The title compound, C₁₉H₁₆N₆, crystallizes with Z′ = 2 in the space group P2₁/n. The two molecules in the selected asymmetric unit are approximate mirror images of one another; most corresponding pairs of atoms are related by an approximate half‐cell translation along [100]. Each molecule contains an intramolecular N—H...N hydrogen bond and the molecules are linked into complex sheets by a combination of two intermolecular N—H...N and four C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds. Comparisons are made with some other 7‐aminopyrazolo[1,5‐a]pyrimidines.     

2‐Ethyl‐1‐[5‐(4‐methylphenyl)pyrazol‐3‐yl]‐3‐(thiophene‐2‐carbonyl)isothiourea: molecular ribbons containing three types of hydrogen‐bonded ring

The title compound, C₁₈H₁₈N₄OS₂, was prepared by reaction of S,S‐diethyl 2‐thenoylimidodithiocarbonate with 5‐amino‐3‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐1H‐pyrazole using microwave irradiation under solvent‐free conditions. In the molecule, the thiophene unit is disordered over two sets of atomic sites, with occupancies of 0.814 (4) and 0.186 (4), and the bonded distances provide evidence for polarization in the acylthiourea fragment and for aromatic type delocalization in the pyrazole ring. An intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond is present, forming an S(6) motif, and molecules are linked by N—H...O and N—H...N hydrogen bonds to form a ribbon in which centrosymmetric R₂²(4) rings, built from N—H...O hydrogen bonds and flanked by inversion‐related pairs of S(6) rings, alternate with centrosymmetric R₂²(6) rings built from N—H...N hydrogen bonds.     

N‐tert‐Butyl‐N′‐[5‐cyano‐2‐(4‐methylphenoxy)phenylsulfonyl]urea,a new TXA2 receptor antagonist

The title compound, C₁₉H₂₁N₃O₄S, crystallizes in the space group P2/c with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. The conformation of both molecules is very similar and is mainly determined by an intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond between a urea N atom and a sulfonyl O atom. The O and second N atom of the urea groups are involved in dimer formation via N—H...O hydrogen bonds. The intramolecular hydrogen‐bonding motif and conformation of the C—SO₂—NH(C=O)—NH—C fragment are explored and compared using the Cambridge Structural Database and theoretical calculations. The crystal packing is characterized by π–π stacking between the 5‐cyanobenzene rings.     

Planarity of heteroaryldithiocarbazic acid derivatives showing tuberculostatic activity. III. Mono‐ and diesters of 3‐(pyrazin‐2‐ylcarbonyl)dithiocarbazic acid

Methyl 2‐(pyrazin‐2‐ylcarbonyl)hydrazinecarbodithioate, C₇H₈N₄OS₂, (E1), N′‐[bis(methylsulfanyl)methylidene]pyrazine‐2‐carbohydrazide, C₈H₁₀N₄OS₂, (F1), N′‐[bis(methylsulfanyl)methylidene]‐6‐methoxypyrazine‐2‐carbohydrazide, C₉H₁₂N₄O₂S₂, (F2), and methyl 1‐methyl‐2‐(pyrazin‐2‐ylcarbonyl)hydrazinecarbodithioate, C₈H₁₀N₄OS₂, (G1), can be considered as derivatives of classical (thio)amide‐type tuberculostatics, and all are moderately active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This study was undertaken in a search for relationships between activity and specific intramolecular interactions, especially conjugations and hydrogen‐bond contacts, and the molecular structures were compared with respective amine analogues, also active against the pathogen. Despite the differences between the amine and carbonyl groups with opposite functions in the hydrogen bond, the two types of structure show a surprisingly similar planar geometry, mostly due to the conjugations aided by the bifurcated intramolecular hydrogen‐bond contact between the N—H group of the central hydrazide group as donor and a pyrazine N atom and an S atom of the dithio function as acceptors. Planarity was suggested to be crucial for the tuberculostatic activity of these compounds. The N‐methylated derivative (G1) showed a significant twist at the N—N bond [torsion angle = −121.9 (3)°] due to the methyl substitution, which precludes an intramolecular N—H...S contact and the planarity of the whole molecule. Nonetheless, the compound shows moderate tuberculostatic activity.     

Acetone‐4‐methyl­thio­semicarbazone at 220 K

In the title compound, C₅H₁₁N₃S, the trans conformation is stabilized by a weak intramolecular N—H?N hydrogen bond. Unusually, one N—H bond is not involved in any hydrogen‐bond interactions and instead the mol­ecules form a one‐dimensional polymer via N—H?S intermolecular hydrogen bonds.     

2‐{[(3‐Fluorophenyl)amino]methylidene}‐3‐oxobutanenitrile and 5‐{[(3‐fluorophenyl)amino]methylidene}‐2,2‐dimethyl‐1,3‐dioxane‐4,6‐dione: X‐ray and DFT studies

In the crystal structures of the title compounds, C₁₁H₉FN₂O, (I), and C₁₃H₁₂FNO₄, (II), the molecules are joined pairwise via different hydrogen bonds and the constituent pairs are crosslinked by weak C—H...O hydrogen bonds. The basic structural motif in (I), which is partially disordered, comprises pairs of molecules arranged in an antiparallel fashion which enables C—H...N[triple‐bond]C interactions. The pairs of molecules are crosslinked by two weak C—H...O hydrogen bonds. The constituent pair in (II) is formed by intramolecular bifurcated C—H...O/O′ and combined inter‐ and intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds. In both structures, F atoms form weak C—F...H—C interactions with the H atoms of the two neighbouring methyl groups, the H...F separations being 2.59/2.80 and 2.63/2.71 Å in (I) and (II), respectively. The bond orders in the molecules, estimated using the natural bond orbitals (NBO) formalism, correlate with the changes in bond lengths. Deviations from the ideal molecular geometry are explained by the concept of non‐equivalent hybrid orbitals. The existence of possible conformers of (I) and (II) is analysed by molecular calculations at the B3LYP/6–31+G** level of theory.     

2‐(4‐Methoxyphenyl­azo)‐4‐phenyl­phenol

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₉H₁₆N₂O₂, displays a trans configuration of the azo moiety, which forms an intramolecular O—H?N=N hydrogen bond. The H?N and O?N distances are 1.81 (3) and 2.581 (4) Å, respectively. The azo­benzene moiety is approximately planar, and has a dihedral angle of ca 23° with the substituted phenyl group.     

4‐[(3‐Chloro­phenyl)­diazenyl]‐2‐{[tris(hydroxy­methyl)­methyl]amino­methyl­ene}cyclo­hexa‐3,5‐dien‐1(2H)‐one

The title compound, C₁₇H₁₈ClN₃O₄, adopts the keto–amine tautomeric form and displays an intramolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond [N⋯O = 2.639 (2) Å]. The configuration around the azo N=N double bond is trans, and the dihedral angle between the planes of the two aromatic rings is 20.5 (2)°. The mol­ecules are linked by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to form a three‐dimensional network.     

Heteronuclear NMR spectroscopic investigations of hydrogen bonding in 2‐(benzo[d]thiazole‐2′‐yl)‐N‐alkylanilines

The 2‐(benzo[d]thiazole‐2′‐yl)‐N‐alkylanilines have previously revealed the presence of a strong intramolecular hydrogen bond. This in turn gives rise to a more complicated multiplet for the protons attached to the carbon adjacent to the amino group. This intramolecular hydrogen bond was investigated by a deuterium exchange experiment using heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy (¹H, ¹³C, ¹⁵ N and ²H). We observed changes in the multiplet structure and chemical shifts providing further evidence that the deuterium replaces the hydrogen in the intramolecular hydrogen bond. A time course study of the D₂O exchange confirmed the presence of a strong hydrogen bond. The comparison of the structures obtained by X‐ray crystallography showed a very small difference in planarity between the two‐substituted and four‐substituted amino compounds. In both the cases, the phenyl ring is not absolutely coplanar with the thiazole unit. The existence of this intramolecular hydrogen bond in 2‐(benzo[d]thiazole‐2′‐yl)‐N‐alkylanilines was further confirmed by single crystal X‐ray crystallography. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Theoretical insights into the excited‐state process of 4‐tert‐butyl‐2‐(5‐(5‐tert‐butyl‐2‐methoxyphenyl)thiazolo[5,4‐d]thiazol‐2‐yl)‐phenol

In this paper, we theoretically explore the motivation and behaviors of the excited‐state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) reaction for a novel white organic light‐emitting diode (WOLED) material 4‐tert‐butyl‐2‐(5‐(5‐tert‐butyl‐2‐methoxyphenyl)thiazolo[5,4‐d]thiazol‐2‐yl)‐phenol (t‐MTTH). The “atoms in molecules” (AIM) method is adopted to verify the formation and existence of the hydrogen bond O? H···N. By analyzing the excited‐state hydrogen bonding behaviors via changes in the chemical bonding and infrared (IR) vibrational spectra, we confirm that the intramolecular hydrogen bond O? H···N should be getting strengthened in the first excited state in four kinds of solvents, thus revealing the tendency of ESIPT reaction. Further, the role of charge‐transfer interaction is addressed under the frontier molecular orbitals (MOs), which depicts the nature of the electronic excited state and supports the ESIPT reaction. Also, the electron distribution confirms the ESIPT tendency once again. The scanned and optimized potential energy curves according to variational O? H coordinate in the solvents demonstrate that the proton transfer reaction should occur in the S₁ state, and the potential energy barriers along with ESIPT direction support this reaction. Based on the excited‐state behaviors reported in this work, the experimental spectral phenomenon has been reasonably explained.     

4,6‐Diamino‐2‐morpholino‐5‐nitrosopyrimidine: a polarized molecular structure within hydrogen‐bonded sheets

In the title compound, C₈H₁₂N₆O₂, the molecular dimensions provide evidence for significant polarization of the electronic structure. There is an intramolecular N—H...N hydrogen bond, and the molecules are linked into complex sheets by a combination of two‐centre hydrogen bonds, one each of the N—H...N and N—H...O types, and a three‐centre N—H...(N,O) hydrogen bond.     

Methyl 2‐benzamido‐4‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐5‐methylbenzoate and N‐{5‐benzoyl‐2‐[(Z)‐2‐methoxyethenyl]‐4‐methylphenyl}benzamide

Methyl 2‐benzamido‐4‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐5‐methylbenzoate, C₂₄H₂₃NO₅, (Ia), and N‐{5‐benzoyl‐2‐[(Z)‐2‐methoxyethenyl]‐4‐methylphenyl}benzamide, C₂₄H₂₁NO₃, (IIa), were formed via a Diels–Alder reaction of appropriately substituted 2H‐pyran‐2‐ones and methyl propiolate or (Z)‐1‐methoxybut‐1‐en‐3‐yne, respectively. Each of these cycloadditions might yield two different regioisomers, but just one was obtained in each case. In (Ia), an intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond closes a six‐membered ring. A chain is formed due to aromatic π–π interactions, and a three‐dimensional framework structure is formed by a combination of C—H...O and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds. Compound (IIa) was formed not only regioselectively but also chemoselectively, with just the triple bond reacting and the double bond remaining unchanged. Compound (IIa) crystallizes as N—H...O hydrogen‐bonded dimers stabilized by aromatic π–π interactions. Dimers of (IIa) are connected into a chain by weak C—H...π(arene) interactions.     

Complexes of 2,2′,2″-Nitrilotriphenol. Part 2. Crystal and Molecular Structures of Three Boron Complexes

Crystal and molecular structures of a complex between B ( III ) and the tripod ligand 2,2′,2″-nitrilotriphenol as well as of its pyridine and quinuclidine adducts are presented. The 2,2′,2″-nitrilotriphenyl borate ( III ) molecule shows a strained, tricyclic chelate system with a central N–B donor-acceptor bond of 1.681(5) Å. In the adducts with pyridine ( IV ) and quinuclidine ( III -quin), this bond is broken, the N-atom inverts and is pushed out of the coordination sphere ( B–N _intern = 2.82 Å for Py and 2.85 Å for quin), and a new bond is formed between the boron atom and the external nucleophile ( B–N _extern = 1.631 Å for Py and 1.643 Å for quin).     

1,3‐Bis[2‐(2‐hydroxybenzylideneamino)phenoxy]propane

The title compound {systematic name: 2,2′‐[1,3‐propanediyldioxydi‐o‐phenylenebis(nitrilomethylidyne)]diphenol}, C₂₉H₂₆N₂O₄, exists as the phenol–imine form in the crystal, and there are strong intramolecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, with O⋯N distances of 2.545 (2) and 2.579 (2) Å. The C=N imine bond distances are in the range 1.276 (2)–1.279 (2) Å and the C=N—C bond angles are in the range 123.05 (16)–124.64 (17)°. The configurations about the C=N bonds are anti (1E).