GFscore: a general nonlinear consensus scoring function for high-throughput docking

Most of the recent published works in the field of docking and scoring protein/ligand complexes have focused on ranking true positives resulting from a Virtual Library Screening (VLS) through the use of a specified or consensus linear scoring function. In this work, we present a methodology to speed up the High Throughput Screening (HTS) process, by allowing focused screens or for hitlist triaging when a prohibitively large number of hits is identified in the primary screen, where we have extended the principle of consensus scoring in a nonlinear neural network manner. This led us to introduce a nonlinear Generalist scoring Function, GFscore, which was trained to discriminate true positives from false positives in a data set of diverse chemical compounds. This original Generalist scoring Function is a combination of the five scoring functions found in the CScore package from Tripos Inc. GFscore eliminates up to 75% of molecules, with a confidence rate of 90%. The final result is a Hit Enrichment in the list of molecules to investigate during a research campaign for biological active compounds where the remaining 25% of molecules would be sent to in vitro screening experiments. GFscore is therefore a powerful tool for the biologist, saving both time and money.     

Support vector regression scoring of receptor-ligand complexes for rank-ordering and virtual screening of chemical libraries

The community structure-activity resource (CSAR) data sets are used to develop and test a support vector machine-based scoring function in regression mode (SVR). Two scoring functions (SVR-KB and SVR-EP) are derived with the objective of reproducing the trend of the experimental binding affinities provided within the two CSAR data sets. The features used to train SVR-KB are knowledge-based pairwise potentials, while SVR-EP is based on physicochemical properties. SVR-KB and SVR-EP were compared to seven other widely used scoring functions, including Glide, X-score, GoldScore, ChemScore, Vina, Dock, and PMF. Results showed that SVR-KB trained with features obtained from three-dimensional complexes of the PDBbind data set outperformed all other scoring functions, including best performing X-score, by nearly 0.1 using three correlation coefficients, namely Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall. It was interesting that higher performance in rank ordering did not translate into greater enrichment in virtual screening assessed using the 40 targets of the Directory of Useful Decoys (DUD). To remedy this situation, a variant of SVR-KB (SVR-KBD) was developed by following a target-specific tailoring strategy that we had previously employed to derive SVM-SP. SVR-KBD showed a much higher enrichment, outperforming all other scoring functions tested, and was comparable in performance to our previously derived scoring function SVM-SP.     

An iterative knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions: II. Validation of the scoring function

We have developed an iterative knowledge-based scoring function (ITScore) to describe protein-ligand interactions. Here, we assess ITScore through extensive tests on native structure identification, binding affinity prediction, and virtual database screening. Specifically, ITScore was first applied to a test set of 100 protein-ligand complexes constructed by Wang et al. (J Med Chem 2003, 46, 2287), and compared with 14 other scoring functions. The results show that ITScore yielded a high success rate of 82% on identifying native-like binding modes under the criterion of rmsd < or = 2 A for each top-ranked ligand conformation. The success rate increased to 98% if the top five conformations were considered for each ligand. In the case of binding affinity prediction, ITScore also obtained a good correlation for this test set (R = 0.65). Next, ITScore was used to predict binding affinities of a second diverse test set of 77 protein-ligand complexes prepared by Muegge and Martin (J Med Chem 1999, 42, 791), and compared with four other widely used knowledge-based scoring functions. ITScore yielded a high correlation of R2 = 0.65 (or R = 0.81) in the affinity prediction. Finally, enrichment tests were performed with ITScore against four target proteins using the compound databases constructed by Jacobsson et al. (J Med Chem 2003, 46, 5781). The results were compared with those of eight other scoring functions. ITScore yielded high enrichments in all four database screening tests. ITScore can be easily combined with the existing docking programs for the use of structure-based drug design.     

DSX: a knowledge-based scoring function for the assessment of protein-ligand complexes

We introduce the new knowledge-based scoring function DSX that consists of distance-dependent pair potentials, novel torsion angle potentials, and newly defined solvent accessible surface-dependent potentials. DSX pair potentials are based on the statistical formalism of DrugScore, extended by a much more specialized set of atom types. The original DrugScore-like reference state is rather unstable with respect to modifications in the used atom types. Therefore, an important method to overcome this problem and to allow for robust results when deriving pair potentials for arbitrary sets of atom types is presented. A validation based on a carefully prepared test set is shown, enabling direct comparison to the majority of other popular scoring functions. Here, DSX features superior performance with respect to docking- and ranking power and runtime requirements. Furthermore, the beneficial combination with torsion angle-dependent and desolvation-dependent potentials is demonstrated. DSX is robust, flexible, and capable of working together with special features of popular docking engines, e.g., flexible protein residues in AutoDock or GOLD. The program is freely available to the scientific community and can be downloaded from our Web site www.agklebe.de .     

DrugScoreRNA--knowledge-based scoring function to predict RNA-ligand interactions

There is growing interest in RNA as a drug target due to its widespread involvement in biological processes. To exploit the power of structure-based drug-design approaches, novel scoring and docking tools need to be developed that can efficiently and reliably predict binding modes and binding affinities of RNA ligands. We report for the first time the development of a knowledge-based scoring function to predict RNA-ligand interactions (DrugScoreRNA). Based on the formalism of the DrugScore approach, distance-dependent pair potentials are derived from 670 crystallographically determined nucleic acid-ligand and -protein complexes. These potentials display quantitative differences compared to those of DrugScore (derived from protein-ligand complexes) and DrugScoreCSD (derived from small-molecule crystal data). When used as an objective function for docking 31 RNA-ligand complexes, DrugScoreRNA generates "good" binding geometries (rmsd (root mean-square deviation) < 2 A) in 42% of all cases on the first scoring rank. This is an improvement of 44% to 120% when compared to DrugScore, DrugScoreCSD, and an RNA-adapted AutoDock scoring function. Encouragingly, good docking results are also obtained for a subset of 20 NMR structures not contained in the knowledge-base to derive the potentials. This clearly demonstrates the robustness of the potentials. Binding free energy landscapes generated by DrugScoreRNA show a pronounced funnel shape in almost 3/4 of all cases, indicating the reduced steepness of the knowledge-based potentials. Docking with DrugScoreRNA can thus be expected to converge fast to the global minimum. Finally, binding affinities were predicted for 15 RNA-ligand complexes with DrugScoreRNA. A fair correlation between experimental and computed values is found (RS = 0.61), which suffices to distinguish weak from strong binders, as is required in virtual screening applications. DrugScoreRNA again shows superior predictive power when compared to DrugScore, DrugScoreCSD, and an RNA-adapted AutoDock scoring function.     

A novel scoring function for molecular docking

We present a novel scoring function for docking of small molecules to protein binding sites. The scoring function is based on a combination of two main approaches used in the field, the empirical and knowledge-based approaches. To calibrate the scoring function we used an iterative procedure in which a ligand's position and its score were determined self-consistently at each iteration. The scoring function demonstrated superiority in prediction of ligand positions in docking tests against the commonly used Dock, FlexX and Gold docking programs. It also demonstrated good accuracy of binding affinity prediction for the docked ligands.     

Theory of docking scores and its application to a customizable scoring function

In general, the docking scoring tends to have a size dependence related to the ranking of compounds. In this paper, we describe a novel method of parameter optimization for docking scores which reduce the size dependence and can efficiently discriminate active compounds from chemical databases. This method is based on a simplified theoretical model of docking scores which enables us to utilize large amounts of data of known active and inactive compounds for a particular target without requiring large computational resources or a complicated procedure. This method is useful for making scoring functions for the identification of novel scaffolds using the knowledge of active compounds for a particular target or a customized scoring function for an interesting family of drug targets.     

Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes

This paper describes the development of a simple empirical scoringfunction designed to estimate the free energy of binding for aprotein–ligand complex when the 3D structure of the complex is knownor can be approximated. The function uses simple contact terms to estimatelipophilic and metal–ligand binding contributions, a simple explicitform for hydrogen bonds and a term which penalises flexibility. Thecoefficients of each term are obtained using a regression based on 82ligand–receptor complexes for which the binding affinity is known. Thefunction reproduces the binding affinity of the complexes with across-validated error of 8.68 kJ/mol. Tests on internal consistency indicatethat the coefficients obtained are stable to changes in the composition ofthe training set. The function is also tested on two test sets containing afurther 20 and 10 complexes, respectively. The deficiencies of this type offunction are discussed and it is compared to approaches by other workers.     

Application of semiempirical quantum chemical methods as a scoring function in docking

A crucial point in docking simulations is the scoring function used for estimation of the target-ligand interaction energy. The usual practice is to employ fast but simplified empirical scoring functions. Rigorous quantum chemical methods are too slow to screen virtual combinatorial libraries consisting of thousands of molecules, but they can be used in the final step of the simulations for assessing the results obtained. At this stage quantum chemical calculations can be performed only for the 10–100 top binders predicted by simplified scoring functions, and only using linear-scaling semiempirical quantum chemical methods such as MOZYME. The possibilities and potentialities of the quantum chemical methods for estimation of the binding affinities in docking simulations are a largely unexplored area, so the main goal of this study is a detailed evaluation of the potential and limitations of the MOZYME methodology for estimation of the target-ligand binding energies and its comparison with available experimental data.Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Quantum Chemistry satellite meeting in honor of Jean-Louis Rivail     

A quantum mechanics-based scoring function: study of zinc ion-mediated ligand binding

In this communication, we report the development of a novel quantum mechanics-based scoring function to predict free energy of ligand binding in the zinc metalloenzymes carbonic anhydrase (CA) and carboxypeptidase A (CPA). In particular, the AM1 method is used in conjunction with solvation modeling to predict the relative binding affinities of 18 CA and 5 CPA inhibitors. The effect of metal-ligand charge transfer is also discussed and shown to be different in CPA and CA, providing a further challenge to computing metalloenzyme binding affinities.     

MedusaScore: an accurate force field-based scoring function for virtual drug screening

Virtual screening is becoming an important tool for drug discovery. However, the application of virtual screening has been limited by the lack of accurate scoring functions. Here, we present a novel scoring function, MedusaScore, for evaluating protein-ligand binding. MedusaScore is based on models of physical interactions that include van der Waals, solvation, and hydrogen bonding energies. To ensure the best transferability of the scoring function, we do not use any protein-ligand experimental data for parameter training. We then test the MedusaScore for docking decoy recognition and binding affinity prediction and find superior performance compared to other widely used scoring functions. Statistical analysis indicates that one source of inaccuracy of MedusaScore may arise from the unaccounted entropic loss upon ligand binding, which suggests avenues of approach for further MedusaScore improvement.     

PEARLS: program for energetic analysis of receptor-ligand system

Analysis of the energetics of small molecule ligand-protein, ligand-nucleic acid, and protein-nucleic acid interactions facilitates the quantitative understanding of molecular interactions that regulate the function and conformation of proteins. It has also been extensively used for ranking potential new ligands in virtual drug screening. We developed a Web-based software, PEARLS (Program for Energetic Analysis of Ligand-Receptor Systems), for computing interaction energies of ligand-protein, ligand-nucleic acid, protein-nucleic acid, and ligand-protein-nucleic acid complexes from their 3D structures. AMBER molecular force field, Morse potential, and empirical energy functions are used to compute the van der Waals, electrostatic, hydrogen bond, metal-ligand bonding, and water-mediated hydrogen bond energies between the binding molecules. The change in the solvation free energy of molecular binding is estimated by using an empirical solvation free energy model. Contribution from ligand conformational entropy change is also estimated by a simple model. The computed free energy for a number of PDB ligand-receptor complexes were studied and compared to experimental binding affinity. A substantial degree of correlation between the computed free energy and experimental binding affinity was found, which suggests that PEARLS may be useful in facilitating energetic analysis of ligand-protein, ligand-nucleic acid, and protein-nucleic acid interactions. PEARLS can be accessed at http://ang.cz3.nus.edu.sg/cgi-bin/prog/rune.pl.     

An improved scoring function for suboptimal polar ligand complexes

Learning strategies can be used to improve the efficiency of virtual screening of very large databases. In these strategies new compounds to be screened are selected on the basis of the results obtained in previous stages, even if truly good ligands have not yet been identified. This approach requires that the scoring function used correctly predicts the energy and geometry of suboptimal complexes, i.e. weak complexes that are not the final solution of the screening but help direct the search toward the most productive regions of chemical space. We show that a small modification in the treatment of the solvation of polar atoms corrects the tendency of the original Autodock 3.0 scoring function to bury ligand polar atoms away from solvent, even if no complementary groups are present in the target and improves the performance of Autodock 3.0 and 4.0 in reproducing the experimental docking energies of weak complexes, resembling the suboptimal complexes encountered in the intermediate stages of virtual screening.     

Developing a high-quality scoring function for membrane protein structures based on specific inter-residue interactions

Membrane proteins are of particular biological and pharmaceutical importance, and computational modeling and structure prediction approaches play an important role in studies of membrane proteins. Developing an accurate model quality assessment program is of significance to the structure prediction of membrane proteins. Few such programs are proposed that can be applied to a broad range of membrane protein classes and perform with high accuracy. We developed a new model scoring function Interaction-based Quality assessment (IQ), based on the analysis of four types of inter-residue interactions within the transmembrane domains of helical membrane proteins. This function was tested using three high-quality model sets: all 206 models of GPCR Dock 2008, all 284 models of GPCR Dock 2010, and all 92 helical membrane protein models of the HOMEP set. For all three sets, the scoring function can select the native structures among all of the models with the success rates of 93, 85, and 100% respectively. For comparison, these three model sets were also adopted for a recently published model assessment program for membrane protein structures, ProQM, which gave the success rates of 85, 79, and 92% separately. These results suggested that IQ outperforms ProQM when only the transmembrane regions of the models are considered. This scoring function should be useful for the computational modeling of membrane proteins.     

Direct detection of structurally resolved dynamics in a multiconformation receptor-ligand complex

Structure-based drug design relies on static protein structures despite significant evidence for the need to include protein dynamics as a serious consideration. In practice, dynamic motions are neglected because they are not understood well enough to model, a situation resulting from a lack of explicit experimental examples of dynamic receptor-ligand complexes. Here, we report high-resolution details of pronounced ~1 ms time scale motions of a receptor-small molecule complex using a combination of NMR and X-ray crystallography. Large conformational dynamics in Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase are driven by internal switching motions of the drug-like, nanomolar-affinity inhibitor. Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill relaxation dispersion experiments and NOEs revealed the crystal structure to contain critical elements of the high energy protein-ligand conformation. The availability of accurate, structurally resolved dynamics in a protein-ligand complex should serve as a valuable benchmark for modeling dynamics in other receptor-ligand complexes and prediction of binding affinities.