The practical realization of the traceability of chemical measurements standards

Metrology is based on the concept of traceability. Traceability provides a means of relating measurement results to common standards thereby helping to ensure that measurements made in different laboratories are comparable. Good progress has been made in the application of metrological principles to chemical measurement, but there remains confusion about how you actually achieve traceability in a practical way. This paper elaborates on the meaning and application of much used phrases such as 'the value of a standard', 'stated references', 'unbroken chain of comparisons', and 'stated uncertainties'. It also explains how traceability can be established in a practical way for different types of stated references, namely pure substance reference materials, matrix reference materials, and primary and reference methods. Finally, traceability chains for some typical examples of chemical measurement are described.     

The practical realization of the traceability of chemical measurements standards

 Metrology is based on the concept of traceability. Traceability provides a means of relating measurement results to common standards thereby helping to ensure that measurements made in different laboratories are comparable. Good progress has been made in the application of metrological principles to chemical measurement, but there remains confusion about how you actually achieve traceability in a practical way.

This paper elaborates on the meaning and application of much used phrases such as 'the value of a standard', 'stated references', 'unbroken chain of comparisons', and 'stated uncertainties'. It also explains how traceability can be established in a practical way for different types of stated references, namely pure substance reference materials, matrix reference materials, and primary and reference methods. Finally, traceability chains for some typical examples of chemical measurement are described.

     

New NIST sediment SRM for inorganic analysis

NIST maintains a portfolio of more than 1300 standard reference materials (SRM), more than a third of these relating to measurements in the biological and environmental fields. As part of the continuous renewal and replacement efforts, a set of new marine sediments has been recently developed covering organic and inorganic determinations. This paper describes the steps taken in sample preparation, homogeneity assay, and analytical characterization and certification with specific emphasis on SRM 2702 inorganics in marine sediment. Neutron activation analysis showed the SRM to be highly homogeneous, opening the possibility for use with solid sampling techniques. The certificate provides certified mass fraction values for 25 elements, reference values for eight elements, and information values for 11 elements, covering most of the priority pollutants with small uncertainties of only several percent relative. The values were obtained by combining results from different laboratories and techniques using a Bayesian statistical model. An intercomparison carried out in field laboratories with the material before certification illustrates a high commutability of this SRM.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at     

Once more on the account of chemical composition analysis, traceability and calibration in chemical analysis (in response to the discussion opened by Werner Hässelbarth [1, 2])

This paper considers the present-day approach to traceability of measurements in chemical analysis. Specific features of concentration as a physical quantity are discussed. It is shown that the traceability of concentration measurements is the main task of metrology applications in quantitative analysis. It is proved that there is no need for a special traceability chain for measuring the properties used to identify components. The differences in the requirements for the composition measurements of standard samples and of reference materials are discussed by analysing the role played by these materials in calibration processes and accuracy checks.     

Improvements in efficiency of production and traceability for certification of reference materials

Issues of current interest to certified reference material producers are addressed. Alternative strategies for certification of matrix reference materials are discussed and the benefits of adopting a flexible, cost-effective approach are described. The difficulty of undertaking homogeneity testing where certification is to be carried out with definitive techniques capable of providing very small measurement uncertainty is discussed. Methodology is described which combines conventional screening of the candidate material for homogeneity with an additional, precise assessment of homogeneity based on isotope dilution mass spectrometry measurements. A systematic procedure for evaluating the commutability (horizontal traceability or scope) of matrix reference materials has been evaluated and shows that in some circumstances matrix effects may be less pervasive than is generally believed. This offers the possibility, especially for trace analysis applications, of more efficient use of existing reference materials without compromising measurement reliability. Vertical traceability of matrix reference material data is of growing interest but is difficult to achieve with present interlaboratory certification exercises. A modification is described which attempts to address this issue. It also offers the possibility of improved identification of outliers and reduced variation of data between the participating laboratories.Presented at BERM-9—9th International Symposium on Biological and Environmental Reference Materials, 15–19June 2003, Berlin, Germany     

Current best practice for traceability in testing laboratories,when certified reference materials are unavailable

Since the implementation of ISO/IEC 17025 in 2002, all accredited laboratories (at the least) need to establish traceability in all their tests and calibration methods. Traceabilty, though well understood in the calibration field (through an unbroken chain of comparisons to the International System of Units —SI), is less straight forward and not so well understood in the testing laboratories. Traceability in analytical and biological testing is found through the use of reference materials, and the validated steps of a test method. This article describes the possibilities to comply with the traceability requirement of ISO/IEC 17025 in testing laboratories , when certified reference materials are unavailable.Presented at the Second International Conference on Metrology—Trends and Applications in Calibration and Testing Laboratories, 4–6 November, 2003, Eilat, Israel     

The role of reference materials

In this article the role of reference materials is confined to chemical measurements only. Recognized reference materials are one of the tools to obtain comparability of analytical results. Recognition demands confidence in the reference materials and in the reference material producers. A reference material producer is a technical competent body that is fully responsible for the certified or other property values of the reference material. The "analyte" has to be specified in relation to the selectivity of analytical procedure. The full range of reference materials can be presented as a three-dimensional space of the coordinates: analyte, matrix and application. If reference materials are used for calibration or correction of calibrations they establish the traceability of results of chemical measurements. The traceability is only valid within a stated range of uncertainty. Pure substances can represent the unit of amount of substance. A precondition is the microscale specification of the analyte and the accurate determination of the main component and/or the impurities.     

Matrix reference materials – provision in Australia

 Until quite recently, Australia has not been much involved in the preparation and certification of matrix reference materials for chemical testing. Even today, the vast bulk of chemical reference materials used in Australia are imported from other world producers. Increased international focus on the accuracy, traceability and comparability of chemical measurements has led to the establishment of the National Analytical Reference Laboratory (NARL) within the Australian Government Analytical Laboratories. Part of the work of NARL will be to supply matrix reference materials, not available from existing sources, to meet specific Australian requirements. This need has been addressed in the past by a combination of industry and government initiatives. Examples include a series of certified matrix reference materials for chemical testing of iron ore, coal and mineral sands produced by Standards Australia and a series of three animal fat matrix reference materials certified for a range of pesticide residues produced by the Australian Chemical Standards Laboratory (now part of NARL). To make effective use of limited resources, it will be important for NARL to focus on identified priorities and to maximise the use of available Australian resources and expertise through technical collaboration for reference material production. An important part of this process should be input on needs and priorities from reference material "users" such as government legislators, regulatory authorities, standards setting bodies, industry and the analytical community. The aim will be to produce matrix certified reference materials that are traceable to SI or other international standards at a stated level of measurement uncertainty.     

Quality and accuracy in analytical chemistry

Summary The accuracy of the result of a chemical analysis can be established most reliably when the laboratory has demonstrated its performance in analysing an internationally accepted certified reference material similar to the tested product. When different laboratories have ensured traceability to the same or to equivalent reference materials, their results should be fully compatible and mutually acceptable, provided the laboratories specify the uncertainty of their results. This paper shows that uncertainty is a simple and efficient means of quantifying quality. A method easily applicable by any laboratory is proposed for the determination of uncertainties [1–3].     

The role of reference materials

 In this article the role of reference materials is confined to chemical measurements only. Recognized reference materials are one of the tools to obtain comparability of analytical results. Recognition demands confidence in the reference materials and in the reference material producers. A reference material producer is a technical competent body that is fully responsible for the certified or other property values of the reference material. The "analyte" has to be specified in relation to the selectivity of analytical procedure. The full range of reference materials can be presented as a three-dimensional space of the coordinates: analyte, matrix and application. If reference materials are used for calibration or correction of calibrations they establish the traceability of results of chemical measurements. The traceability is only valid within a stated range of uncertainty. Pure substances can represent the unit of amount of substance. A precondition is the microscale specification of the analyte and the accurate determination of the main component and/or the impurities.

     

The International Atomic Energy Agency's program on analytical quality control

For more than thirty years the International Atomic Energy Agency has been assisting laboratories in Member States in maintaining and improving the reliability, i.e. the quality of analyses of nuclear, industrial, environmental and biological materials, and materials of marine origin. Through the Analytical Quality Control Services (AQCS) the Agency initiates and supports improvements in the accuracy of analytical chemical and radiometric measurements and their traceability to basic standards. This is achieved by organizing worldwide and regional intercomparison exercises and by distributing reference materials. The latest biological and environmental reference and intercomparison materials are presented and general information is given on the preparation of materials, intercomparison runs, and the evaluation of reference data. Means to improve the quality of intercomparison results are presented and discussed.     

On practical metrology and chemical analysis: etalons and traceability systems

 National measurement systems are infrastructures to ensure, for each nation, a consistent and internationally recognised basis for measurement. Such complex systems have historical, technical, legal, organisational and institutional aspects to connect scientific metrology with practical measurements. Underlying any valid measurement is a chain of comparisons linking the measurement to an accepted standard. The ways the links are forged and the etalons (measurement standards) to which they connect are defining characteristics of all measurement systems. This is often referred to as traceability which aims at basing measurements in common measurement units – a key issue for the integration of quantitative chemical analysis with the evolving physical and engineering measurement systems. Adequate traceability and metrological control make possible new technical capabilities and new levels of quality assurance and confidence by users in the accuracy and integrity of quantitative analytical results. Traceability for chemical measurements is difficult to achieve and harder to demonstrate. The supply of appropriate etalons is critical to the development of metrology systems for chemical analysis. An approach is suggested that involves the development of networks of specialised reference laboratories able to make matrix-independent reference measurements on submitted samples, which may then be used as reference materials by an originating laboratory using its practical measurement procedures. Received: 31 July 1995 Accepted: 19 August 1995     

What is new in certified reference materials and measurements at IRMM?

IRMM is developing more and more isotopic spike reference materials since these are increasingly needed in trace analysis. In addition, they appear to play an increasingly important role in ensuring traceability to the SI system of isotope-specific measurements made by e.g. isotope dilution mass spectometry (IDMS). Their present availability and future development is summarised. IDMS is also applied in a definitive way to establish reference measurements for IRMM's international measurement evaluation programme (IMEP), which aims at the realisation of traceability for field laboratories. IRMM uses its advanced technology for the preparation and contamination-free handling of large quantities of biological and environmental reference materials. These facilities are used for the preparation of both BCR CRM's (orange juice, sheep milk curd, sediments, etc.) and reference materials for private customers (catalytic converter materials, apple powder, flour, animal innards, tomato powder, etc.).     

Reference materials – an industry perspective

Biotechnologically enhanced plants and products derived thereof continue to be the reason for much dispute. In order to address concerns raised by the public, several countries have imposed mandatory labeling schemes indicating the presence of products derived from modern biotechnology, while others rely on voluntary labeling codes. Mandatory labeling triggers the need for methods that can be used to check compliance with and enforcement of the corresponding labeling legislation. In order to ensure the proper validation and implementation of a detection method in a specific laboratory, reference materials play a crucial role.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article if you access the article at . A link in the frame on the left on that page takes you directly to the supplementary material.Presented at the CCQM Workshop on Comparability and Traceability in Food Analysis, 18–19 November 2003, BIPM, Sèvre, France.     

Development and supply system of reference materials based on the Measurement Law in Japan

 Analytical instruments used for measurements of air and water pollution are calibrated by using reference materials such as standard gases and standard solutions. In Japan, since the middle of the 1970s, those reference materials which are traceable to the national standards maintained at national research institutes have been supplied to users by reference material producers. In order to establish the primary standards and to secure the traceability from the working standards to the national ones, various analytical methods such as coulometric, titrimetric and gravimetric analyses for purity determination and highly sensitive atomic spectrometry for trace analysis have been developed as the primary methods and reference methods. The Japanese Measurement Law, revised in 1992, has introduced a new traceability system in which a public organization, a "designated calibration body", can also prepare and maintain the national standards under the advice and instruction of national research institutes. The designated calibration body can provide calibration services to reference material producers (accredited calibration bodies) by using the national standards. The reference materials supplied in conformity with the traceability system include standard gases, pH standard solutions, metal standard solutions and non-metal ion standard solutions. Received: 4 October 1996 Accepted: 2 December 1996     

A national traceability system for chemical measurements

Current developments in Germany for establishing a traceability system for chemical measurements are reported. The focus is on a dissemination mechanism which employs chemical calibration laboratories accredited within the framework of the German Calibration Service (DKD) and acting as "multipliers" between the national standards level and the user level by providing the user with calibration means which are traceable to the SI via national standards. At the national standards level, a network of high-level chemistry institutes coordinated by the national metrology institute, PTB, provides the primary references for chemical measurements.The use of the metrological dissemination system provided by the DKD also for chemical measurements is a logical extension of a traceability mechanism, successful for more than two decades in general metrology, to metrology in chemistry. In detail, traceability structures in clinical chemistry, electrochemistry, elemental analysis and gas analysis are described. This system has become an important part of the efforts made in Germany to support chemical laboratories in meeting the traceability requirements of the market and of legal regulations.     

Comparison of calibration curves using the L p norm

Interlaboratory comparisons are a fundamental task in order to provide measurements with traceability. The simplest possible scenario implies that a single traveling standard of a quantity is measured at various laboratories. A more complex scenario arises when the laboratories measure a large set of standard values pertaining to a given physical quantity or when the traveling standard is not a realization of the quantity of interest but a measuring instrument. In the last case, it might be convenient to globally compare the calibration curves provided by the laboratories. We will introduce a distance between two generic analytical curves based on the Least Power L _p norm of their difference. The properties of such distance will be presented, with particular attention to its dependence on the parameter p.     

Radionuclide traceability for U.S. Department of Energy Environmental Management Radioanalytical Services

In 1999, the Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management (DOE-EM) National Analytical Management Program (NAMP) established a Radiological Traceability Program (RTP) as a new initiative for the radioanalytical acitivies related to the environmental programs conducted throughout the DOE complex. The National Analytical Management Program entered into an interagency agreement with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to establish traceability to the national standard for DOE-EM radioanalytical activities through the NIST/reference laboratory concept as described in ANSI N42.23-1996.¹ Using the criteria established by the RTP, NAMP named two DOE-EM laboratories as reference or secondary laboratories and established a program with NIST that demonstrated the concept of traceability. In order to gain and maintain traceability to NIST, each reference laboratory must meet the performance criteria as defined by the RTP and NAMP. Traceability to NIST is tiered down to each radioanalytical laboratory (monitor or service) that successfully participates in the performance-evaluation programs offered by the reference laboratories. Essential to the RTP is the demonstration that the reference laboratories can produce performance-testing (PT) materials of high quality as well as analyze/verify the radionuclide concentration to the required accuracy and precision. This paper presents the elements of the RTP and the program requirements of NIST and the reference laboratories.     

Traceability in laboratory medicine

In laboratory medicine meaningful measurements are essential for diagnosis, risk assessment, treatment and monitoring of patients. Thus methods applied in diagnostic measurements must be accurate, precise, specific and comparable among laboratories. Inadequate or incorrect analytical performance has consequences for the patients, the clinicians, and the health care system. One key element of metrology is the traceability of a measurement result to the SI system ensuring comparable results. This principle is described in the ISO/TC 212/WG2 N65 prEN 17511 Standard. In addition to the principles of metrology, the clinical usefulness, the diagnostic needs, and the biological and disease associated variations in patients' specimens have to be considered when the analytical biases for diagnostic purposes are defined. It must be the general goal of diagnostic laboratories to produce results that are true and comparable worldwide. The recent European in vitro diagnostic (IVD) Directive 98/79 EC follows the above mentioned standard of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) requesting its application for all IVD reagents used within the European Union. This new European legislation will have a worldwide impact on manufacturers and clinical laboratories and will be implemented in 2003. It states that "traceability of values assigned to calibrators and/or control materials must be assured through available reference measurement procedures and/or available reference materials of a higher order". Thus a worldwide reference system needs to be established by collaboration and mutual recognition between the United States National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), European Metrology Institutes (EUROMET), regulatory bodies (e.g. United States Food and Drug Administration, FDA) the IVD industry and professional organizations (e.g. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, IFCC). In June 2002, in Paris, representatives of international and regional organizations and institutions decided to form the "Joint Committee on Traceability for Laboratory Medicine" (JCTLM), which will support industry in registration and licensing of the "CE" label to test systems conforming to the IVD Directive.Presented at the International ILAC/IAF Conference on Accreditation in Global Trade, 23–25 September 2002, Berlin, Germany     

Quality assurance in biological monitoring of environmental exposure to pollutants: from reference materials to external quality assessment schemes

The presence of chemicals in the environment is a matter of concern in that it poses potential health risks. At present, exposure to toxic chemicals and their biological and biochemical effects can be better estimated by biological monitoring, through the systematic collection of specimens from potentially exposed humans. Biological monitoring of human exposure to environmental pollutants is hampered by the difficulty to assess data reliability. As a consequence, the validity of biological monitoring should depend on the strict implementation of a quality assurance (QA) program, which includes a series of procedures aiming to ensure that laboratory results meet defined standards of quality and are reliable. For the validation and monitoring of methods’ performance, to ensure the trueness of measurements and to warrant the traceability to international standards, reference materials (RMs) and certified reference materials should be used. Internal quality control and external quality assessment (EQA) are part of overall QA and are carried out to verify that analytical errors are compatible with the specific requirements or needs of the user. In particular EQA schemes (EQAS) allow to test independently the analytical performance of participating laboratories. In the last decades, increasing concern has been raised by urban air pollution; lead and benzene, two gasoline components released by motor vehicle exhausts, are known to be toxic to humans. For biological monitoring of lead exposure of the general population, screening campaigns, utilizing lead in blood as a biomarker, have been carried out since the 1970s. Strict strategies were adopted to ensure data comparability, including the preparation of RMs, the organization of EQAS and the cross-exchange and analysis of blood samples between laboratories. Biological monitoring of benzene exposure could be carried out by means of various biomarkers such as benzene in blood and benzene, trans,trans-muconic acid (t,t-MA) and S-phenylmercapturic acid (S-PMA) in urine. At present, few RMs and EQAS are available for these biomarkers. A pilot EQAS for t,t-MA in urine, adopted to assess the reliability of data regarding benzene exposure, has been organized and carried out between 1996 and 1997 in Italy. From the accrued experience, it clearly emerges the importance of strategies designed to guarantee the quality of biological monitoring data. The use of RMs and the participation in EQAS are highly recommended in order to improve the global performance of methods and laboratories involved in biological monitoring.