Powerful numbers in (1ℓ + qℓ)(2ℓ + qℓ)⋯(nℓ + qℓ)

Let q be a positive integer. Recently, Niu and Liu proved that, if $n\ge \max ?\{q,1198?q\}$, then the product $(1^3+q^3)(2^3+q^3)?(n^3+q^3)$ is not a powerful number. In this note, we prove (1) that, for any odd prime power ? and $n\ge \max ?\{q,11?q\}$, the product $(1^{?}+q^{?})(2^{?}+q^{?})?(n^{?}+q^{?})$ is not a powerful number, and (2) that, for any positive odd integer ?, there exists an integer $N_{q,?}$ such that, for any positive integer $n\ge N_{q,?}$, the product $(1^{?}+q^{?})(2^{?}+q^{?})?(n^{?}+q^{?})$ is not a powerful number.     

Regularity of random attractors for fractional stochastic reaction–diffusion equations on Rn

We investigate the regularity of random attractors for the non-autonomous non-local fractional stochastic reaction–diffusion equations in $H^s({\mathbb{R}}^n)$ with $s\in (0,1)$. We prove the existence and uniqueness of the tempered random attractor that is compact in $H^s({\mathbb{R}}^n)$ and attracts all tempered random subsets of $L^2({\mathbb{R}}^n)$ with respect to the norm of $H^s({\mathbb{R}}^n)$. The main difficulty is to show the pullback asymptotic compactness of solutions in $H^s({\mathbb{R}}^n)$ due to the noncompactness of Sobolev embeddings on unbounded domains and the almost sure nondifferentiability of the sample paths of the Wiener process. We establish such compactness by the ideas of uniform tail-estimates and the spectral decomposition of solutions in bounded domains.     

Weak version of restriction estimates for spheres and paraboloids in finite fields

We study $L^p-L^r$ restriction estimates for algebraic varieties in d-dimensional vector spaces over finite fields. Unlike the Euclidean case, if the dimension d is even, then it is conjectured that the $L^{(2d+2)/(d+3)}-L^2$ Stein–Tomas restriction result can be improved to the $L^{(2d+4)/(d+4)}-L^2$ estimate for both spheres and paraboloids in finite fields. In this paper we show that the conjectured $L^p-L^2$ restriction estimate holds in the specific case when test functions under consideration are restricted to d-coordinate functions or homogeneous functions of degree zero. To deduce our result, we use the connection between the restriction phenomena for our varieties in d dimensions and those for homogeneous varieties in $(d+1)$ dimensions.     

Homogenization of a Dirichlet semilinear elliptic problem with a strong singularity at u = 0 in a domain with many small holes

In the present paper we perform the homogenization of the semilinear elliptic problem

$\{\begin{array}{cc}{u}^{\epsilon }\ge 0\hfill & \text{in}{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon },\hfill \\ ?divA(x)D{u}^{\epsilon }=F(x,u^{\epsilon })\hfill & \text{in}{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon },\hfill \\ u^{\epsilon }=0\hfill & \text{on}?{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon }.\hfill \end{array}$

In this problem $F(x,s)$ is a Carathéodory function such that $0\le F(x,s)\le h(x)/\mathrm{\Gamma }(s)$ a.e. $x\in \mathrm{\Omega }$ for every $s>0$, with h in some $L^r(\mathrm{\Omega })$ and Γ a $C^1([0,+\infty [)$ function such that $\mathrm{\Gamma }(0)=0$ and ${\mathrm{\Gamma }}^{\prime }(s)>0$ for every $s>0$. On the other hand the open sets ${\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon }$ are obtained by removing many small holes from a fixed open set Ω in such a way that a “strange term” $\mu u^0$ appears in the limit equation in the case where the function $F(x,s)$ depends only on x.We already treated this problem in the case of a “mild singularity”, namely in the case where the function $F(x,s)$ satisfies $0\le F(x,s)\le h(x)(\frac{1}{s}+1)$. In this case the solution $u^{\epsilon }$ to the problem belongs to $H_0^1({\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon })$ and its definition is a “natural” and rather usual one.In the general case where $F(x,s)$ exhibits a “strong singularity” at $u=0$, which is the purpose of the present paper, the solution $u^{\epsilon }$ to the problem only belongs to $H_{\text{loc}}^1({\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon })$ but in general does not belong to $H_0^1({\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon })$ anymore, even if $u^{\epsilon }$ vanishes on $?{\mathrm{\Omega }}^{\epsilon }$ in some sense. Therefore we introduced a new notion of solution (in the spirit of the solutions defined by transposition) for problems with a strong singularity. This definition allowed us to obtain existence, stability and uniqueness results.In the present paper, using this definition, we perform the homogenization of the above semilinear problem and we prove that in the homogenized problem, the “strange term” $\mu u^0$ still appears in the left-hand side while the source term $F(x,u^0)$ is not modified in the right-hand side.     

A sharp Balian–Low uncertainty principle for shift-invariant spaces

A sharp version of the Balian–Low theorem is proven for the generators of finitely generated shift-invariant spaces. If generators ${\{f_k\}}_{k=1}^K?L^2({\mathbb{R}}^d)$ are translated along a lattice to form a frame or Riesz basis for a shift-invariant space V, and if V has extra invariance by a suitable finer lattice, then one of the generators $f_k$ must satisfy ${\int }_{{\mathbb{R}}^d}|x||f_k(x){|}^{2}dx=\infty$, namely, $\stackrel{?}{f_k}?H^{1/2}({\mathbb{R}}^d)$. Similar results are proven for frames of translates that are not Riesz bases without the assumption of extra lattice invariance. The best previously existing results in the literature give a notably weaker conclusion using the Sobolev space $H^{d/2+?}({\mathbb{R}}^d)$; our results provide an absolutely sharp improvement with $H^{1/2}({\mathbb{R}}^d)$. Our results are sharp in the sense that $H^{1/2}({\mathbb{R}}^d)$ cannot be replaced by $H^s({\mathbb{R}}^d)$ for any $s<1/2$.     

A continuum of periodic solutions to the planar four-body problem with two pairs of equal masses

In this paper, we apply the variational method with Structural Prescribed Boundary Conditions (SPBC) to prove the existence of periodic and quasi-periodic solutions for the planar four-body problem with two pairs of equal masses $m_1=m_3$ and $m_2=m_4$. A path $q(t)$ on $[0,T]$ satisfies the SPBC if the boundaries $q(0)\in \mathbf{A}$ and $q(T)\in \mathbf{B}$, where A and B are two structural configuration spaces in ${({\mathbf{R}}^2)}^4$ and they depend on a rotation angle $\theta \in (0,2\pi )$ and the mass ratio $\mu =\frac{m_2}{m_1}\in {\mathbf{R}}^{+}$.We show that there is a region $\mathrm{\Omega }?(0,2\pi )\times R^{+}$ such that there exists at least one local minimizer of the Lagrangian action functional on the path space satisfying the SPBC $\{q(t)\in H^1([0,T],{({\mathbf{R}}^2)}^4)|q(0)\in \mathbf{A},q(T)\in \mathbf{B}\}$ for any $(\theta ,\mu )\in \mathrm{\Omega }$. The corresponding minimizing path of the minimizer can be extended to a non-homographic periodic solution if θ is commensurable with π or a quasi-periodic solution if θ is not commensurable with π. In the variational method with the SPBC, we only impose constraints on the boundary and we do not impose any symmetry constraint on solutions. Instead, we prove that our solutions that are extended from the initial minimizing paths possess certain symmetries.The periodic solutions can be further classified as simple choreographic solutions, double choreographic solutions and non-choreographic solutions. Among the many stable simple choreographic orbits, the most extraordinary one is the stable star pentagon choreographic solution when $(\theta ,\mu )=(\frac{4\pi }{5},1)$. Remarkably the unequal-mass variants of the stable star pentagon are just as stable as the equal mass choreographies.     

Analysis of some injection bounds for Sobolev spaces by wavelet decomposition

We consider the Sobolev spaces $H^s(\Omega )$ and $H_0^s(\Omega )$ and the Besov spaces $B_{2,\infty }^{1/2}(\Omega )$, where Ω is a sufficiently regular (see Lemma 2) subdomain of ${\mathbb{R}}^2$. It is well known that for the values of $s\in [0,1/2)$ the two Sobolev spaces coincide, with equivalence of the norms, and that the inclusion $B_{2,\infty }^{1/2}(\Omega )?H^s(\Omega )$ holds. The Note is concerned with the explicit analysis of the constants appearing in the continuity bounds for the injections $H^s(\Omega )?H_0^s(\Omega )$ and $B_{2,\infty }^{1/2}(\Omega )?H^s(\Omega )$ and of their dependence on the regularity s of the spaces. The analysis is carried out by using the wavelet characterization of the corresponding norms.     

ON THE COMMUTATORS OF SINGULAR INTEGRAL OPERATORS

Lp(Rn) (1＜p＜∞) boundedness and a weak type endpoint estimate are considered for the commutators of singular integral operators. A condition on the associated kernel is given under which the L2(Rn) boundedness of the singular integral operators implies the Lp(Rn) boundedness (1＜p＜∞) and the weak type (H1(Rn), L1(Rn))boundedness for the corresponding commutators. A new interpolation theorem is also established.     

Neumann problem for a quasilinear elliptic equation in a varying domain

We investigate the Neumann problem for a nonlinear elliptic operator of Leray–Lions type in ${\Omega }^{(s)}=\Omega \backslash F^{(s)}$, $s=1,2,\dots$, where Ω is a domain in ${\mathbf{R}}^n$$(n?3)$, $F^{(s)}$ is a closed set located in the neighborhood of a $(n?1)$-dimensional manifold Γ lying inside Ω. We study the asymptotic behavior of $u^{(s)}$ as $s\to \infty$, when the set $F^{(s)}$ tends to Γ. To cite this article: M. Sango, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 342 (2006).     

A Schauder and Riesz basis criterion for non-self-adjoint Schrödinger operators with periodic and antiperiodic boundary conditions

Under the assumption that $V\in L^2([0,\pi ];dx)$, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions in terms of spectral data for (non-self-adjoint) Schrödinger operators $?d^2/d{x}^2+V$ in $L^2([0,\pi ];dx)$ with periodic and antiperiodic boundary conditions to possess a Riesz basis of root vectors (i.e., eigenvectors and generalized eigenvectors spanning the range of the Riesz projection associated with the corresponding periodic and antiperiodic eigenvalues).We also discuss the case of a Schauder basis for periodic and antiperiodic Schrödinger operators $?d^2/d{x}^2+V$ in $L^p([0,\pi ];dx)$, $p\in (1,\infty )$.