Electrophilic Arene Hydroxylation and Phenol O?H Oxidations Performed by an Unsymmetric μ‐η1:η1‐O2‐Peroxo Dicopper(II) Complex

Reactions of the unsymmetric dicopper(II) peroxide complex [Cu^II₂(μ‐η¹:η¹‐O₂)(m‐XYL^N3N4)]²⁺ ( 1 O₂ , where m‐XYL is a heptadentate N‐based ligand), with phenolates and phenols are described. Complex 1 O₂ reacts with p‐X‐PhONa (X=MeO, Cl, H, or Me) at ?90 °C performing tyrosinase‐like ortho‐hydroxylation of the aromatic ring to afford the corresponding catechol products. Mechanistic studies demonstrate that reactions occur through initial reversible formation of metastable association complexes [Cu^II₂(μ‐η¹:η¹‐O₂)(p‐X‐PhO)(m‐XYL^N3N4)]⁺ ( 1 O₂ ?X‐PhO) that then undergo ortho‐hydroxylation of the aromatic ring by the peroxide moiety. Complex 1 O₂ also reacts with 4‐X‐substituted phenols p‐X‐PhOH (X=MeO, Me, F, H, or Cl) and with 2,4‐di‐tert‐butylphenol at ?90 °C causing rapid decay of 1 O₂ and affording biphenol coupling products, which is indicative that reactions occur through formation of phenoxyl radicals that then undergo radical C? C coupling. Spectroscopic UV/Vis monitoring and kinetic analysis show that reactions take place through reversible formation of ground‐state association complexes [Cu^II₂(μ‐η¹:η¹‐O₂)(X‐PhOH)(m‐XYL^N3N4)]²⁺ ( 1 O₂ ?X‐PhOH) that then evolve through an irreversible rate‐determining step. Mechanistic studies indicate that 1 O₂ reacts with phenols through initial phenol binding to the Cu₂O₂ core, followed by a proton‐coupled electron transfer (PCET) at the rate‐determining step. Results disclosed in this work provide experimental evidence that the unsymmetric 1 O₂ complex can mediate electrophilic arene hydroxylation and PCET reactions commonly associated with electrophilic Cu₂O₂ cores, and strongly suggest that the ability to form substrate?Cu₂O₂ association complexes may provide paths to overcome the inherent reactivity of the O₂‐binding mode. This work provides experimental evidence that the presence of a H⁺ completely determines the fate of the association complex [Cu^II₂(μ‐η¹:η¹‐O₂)(X‐PhO(H))(m‐XYL^N3N4)]ⁿ⁺ between a PCET and an arene hydroxylation reaction, and may provide clues to help understand enzymatic reactions at dicopper sites.     

Formation of Trinuclear Rhodium‐Hydride Complexes [{Rh(PP*)H}3‐ (μ2‐H)3(μ3‐H)][anion]2—During Asymmetric Hydrogenation?

Recently described and fully characterized trinuclear rhodium‐hydride complexes [{Rh(PP*)H}₃(μ₂‐H)₃(μ₃‐H)][anion]₂ have been investigated with respect to their formation and role under the conditions of asymmetric hydrogenation. Catalyst–substrate complexes with mac (methyl (Z)‐ N‐acetylaminocinnamate) ([Rh(tBu‐BisP*)(mac)]BF₄, [Rh(Tangphos)(mac)]BF₄, [Rh(Me‐BPE)(mac)]BF₄, [Rh(DCPE)(mac)]BF₄, [Rh(DCPB)(mac)]BF₄), as well as rhodium‐hydride species, both mono‐([Rh(Tangphos)‐ H₂(MeOH)₂]BF₄, [Rh(Me‐BPE)H₂(MeOH)₂]BF₄), and dinuclear ([{Rh(DCPE)H}₂(μ₂‐H)₃]BF₄, [{Rh(DCPB)H}₂(μ₂‐H)₃]BF₄), are described. A plausible reaction sequence for the formation of the trinuclear rhodium‐hydride complexes is discussed. Evidence is provided that the presence of multinuclear rhodium‐hydride complexes should be taken into account when discussing the mechanism of rhodium‐promoted asymmetric hydrogenation.     

Note: Helix or No Helix of β‐Peptides Containing β3hAla(αF) Residues?

A remote ⁴J(F,H) coupling (F? C(α)? C(O)? N? H) of up to 4.2 Hz in α‐fluoro amides with antiperiplanar arrangement of the C? F and the C?O bonds (dihedral angle F? C? C?O ca. 180°) confirms that previous NMR determinations, using the XPLOR‐NIH procedure, of the secondary structures of β‐peptides containing β³hAla(αF) and β³hAla(αF₂) residues were correct. In contrast, molecular‐dynamics (MD) simulations, using the GROMOS program with the 45A3 force field, led to an incorrect conclusion about the relative stability of secondary structures of these β‐peptides. The problems encountered in NMR analyses and computations of the structures of backbone‐F‐substituted peptides are briefly discussed.     

Partially Oxidized Zintl Ions? The Characterization of [(μ3-OH)(μ3-O)3(OEt)3{(CO)5W}7Sn7]2−

A formally isoelectronic ( μ ₃ -Sn) ²⁻ ion replaces the μ₃-O building block in the subvalent anion 1 , which is a derivative of the known cage compound [(μ₃-OR)₄(μ₃-O)₄Sn₆]. Thus, compound 1 forms a link between oxo metal clusters and Zintl ions. [(μ₃-OH)(μ₃-O)₃(OEt)₃{(CO)₅W}₇Sn₇]²⁻ 1     

Is the μ‐Oxo‐μ‐Peroxodiiron Intermediate of a Ribonucleotide Reductase Biomimetic a Possible Oxidant of Epoxidation Reactions?

Density functional calculations on a mu-oxo-mu-peroxodiiron complex (1) with a tetrapodal ligand BPP (BPP=N,N-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-3-aminopropionate) are presented that is a biomimetic of the active site region of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR). We have studied all low-lying electronic states and show that it has close-lying broken-shell singlet and undecaplet (S=0, 5) ground states with essentially two sextet spin iron atoms. In strongly distorted electronic systems in which the two iron atoms have different spin states, the peroxo group moves considerably out of the plane of the mu-oxodiiron group due to orbital rearrangements. The calculated absorption spectra of (1,11)1 are in good agreement with experimental studies on biomimetics and RNR enzyme systems. Moreover, vibrational shifts in the spectrum due to (18)O(2) substitution of the oxygen atoms in the peroxo group follow similar trends as experimental observations. To identify whether the mu-oxo-mu-1,2-peroxodiiron or the mu-oxo-mu-1,1-peroxodiiron complexes are able to epoxidize substrates, we studied the reactivity patterns versus propene. Generally, the reactions are stepwise via radical intermediates and proceed by two-state reactivity patterns on competing singlet and undecaplet spin state surfaces. However, both the mu-oxo-mu-1,2-peroxodiiron and mu-oxo-mu-1,1-peroxodiiron complex are sluggish oxidants with high epoxidation barriers. The epoxidation barriers for the mu-oxo-mu-1,1-peroxodiiron complex are significantly lower than the ones for the mu-oxo-mu-1,2-peroxodiiron complex but still are too high to be considered for catalytic properties. Thus, theory has ruled out two possible peroxodiiron catalysts as oxidants in RNR enzymes and biomimetics and the quest to find the actual oxidant in the enzyme mechanism continues.     

Synthesis of Perfluoroalkyl‐Substituted γ‐Lactones and 4,5‐Dihydropyridazin‐3(2H)‐ones via Donor?Acceptor Cyclopropanes

Rh₂(OAc)₄‐Catalyzed decomposition of diazo esters in the presence of perfluoroalkyl‐ or perfluoroaryl‐substituted silyl enol ethers smoothly provided the corresponding alkyl 2‐siloxycyclopropanecarboxylates in very good yields. The generated donor? acceptor cyclopropanes are equivalents of γ‐oxo esters, which we demonstrated by their one‐pot transformations to yield fluorine‐containing heterocycles. A reductive procedure selectively afforded perfluoroalkyl‐substituted γ‐hydroxy esters or γ‐lactones. The treatment of the donor? acceptor cyclopropanes with hydrazine or phenylhydrazine afforded a series of perfluoroalkyl‐ and perfluoroaryl‐substituted 4,5‐dihydropyridazin‐3(2H)‐ones.     

Redox‐Triggered C?C Coupling of Diols and Alkynes: Synthesis of β,γ‐Unsaturated α‐Hydroxyketones and Furans by Ruthenium‐Catalyzed Hydrohydroxyalkylation

Direct ruthenium‐catalyzed C C coupling of alkynes and vicinal diols to form β,γ‐unsaturated ketones occurs with complete levels of regioselectivity and good to complete control over the alkene geometry. Exposure of the reaction products to substoichiometric quantities of p‐toluenesulfonic acid induces cyclodehydration to form tetrasubstituted furans. These alkyne‐diol hydrohydroxyalkylations contribute to a growing body of merged redox‐construction events that bypass the use of premetalated reagents and, hence, stoichiometric quantities of metallic by‐products.