Variable neighborhood search for extremal graphs. 21. Conjectures and results about the independence number

A set of vertices S in a graph G is independent if no neighbor of a vertex of S belongs to S. The independence number α is the maximum cardinality of an independent set of G. A series of best possible lower and upper bounds on α and some other common invariants of G are obtained by the system AGX 2, and proved either automatically or by hand. In the present paper, we report on such lower and upper bounds considering, as second invariant, minimum, average and maximum degree, diameter, radius, average distance, spread of eccentricities, chromatic number and matching number.     

Graphs with the second largest number of maximal independent sets

Let G be a simple undirected graph. Denote by (respectively, xi(G)) the number of maximal (respectively, maximum) independent sets in G. Erd?s and Moser raised the problem of determining the maximum value of among all graphs of order n and the extremal graphs achieving this maximum value. This problem was solved by Moon and Moser. Then it was studied for many special classes of graphs, including trees, forests, bipartite graphs, connected graphs, (connected) triangle-free graphs, (connected) graphs with at most one cycle, and recently, (connected) graphs with at most r cycles. In this paper we determine the second largest value of and xi(G) among all graphs of order n. Moreover, the extremal graphs achieving these values are also determined.     

On the chromatic number of random graphs

We consider random graphs G_n,p with fixed edge-probability p. We refine an argument of Bollobás to show that almost all such graphs have chromatic number equal to n/{2 log_b n ? 2 log_b log_b n + O(1)} where b = 1/(1 ? p).     

Trees with the second largest number of maximal independent sets

A maximal independent set is an independent set that is not a proper subset of any other independent set. In this paper, we determine the second largest number of maximal independent sets among all trees and forests of order n≥4. We also characterize those extremal graphs achieving these values.     

On the complete chromatic number of Halin graphs

ThisresearchissupportedbytheNationalNaturalScienceFoundationofChina.Write.1.IntroductionDefinition1.FOrany3-connectedplanargraphG(V,E,F)withA(G)23,iftheboundaryedgesoffacefowhichisadjacenttotheothersareremoved,itbecomesatree,andthedegreeofeachvertexofV(fo)is3,andthenGiscalledaHalingraph;foiscalledtheouterfaceofG,andtheotherscalledtheinteriorfaces,thevenicesonthefacefoarecalledtheoutervenices,theoillersarecalledtheinterior...ti..,tll.ForanyplanargraphG(V,E,F),f,f'eF,fisadjacenttof'ifan…     

On large light graphs in families of polyhedral graphs

A graph H is said to be light in a family H of graphs if each graph G∈H containing a subgraph isomorphic to H contains also an isomorphic copy of H such that each its vertex has the degree (in G) bounded above by a finite number φ(H,H) depending only on H and H. We prove that in the family of all 3-connected plane graphs of minimum degree 5 (or minimum face size 5, respectively), the paths with certain small graphs attached to one of its ends are light.     

On the oriented chromatic number of graphs with given excess

The excess of a graph G is defined as the minimum number of edges that must be deleted from G in order to get a forest. We prove that every graph with excess at most k has chromatic number at most and that this bound is tight. Moreover, we prove that the oriented chromatic number of any graph with excess k is at most k+3, except for graphs having excess 1 and containing a directed cycle on 5 vertices which have oriented chromatic number 5. This bound is tight for k?4.     

On the spectral radii of unicyclic graphs with fixed matching number

In this paper, the first five sharp upper bounds on the spectral radii of unicyclic graphs with fixed matching number are presented. The first ten spectral radii over the class of unicyclic graphs on a given number of vertices and the first four spectral radii of unicyclic graphs with perfect matchings are also given, respectively.     

Domination number in graphs with minimum degree two

A set D of vertices of a graph G = （V, E） is called a dominating set if every vertex of V not in D is adjacent to a vertex of D. In 1996, Reed proved that every graph of order n with minimum degree at least 3 has a dominating set of cardinality at most 3n/8. In this paper we generalize Reed＇s result. We show that every graph G of order n with minimum degree at least 2 has a dominating set of cardinality at most （3n ＋IV21）/8, where V2 denotes the set of vertices of degree 2 in G. As an application of the above result, we show that for k ≥ 1, the k-restricted domination number rk （G, γ） ≤ （3n＋5k）/8 for all graphs of order n with minimum degree at least 3.     

The maximum number of maximal independent sets in unicyclic connected graphs

In this paper, we determine the maximum number of maximal independent sets in a unicyclic connected graph. We also find a class of graphs achieving this maximum value.     

On the locating chromatic number of Kneser graphs

Let c be a proper k-coloring of a connected graph G and Π=(C₁,C₂,…,C_k) be an ordered partition of V(G) into the resulting color classes. For a vertex v of G, the color code of v with respect to Π is defined to be the ordered k-tuple c_Π(v):=(d(v,C₁),d(v,C₂),…,d(v,C_k)), where d(v,C_i)=min{d(v,x)|x∈C_i},1≤i≤k. If distinct vertices have distinct color codes, then c is called a locating coloring. The minimum number of colors needed in a locating coloring of G is the locating chromatic number of G, denoted by χ_L(G). In this paper, we study the locating chromatic number of Kneser graphs. First, among some other results, we show that χ_L(KG(n,2))=n−1 for all n≥5. Then, we prove that χ_L(KG(n,k))≤n−1, when n≥k². Moreover, we present some bounds for the locating chromatic number of odd graphs.     

Polynomial algorithm for sharp upper bound of rainbow connection number of maximal outerplanar graphs

For a finite simple edge-colored connected graph G (the coloring may not be proper), a rainbow path in G is a path without two edges colored the same; G is rainbow connected if for any two vertices of G, there is a rainbow path connecting them. Rainbow connection number, rc(G), of G is the minimum number of colors needed to color its edges such that G is rainbow connected. Chakraborty et al. (2011) [5] proved that computing rc(G) is NP-hard and deciding if rc(G)=2 is NP-complete. When edges of G are colored with fixed number k of colors, Kratochvil [6] proposed a question: what is the complexity of deciding whether G is rainbow connected? is this an FPT problem? In this paper, we prove that any maximal outerplanar graph is k rainbow connected for suitably large k and can be given a rainbow coloring in polynomial time.     

THE TOTAL CHROMATIC NUMBER OF PSEUDO-OUTERPLANAR GRAPHS

A Planar graph g is called a ipseudo outerplanar graph if there is a subset v.∈V(G),[V.]=i,such that G-V. is an outerplanar graph in particular when G-V.is a forest ,g is called a i-pseudo-tree .in this paper.the following results are proved;(1)the conjecture on the total coloring is true for all 1-pseudo-outerplanar graphs;(2)X1(G) 1 fo any 1-pseudo outerplanar graph g with △(G)≥3,where x4(G)is the total chromatic number of a graph g.     

On total chromatic number of planar graphs without 4-cycles

Let G be a simple graph with maximum degree A(G) and total chromatic number Xve(G). Vizing conjectured thatΔ(G) 1≤Xve(G)≤Δ(G) 2 (Total Chromatic Conjecture). Even for planar graphs, this conjecture has not been settled yet. The unsettled difficult case for planar graphs isΔ(G) = 6. This paper shows that if G is a simple planar graph with maximum degree 6 and without 4-cycles, then Xve(G)≤8. Together with the previous results on this topic, this shows that every simple planar graph without 4-cycles satisfies the Total Chromatic Conjecture.     

Bounds on the clique-transversal number of regular graphs

A clique-transversal set D of a graph G is a set of vertices of G such that D meets all cliques of G.The clique-transversal number,denoted Tc(G),is the minimum cardinality of a clique- transversal set in G.In this paper we present the bounds on the clique-transversal number for regular graphs and characterize the extremal graphs achieving the lower bound.Also,we give the sharp bounds on the clique-transversal number for claw-free cubic graphs and we characterize the extremal graphs achieving the lower bound.     

Independence number of de Bruijn graphs

In this paper, we give several exact values of the independence number of a de Bruijn graph UB(d,D) and in the other cases, we establish pertinent lower and upper bounds of this parameter. We show that asymptotically, if d is even, the ratio of the number of vertices of a greatest independent set of UB(d,D) is .     

Rainbow number of matchings in planar graphs

The rainbow number$rb(G,H)$ for the graph $H$ in $G$ is defined to be the minimum integer $c$ such that any $c$-edge-coloring of $G$ contains a rainbow $H$. As one of the most important structures in graphs, the rainbow number of matchings has drawn much attention and has been extensively studied. Jendrol et al. initiated the rainbow number of matchings in planar graphs and they obtained bounds for the rainbow number of the matching $k{K}_2$ in the plane triangulations, where the gap between the lower and upper bounds is $O\left(k^3\right)$. In this paper, we show that the rainbow number of the matching $k{K}_2$ in maximal outerplanar graphs of order $n$ is $n+O\left(k\right)$. Using this technique, we show that the rainbow number of the matching $k{K}_2$ in some subfamilies of plane triangulations of order $n$ is $2n+O\left(k\right)$. The gaps between our lower and upper bounds are only $O\left(k\right)$.     

On the number of graphs with a given endomorphism monoid

For a given finite monoid , let be the number of graphs on n vertices with endomorphism monoid isomorphic to . For any nontrivial monoid we prove that where and are constants depending only on with .For every k there exists a monoid of size k with , on the other hand if a group of unity of has a size k>2 then .