The educational needs and professional roles of Canadian physicians and nurses regarding genetic testing and adult onset hereditary disease

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the knowledge, professional involvement and confidence of Canadian nurses and physicians in providing genetic services for adult onset hereditary disease. METHODS: 1,425 physicians and 1,425 nurses received a mailed questionnaire with reminders. The response rates were 50% (n = 543) and 79% (n = 975), respectively. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent of physicians and 31% of nurses lacked formal education in genetics. Respondents reported being involved in caring for people at risk for adult onset hereditary disease. Their levels of confidence that they could perform tasks, such as counselling about predictive genetic tests, however, were lower than their levels of expectation that it would be important for them to provide these services. CONCLUSIONS: The expected roles and educational needs of Canadian nurses and physicians have broad areas of overlap suggesting the possibility of combined professional education programs and multiple ways of organizing teams to provide genetic services to people at risk for adult onset hereditary disease.     

Assessment of two 'low-tech' genetic health care procedures performed by prenatal care providers in Washington state: implications for future policy development activities

Equity in health care demands that patients be treated fairly, impartially and with justice. Health care professionals and others have long been aware of the concept of equity, and the many inequities that exist in our health care system. As part of our analysis of postpartum data collected between 1993 and 1996 by the Washington Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) from self-administered patient surveys, we explored equity as it pertains to two 'low-tech' prenatal genetic health care procedures: (1) whether or not prenatal care providers asked their patients about a family history of birth defects/genetic disorders, and (2) whether or not prenatal care providers talked to their patients about prenatal testing for birth defects/genetic disorders. Overall, about 80% of pregnant women reported that they had been asked about their family history of birth defects/genetic disorders, and about 85% said that their prenatal care provider(s) had talked to them about prenatal testing. Maternal characteristics associated with a lower likelihood of receiving these two low-tech genetic health care procedures appeared to be young maternal age, and low education and income levels, regardless of where women with these attributes received their prenatal care (e.g. community, migrant, health department or military health care clinics, private physicians, or health maintenance organizations).     

Genetics in primary care: a USA faculty development initiative

The Genetics in Primary Care (GPC) project is a USA national faculty development initiative with the goal of enhancing the training of medical students and primary care residents by developing primary care faculty expertise in genetics. Educational strategies were developed for the project by an executive committee with input from an advisory committee, comprising individuals with primary care, medical education and genetics expertise. These committees identified the key issues in genetics education for primary care as (1) considering inherited disease in the differential diagnosis of common disorders; (2) using appropriate counseling strategies for genetic testing and diagnosis, and (3) understanding the implications of a genetic diagnosis for family members. The group emphasized the importance of a primary care perspective, which suggests that the clinical utility of genetic information is greatest when it has the potential to improve health outcomes. The group also noted that clinical practice already incorporates the use of family history information, providing a basis for discussing the application of genetic concepts in primary care. Genetics and primary care experts agreed that educational efforts will be most successful if they are integrated into existing primary care teaching programs, and use a case-based teaching format that incorporates both clinical and social dimensions of genetic disorders. Three core clinical skills were identified: (1) interpreting family history; (2) recognizing the variable clinical utility of genetic information, and (3) acquiring cultural competency. Three areas of potential controversy were identified as well: (1) the role of nondirective counseling versus shared decision-making in discussions of genetic testing; (2) the intrinsic value of genetic information when it does not influence health outcomes, and (3) indications for a genetics referral. The project provides an opportunity for ongoing discussion about these important issues.     

Cancer genetic counseling in public health care hospitals: the experience of three Brazilian services

In Brazil, genetic counseling is usually available in university-affiliated medical genetics services located in tertiary centers that provide cancer diagnosis and treatment. The present study aims to describe the structure and characteristics of three cancer genetic services in Brazilian public health care hospitals and discuss alternatives for the identification and prevention of hereditary cancer syndromes in developing countries. The three services presented here are similar in their structure, routine procedures for cancer risk estimation and criteria for the indication of genetic testing. They all demand that genetic counseling be an essential part of the cancer risk evaluation process, before and after cancer predisposition testing. However, when high-risk patients are identified, all services describe difficulties in the access and continuity of genetic and medical services to the patient and his/her at-risk relatives. The services differ in the type of population served, reflecting distinct referral guidelines. This study emphasizes the importance of the creation of new cancer genetic services in other Brazilian regions and the necessity for establishing a collaborative network to facilitate the diagnosis and research of cancer genetic syndromes.     

Information-seeking behaviour and psycho-social interactions during the genetic testing process

OBJECTIVES: The first aim of this study was to investigate the information-seeking behaviour (ISB) of women attending cancer genetic consultations at which the possibility of BRCA testing is considered. We focused here specifically on ISB apart from the cancer genetic consultation, i.e. on what complementary sources of information about genetic testing were consulted and what factors were involved in this behaviour. The second aim was to study the role of the social network used by the patients to collect various opinions on which to base their decisions about being tested. METHODS: A prospective cohort study (2000-2002) was therefore carried out on all women attending a single cancer genetic clinic in France after a BRCA1/2 analysis had been proposed. Closed questionnaires were administered before and after the second cancer genetic consultation. The purpose of this consultation was to confirm the patient's decision to be tested. RESULTS: Results were analysed in 108 subjects (mean age 47 years, SD 11 years; 74% affected by breast/ovarian cancer). Prior to the 2nd consultation, 35.2% of the women had actively looked for information about BRCA1/2 testing, as compared to 25.0% afterwards. After multivariate adjustment by logistic regression, the pre-consultation ISB was found to be associated with greater satisfaction with the information about the psycho-social consequences of genetic testing [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.06] (scale from 0 to 100) and about the certainty of being a gene carrier (ORadj 3.04, 95% CI 1.16-7.98). Those who actively looked for complementary information were also more often accompanied at the consultation by a family member (ORadj 4.82, 95% CI 1.85-12.56). The other variables tested (depression, coping, socio-demographic and medical characteristics) were not significant (p > 0.05). The role of the social network in the decision making process was perceived as being less helpful when the persons consulted tended to have neutral or unfavourable opinions about genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Few women actively sought complementary information about BRCA genetic testing in addition to the cancer genetic consultation. Those who did so differed from the others in terms of their social network and their satisfaction with the consultation. The cancer geneticist is the key actor in women's decision making about genetic testing.     

Knowledge about medical genetics in health care

Effective genetic services depend upon co-operation between medical geneticists and many different non-geneticist professionals to ensure that the most appropriate patients are referred to geneticists and that those that require long-term care receive it. Important determinants of the quality of genetic services are the knowledge that professionals have about clinical genetics and the equitable distribution of adequately resourced genetic centres. Consequently, we have investigated in a European context how much clinically relevant genetics non-geneticists know, how competent non-geneticists are in counselling their own patients, how well equipped specialist genetic centres are, who refers to genetic centres and what they refer and who offers continuing care to patients and families whose problems are not resolvable at a limited genetic clinic visit.     

The Cancer Genetics Network: recruitment results and pilot studies

OBJECTIVE: The National Cancer Institute established the Cancer Genetics Network (CGN) to support collaborative investigations into the genetic basis of cancer susceptibility, explore mechanisms to integrate this new knowledge into medical practice, and identify ways of addressing the associated psychosocial, ethical, legal, and public health issues. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The CGN has developed the complex infrastructure required to support the projects, including the establishment of guidelines and policies, uniform methods, standard questionnaires to be used by all of the centers, and a standard format for submission of data to the Informatics Center. Cancer patients and their family members have been invited to enroll and be included in a pool of potential study participants. The Information Technology Group is responsible for support of the design, implementation, and maintenance of the multicenter Network-wide research protocols. RESULTS: As of January 2004, the CGN contained data on 23,995 probands (participants) and 425,798 family members. As a resource for cancer genetic studies, the CGN has a large number of probands and first-degree relatives with and without cancer and with multiple ethnicities. Different study designs can be used including case-control, case-case, and family studies. CONCLUSIONS: The unique resources of the CGN are available for studies on cancer genetic susceptibility, translational research, and behavioral research. The CGN is now at a point where approved collaborators may have access to enrolled patients and their families for special studies, as well as to the clinical, environmental and family cancer history data banked in the Informatics Center.     

Life and health insurance behaviour of individuals having undergone a predictive genetic testing programme for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Objective and Methods: We describe the insurance behaviour of subjects (n=271) who had previously taken a predictive genetic test for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC); 31% of them were mutation positive, indicating a high risk of cancer. One year after testing, subjects were sent a questionnaire including questions about their present life and health insurance before participation in the study, and their actual and planned purchase of the insurance policies during the testing programme which compromised a pre-test counseling session, a period for reflection, the testing, and a test disclosure session. Results: Thirty percent reported that they already had a life insurance and 14% a health insurance before participating in the study. The mutation-positive subjects possessed a health insurance significantly more often than the mutation-negative individuals (21 vs. 11%, p=0.02) and similar trend was observed for life insurance (36 vs. 28%, p=0.12). Life and health insurance policies purchased just before testing was reported by 3 and 2% of the subjects, respectively. Life and health insurance policies purchased after testing were reported by 3 and <1% respectively, and planned purchase by 3 and 2%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups defined by mutation status in reports of life or health insurance behaviour during or after the programme. Conclusion: According to self-reported data, the mutation-positive subjects did not differ from the others in the purchase of life or health insurance policies. However, the mutation-positive individuals reported that they possessed health insurance policies before entering the study more often than their counterparts.     

Genetics education for non-genetic health care professionals in the Netherlands (2002)

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether medical care providers in the Netherlands are adequately educated in genetics by collecting information about the current state of genetics education of non-genetics health care professionals. METHOD: The curricula of the 8 universities providing medical education and of all varieties of specialised medical training were examined for the year 2002. RESULTS: In most universities, the number of hours spent on genetics education is small, and genetics is relatively invisible, being integrated within several courses, comprising only a small proportion of the total course (a mean of 8%). Only 3 of the programmes for medical specialist training and the training of medical doctors for mentally handicapped people indicated a formal genetics education programme. Continued education courses on genetics are offered irregularly. Training in midwifery involves at least 3 weeks of genetics education. Courses on genetics are offered frequently to practicing midwives. CONCLUSION: There appear to be no general, nationally defined final goals for education in genetics for non-genetics health care professionals in the Netherlands. Furthermore, the lack of visibility of genetics in medical education in the Netherlands was striking.     

Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations

OBJECTIVE: New medical discoveries regarding genetic susceptibility to common chronic diseases, and the decoding of the human genome have increased public attention to genetics. What information is understood and what attitudes exist towards genetics and genetic research have not been well examined in underserved, culturally diverse communities. METHODS: To better understand attitudes and beliefs towards genetics and genetic testing in these groups, we conducted eight focus groups with 55 patients and health care workers in New York City and Westchester, N.Y., in English, Spanish, and Chinese. RESULTS: Focus group participants had limited understanding about genetics or genetic testing. Newborn screening was the least-known genetic issue, even among health care workers. Regardless of their cultural group, most participants expressed a desire for more information about genetics and genetic tests. Latinos and Chinese participants generally expressed positive attitudes towards genetic studies and genetic testing, with the possibility of preventing diseases cited as the main advantage. Black Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites reported mixed feelings about genetic research and genetic testing. Concerns expressed included: anxiety before receiving test results or waiting for a disease to develop, fear of genetic discrimination by health and life insurance companies and employers, not having the financial means to deal with genetic diseases in themselves or a sick child, concern that children and adults are having too many tests. Black Americans expressed the most concern for possibly harmful use of genetic information. CONCLUSIONS: Minority populations of diverse cultures have limited knowledge about genetics and genetic testing, would like to have more information, and are not well reached by the current educational approaches. Participants knew the least about newborn screening, a test that is mandatory in the New York State. While genetic knowledge by minority populations was perhaps not different from the level of knowledge of consumers in general, minority populations are at particular risk of being left behind because of historically poor access to information and services.     

Provision of breast cancer risk information to women at the lower end of the familial risk spectrum

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer family clinics provide risk information as one of their key functions. Many referrals to these clinics are 'low-risk' women. OBJECTIVE: It was the aim of this study to report on the generic risk status letters and printed materials (in the form of leaflets) provided to this category of counselees by UK cancer genetics centres. METHODS: A postal survey was conducted requesting information materials from genetic centres. RESULTS: Personalized risk letters and/or printed materials were received from 16 of 22 familial cancer centres in the UK. Personalized risk letters and printed materials currently provided to these counselees display inconsistencies and over-simplification that may lead to misunderstanding. CONCLUSION: There is a need for collaboration among cancer genetics centres to design more helpful and consistent literature.     

Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were (1) to explore public experiences, genetic knowledge, expectations of future medical genetic developments, and the attitudes towards the use of genetic information, and (2) to determine whether there are subject characteristics associated with these variables. METHODS: Participants (n = 1,308, age > or = 25 years) of a Dutch consumer panel were sent a questionnaire, specifically designed for this study. RESULTS: Response was 63% (817/1,308). A minority of respondents reported to know someone with a hereditary disease (34%) or to have used a genetic test (8%). Overall, 57% perceived a lack of genetic knowledge. In multivariate analyses, high self-rated knowledge, younger age, having heard of genetic testing, high educational level, female gender, having children living at home, being a health professional, and familiarity with genetic testing were positively associated with genetic knowledge. Future expectations of the consequences of developments in medical genetics varied between the subjects. The great majority expected great benefits for medical practice such as an increasing use of genetic aspects of disease for diagnosis or prevention. One fifth, mainly older people, anticipated a negative impact of genetic developments on society. The results also show that most people are reserved to share their genetic information with others, especially with regard to the wider public domain (e.g. industry and insurers) and employers. Remarkably, respondents were more willing to share their genetic information with scientific researchers (68%) than with their relatives (54%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that although one fifth anticipates negative consequences of genetic developments, the great majority has high expectations about the increasing use of genetics in prevention, diagnosis and treatment of diseases. In developing educational programmes about genetic innovations in medicine, policymakers will have to take into account pre-existing lay knowledge, views and expectations of different groups of citizens towards these developments.     

Strengthening genetic services in primary care for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders

The Association of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations (AAPCHO) is a national membership organization of community health centers (CHCs) that serve medically underserved Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs) with limited English-speaking proficiency and low income. OBJECTIVES: In 1995, AAPCHO was funded for a 3-year national genetics training project to improve genetics training among primary care providers at CHCs and strengthen linkages with tertiary genetic centers (TGCs). Three model linkages between CHCs and TGCs were documented on the coordination of genetic services for medically underserved AAPIs. METHODS: Guidelines were developed for three CHCs to document their genetic programs and linkages with TGCs. In addition, one clinic conducted a mail survey to assess understanding of prenatal genetic counseling sessions by patients that visited the clinic during the past 2 years. RESULTS: Model linkages between CHCs and TGCs to improve cultural and linguistic accessibility for patients include formal coordination between the CHCs and TGCs for the delivery of genetic services and the provision of varying levels of genetic services at the CHC. From the patient survey, there was a 59% response rate among 70 surveys mailed to former patients. The survey results showed that while a majority of patients understood and recalled key genetic concepts, one-fifth of patients experienced difficulty understanding their genetic counseling sessions. CONCLUSION: Based on model linkages between CHCs and TGCs and the patient satisfaction survey results, the following strategies are recommended to improve accessibility of genetic services for medically underserved AAPIs: (1) genetics education should be developed for all levels of health center staff; (2) counseling should be culturally sensitive and focus on key issues that must be conveyed for appropriate informed consent; (3) genetics education should employ the use of translated audiovisual aids and brochures to improve understanding; (4) genetic services should be coordinated between CHCs and TGCs to provide culturally and linguistically competent care for medically underserved AAPIs, and (5) financial mechanisms should be available to support genetic testing of patients and their families with little or no coverage for genetic services.     

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: an approach to the selection of candidates to genetic testing based on clinical and molecular characteristics

OBJECTIVE: Identification of clinical and molecular characteristics associated with constitutional MLH1 and MSH2 mutations and definition of a stepwise strategy for the selection of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients amenable to MLH1 and MSH2 genetic testing. METHODS: 90 unrelated CRC patients were initially selected on the basis of either familial or early onset occurrence of CRC. They were screened for the presence of constitutional MLH1 and MSH2 mutations and for microsatellite instability (MSI). RESULTS: 16 pathogenetic mutations (9 MLH1 and 7 MSH2) were identified in 41% of Amsterdam hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families, 5% of suspected HNPCC families, and 14% of sporadic early-onset CRC patients. The presence of the mutations correlated with MSI, with early age of onset and proximal location of the tumor, and with the presence of some extracolonic tumors of the HNPCC spectrum and/or multiple tumors in the family. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of clinical and molecular characteristics is useful for the identification of candidates to MLH1 and MSH2 mutational analysis and allows the application of a rational approach to genetic testing.     

Cancer genetics service provision: a comparison of seven European centres

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a survey in seven European cancer genetics centres to compare service provision, organisation and practices for familial breast and colon cancer consultations and testing. Information was obtained on aspects of services both nationally and locally. METHODS: A detailed survey questionnaire was adapted collaboratively to obtain the required information. Initial survey data were collected within each centre and interim results were discussed at two European Workshops. Where differences in practice existed, details were clarified to ensure accuracy and adequacy of information. Participating centres were Haifa (Israel), Hannover (Germany), Leiden (The Netherlands), Leuven (Belgium), Manchester (UK), Marseille (France) and Milan (Italy), representing countries with populations ranging from 6.5 to 80 million. RESULTS: The European countries diverged in regard to the number of cancer genetics centres nationally (from 8 in Belgium to 37 in France), and the average population served by each centre (from 0.59 million in Israel to 3.32 million in Italy). All centres offered free care at the point of access, but referral to specialist care varied according to national health care provision. At a centre level, staff roles varied due to differences in training and health care provision. The annual number of counsellees seen in each participating centre ranged from 200 to over 1,700. Access to breast surveillance or bowel screening varied between countries, again reflecting differences in medical care pathways. These countries converged in regard to the wide availability of professional bodies and published guidelines promoting aspects of service provision. Similarities between centres included provision of a multidisciplinary team, with access to psychological support, albeit with varying degrees of integration. All services were dominated (70-90%) by referrals from families with an increased risk of breast cancer despite wide variation in referral patterns. Collection of pedigree data and risk assessment strategies were broadly similar, and centres used comparable genetic testing protocols. Average consultation times ranged between 45 and 90 min. All centres had access to a laboratory offering DNA testing for breast and bowel cancer-predisposing genes, although testing rates varied, reflecting the stage of service development and the type of population. Israel offered the highest number of genetic tests for breast cancer susceptibility because of the existence of specific founder mutations, in part explaining why the cancer genetics service in Haifa differed most from the other six. CONCLUSION: Despite considerable differences in service organisation, there were broad similarities in the provision of cancer genetic services in the centres surveyed.     

Improving access to and utilization of genetic services in Arizona's Hispanic population

This abstract presents a model project aimed to train community lay health workers about genetics, increase cultural competency of genetic services providers, and provide local access to genetic services in primarily Hispanic communities in the state of Arizona. Health Start, a community-based prenatal outreach program, served as the basis for providing genetic education and services. A genetics training curriculum was developed and training of community lay health workers was provided. Cultural and Spanish language training was provided for all genetic services providers. Pediatric genetics outreach clinics were established in eight communities. Community-based lay health workers eagerly incorporate genetic information into their public health knowledge base, but this may not lead to acceptance of these personnel by local health care providers as sources of referrals for specialized health services such as genetics. Cultural competence training of genetic service providers is enthusiastically accepted and utilized in the provision of locally accessible genetics clinics.     

France: genetics education for non-genetics health care providers

OBJECTIVE: This paper explores the treatment of medical genetics in undergraduate medical education, specialists' training and continuing medical education (CME) for general practitioners, specialists, nurses and midwives. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative survey of websites, published or unpublished documents, telephone interviews and mailed questionnaires. RESULTS: Genetics is a medical specialty in France, and the small number of university professors in genetics are in charge of the genetic component of medical training of all future practitioners. The study was complicated by the ongoing waves of reforms in the French health and educational systems and by the autonomy of the faculties. Specialist training and CME in genetics is heterogeneous and not organised as a priority. CONCLUSIONS: Specialist education and CME in genetics of non-geneticist health care providers needs to be adapted to the fast ongoing developments of this field of knowledge.     

Informed consent and subject motivation to participate in a large, population-based genomics study: the Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to measure subject perspective and reaction to participation in the Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP) and to identify factors predicting understanding of the study elements. METHOD: Self-administered questionnaires were mailed to 1,593 subjects (10% sample). The questionnaire had three sections: section A consisted of 21 factual questions; section B consisted of 14 questions to assess the level of understanding about the PMRP concepts, and section C asked about the purpose of the PMRP. RESULTS: The mean age of the 924 survey respondents was 52 years (SD = 16.9), with a range of 18-95 years. The majority of participants were female (n = 561, 61%). The percent of total correct responses for section A was significantly higher for females compared with males (males: 58.4% and females: 60.4%, t test = -2.18, p = 0.03) and age was significantly inversely related to percent of correct responses (beta coefficient = -0.122, p < 0.001). More than one third of the participants indicated that the USD 20 greatly influenced their decision to participate in the project. In a multiple logistic regression model, people living outside of Marshfield were significantly more likely to indicate that the USD 20 greatly influenced their decision to participate (odds ratio = 1.40, 95% confidence limit = 1.06, 1.86) and age was inversely related to the monetary influence on decision to participate (odds ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence limit = 0.97, 0.98). CONCLUSION: Future community consultation efforts should highlight areas of lower understanding. In addition, research coordinators may need to take more time informing males and older individuals about project details so that they are making truly informed decisions about study participation.     

Effects of individual and family functioning on interest in genetic testing

OBJECTIVE: The present study reports on the important issue of how family communication and support regarding breast cancer risk affects interest in genetic testing and mental health. METHODS: Participants (n = 221) were women aged 18-74 who had at least one relative of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, no personal history of breast or ovarian cancer, and lived within 60 miles of Seattle, Wash. RESULTS: Communication about breast cancer risk was reported with very low frequency across all types of relatives. Women talked with their mothers and sisters more often than their fathers, brothers, or children. The only significant predictor of interest in genetic testing was the individual level variable of seeking social support. CONCLUSION: Social support needs might be a part of the genetic testing process.