Determination and comparison of the plane stress essentialwork of fracture of three polyesters PET, PPT and PBT

The essential work of fracture (EWF) method has been used to study the relationship between molecular structure and thin film fracture toughness for three ductile polyesters at ambient temperature. The fracture toughness of PPT is of particular interest. Successful fracture characterisation of thin film polyesters has been achieved by the EWF method using double edge notched tension (DENT) specimens. The specific essential work of fracture, w _e, for polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene terephthalate (PPT) and polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) films is found to be 35.54±2.56, 41.03±3.23 and 31.34±8.60 kJ m^–2, respectively. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) has been employed to investigate the crystallinity of the polymers concerned and the effect of this on their EWF values.     

Flory-huggins interaction parameters of LCP/thermoplastic blends measured by DSC analysis

Liquid crystalline polymer/polyamide 66 (LCP/PA66) and LCP/poly(butyl terephthalate) (LCP/PBT) blends were compounded using a Brabender Plasticorder equipped with a mixing chamber. The LCP employed was a semi-flexible liquid crystalline copolyesteramide based on 30 mol% of p-amino benzoic acid (ABA) and 70 mol% of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). The Flory-Huggins interaction parameters (χ12) of the LCP/ PA66 and LCP/PBT blends are estimated by melting point depression from DSC measurement. The results indicate that c12 values all are negative for LCP/PA66 and LCP/PBT blends, and when the LCP content in these blends is more than 10 mass%, the absolute value of χ₁₂ decreases. Thereby, we can conclude that LCP/PA66 and LCP/PBT blends are fully miscible in the molten state, the molecular interaction between the LCP and PA66 is stronger than that between LCP and PBT. As the LCP content in LCP/PA66 and LCP/PBT blends is more than 10 mass%, the molecular interaction between LCP and matrix polymer decreases. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Morphologies,interfacial interaction and mechanical performance of super-tough nanostructured PK/PA6 blends

Nanostructured polyketone (PK)/polyamide 6 (PA6) blends can be readily prepared via melt blending technologies and exhibit ultra-high toughness when PA6 is present as the nanoscale phase domains. When PA6 content is 30 vol%, the impact strength of the blends increases from 21.4 kJ/m² of pure PK to 103.2 kJ/m². The impact strength of the PK/PA6 blends with a 5:5 composition ratio reaches as high as 113 kJ/m². The strong intermolecular force between PK and PA6 molecular chains enables the PA6 nanophase to cavitate to dissipate a significant amount of impact energy and effectively prevents the crack propagation or even terminates the cracks. The fracture mechanism of the PK/PA6 blends was further examined by the essential work of fracture method which proves that PK/PA6 blends show improved ability to prevent crack propagation. This work may deepen the understanding of polymer blend systems with strong hydrogen bonding interaction.     

Preparation of core‐shell structured particle and its application in toughening PA6/PBT blends

Combining the excellent mechanical strengths of polyamide 6 (PA6) with the low water absorption of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) was supposed to be a feasible way to prepare a high comprehensive performance material. However, the poor compatibility between PA6 and PBT resulted in low‐notched impact strength of PA6/PBT blends. Poly(n‐butyl acrylate)/poly(methyl methacrylate‐co‐methacrylic acid) (PBMMA), a core‐shell structured modifier with controlled particle sizes, was prepared by seed emulsion polymerization and confirmed by Transmission electron microscope (TEM). The PBMMA particles as toughening modifier and compatilizer were employed to toughen PA6/PBT blends. The notched impact strength of the PA6/PBT blends was significantly increased and the water absorption was reduced with the addition of PBMMA particles. With 23.0 wt% modifier loading, the notched impact strength of the blends was 25.66 kJ/m², which was 4.04 times higher than that of pure PA6/PBT. Meanwhile, the water absorption of the blends was only 1.3%, dropping 53.6% compared with pure PA6 and reducing by 26.6% than PA6/PBT. Scanning electron microscope results showed that the PBMMA particles were dispersed in the PA6/PBT blends homogeneously, and the toughening mechanism was the cavitation of rubber particles and shear yielding of the matrix. Thermo‐gravimetric analysis analysis demonstrated that the compatibility between PA6 and PBT was improved with the addition of core‐shell PBMMA particles. The core‐shell particles could be used as an effective modifier to achieve the high toughness and low water absorption for PA6/PBT blends. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Phase behavior and interactions in blends of poly[(butylene adipate)-co-poly(butylene terephthalate)] copolyester with poly(4-vinyl phenol)

Miscibility with a linear T _g–composition relationship was proven for blend of poly(butylene adipate-co-butylene terephthalate) [P(BA-co-BT)] with poly(4-vinyl phenol) (PVPh). In comparison to the blends of PBA/PVPh and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/PVPh, the Kwei’s T _g model fitting on data for the P(BA-co-BT)/PVPh blend yields a q value between those for the PBA/PVPh and PBT/PVPh blends. The q values suggest that the interaction strength in the P(BA-co-BT)/PVPh blend is not as strong as that in the PBT/PVPh blend. Upon mixing the PVPh into the immiscible blend of PBA and PBT, the ternary PBA/PBT/PVPh blends only exhibits partial miscibility. Full-scale ternary miscibility in whole compositions is not possible owing to the significant ∆χ effect (χ _ij  – χ _ik ). The wavenumber shifts of the hydroxyl IR absorbance band indicates that the H-bonding strength is in decreasing order—PBT/PVPh > P(BA-co-BT)/PVPh > PBA/PVPh—and shows that the BA segment in the copolymer tends to defray interactions between P(BA-co-BT) and PVPh in blends.     

Determination of interactions between aryl polyesters and poly(ether imide) via glass transition temperatures of separated phases in immiscible blends

Phase behavior in domains of immiscible blends of poly(pentamethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) (PPT/PEI) and poly(hexamethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) (PHT/PEI) were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The measured glass transition temperature (T _g) reveals that aryl polyesters dissolve more in the PEI-rich phase than the PEI does in the aryl polyester-rich phase, for both PPT/PEI and PHT/PEI systems. Additionally, optical microscopy supports the conclusion that PPT (or PHT) dissolves more in the PEI-rich phase than PEI does in the PPT-rich (or PHT-rich) phase in the aryl polyester/PEI blends. Furthermore, the Flory–Huggins interaction parameters (χ₁₂) for the PPT/PEI and the PHT/PEI blends were calculated to be 0.12 and 0.17, respectively. For the blend systems comprising of PEI and homologous aryl polyesters, the value of χ₁₂ exhibits a trend of variation with respect to structure of aryl polyesters. For the PPT/PEI and PHT/PEI blends, investigated in this study, value of the polymer–polymer interaction parameter (χ₁₂) between the aryl polyester and the PEI was found to be positive, which increases with the number of methylene moieties in the repeating unit of the aryl polyester, ultimately resulting in phase separation observed.     

The structure and physical properties of in situ composites based on semiflexible thermotropic liquid crystalline copolyesteramide and poly(butylene terephthalate)

Liquid crystalline polymer–poly(butylene terephthalate) (LCP/PBT) blends were prepared by melt mixing. The LCP employed was a thermotropic copolyesteramide based on 30 mol % of p‐amino benzoic acid (ABA) and 70 mol % of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). The thermal, dynamic mechanical and rheological properties, morphology, and crystal structure of LCP/PBT blends were studied. The results showed that the semiflexible ABA30/PET LCP is miscible in the melt state with PBT, and they are partial miscible in the solid state. Differential scanning calorimetric measurements showed that the introduction of the semiflexible LCP into LCP/PBT blends retards the crystallization rate of PBT. However, the LCP dispersed phase acted as the sites for the nucleation of spherulites and enhance the degree of crystallinity of PBT. Hot‐stage optical microscopy examination revealed that the LCP microfibers with random orientation are dispersed in the PBT matrix of compression molded LCP/PBT blends. Under the application of a shearing force, the LCP domains in the PBT matrix tended to deform into microfibers, and to orient themselves along the flow direction. The formation of microfibers resulted in an increase of the storage modulus. The torque measurements indicated that the melting viscosity of the LCP/PBT blends is much lower than that of the pure PBT. Finally, the wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction patterns indicated that PBT shows no structural change with the incorporation of LCP, but the apparent crystal sizes of several diffraction planes change significantly. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 403–414, 2000     

Inhibited transesterification of PET/PBT blends filled with silica nanoparticles during melt processing

The blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) undergo transesterification reactions between PET and PBT during melt processing. In this research, PET/PBT transesterification has been investigated in the presence of nano-fillers, including pure SiO₂ and silane-coupling-agent-modified SiO₂. The results show that the incorporation of SiO₂ nanoparticles inhibits PET/PBT transesterification, and the influence of pure SiO₂ is higher than modified SiO₂. The inhibition of SiO₂ on transesterification is explained by the fact that the hydroxyl end groups of PET and PBT react with the surface hydroxyl groups of SiO₂ before transesterification due to the high activity of surface hydroxyl groups of SiO₂, and the reduction of hydroxyl end groups of PET and PBT leads to the inhibition of transesterification between PET and PBT. This has been demonstrated by the experimental data of TGA, FTIR, and XPS. And the reactivity of hydroxyl end groups of PBT is higher than that of PET.     

Thermal and spectroscopy studies on ternary miscibility and phase behavior in blends comprising poly(4‐vinyl phenol) and two aryl polyesters

Thermal analysis and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy characterizations were performed on three ternary blend systems that comprise poly(4‐vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and any two of the three homologous aryl polyesters [poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT), and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)]. Although PVPh is miscible with any one of the polyesters in forming a binary blend system, miscibility in ternary systems by introducing one more polymer of different structures to the blend system is not always expected. However, this study concludes that miscibility does exist in all these three ternary blends of all compositions investigated. Reasons and factors for such behavior were probed. Quantitative interactions in the ternary blend system were also estimated. The overall interaction energy density (B) by analysis of melting point depression for the PBT/PVPh/PET ternary blend system led to a negative value (B = −5.74 cal/cm³). Similarly, T_g‐composition analyses were performed on two other ternary blend systems, PET/PVPh/PTT and PTT/PVPh/PBT. Comparison of the qualitative results showed that the interaction energy densities in the other two ternary blend systems are similarly negative and comparable to the PBT/PVPh/PET ternary blend system. The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy results also support the qualitative findings among these three ternary blend systems. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 1339–1350, 2006     

Phase behavior,morphology, and mechanical properties of polyethylene-copolymer blends

Binary blends of unbranched polyethylene (PE) and 5-10% model ethylene-butene random copolymers are used to determine the effects of composition heterogeneity on phase separation in the melt, semicrystalline morphology, plane strain fracture toughness J_C and tensile modulus and yield strength. Slowly cooled samples of melt-miscible blends are appreciably tougher (J_C = 5.2 kJ/m²) than unblended PE (J_C = 2.7 kJ/m²). A blend with the same average short chain branch concentration, but which is phase separated in the melt state, has J_C= 3.3 kJ/m²; dispersed domains of amorphous polymer have little effect on toughness. Enhanced toughness is associated with nonuniform morphology formed on slow cooling “one phase” melts composed of chains with different amounts of branching. The relative number of chemically different chains, as opposed to absolute branch concentrations, seems most important. Tensile properties are relatively unaffected by blending at these levels. Results from these model blends are used to consider the properties of compositionally heterogeneous ethylene copolymers. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Miscibility and Mechanical Behavior of SAN/NBR Blends

Summary: Aiming the development of high toughness polymer materials, blends of poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) (SAN) and poly(butadiene-co-acrylonitrile) (NBR) rubbers, with contents of acrylonitrile (AN) varying from 21 to 45%, were prepared by casting, coprecipitation and monoscrew extrusion followed by injection molding. SAN/NBR blends, prepared in the compositions (w/w) 90/10, 80/20, 70/30, 60/40, and 50/50, were characterized by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and Izod impact tests. DSC analyses showed that blends with 33% AN NBR prepared by casting, and with 39% AN NBR prepared by coprecipitation, are partially miscible at 60/40, 70/30 and 80/20 (SAN/NBR) compositions and immiscible for 50/50 compositions. On the other hand, 90/10 SAN/NBR systems were totally miscible. The blends with 45% AN NBR prepared by coprecipitation showed partial miscibility to 50/50, 60/40, 70/30 and 90/10 compositions and total miscibility to 80/20 composition. The NBR addition results in a significant increase in the impact resistance, strongly dependent on the blend composition and the NBR AN content. The best result of impact resistance — 75.2 ± 8.6 (kJ · m⁻²) — was obtained for SAN/NBR 50/50, using 45% AN NBR. This value is 15.7 times bigger than that for pure SAN -4.8 ± 0.7 (kJ · m⁻²).     

Behavior of pressure dependence of melting temperatures in aromatic polyesters: Influence of polymer structure

The thermal behavior of three aromatic polyesters in a homologous series, poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT), and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) was studied under hydrostatic pressure up to 200 MPa by using a high pressure differential thermal analysis apparatus. Confining fluid high pressure dilatometer was used to establish the volume–temperature curves (in both solid and liquid regions) from which volume change on melting of these polyesters at atmospheric pressure was determined. Single endothermic peak was seen for PET and PTT, whereas PBT showed double peaks above 50 MPa. Pressure coefficient of melting temperature at atmospheric pressure (dT_m/dp₍₀₎), was obtained from the quadratic fit. The dT_m/dp₍₀₎ for PTT was newly determined to be 0.445 KMPa^?1, whereas for PET and PBT were 0.503 and 0.455 KMPa^?1, respectively, comparable to reported values. The dT_m/dp₍₀₎ exhibited the odd‐even behavior corresponding to odd and even number of methylene groups in the repeat unit. Enthalpy and entropy of fusion had the most influence on this coefficient. Entropy related to conformational and volume change were evaluated and the former was found to have a significant impact on the value of dT_m/dp₍₀₎. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 47: 1799–1808, 2009     

Supertoughness and critical interparticle distance dependence in poly(butylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) blends

Supertough poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)‐based blends were obtained by the melt blending of PBT with 0–30 wt % poly(ethylene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) (EGMA). The reaction between PBT and EGMA was detected by torque measurements. The particle size was almost constant with increasing EGMA content, and this indicated that compatibilization occurred. The minimum EGMA content for achieving supertoughness (i.e., an impact strength 16 times greater than that of PBT) was 20 wt %. The interparticle distance was the parameter controlling toughness in these PBT/EGMA blends. The dependence of the critical interparticle distance (τ_c) on the modulus of the dispersed phase appeared only at low τ_c values, and the primary dependence of τ_c on the ratio of the modulus of the matrix to the modulus of the rubbery dispersed phase was proposed. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 41: 2236–2247, 2003     

Preparation of core-shell structured polyacrylic modifiers and effects of the core-shell weight ratio on toughening of poly(butylene terephthalate)

Core-shell structured polyacrylic(named CSSP) impact modifiers consisting of a rubbery poly(n-butyl acrylate) core and a rigid poly(methyl methacrylate) shell with a size of about 353 nm were prepared by seed emulsion polymerization. The CSSP modifiers with different core-shell weight ratios(90/10, 85/15, 80/20, 75/25, 70/30, 65/35 and 60/40) were used to modify the toughness of poly(butylene terephthalate)(PBT) by melt blending. It was found that the polymerization had a very high instantaneous conversion(> 95.7%) and overall conversion(99.7%). The morphology of the core-shell structure was confirmed by means of transmission electron microscopy. Scanning electron microscopy was used to observe the morphology of the fractured surfaces. Differential scanning calorimeter was used to study the crystallization behaviors of PBT/CSSP blends. The dynamic mechanical analyses of PBT/CSSP blends showed two merged transition peaks of PBT matrix, with the presence of CSSP core-shell structured modifier, that were responsible for the improvement of PBT toughness. The results indicated that the notch impact strength of PBT/CSSP blends with a core-shell weight ratio of 75/25 was almost 8.64 times greater than that of pure PBT, and the mechanical properties agreed well with the SEM observation.     

High‐pressure DTA of poly(butylene terephthalate), poly(hexamethylene terephthalate), and poly(ethylene terephthalate)

Pressure effect on the melting behavior of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and poly(hexamethylene terephthalate) (PHT) was studied by high‐pressure DTA (HP‐DTA) up to 320 and 530 MPa, respectively. Cooling rate dependence on the DSC melting curves of the samples cooled from the melt was shown at atmospheric pressure. Stable and metastable samples were prepared by cooling from the melt at low and normal cooling rates, respectively. DTA melting curves for the stable samples showed a single peak, and the peak profile did not change up to high pressure. Phase diagrams for PBT and PHT were newly determined. Fitting curves of melting temperature (T_m) versus pressure expressed by quadratic equation were obtained. Pressure coefficients of T_m at atmospheric pressure, dT_m/dp, of PBT and PHT were 37 and 33 K/100 MPa, respectively. HP‐DTA curves of the metastable PBT showed double melting peaks up to about 70 MPa. In contrast, PHT showed them over the whole pressure region. HP‐DTA of stable poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was also carried out up to 200 MPa, and the phase diagram for PET was determined. dT_m/dp for PET was 49 K/100 MPa. dT_m/dp increased linearly with reciprocal number of ethylene unit. The decrease of dT_m/dp for poly(alkylene terephthalate) with increasing a segmental fraction of an alkyl group in a whole molecule is explained by the increase of entropy of fusion. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 38: 262–272, 2000     

Formation and morphology of cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB)/polyolefin and CAB/polyester in situ microfibrillar and lamellar hybrid blends

Cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB)/iPP (isotactic polypropylene), CAB/HDPE (high density polyethylene), CAB/PET (poly ethylene terephthalate), CAB/PTT (poly trimethylene terephthalate), CAB/PBT (poly butylenes terephthalate) and CAB/IPET-PEG (poly(ethylene terephthalate-co-isophthalate)-poly(ethylene glycol)) in situ microfibrillar and lamellar hybrid blends at a weight ratio of 80/20 were prepared by melt extrusion. Microfibrillar and lamellar hybrid morphologies of CAB/polyolefin and CAB/polyester blends under different force fields were investigated. The formation process of in situ microfibrillar and lamellar hybrid blends were analyzed and proposed.     

Miscibility and crystallization behavior of PBT/epoxy blends

The miscibility and the isothermal crystallization kinetics for PBT/Epoxy blends have been studied by using differential scanning calorimetry, and several kinetic analyses have been used to describe the crystallization process. The Avrami exponents n were obtained for PBT/Epoxy blends. An addition of small amount of epoxy resin (3%) leads to an increase in the number of effective nuclei, thus resulting in an increase in crystallization rate and a stronger trend of instantaneous three‐dimensional growth. For isothermal crystallization, crystallization parameter analysis showed that epoxy particles could act as effective nucleating agents, accelerating the crystallization of PBT component in the PBT/Epoxy blends. The Lauritzen–Hoffman equation for DSC isothermal crystallization data revealed that PBT/Epoxy 97/3 had lower nucleation constant K_g than 100/0, 93/7, and 90/10 PBT/Epoxy blends. Analysis of the crystallization data of PBT/Epoxy blends showed that crystallization occurs in regime II. The fold surface free energy, σ_e = 101.7–58.0 × 10^?3 J/m², and work of chain folding, q = 5.79–3.30 kcal/mol, were determined. The equilibrium melting point depressions of PBT/Epoxy blends were observed and the Flory–Huggins interaction parameters were obtained. It indicated that these blends were thermodynamically miscible in the melt. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 44: 1320–1330, 2006     

Relationships between the molecular architecture,crystallization capacity,and miscibility in poly(butylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends: A comparison with poly(ethylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate blends

Poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT)/polycarbonate (PC) samples, prepared via reactive blending in the presence of Ti‐ and Sm‐based catalysts, resulted in block copolymers whose block length decreased as the mixing time increased. A single homogeneous amorphous phase occurred when the blocks had monomeric sequences shorter than 10 units. Otherwise, a crystalline phase of PBT developed. Also, in poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/PC blends previously studied, the miscibility was strictly correlated with the crystallizability of the system. Therefore, the miscibility of the PBT/PC and PET/PC blends was compared with respect to the tendency of the PBT and PET blocks to crystallize under isothermal conditions. The crystallization rate of the PBT/PC copolymers was faster than that of the PET/PC copolymers with similar block lengths. Accordingly, the minimum crystallizable sequence length of the PBT blocks was shorter than that of the PET blocks (18 vs 31 monomeric unit sequences). This behavior was interpreted as an effect of the more flexible PBT units, which had a greater tendency to fold and crystallize than the PET units. Therefore, PBT, the blocks of which tended to crystallize even if they were very short and phase‐separated, was characterized by a poorer compatibility with PC than that of PET. As a result, the block size had a fundamental role in determining the crystallizability and, therefore, phase behavior of the semicrystalline block copolymers. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 2821–2832, 2004     

Electrical conductivities of carbon nanotube-filled polycarbonate/polyester blends

Carbon nanotube (CNT)-filled polycarbonate (PC)/poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and polycarbonate (PC)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) blends containing 1 wt% CNTs over a wide range of blend compositions were prepared by melt mixing in a torque rheometer to investigate the structure-electrical conductivity relationship. Field emission scanning electron microscopy was used to observe the blend morphology and the distribution of CNTs. The latter was compared with the thermodynamic predictions through the calculation of wetting coefficients. It was found that CNTs are selectively localized in the polyester phase and conductive blends can be obtained over the whole composition range (20 wt%, 50 wt% and 80 wt% PBT) for CNT-filled PC/PBT blends, while conductive CNT-filled PC/PET blends can only be obtained when PET is the continuous phase (50 wt%, 80 wt% PET). The dramatic difference in the electrical conductivity between the two types of CNT-filled PC/polyester blends at a low polyester content (20 wt%) was explained by the size difference of the dispersed phases on the basis of the transmission electron microscope micrographs.     

Some thermodynamic aspects of nitrides in materials science

The energies of combustion in fluorine of gallium nitride and indium nitride in wurzite crystalline structure have been measured in a two-compartment calorimetric bomb, and new standard molar enthalpies of formation have been calculated: Δ_fH_m⁰(GaN(cr) 298.15 K)= –(163.7±4.2) kJ mol^–1 and Δ_fH_m⁰(InN(cr) 298.15 K)= –(146.5±4.6) kJ mol^–1 . Comparison with the recommended values of the Δ_fH_m⁰ nitrides from the literature is also presented.