Selenium heterocycles XLIV. Syntheses of 8,9‐dihydro‐1,2,3‐thiadiazolo[4,5‐a]‐4,7‐dihydroxynaphthalene and 1,2,3‐selenadiazolo[4,5‐a]‐4,7‐dimethoxynaphthalene

The reaction of thionyl chloride with the semicarbazone 2 gave 4,5‐dihydro‐6,9‐dihydroxynaphtho‐[1,2‐d][1,2,3]thiadiazole ( 3 ) instead of 4,5‐dihydro‐6,9‐dimethyoxynaphtho[1,2‐d][1,2,3]thiadiazole ( 4 ). Selenium dioxide oxidation of compound 2 gave 4,5‐dihydro‐6,9‐dimethyoxynaphtho[1,2‐d][1,2,3]selenadiazole ( 5 ). Oxidation of compound 5 with 2,3‐dichloro‐5,6‐dicyano‐1,4‐benzoquinone afforded 6,9‐dimethyoxynaphtho[1,2‐d][1,2,3]selenadiazole ( 6 ).     

Poly((2‐alkylbenzo[1,2,3]triazole‐4,7‐diyl)vinylene)s for organic solar cells

Poly((2‐Alkylbenzo[1,2,3]triazole‐4,7‐diyl)vinylene)s (pBTzVs) synthesized by Stille coupling show different absorption spectra, solid‐state morphology, and photovoltaic performance, depending on straight‐chain versus branched‐chain (pBTzV12 and pBTzV20) pendant substitution. Periodic boundary condition density functional computations show limited alkyl pendant effects on isolated chain electronic properties; however, pendants could influence polymer backbone conjugative planarity and polymer solid film packing. The polymers are electronically ambipolar, with best performance by pBTzV12 with hole and electron transport mobilities of 4.86 × 10^?6 and 1.96 × 10^?6 cm² V^?1 s^?1, respectively. pBTzV12 gives a smooth film morphology, whereas pBTzV20 gives a very different fibrillar morphology. For ITO/PEDOT:PSS/(1:1 w/w polymer:PC₇₁BM)/LiF/Al devices, pBTzV12 gives power conversion efficiency (PCE) up to 2.87%, and pBTzV20 gives up to PCE = 1.40%; both have open‐circuit voltages of V_OC = 0.6–0.7 V. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2015 , 53, 1539–1545     

Generation and detection of the radical cation and the dication derived from 4,9‐diethyl[1,4]dihydrodithiino[5,6‐f]benzotrithiole and its 5‐oxide

4,9‐Diethyl[1,4]dihydrodithiino[5,6‐f]benzotrithiole (DTBT) gave a radical cation, DTBT(•+), and a dication, DTBT(2+), on treatment with a single‐electron oxidizing reagent. Both compounds showed an ESR signal, whereas the dication, generated by this procedure, was silent for ¹H NMR. Hydrolysis of DTBT(2+) gave DTBT 1‐oxide (DTBT 1‐O) and 2‐oxide (DTBT 2‐O) together with DTBT and a mixture of several dioxides. A singlet‐state dication, DTBT(2+)‐S, which was generated upon treatment of DTBT 5‐oxide (DTBT 5‐O) with concentrated D₂SO₄, was detected by ¹H and ¹³C NMR. After 20 h, the NMR signals disappeared while the solution was active for ESR. The results suggest that (i) a species generated from DTBT by oxidation with the single‐electron oxidizing reagent is a triplet‐state dication, DTBT(2+)‐T, and (ii) DTBT(2+)‐S, initially generated, gradually isomerizes to DTBT(2+)‐T in the solution, and DTBT(2+)‐T forms a partial spin pair. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 19:394–401, 2008; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/hc.20445     

Similarities and differences between bis[2‐(bromomethyl)phenyl] diselenide,bis[2‐(chloromethyl)phenyl] diselenide and bis[2‐(hydroxymethyl)phenyl] diselenide

The title compounds, C₁₄H₁₂Br₂Se₂, (I), C₁₄H₁₂Cl₂Se₂, (II), and C₁₄H₁₄O₂Se₂, (III), feature a diselenide bridge between two o‐benzyl bromide [in (I)], two o‐benzyl chloride [in (II)] or two o‐benzyl alcohol units [in (III)]. In the molecular structure of (I) and in both independent molecules of (II), close contacts are observed between the halogen centres and the diselenide unit. In the case of modification (IIIa), strong hydrogen bonds between the –OH groups dominate, whereas the molecular structures of modification (IIIb) and bis{2‐[(dimethylamino)methyl]phenyl} diselenide, C₁₈H₂₄N₂Se₂, (IV), are comparable with those of (I) and (II). A correlation between the strength of the contacts and the angle between the benzene planes and the Se—Se units is found.     

Three ruthenocene derivatives: (η5‐4,7‐dimethylindenyl)(η5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)ruthenium(II), [η5‐[2](4,7)indeno[2]paracyclophanyl](η5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)ruthenium(II) and bis[η5‐[2](4,7)indeno[2]paracyclophanyl]­ruthenium(II)

In the title compounds, [Ru(C₁₀H₁₅)(C₁₁H₁₁)], (III), [Ru(C₁₀H₁₅)(C₁₉H₁₇)], (IV), and [Ru(C₁₉H₁₇)₂], (V), respectively, the coordinating ring systems are planar and parallel, with the Ru atoms lying at perpendicular distances of Ru–Cp* 1.790 (1) Å and Ru–indenyl 1.836 (1) Å in (III), Ru–Cp* 1.791 (1) Å and Ru–indenyl 1.837 (1) Å in (IV), and Ru–indenyl 1.812 (1) Å and 1.809 (1) Å in (V) (Cp* is penta­methyl­cyclo­penta­dienyl). The ring conformations are eclipsed for (III), staggered for (IV) and intermediate for (V). All three compounds show short intermolecular contacts from C—H groups to some ring centroids; these could be regarded as C—H?π hydrogen bonds. The mol­ecules of each compound are thus connected via the 2₁ screw axis to form layers parallel to the xy plane.     

Synthesis,structure and catalytic properties of bis[2‐(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]silanediol

A novel trifluoromethylaryl‐substituted disilanol, bis[(2‐trifluoromethyl)phenyl] silanediol, was prepared by hydrolysis of the precursor dichloride and fully characterized. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction indicates doubly linked hydrogen bonded dimers and also hydrogen bonding to tetrahydrofuran solvent. The acidity of the silanol functions is enhanced by the presence of the trifluoromethyl groups and the compound is found to be active in promoting a standard Diels–Alder reaction, increasing yields by a factor of three.     

Intramolecular cyclization of 4,7‐bis(2‐bromo­acetyl)‐1‐thia‐4,7‐di­azacyclo­nonane

The reaction of 1‐thia‐4,7‐di­azacyclo­nonane with bromo­acetyl bromide in CHCl₃ affords the unexpected salt 4‐(2‐bromo­acetyl)‐8‐oxo‐1‐thionia‐4,7‐di­aza­bi­cyclo­[5.2.2]­un­decane bromide, C₁₀H₁₆BrN₂O₂S⁺·Br⁻. Two units of the salt are linked by S⋯Br contacts about a crystallographic inversion centre, thus forming dimers that are linked by Br⋯Br contacts into extended ribbons. S⋯O contacts between these ribbons generate a two‐dimensional sheet.     

Self‐inclusion structure of 5,11,17,23‐tetrakis(azidomethyl)‐25,26,27,28‐tetrahydroxycalix[4]arene,and 5,11,17,23‐tetra‐tert‐butyl‐25,27‐bis(chloroacetoxy)‐26,28‐bis(2‐pyridylmethoxy)calix[4]arene

In the structures of the two title calix[4]arene derivatives, C₃₂H₂₈N₁₂O₄, (I), and C₆₀H₆₈Cl₂N₂O₆, (II), compound (I) adopts an open‐cone conformation in which there are four intramolecular O—H...O hydrogen bonds, while compound (II) adopts a distorted chalice conformation where the two pendant pyridyl rings, one of which is disordered, are almost mutually perpendicular, with an interplanar angle of 79.2 (2) or 71.4 (2)°. The dihedral angles between the virtual plane defined by the four bridging methylene C atoms and the phenol rings are 120.27 (7), 124.03 (6), 120.14 (8) and 128.25 (7)° for (I), and 95.99 (8), 135.93 (7), 97.21 (8) and 126.10 (8)° for (II). In the supramolecular structure of (I), pairs of molecules associate by self‐inclusion, where one azide group of the molecule is inserted into the cavity of the inversion‐related molecule, and the association is stabilized by weak intermolecular C—H...N hydrogen bonds and π(N₃)–π(aromatic) interactions. The molecular pairs are linked into a two‐dimensional network by a combination of weak intermolecular C—H...N contacts. Each network is further connected to its neighbor to produce a three‐dimensional framework via intersheet C—H...N hydrogen bonds. In the crystal packing of (II), the molecular components are linked into an infinite chain by intermolecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds. This study demonstrates the ability of calix[4]arene derivatives to form self‐inclusion structures.     

Bis[μ‐1,2‐bis(2‐pyridyl)ethyne‐κ2N:N′]bis[aquadinitratocadmium(II)]

Two twisted 1,2‐bis(2‐pyridyl)­ethyne ligands bridge two Cd²⁺ centers in the C₂‐symmetric title complex, [Cd₂(NO₃)₄(μ‐C₁₂H₈N₂)₂(H₂O)₂]. The bridging ligands arch across one another creating a `zigzag loop' molecular geometry. Two nitrate ions and a water mol­ecule complete the irregular seven‐coordinate Cd‐atom environment. The dihedral angles between the equivalent pyridyl ring planes of the two independent ligands are 67.2 (1)°. O_water—H⃛O_nitrate hydrogen bonding creates two‐dimensional layers parallel to the ab plane.     

Bis(tetraphenylphosphonium) bis[cis‐1,2‐bis(methoxycarbonyl)ethylenedithiolato‐κ2S,S′]nickelate(II) and bis(tetraphenylphosphonium) bis[cis‐1,2‐bis(methoxycarbonyl)ethylenedithiolato‐κ2S,S′]nickelate(III) iodide

The crystal structures of the title compounds, (C₂₄H₂₀P)₂[Ni(C₆H₆O₄S₂)₂], (I), and (C₂₄H₂₀P)₂[Ni(C₆H₆O₄S₂)₂]I, (II), in the diamagnetic reduced (2–) and paramagnetic oxidized (1–) states, are reported at 200 and 293 K, respectively. In both compounds, the Ni atom lies on an inversion centre and the NiS₄ coordination is thus required to be exactly planar. In the diamagnetic complex, (I), the Ni—S distances are 2.1818 (7) and 2.1805 (6) Å, while they are 2.1481 (6) and 2.1392 (5) Å in the paramagnetic complex, (II). This results from both the different complex core oxidation states and the different conformations of the methoxycarbonyl groups.     

2,5‐Bis(methylthio)‐1,4‐benzo­quinone and 2‐methyl‐3‐(methylsulfonyl)benzo[b]thiophene

The structure of 2,5‐bis­(methyl­thio)‐1,4‐benzo­quinone, C₈H₈O₂S₂, is composed of an essentially planar centrosymmetric benzo­quinone substituted with two methyl­thio groups. The important bond distances are S—Csp³ 1.788 (2) and S—Csp² 1.724 (2) Å, and the two Csp²—Csp² distances are 1.447 (3) and 1.504 (3) Å, which differ significantly. There are short S?S interactions of 3.430 (1) Å and Csp²—H?O‐type contacts forming a dimeric motif with graph set R₂²(8). The structure of 2‐methyl‐3‐(methyl­sulfonyl)­benzo­[b]­thio­phene, C₁₀H₁₀O₂S₂, is composed of an essentially planar benzo­thio­phene moiety substituted with methyl and methyl­sulfonyl groups. The mean values of the important bond distances are endocyclic S—Csp² 1.734 (3), S=O 1.434 (4) and C—C_aromatic 1.389 (10) Å. The exocyclic S—Csp² and S—Csp³ distances are 1.759 (4) and 1.763 (5) Å, respectively.     

Tris(thianthrene)(2+) bis(dodecamethylcarba‐closo‐dodecaborate) dichloromethane tetrasolvate: a crossed triple‐decker π‐trimer dication

The title compound, (3C₁₂H₈S₂)²⁺·2C₁₃H₃₆B₁₁⁻·4CH₂Cl₂, contains an unusual cation–radical association comprising a π‐trimer dication of crossed thianthrenes. The thianthrene molecular planes are essentially cofacial, but the S...S axes of adjacent molecules are orthogonal to each other. The outer thianthrenes (both located on mirror planes bisecting the units at the S atoms) are bent slightly towards the inner and planar thianthrene (residing on a 2/m symmetry element with the S atoms on the twofold rotation axis), with close noncovalent separations of 3.1 Å indicating strong interplanar interactions within the trimeric dication. Bond‐length analysis indicates that the 2+ charge is delocalized over the three stacked thianthrenes with the maximum charge on the central unit. The crossed monomer arrangement is attributed to the frontier‐orbital symmetry that allows various π‐bonding orientations between thianthrene molecules. The CB₁₁(CH₃)₁₂⁻ counter‐ion resides on a mirror plane. One of the CH₂Cl₂ solvent molecules resides on a twofold rotation axis, whereas the other is located on a mirror plane.     

[2‐(2‐{Bis[2‐(1H‐imidazol‐2‐ylmethyleneamino)ethyl]amino}ethyliminomethyl)imidazolido]cobalt(III) bis(tetrafluoridoborate) monohydrate

The title compound, [Co(C₁₈H₂₃N₁₀)](BF₄)₂·H₂O, is the result of complexing a Co cation (initially in a Co^II state) with tris[2‐(1H‐imidazol‐2‐ylmethyleneamino)ethyl]amine (L), obtained by a condensation process involving imidazole‐2‐carbaldehyde and tris(2‐aminoethyl)amine. Both the Co cation and the ligand were modified in the synthesis process, the cation via oxidation to Co^III, and the ligand via deprotonation to convert it into the 2‐(2‐{bis[2‐(1H‐imidazol‐2‐ylmethyleneamino)ethyl]amino}ethyliminomethyl)imidazolide anion (L⁻). The ligand chelates the metal centre in a hexadentate fashion, forming a slightly distorted octahedral CoN₆ chromophore. Packing is governed by N—H...N hydrogen bonds defining zigzag chains. A similar structure in the literature is discussed, and the wrong assignment of the oxidation state, given therein to the Co cation, is corrected.     

Bis[2‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)pyridinium] μ‐decavanadato‐bis[pentaaquamanganate(II)] tetrahydrate

The structure of the title compound, (C₇H₁₀NO)₂[Mn₂V₁₀O₂₈(H₂O)₁₀]·4H₂O or (C₅H₄NHCH₂CH₂OH)₂[{Mn(H₂O)₅}₂V₁₀O₂₈]·4H₂O, at 293 (2) K has triclinic (P) symmetry. The asymmetric unit consists of one half of a decavanadate anion of C_i symmetry, one [Mn(H₂O)₅]²⁺ group, one 2‐(2‐hydroxyethyl)pyridinium cation and two solvent water molecules. The decavanadate ion bridges between two [Mn(H₂O)₅]²⁺ groups, thus forming a dodecanuclear complex unit. Complex units are connected via a hydrogen‐bonding network, forming supramolecular layers lying in the (001) plane. Cations and solvent water molecules are located between these layers.     

A two‐dimensional layer in N,N′‐bis[2‐(hydroxymethyl)benzyl]ethylenediamine and a three‐dimensional network in N,N′‐bis[2‐(hydroxymethyl)benzyl]ethylenediammonium bis(perchlorate)

In both title compounds, C₁₈H₂₄N₂O₂, (Ia), and C₁₈H₂₆N₂O₂²⁺·2ClO₄⁻, (II), respectively, the two aryl rings are strictly parallel, with an inversion centre lying at the mid‐point of each central CH₂—CH₂ bond. Molecules in (Ia) are linked into two‐dimensional layers by N—H...O hydrogen bonds. The component ions in (II) are joined together by a combination of N/O/C—H...O hydrogen bonds and C—H...π and anion...π interactions, forming a three‐dimensional network. A structural understanding of (Ia) and (II) may provide some useful information about how and why their metal–organic complexes display various biological activities and function in catalytic processes.     

Crystal structure of 5,6‐bis(9H‐carbazol‐9‐yl)benzo[c][1,2,5]thiadiazole: distortion from a hypothetical higher‐symmetry structure

Nucleophilic substitution of F atoms in 5,6‐difluorobenzo[c ][1,2,5]thiadiazole (DFBT) for carbazole could be potentially interesting as a novel way of synthesizing building blocks for new conjugated materials for applications in organic chemistry. The crystal structures of 5,6‐bis(9H‐carbazol‐9‐yl)benzo[c ][1,2,5]thiadiazole (DCBT), C₃₀H₁₈N₄S, and its hydrate, C₃₀H₁₈N₄S·0.125H₂O, were investigated using single‐crystal X‐ray analysis. The hydrate contains two symmetry‐independent DCBT molecules. The dihedral angles between the plane of the central benzothiadiazole fragment and that of the carbazole units vary between 50.8 and 69.9°, indicating conformational flexibility of the DCBT molecule in the crystals, which is consistent with quantum chemical calculations. The analysis of the crystal packing of DCBT revealed that the experimental triclinic structure could be described as a distortion from a hypothetical higher‐symmetry monoclinic structure. The quantum chemical calculations of two possible monoclinic structures, which are related to the experimental structure by a shifting of molecular layers, showed that the proposed structures are higher in energy by 5.4 and 10.1 kcal mol⁻¹. This energy increase is caused by less dense crystal packings of the symmetric structures, which results in a decrease of the number of intermolecular interactions.     

Intramolecular interactions in μ‐oxido‐bis{bis[2‐(dimethylaminomethyl)phenyl]stannol}

The title compound, [Sn₂(C₉H₁₂N)₄O(OH)₂], consists of two [2‐(Me₂NCH₂)C₆H₄]₂SnOH units bridged by an O atom located on a twofold rotation axis. The unique Sn atom is six‐coordinated with a (C,N)₂SnO₂ octahedral core, as a result of the strong intramolecular N→Sn dative coordination trans to the Sn—O bonds [N—Sn—O = 170.24 (12) and 167.83 (10)°]. Owing to the presence of intermolecular H...phenyl contacts, the molecules are arranged in a ladder‐like structure.     

Syntheses of [1,2,3]selenadiazolo[4,5‐e]benzofuran or benzothiophene, [1,2,3]thiadiazolo[4,5‐e]benzofuran or benzothiophene,and 2‐benzofuranyl‐1,3,4‐oxodiazole derivatives

Dehydrogenation of ethyl 3‐methyl‐4‐oxo‐4,5,6,7‐tetrahydrobenzofuran‐2‐carboxylate 1 with 2,2′‐azobi‐sisobutyronitrile and N‐bromosuccinimide gave ethyl 4‐hydroxy‐3‐methylbenzofuran‐2‐carboxylate 3 . Reaction of compounds 3–4 with hydrazine hydrate afforded the corresponding hydrazides 5a‐b . The reaction of 5a‐b with aldehydes yielded substituted hydrazones 6a‐l . Compounds 7a‐d were prepared from compounds 6a‐d and bromine in acetic acid. Lead tetraacetate oxidation of compounds 6e‐l afforded substituted oxadiazoles 8e‐l . Selenium dioxide oxidation of 4‐oxo‐4,5,6,7‐tetrahydrobenzofuran semicarbazones 9, 14a and 4‐oxo‐4,5,6,7‐tetrahydrobenzothiophene 14b gave the tricyclic 1,2,3‐selenadiazoles 10, 15a and 15b respectively. Reaction of semicarbazones 9, 14a and 14b with thionyl chloride afforded the corresponding 1,2,3‐thiadiazoles 12, 16a and 16b respectively.     

Bis[bis(methoxycarbimido)aminato]copper(II) 1‐methylpyrrolidin‐2‐one disolvate

The title compound, [Cu(C₄H₈N₃O₂)₂]·2C₅H₉NO, consists of a neutral copper complex, in which the Cu^II centre coordinates to two bis(methoxycarbimido)aminate ligands, solvated by two molecules of 1‐methylpyrrolidin‐2‐one. The complex is planar and centrosymmetric, with the Cu^II centre occupying a crystallographic inversion centre and adopting approximately square‐planar geometry. N—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interactions exist between the amine NH groups of the ligands and the O atoms of the 1‐methylpyrrolidin‐2‐one molecules. The associated units pack to form sheets.     

Methanol[1‐(methoxymethanimidoyl)‐2‐(pyridin‐2‐ylmethyl)guanidine]bis(perchlorato)copper(II)

The title complex, [Cu(ClO₄)₂(C₉H₁₃N₅O)(CH₃OH)], was synthesized from a methanolysis reaction of N‐(methylpyridin‐2‐yl)cyanoguanidine (L³) and copper(II) perchlorate hexahydrate in a 1:1 molar ratio. The Cu^II ion is six‐coordinated by an N₃O₃ donor set which confers a highly distorted and asymmetric octahedral geometry. Three N‐donor atoms from the chelating 1‐(methoxymethanimidoyl)‐2‐(pyridin‐2‐ylmethyl)guanidine (L^3m) ligand and one O atom from the methanol molecule define the equatorial plane, with two perchlorate O atoms in the apical sites, one of which has a long Cu—O bond of 2.9074 (19) Å. The dihedral angle between the five‐ and six‐membered chelate rings is 8.21 (8)°. Two molecules are associated into a dimeric unit by intermolecular N—H...O(perchlorate) hydrogen bonds. Additionally, the weakly coordinated perchlorate anions also link adjacent [Cu(ClO₄)₂(L^3m)(CH₃OH)] dimers by hydrogen‐bonding interactions, resulting in a two‐dimensional layer in the (100) plane. Further C—H...O hydrogen bonds link the two‐dimensional layers along [100] to generate a three‐dimensional network.