共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
We study the singular homology (with field coefficients) of the moduli stack
[`(\mathfrakM)]g, n{\overline{\mathfrak{M}}_{g, n}} of stable n-pointed complex curves of genus g. Each irreducible boundary component of
[`(\mathfrakM)]g, n{\overline{\mathfrak{M}}_{g, n}} determines via the Pontrjagin–Thom construction a map from
[`(\mathfrakM)]g, n{\overline{\mathfrak{M}}_{g, n}} to a certain infinite loop space whose homology is well understood. We show that these maps are surjective on homology in
a range of degrees proportional to the genus. This detects many new torsion classes in the homology of
[`(\mathfrakM)]g, n{\overline{\mathfrak{M}}_{g, n}}. 相似文献
2.
Margarida Melo 《Mathematische Zeitschrift》2009,263(4):939-957
We study algebraic (Artin) stacks over [`(M)]g{\overline{\mathcal M}_{g}} giving a functorial way of compactifying the relative degree d Picard variety for families of stable curves. We also describe for every d the locus of genus g stable curves over which we get Deligne–Mumford stacks strongly representable over[`(M)]g{\overline{\mathcal M}_{g}} . 相似文献
3.
Amol Sasane 《Complex Analysis and Operator Theory》2012,6(2):465-475
Let
\mathbb Dn:={z=(z1,?, zn) ? \mathbb Cn:|zj| < 1, j=1,?, n}{\mathbb {D}^n:=\{z=(z_1,\ldots, z_n)\in \mathbb {C}^n:|z_j| < 1, \;j=1,\ldots, n\}}, and let
[`(\mathbbD)]n{\overline{\mathbb{D}}^n} denote its closure in
\mathbb Cn{\mathbb {C}^n}. Consider the ring
Cr([`(\mathbbD)]n;\mathbb C) = {f:[`(\mathbbD)]n? \mathbb C:f is continuous and f(z)=[`(f([`(z)]))] (z ? [`(\mathbbD)]n)}C_{\rm r}(\overline{\mathbb{D}}^n;\mathbb {C}) =\left\{f: \overline{\mathbb{D}}^n\rightarrow \mathbb {C}:f \,\, {\rm is \,\, continuous \,\, and}\,\, f(z)=\overline{f(\overline{z})} \;(z\in \overline{\mathbb{D}}^n)\right\} 相似文献
4.
Let M be
(2n-1)\mathbbCP2#2n[`(\mathbbCP)]2(2n-1)\mathbb{CP}^{2}\#2n\overline{\mathbb{CP}}{}^{2} for any integer n≥1. We construct an irreducible symplectic 4-manifold homeomorphic to M and also an infinite family of pairwise non-diffeomorphic irreducible non-symplectic 4-manifolds homeomorphic to M. We also construct such exotic smooth structures when M is
\mathbbCP2#4[`(\mathbbCP)]2\mathbb{CP}{}^{2}\#4\overline {\mathbb{CP}}{}^{2} or
3\mathbbCP2#k[`(\mathbbCP)]23\mathbb{CP}{}^{2}\#k\overline{\mathbb{CP}}{}^{2} for k=6,8,10. 相似文献
5.
We study complex analytic properties of the augmented Teichmüller spaces [`(T)]g,n{\overline{\mathcal{T}}_{g,n}} obtained by adding to the classical Teichmüller spaces Tg,n{\mathcal{T}_{g,n}} points corresponding to Riemann surfaces with nodal singularities. Unlike Tg,n{\mathcal{T}_{g,n}}, the space [`(T)]g,n{\overline{\mathcal{T}}_{g,n}} is not a complex manifold (it is not even locally compact). We prove, however, that the quotient of the augmented Teichmüller
space by any finite index subgroup of the Teichmüller modular group has a canonical structure of a complex orbifold. Using
this structure, we construct natural maps from [`(T)]{\overline{\mathcal{T}}} to stacks of admissible coverings of stable Riemann surfaces. This result is important for understanding the cup-product
in stringy orbifold cohomology. We also establish some new technical results from the general theory of orbifolds which may
be of independent interest. 相似文献
6.
B. Enriquez 《Selecta Mathematica, New Series》2001,7(3):321-407
To any field
\Bbb K \Bbb K of characteristic zero, we associate a set
(\mathbbK) (\mathbb{K}) and a group
G0(\Bbb K) {\cal G}_0(\Bbb K) . Elements of
(\mathbbK) (\mathbb{K}) are equivalence classes of families of Lie polynomials subject to associativity relations. Elements of
G0(\Bbb K) {\cal G}_0(\Bbb K) are universal automorphisms of the adjoint representations of Lie bialgebras over
\Bbb K \Bbb K . We construct a bijection between
(\mathbbK)×G0(\Bbb K) (\mathbb{K})\times{\cal G}_0(\Bbb K) and the set of quantization functors of Lie bialgebras over
\Bbb K \Bbb K . This construction involves the following steps.? 1) To each element v \varpi of
(\mathbbK) (\mathbb{K}) , we associate a functor
\frak a?\operatornameShv(\frak a) \frak a\mapsto\operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak a) from the category of Lie algebras to that of Hopf algebras;
\operatornameShv(\frak a) \operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak a) contains
U\frak a U\frak a .? 2) When
\frak a \frak a and
\frak b \frak b are Lie algebras, and
r\frak a\frak b ? \frak a?\frak b r_{\frak a\frak b} \in\frak a\otimes\frak b , we construct an element
?v (r\frak a\frak b) {\cal R}^{\varpi} (r_{\frak a\frak b}) of
\operatornameShv(\frak a)?\operatornameShv(\frak b) \operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak a)\otimes\operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak b) satisfying quasitriangularity identities; in particular,
?v(r\frak a\frak b) {\cal R}^\varpi(r_{\frak a\frak b}) defines a Hopf algebra morphism from
\operatornameShv(\frak a)* \operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak a)^* to
\operatornameShv(\frak b) \operatorname{Sh}^\varpi(\frak b) .? 3) When
\frak a = \frak b \frak a = \frak b and
r\frak a ? \frak a?\frak a r_\frak a\in\frak a\otimes\frak a is a solution of CYBE, we construct a series
rv(r\frak a) \rho^\varpi(r_\frak a) such that
?v(rv(r\frak a)) {\cal R}^\varpi(\rho^\varpi(r_\frak a)) is a solution of QYBE. The expression of
rv(r\frak a) \rho^\varpi(r_\frak a) in terms of
r\frak a r_\frak a involves Lie polynomials, and we show that this expression is unique at a universal level. This step relies on vanishing
statements for cohomologies arising from universal algebras for the solutions of CYBE.? 4) We define the quantization of a
Lie bialgebra
\frak g \frak g as the image of the morphism defined by ?v(rv(r)) {\cal R}^\varpi(\rho^\varpi(r)) , where
r ? \mathfrakg ?\mathfrakg* r \in \mathfrak{g} \otimes \mathfrak{g}^* .<\P> 相似文献
7.
Stevan Pilipovi? Nenad Teofanov Joachim Toft 《Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications》2011,17(3):374-407
Let ω,ω
0 be appropriate weight functions and q∈[1,∞]. We introduce the wave-front set, WFFLq(w)(f)\mathrm{WF}_{\mathcal{F}L^{q}_{(\omega)}}(f) of f ? S¢f\in \mathcal{S}' with respect to weighted Fourier Lebesgue space FLq(w)\mathcal{F}L^{q}_{(\omega )}. We prove that usual mapping properties for pseudo-differential operators Op (a) with symbols a in S(w0)r,0S^{(\omega _{0})}_{\rho ,0} hold for such wave-front sets. Especially we prove that
|