Monaural and interaural temporal modulation transfer functions measured with 5-kHz carriers

Temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) were measured for detection of monaural sinusoidal amplitude modulation and dynamically varying interaural level differences for a single set of listeners. For the interaural TMTFs, thresholds are the modulation depths at which listeners can just discriminate interaural envelope-phase differences of 0 and 180 degrees. A 5-kHz pure tone and narrowband noises, 30- and 300-Hz wide centered at 5 kHz, were used as carriers. In the interaural conditions, the noise carriers were either diotic or interaurally uncorrelated. The interaural TMTFs with tonal and diotic noise carriers exhibited a low-pass characteristic but the cutoff frequencies changed nonmonotonically with increasing bandwidth. The interaural TMTFs for the tonal carrier began rolling off approximately a half-octave lower than the tonal monaural TMTF (approximately 80 Hz vs approximately 120 Hz). Monaural TMTFs obtained with noise carriers showed effects attributable to masking of the signal modulation by intrinsic fluctuations of the carrier. In the interaural task with dichotic noise carriers, similar masking due to the interaural carrier fluctuations was observed. Although the mechanisms responsible for differences between the monaural and interaural TMTFs are unknown, the lower binaural TMTF cutoff frequency suggests that binaural processing exhibits greater temporal limitation than monaural processing.     

Tonal masking and frequency selectivity for the monaural and binaural hearing systems

A series of masking experiments was performed with the aim of comparing frequency selectivity for the monaural and binaural systems. The masking stimulus used in this study combined a sinusoid, which was gated simultaneously with the signal, with a continuous broadband noise. Signal frequency was fixed at 500 Hz. In one condition, the tonal masker and noise were interaurally in phase and the signal was phase reversed. In a second condition, noise, tonal masker, and signal were presented to one ear alone. Signal thresholds were obtained as a function of masker frequency for these two conditions. After making an appropriate selection of noise levels, masking functions for the monaural and binaural system conditions were found to agree closely except for a region about their tips where the binaural condition was more detectable. Two possible interpretations of these results are discussed. Either the monaural and binaural systems contain filters each which have similarly shaped skirts, or the frequency selectivity observed under both diotic and dichotic conditions (for large frequency separations of masker and signal) reflect the operation of a common peripheral filter.     

Modeling binaural loudness

A survey of data on the perception of binaurally presented sounds indicates that loudness summation across ears is less than perfect; a diotic sound is less than twice as loud as the same sound presented monaurally. The loudness model proposed by Moore et al. [J. Audio Eng. Soc. 45, 224-240 (1997)] determines the loudness of binaural stimuli by a simple summation of loudness across ears. It is described here how the model can be modified so as to give more accurate predictions of the loudness of binaurally presented sounds, including cases where the sounds at the two ears differ in level, frequency or both. The modification is based on the idea that there are inhibitory interactions between the internal representations of the signals at the two ears, such that a signal at the left ear inhibits (reduces) the loudness evoked by a signal at the right ear, and vice versa. The inhibition is assumed to spread across frequency channels. The modified model gives reasonably accurate predictions of a variety of data on the loudness of binaural stimuli, including data obtained using loudness scaling and loudness matching procedures.     

Two experiments on the spectral boundary conditions for nonlinear additivity of simultaneous masking.

The present paper describes the results from two experiments which explored the spectral boundaries for the nonlinear additivity of simultaneous masking. The first experiment measured the threshold for detection of a 2-kHz tone in the presence of two 800-Hz-wide bands of noise that had varying degrees of spectral overlap with each other and the 2-kHz signal. Results revealed an abrupt transition from linear to nonlinear additivity of masking as the spectral separation between the two maskers varied from some overlap to none. The second experiment examined alternative explanations for the data. Explanations based on restricted-listening or distortion-product-detection hypotheses were not supported by the results of this experiment. These data indicate that nonlinear additivity of simultaneous masking holds for maskers that do not overlap within the critical band centered on the signal frequency. This interpretation is also consistent with a large body of data on the monaural and binaural summation (additivity) of loudness.     

Binaural loudness summation for speech presented via earphones and loudspeaker with and without visual cues

Preliminary data [M. Epstein and M. Florentine, Ear. Hear. 30, 234-237 (2009)] obtained using speech stimuli from a visually present talker heard via loudspeakers in a sound-attenuating chamber indicate little difference in loudness when listening with one or two ears (i.e., significantly reduced binaural loudness summation, BLS), which is known as "binaural loudness constancy." These data challenge current understanding drawn from laboratory measurements that indicate a tone presented binaurally is louder than the same tone presented monaurally. Twelve normal listeners were presented recorded spondees, monaurally and binaurally across a wide range of levels via earphones and a loudspeaker with and without visual cues. Statistical analyses of binaural-to-monaural ratios of magnitude estimates indicate that the amount of BLS is significantly less for speech presented via a loudspeaker with visual cues than for stimuli with any other combination of test parameters (i.e., speech presented via earphones or a loudspeaker without visual cues, and speech presented via earphones with visual cues). These results indicate that the loudness of a visually present talker in daily environments is little affected by switching between binaural and monaural listening. This supports the phenomenon of binaural loudness constancy and underscores the importance of ecological validity in loudness research.     

Trading of intensity and interaural coherence in dichotic pitch stimuli

When a signal is added to noise in the NoSπ binaural configuration, a reduction in interaural coherence, ρ, occurs at the signal frequency and increases in tone intensity decrease ρ. Corresponding manipulations of ρ result in the perception of a phantom signal which increases in loudness as ρ decreases [Culling et al. (2001). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1020-1029]. In the present study, a narrow sub-band of noise (462-539 Hz) embedded within a broadband (0-3 kHz) diotic noise was manipulated in both intensity and ρ in a 3-interval, odd-one-out task. In the reference intervals, ρ was zero and the spectrum was flat. In the target interval, both ρ and the intensity of the target band were incremented giving opposing effects on loudness. Correct identification of the target interval followed a V-shape as a function of the size of intensity increment. The minimum of this function was often at chance performance, indicating that monaurally and binaurally evoked loudness were fully traded. These results show that reduction in ρ at a given frequency produces increased loudness at that frequency equivalent to up to 6 dB and consistent with an equalization-cancellation mechanism whose binaural output is strongly weighted compared to monaural excitation.     

Masked detection and discrimination of tone sequences under conditions of monaural and binaural masking release

Experiment 1 examined detection and discrimination of monaural four-tone sequences composed of 400-, 500-, and 625-Hz sinusoids. In the baseline conditions, the masker was monaural composed of 25-Hz-wide bands of random noise centered on 320, 400, 500, 625, and 781 Hz. In the binaural masking release conditions, the noise was presented diotically. In the monaural masking release conditions, the noise was presented to the same ear as the signal, but it was comodulated. Tones had half-amplitude durations of 30, 60, or 150 ms. There was no delay between successive tones, so the rate of frequency change depended on tone duration. Listeners discriminated between sequences composed of 500-400-625-500 Hz and 500-625-400-500 Hz. Discrimination results were poor for rapid sequences in both monaural and binaural masking release conditions relative to baseline conditions. Results from experiment 2 indicated that poor discrimination for rapid sequences could also occur in the baseline conditions, provided that the frequency separation among tonal components was small. Sluggish processing in the present paradigm was not restricted to conditions relying on binaural cues. It is argued that sluggishness may reflect a long temporal window in monaural and binaural masking release conditions or an interaction between poor cue quality and task difficulty.     

A test of the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis for tones

It is well known that a tone presented binaurally is louder than the same tone presented monaurally. It is less clear how this loudness ratio changes as a function of level. The present experiment was designed to directly test the Binaural Equal-Loudness-Ratio hypothesis (BELRH), which states that the loudness ratio between equal-SPL monaural and binaural tones is independent of SPL. If true, the BELRH implies that monaural and binaural loudness functions are parallel when plotted on a log scale. Cross-modality matches between string length and loudness were used to directly measure binaural and monaural loudness functions for nine normal listeners. Stimuli were 1-kHz 200-ms tones ranging in level from 5 dB SL to 100 dB SPL. A two-way ANOVA showed significant effects of level and mode (binaural or monaural) on loudness, but no interaction between the level and mode. Consequently, no significant variations were found in the binaural-to-monaural loudness ratio across the range of levels tested. This finding supports the BELRH. In addition, the present data were found to closely match loudness functions derived from binaural level differences for equal loudness using the model proposed by Whilby et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 3931-3939 (2006)].     

Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.

Thresholds of a 5-ms, 1-kHz signal were determined in the presence of a frozen-noise masker. The noise had a flat power spectrum between 20 Hz and 5 kHz and was presented with a duration of 300 ms. The following interaural conditions were tested with four listeners: Noise and signal monaural at the same ear (monaural condition, NmSm), noise and signal identical at both ears (diotic condition, NoSo), noise identical at both ears and signal monaural (dichotic condition, NoSm) and uncorrelated noise at the two ears and signal monaural (NuSm). The signal was presented at a fixed temporal position with respect to the frozen noise in all measurements and thresholds were determined for different starting phases of the carrier frequency of the signal. Variation of the carrier phase strongly influenced the detection in the diotic condition and the masked thresholds varied by more than 10 dB. The pattern of thresholds for the monaural condition was less variable and the thresholds were generally higher than for the diotic condition. The monaural-diotic difference for specific starting phases amounted to as much as 8 dB. Comparison measurements using running noise maskers revealed no such difference. This relation between monaural and diotic thresholds was further investigated with eight additional subjects. Again, monaural and diotic thresholds in running noise were identical, while in frozen noise, diotic thresholds were consistently lower than monaural thresholds, even when the ear with the lower NmSm threshold was compared. For the starting phase showing the largest monaural-diotic difference, the thresholds for NoSm lay between the monaural and the diotic values. At other starting phases, the NoSm threshold was clearly lower than both the NmSm and the NoSo threshold. One possible explanation of the observed monaural-diotic differences relates to contralateral efferent interaction between the right and the left hearing pathway. A prediction based on this explanation was verified in a final experiment, where frozen-noise performance for NmSm was improved by simultaneously presenting an uncorrelated running noise to the opposite ear.     

Modulation cues influence binaural masking-level difference in masking-pattern experiments

Binaural masking patterns show a steep decrease in the binaural masking-level difference (BMLD) when masker and signal have no frequency component in common. Experimental threshold data are presented together with model simulations for a diotic masker centered at 250 or 500 Hz and a bandwidth of 10 or 100 Hz masking a sinusoid interaurally in phase (S(0)) or in antiphase (S(π)). Simulations with a binaural model, including a modulation filterbank for the monaural analysis, indicate that a large portion of the decrease in the BMLD in remote-masking conditions may be due to an additional modulation cue available for monaural detection.     

Effects of flanking noise bands on the rate of growth of loudness of tones in normal and recruiting ears

Five subjects with unilateral cochlear hearing impairments and three normally hearing subjects made loudness matches between tones presented alternately to two ears, as a function of the intensity of the tone in the impaired ear (or the left ear of the normal subjects). The impaired ears showed recruitment; the rate of growth of loudness with increasing intensity was more rapid in the impaired ear than the normal ear. Presenting the tone in the impaired ear with two noise bands on either side of the tone frequency, at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio, did not abolish the recruitment. This suggests that recruitment is not caused by an abnormally rapid spread of excitation in the peripheral auditory system. At low signal-to-noise ratios, a continuous background noise reduced the loudness of the tone more than a noise gated with the tone, suggesting that the continuous noise induces adaptation to the tone. The noise had a greater effect on the loudness of the tone in normal ears than in impaired ears. It is possible that the loudness reduction of the tone in noise is mediated by suppression; suppression is weak or absent in impaired ears, and so the loudness reduction is smaller.     

The influence of middle-ear muscle contraction on auditory threshold for selected pure tones

The influence of middle-ear muscle (MEM) contraction on auditory threshold has been measured for pure tones of 0.25, 0.5, and 1.5 kHz. The reflex-activating signal was a 3-kHz pure tone. Signal paradigms were chosen to reduce or eliminate the effects of binaural loudness summation, contralateral direct masking, and contralateral remote and backward masking effects, and to maximize the influence of MEM contraction. Results indicate that under no condition was behavioral threshold affected by the MEM contraction induced using a pure-tone stimulus of 3 kHz, 105 dB SPL.     

Binaural modulation masking

Modulation thresholds were measured in three subjects for a sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (SAM) wideband noise (the signal) in the presence of a second amplitude-modulated wideband noise (the masker). In monaural conditions (Mm-Sm) masker and signal were presented to only one ear; in binaural conditions (M0-S pi) the masker was presented diotically while the phase of modulation of the SAM noise signal was inverted in one ear relative to the other. In experiment 1 masker modulation frequency (fm) was fixed at 16 Hz, and signal modulation frequency (fs) was varied from 2-512 Hz. For monaural presentation, masking generally decreased as fs diverged from fm, although there was a secondary increase in masking for very low signal modulation frequencies, as reported previously [Bacon and Grantham, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 2575-2580 (1989)]. The binaural masking patterns did not show this low-frequency upturn: binaural thresholds continued to improve as fs decreased from 16 to 2 Hz. Thus, comparing masked monaural and masked binaural thresholds, there was an average binaural advantage, or masking-level difference (MLD) of 9.4 dB at fs = 2 Hz and 5.3 dB at fs = 4 Hz. In addition, there were positive MLDs for the on-frequency condition (fm = fs = 16 Hz: average MLD = 4.4 dB) and for the highest signal frequency tested (fs = 512 Hz: average MLD = 7.3 dB). In experiment 2 the signal was a SAM noise (fs = 16 Hz), and the masker was a wideband noise, amplitude-modulated by a narrow band of noise centered at fs. There was no effect on monaural or binaural thresholds as masker modulator bandwidth was varied from 4 to 20 Hz (the average MLD remained constant at 8.0 dB), which suggests that the observed "tuning" for modulation may be based on temporal pattern discrimination and not on a critical-band-like filtering mechanism. In a final condition the masker modulator was a 10-Hz-wide band of noise centered at the 64-Hz signal modulation frequency. The average MLD in this case was 7.4 dB. The results are discussed in terms of various binaural capacities that probably play a role in binaural release from modulation masking, including detection of varying interaural intensity differences (IIDs) and discrimination of interaural correlation.     

Binaural forward and backward masking: evidence for sluggishness in binaural detection

The threshold of a short interaurally phase-inverted probe tone (20 ms, 500 Hz, S pi) was obtained in the presence of a 750-ms noise masker that was switched after 375 ms from interaurally phase-inverted (N pi) to interaurally in-phase (No). As the delay between probe-tone offset and noise phase transition is increased, the threshold decays from the N pi S pi threshold (masking level difference = 0 dB) to the No S pi threshold (masking level difference = 15 dB). The decay in this "binaural" situation is substantially slower than in a comparable "monaural" situation, where the interaural phase of the masker is held constant (N pi), but the level of the masker is reduced by 15 dB. The prolonged decay provides evidence for additional binaural sluggishness associated with "binaural forward masking." In a second experiment, "binaural backward masking" is studied by time reversing the maskers described above. Again, the situation where the phase is switched from No to N pi exhibits a slower transition than the situation with constant interaural phase (N pi) and a 15-dB increase in the level of the masker. The data for the binaural situations are compatible with the results of a related experiment, previously reported by Grantham and Wightman [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 65, 1509-1517 (1979)] and are well fit by a model that incorporates a double-sided exponential temporal integration window.     

Measurements of binaural echo suppression

The notion of binaural echo suppression that has persisted through the years states that when listening binaurally, the effects of reverberation (spectral modulation or coloration) are less noticeable than when listening with one ear only. This idea was tested in the present study by measuring thresholds for detection of an echo of a diotic noise masker with the echo presented with either a zero or a 500-musec interaural delay. With echo delays less than 5-10 msec, thresholds for the diotic echo were about 10 dB lower than for the dichotic signal, a finding opposite that of the usual binaural masking-level difference but consistent with the notion of binaural echo suppression. Additional echo-threshold measurements were made with echoes of interaurally reversed polarity, producing out-of-phase spectral modulations. The 10-15 dB increase in thresholds for the reverse-polarity echo, over those for the same-polarity echo, indicated that the apparent "hollowness" associated with spectral modulations can be partially canceled centrally. Overall, the results of this study are consistent with a model in which: (1) the monaural representations of spectral magnitude are nonlinearly compressed prior to being combined centrally; and (2) neither monaural channel can be isolated in order to perform the detection task.     

Exploring the additivity of binaural and monaural masking release

Experiment 1 examined comodulation masking release (CMR) for a 700-Hz tonal signal under conditions of N(o)S(o) (noise and signal interaurally in phase) and N(o)S(π) (noise in phase, signal out of phase) stimulation. The baseline stimulus for CMR was either a single 24-Hz wide narrowband noise centered on the signal frequency [on-signal band (OSB)] or the OSB plus, a set of flanking noise bands having random envelopes. Masking noise was either gated or continuous. The CMR, defined with respect to either the OSB or the random noise baseline, was smaller for N(o)S(π) than N(o)S(o) stimulation, particularly when the masker was continuous. Experiment 2 examined whether the same pattern of results would be obtained for a 2000-Hz signal frequency; the number of flanking bands was also manipulated (two versus eight). Results again showed smaller CMR for N(o)S(π) than N(o)S(o) stimulation for both continuous and gated masking noise. The CMR was larger with eight than with two flanking bands, and this difference was greater for N(o)S(o) than N(o)S(π). The results of this study are compatible with serial mechanisms of binaural and monaural masking release, but they indicate that the combined masking release (binaural masking-level difference and CMR) falls short of being additive.     

Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: partial loudness

This experiment examined the partial masking of periodic complex tones by a background of noise, and vice versa. The tones had a fundamental frequency (F0) of 62.5 or 250 Hz, and components were added in either cosine phase (CPH) or random phase (RPH). The tones and the noise were bandpass filtered into the same frequency region, from the tenth harmonic up to 5 kHz. The target alone was alternated with the target and the background; for the mixture, the background and target were either gated together, or the background was turned on 400 ms before, and off 200 ms after, the target. Subjects had to adjust the level of either the target alone or the target in the background so as to match the loudness of the target in the two intervals. The overall level of the background was 50 dB SPL, and loudness matches were obtained for several fixed levels of the target alone or in the background. The resulting loudness-matching functions showed clear asymmetry of partial masking. For a given target-to-background ratio, the partial loudness of a complex tone in a noise background was lower than the partial loudness of a noise in a complex tone background. Expressed as the target-to-background ratio required to achieve a given loudness, the asymmetry typically amounted to 12-16 dB. When the F0 of the complex tone was 62.5 Hz, the asymmetry of partial masking was greater for CPH than for RPH. When the F0 was 250 Hz, the asymmetry was greater for RPH than for CPH. Masked thresholds showed the same pattern as for partial masking for both F0's. Onset asynchrony had some effect on the loudness matching data when the target was just above its masked threshold, but did not significantly affect the level at which the target in the background reached its unmasked loudness. The results are interpreted in terms of the temporal structure of the stimuli.     

Effects of temporal separation and masker level on binaural analysis in forward masking.

In the present study detection under diotic (NoSo) and dichotic (NoS pi) listening conditions in a forward masking paradigm was investigated. Both the level of a noise masker and the temporal separation between the masker and a 250-Hz tone burst served as independent variables. Results showed that most of the variance in the data could be accounted for by the amount of masking in the NoSo condition, independent of the value of the temporal parameter, which itself accounted for only 1.4% of the variance that remained. Once the data were corrected for NoSo masking effectiveness, the MLD was found to decrease by only 1.4 dB as temporal separation increased from 5-100 ms, which is consistent with a very long time constant for the binaural system. Consistent with this finding, it was shown that slope changes of the growth of masking functions, for simultaneous as compared to forward masking, were similar for both the NoSo and NoS pi conditions.     

The role of monaural frequency selectivity in binaural analysis

The relation between the monaural critical band and binaural analysis was examined using an NoSm MLD paradigm, in order to resolve ambiguities about the width of the masking spectrum important for binaural detection. A 500-Hz pure-tone signal was presented with a 600-Hz-wide band of masking noise to the signal ear. Bands of noise ranging in width from 25 to 600 Hz, or noise notches (imposed on a 600-Hz-wide band centered on the signal frequency) ranging in width from 0 to 600 Hz were presented to the nonsignal ear. All noise bands and notches were centered on 500 Hz, the frequency of the signal. The effects of varying bandwidth were radically different from those of varying notchwidth: the MLD changed from zero to approximately 8 dB over a bandwidth range of 400 Hz; for notchwidths, however, the MLD changed 8 dB over a range of only 50 Hz. The results support an interpretation that the fine frequency selectivity of monaural analysis is preserved in peripheral binaural interaction, but that a relatively wide frequency range of critical bands is scanned at a later stage of binaural processing. It was suggested that the wide spectral range of binaural analysis may provide a background against which binaural differences due to the signal are detected.     

Binaural summation and lateralization of transients: a combined analysis

Subjects judged the loudness and the lateral position of dichotic transient signals, which were presented at equal and unequal levels, synchronously and asynchronously, to the two ears. Binaural loudness summation of clicks does not obey a law of linear addition: It is partial at low level and superadditive at high level. Supersummation is greater for interaurally delayed clicks than for coincidental ones. The relation between click loudness and sound pressure (over moderate SLs) can be described as a power function with a greater exponent for the binaural function. Lateral positions spread over a greater range for interaural level differences than for interaural time differences. The time-intensity trading ratio was greater than is typically reported for tones. When sound lateralization was induced by interaural time difference, but not by intensity difference, a virtually perfect negative correlation between loudness and extent of off-center displacement existed.