共查询到3条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Shi L Tong W Fang H Xie Q Hong H Perkins R Wu J Tu M Blair RM Branham WS Waller C Walker J Sheehan DM 《SAR and QSAR in environmental research》2002,13(1):69-88
Recent legislation mandates the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop a screening and testing program for potential endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), of which xenoestrogens figure prominently. Under the legislation, a large number of chemicals will undergo various in vitro and in vivo assays for their potential estrogenicity, as well as other hormonal activities. There is a crucial need for priority setting before this strategy can be effectively implemented. Here we report an integrated computational approach to priority setting using estrogen receptor (ER) binding as an example. This approach rationally integrates different predictive computational models into a "Four-Phase" scheme so that it can effectively identify potential estrogenic EDCs based on their predicted ER relative binding affinity (RBA). The system has been validated using an in-house ER binding assay dataset for 232 chemicals that was designed to have both broad structural diversity and a wide range of binding affinities. When applied to 58,000 chemicals identified by Walker et al. as candidates for endocrine disruption screening, some 9100 chemicals were predicted to bind to ER. Of these, only 3600 were expected to bind to ER at RBA values up to 100,000-fold less than that of 17beta-estradiol. The method ruled out 83% of the chemicals as non-binders with a very low rate of false negatives. We believe that the same integrated scheme will be equally applicable to endpoints of other endocrine disrupting mechanisms, e.g. androgen receptor binding. 相似文献
2.
The COREPA approach for identifying the COmmon REactivity PAttern of biologically similar chemicals was employed to upgrade the recently derived affinity pattern for high androgen receptor (AR) binding affinity. The training set consisted of 28 steroidal and nonsteroidal ligands whose AR binding affinity was determined in competitive binding assays (in terms of p K i ). The interatomic distances between nucleophilic sites and their charges providing distinct and non-overlapping integral patterns for active and inactive chemicals were assumed that it was related with the endpoint, which was under study. These stereoelectronic characteristics were used to predict p K i values of pesticide "active" formulation ingredients in an attempt to identify chemicals with potential AR binding affinity. 相似文献
3.
The fluorescence polarization binding assay (FPBA) using fluorescein-labeled estrogen tracer is a homogeneous assay applicable to both estrogen antibody and estrogen receptor-binding assays. Two estrogen-ethylendiamine fluoresceinthiobamyl (E-EDF) tracers were synthesized; estrogen-6-EDF (E-6-F) derived from 6-ketoestradiol 6-(o-carboxymethyl) oxime and estrogen-17-EDF (E-17-F) was from 17β-estradiol 17-hemisuccinate. In both FPBAs using antibody and receptor, E-6-F tracer (Rf365nm=0.58) showed a better binding response than E-17-F (Rf365nm=0.70) indicating that the 17-position of estrogen seems to play an essential role as a binding site for antibody or receptor. In the optimized conditions of FPBA for E2 using E-6-F tracer, antibody binding (Kd=9.4×10−9 M) is 50 times sensitive than receptor binding (Kd=4.6×10−8 M). Binding responses of estrogen and its related chemicals by FPBA indicate that antibody binding assay is able to screen the structural similarity of estrogen showing some response with methyltestosterone (Ki=2.1×10−5 M). On the other hand, the receptor assay is able to screen for estrogenic chemicals such as tamoxifen (Ki=4.5×10−9 M) and diethylstilbesterol (Ki=8.1×10−7 M). Therefore, E-6-F tracer is useful as a tracer for FPBA that is able to screen for chemicals structurally similar to estrogen using antibody, and that is able to screen for chemicals functionally similar to estrogen using receptor binding assay. 相似文献