| 不同燃料循环方案的可持续性与经济性分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 丁文杰, 黄欢, 戴涛, 等. 不同燃料循环方案的可持续性与经济性分析[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2019, 31: 056007. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190013 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 丁文杰 黄欢 戴涛 郭海兵 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国工程物理研究院核物理与化学研究所 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金项目L172400024 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 基于核燃料循环政策技术的成熟度，选取了一次通过循环方案(OTC)、单次复用循环方案(TTC)、快堆闭式循环方案(FRC)及混合堆闭式循环方案(HRC)四种典型的核燃料循环方案进行分析。采用平衡物质流模型对不同燃料循环方案的可持续性进行研究，基于平准化电力成本计算方法对不同方案的燃料成本和乏燃料处置成本进行分析。研究结果表明：闭式燃料循环可极大减少核废料产生; 燃料可自持的FRC方案及HRC方案可使用贫铀做燃料而不消耗天然铀; 仅考虑燃料成本和乏燃料处置成本时，HRC方案的经济性最高而TTC方案的经济性最差。
|
| 关 键 词： | 燃料循环 平衡物质流 可持续性 平准化电力成本 经济性 |
| 收稿时间： | 2019-01-15 |
| 修稿时间： | 2019-02-24 |
Sustainability and economy analysis of different fuel cycle options |
| |
| Ding Wenjie, Huang Huan, Dai Tao, et al. Sustainability and economy analysis of different fuel cycle options[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2019, 31: 056007. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB201931.190013 |
| |
| Authors: | Ding Wenjie Huang Huan Dai Tao Guo Haibing |
| |
| Affiliation: | Institute of Nuclear Physics and Chemistry, CAEP, Mianyang 621900, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Based on the technology maturity, four typical nuclear fuel cycle options, namely, OTC, TTC, FRC and HRC, were selected for analysis. The sustainability of different fuel cycle options was studied using the balanced mass flow model, and the fuel cost and spent fuel disposal cost of different options were evaluated based on levelized cost of electricity calculation method. The results show that closed fuel cycle can greatly reduce the production of nuclear waste. And the FRC option with fuel self-supporting as well as the HRC option can use depleted uranium without consuming natural uranium. Besides, the HRC option is the most economical while the TTC option is the worst, considering only fuel cost and spent fuel disposal cost. |
| |
| Keywords: | fuel cycle balanced mass flow sustainability levelized cost of electricity economy |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《强激光与粒子束》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《强激光与粒子束》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
