| 300 MW等级燃煤机组煤粉炉与循环流化床锅炉汞排放特性比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | MW等级燃煤机组煤粉炉与循环流化床锅炉汞排放特性比较.300 MW等级燃煤机组煤粉炉与循环流化床锅炉汞排放特性比较[J].燃料化学学报,2017,45(8):1009-1016. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | MW等级燃煤机组煤粉炉与循环流化床锅炉汞排放特性比较 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. Jinneng Electric Power Group Co., Ltd., Taiyuan 030002, China;
2. Shanxi Province Engineering Research Center of Clean Coal Combustion for Power Generation (Under Preparation), Taiyuan 030006, China;
3. Beijing Key Laboratory of Emission Surveillance and Control for Thermal Power Generation, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China;
4. Jinneng Group Changzhi Thermoelectricity Co., Ltd., Changzhi 046011, China |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金联合基金项目（U1610254），2015年度山西省科技重大专项（MD2015-01）和中央高校基本科研业务费（2017MS020）资助 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 选取某地330 MW煤粉炉(PC炉)和350 MW循环流化床锅炉(CFB)的燃煤电厂进行汞排放特性的研究。采用30B法和安大略法对两个燃煤电厂的除尘器入口、除尘器出口、脱硫塔出口和湿式电除尘器出口的烟气进行了取样和汞浓度分析,采集了入炉煤和副产物底渣、飞灰及脱硫石膏样品。通过样品中汞含量的分布,探讨了PC炉与CFB锅炉机组现有污染物控制设备对汞的协同脱除作用。结果表明,350 MW CFB电厂除尘器出口烟气平均汞浓度降低至0.43μg/m~3,布袋除尘器对汞的捕获效率达到98.9%,相应的燃烧副产物中飞灰是汞的主要富集对象。对于330 MW PC炉电厂,除尘器入口和除尘器出口烟气汞浓度均高于350 MW CFB电厂,烟气汞浓度从除尘器入口、除尘器出口到脱硫塔出口依次降低,在脱硫塔出口烟气汞浓度降低至0.42μg/m~3,静电除尘器和湿式脱硫塔对烟气汞的捕获效率分别为75.0%和22.4%,相应的产物中飞灰和脱硫石膏中汞都有一定程度的富集。
|
| 关 键 词： | 燃煤电厂 汞排放 污染物监测 煤粉炉 循环流化床 |
| 收稿时间： | 2017-01-24 |
Comparison of mercury emission from around 300 MW coal-fired power generation units between pulverized boiler and circulating fluidized-bed boiler |
| |
| WEI Shao-qing,TENG Yang,LI Xiao-hang,SU Yin-jiao,YANG Wei,ZHANG Kai.Comparison of mercury emission from around 300 MW coal-fired power generation units between pulverized boiler and circulating fluidized-bed boiler[J].Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology,2017,45(8):1009-1016. |
| |
| Authors: | WEI Shao-qing TENG Yang LI Xiao-hang SU Yin-jiao YANG Wei ZHANG Kai |
| |
| Abstract: | The mercury emission characteristics are investigated and compared at a coal-fired power plant with 330 MW pulverized coal (PC) boiler and a coal-fired power plant with 350 MW circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boiler. EPA 30B method and Ontario method were used to test the mercury concentration in flue gas at the inlet of dust extraction unit, outlet of dust extraction unit, outlet of desulfurization unit, and outlet of wet dust extraction unit. The feed coal, bottom ash, fly ash and gypsum sample were collected at the same time together with gas sampling. The effect of the existing air pollution control device on mercury control was discussed toward PC and CFB units based on the mercury distribution data. The results show that the mercury concentration at fabric filter (FF) outlet of CFB power plant is decreased to 0.43 μg/m3 and the mercury removal efficiency of FF reaches 98.9%. A predominating portion of mercury is enriched in fly ash. With respect to a PC power plant, the mercury concentrations at inlet and outlet of ESP are both higher than those in the CFB power plant, and the mercury concentration gradually drops from electrostatic precipitator (ESP) inlet to wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) outlet. The mercury concentration reaches a low value of 0.42 μg/m3 at the WFGD outlet, and the mercury removal efficiency of ESP and WFGD is 75.0% and 22.4%, respectively, which can meet the ultra low mercury emission controlling. |
| |
| Keywords: | coal-fired power plant mercury emission mercury pollution monitor pulverized coal boiler circulating fluidized bed |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《燃料化学学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《燃料化学学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
