| 地球化学样品中钒检测方法的对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王文杰,刘安安.地球化学样品中钒检测方法的对比[J].分析测试技术与仪器,2018(3):151-158. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王文杰 刘安安 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 甘肃省有色金属地质勘查局张掖矿产勘查院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 地球化学样品中钒的测定方法主要有原子吸收光谱法、等离子体发射光谱法(ICP-AES)、电感耦合等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS)和X射线荧光光谱法.选用国家一级标样,分别用4种方法测定样品含量值,依次对方法检出限、准确度、精密度、加标回收率作比较.经对比,4种方法测定值与推荐值都基本吻合.等离子体发射光谱法检出限低,线性范围更宽,准确度与精密度更好,更适用于地球化学样品中钒批量的测试.
|
| 关 键 词： | 地球化学样品 钒 原子吸收光谱法 等离子体发射光谱法 电感耦合等离子体质谱法 X射线荧光光谱法 |
| 收稿时间： | 2018/8/5 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2018/8/30 0:00:00 |
Comparison on Determination Methods of Vanadium in Geochemical Samples |
| |
| WANG Wen-jie and LIU An-an.Comparison on Determination Methods of Vanadium in Geochemical Samples[J].Analysis and Testing Technology and Instruments,2018(3):151-158. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Wen-jie and LIU An-an |
| |
| Institution: | Zhangye Geo-Mine Survey Instisute of Non-Ferrous Metal Geological Exploration Bureau, Zhangye 734000, Gansu China and Zhangye Geo-Mine Survey Instisute of Non-Ferrous Metal Geological Exploration Bureau, Zhangye 734000, Gansu China |
| |
| Abstract: | The determination methods of vanadium in geochemical samples include atomic absorption spectrometry, plasma emission spectrometry(ICP-AES), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry(ICP-MS), and X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Four national standard samples were used to determine the content of samples, and the detection limits, accuracy, precision and recovery rates were compared. By comparison, the measured values of the four methods are basically in agreement with the recommended values. The plasma emission spectrometric method has a low detection limit, a wider linear range, a better accuracy and precision, and is more suitable for testing vanadium batches in geochemical samples. |
| |
| Keywords: | geochemical samples vanadium atomic absorption spectrometry ICP-AES ICP-MS X-ray fluorescence spectrometry |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《分析测试技术与仪器》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《分析测试技术与仪器》下载免费的PDF全文 |
