首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

悬浮固化-分散液液微萃取-液相色谱-串联质谱测定纺织废水中磷系阻燃剂
引用本文:何静,叶曦雯,汤志旭,牛增元,罗忻,邹立.悬浮固化-分散液液微萃取-液相色谱-串联质谱测定纺织废水中磷系阻燃剂[J].色谱,2020,38(6):679-686.
作者姓名:何静  叶曦雯  汤志旭  牛增元  罗忻  邹立
作者单位:1 中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院, 山东 青岛 2661002 青岛海关技术中心, 山东 青岛 266003
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(NQI2016YFF0203702)
摘    要:建立了悬浮固化-分散液液微萃取结合液相色谱-串联质谱测定纺织废水中5种痕量磷系阻燃剂的方法。通过对萃取过程中萃取剂、分散剂的种类与体积、盐浓度、溶液pH值等对萃取效率的影响因素优化,确立了最佳萃取条件。采用了密度小于水的十一烷醇(400 μL)为萃取剂,甲醇(300 μL)为分散剂,控制溶液pH值在6~9之间,NaCl添加量为2 g,萃取时间为涡旋2 min。在优化的萃取条件下,该方法在2~100 μg/L均有良好的线性关系,相关系数大于0.995,除二(2,3-二溴丙基)磷酸酯(BIS)的检出限为5 μg/L外,三(2-氯乙基)磷酸酯(TCEP)、三(1,3-二氯-异丙基)磷酸酯(TDCP)、三(1-氮丙啶基)氧化膦(TEPA)和三(2,3-二溴丙基)磷酸酯(TRIS)的检出限均为2 μg/L。后整理、染色和印花等实际废水样品加标试验表明,方法的平均回收率为71.6%~114.5%,RSD为2.7%~11.2%(n=6)。对11个样品进行检测,其中3个废水样品检出TCEP与TDCP化合物,含量为2.6~3.4 μg/L。本方法简单,快速,灵敏度好且环保绿色,能够对纺织废水中的5种痕量磷系阻燃剂进行准确的定性与定量检测。

关 键 词:悬浮固化  分散液液微萃取  超高效液相色谱-串联质谱  磷系阻燃剂  纺织废水  
收稿时间:2019-10-27

Determination of organophosphorus flame retardants in textile wastewater by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop followed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
HE Jing,YE Xiwen,TANG Zhixu,NIU Zengyuan,LUO Xin,ZOU Li.Determination of organophosphorus flame retardants in textile wastewater by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop followed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J].Chinese Journal of Chromatography,2020,38(6):679-686.
Authors:HE Jing  YE Xiwen  TANG Zhixu  NIU Zengyuan  LUO Xin  ZOU Li
Institution:1 College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China2 Qingdao Customs Technology Center, Qingdao 266003, China
Abstract:A rapid method for the determination of five organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs) in textile wastewater was established by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) based on solidification of floating organic drop (SFO) coupled with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The analytes were extracted from the water samples by SFO-DLLME, which was performed using a mixture of an extraction solvent that was less dense than water, 1-undecanol, and a dispersive solvent, methanol. The influences of the SFO-DLLME parameters on the extraction efficiencies were studied. 1-Undecanol (extraction solvent, 400 μL) and methanol (dispersive solvent, 300 μL) were added to textile wastewater (containing 2 g NaCl) with pH between 6 and 9, and the solution was shaken for 2 min. Under optimum conditions, the linear ranges of the proposed method were from 2 μg/L to 100 μg/L with correlation coefficients (R2) above 0.99 for all the analytes. The limits of detection (S/N=3) ranged from 2 μg/L to 5 μg/L. The precision of the method was evaluated in terms of repeatability; the relative standard deviations varied from 2.7% to 11.2% (n=6). The relative recoveries ranged from 71.6% to 117.6% for all analytes. Only 3 of the 11 selected samples were tested positive for OPFRs, and the total concentrations of OPFRs in them were in the range of 2.6-3.4 μg/L. Hence, this method is accurate, environmentally friendly, fast, and convenient for the routine analysis of OPFRs in textile wastewater.
Keywords:solidification of floating organic drop (SFO)  dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME)  ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS)  organophosphorus flame retardants (OPFRs)  textile wastewater  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《色谱》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《色谱》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号