首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

直角和贴体坐标系下两种格子Boltzmann方法的比较研究
引用本文:李维仲,冯玉静,董波,张宁.直角和贴体坐标系下两种格子Boltzmann方法的比较研究[J].计算力学学报,2014,31(3):357-362.
作者姓名:李维仲  冯玉静  董波  张宁
作者单位:大连理工大学 海洋能源利用与节能教育部重点实验室, 大连 116023;大连理工大学 海洋能源利用与节能教育部重点实验室, 大连 116023;大连理工大学 海洋能源利用与节能教育部重点实验室, 大连 116023;大连理工大学 海洋能源利用与节能教育部重点实验室, 大连 116023
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51276030,51206017)资助项目.
摘    要:采用格子Boltzmann方法(LBM)和改进的插值格子Boltzmann方法(GILBM)研究了45°斜方腔的顶盖驱动流和Roach通道内的流动特性,并与基准解进行了对比。结果表明,对于45°斜方腔的顶盖驱动流,当雷诺数较小时,两种方法的计算结果与基准解吻合较好;但当雷诺数较大时,采用LBM的计算结果准确性降低,而基于GILBM方法得到的结果准确度升高,且计算稳定性好。对于Roach通道内的流体流动而言,两种方法的计算精度和复杂边界的复杂程度与雷诺数大小有关。根据流场边界形状的复杂程度,网格划分与计算精确度的不同要求,两种方法各有利弊。

关 键 词:LBM  GILBM  °斜方腔  Roach通道  雷诺数
收稿时间:2013/3/11 0:00:00
修稿时间:2013/4/18 0:00:00

Comparison of two lattice Boltzmann schemes in cartesian coordinate and body-fitted coordinate system
LI Wei-zhong,FENG Yu-jing,DONG Bo and ZHANG Ning.Comparison of two lattice Boltzmann schemes in cartesian coordinate and body-fitted coordinate system[J].Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics,2014,31(3):357-362.
Authors:LI Wei-zhong  FENG Yu-jing  DONG Bo and ZHANG Ning
Institution:Key Laboratory of Ocean Energy Utilization and Energy Conservation of Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China;Key Laboratory of Ocean Energy Utilization and Energy Conservation of Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China;Key Laboratory of Ocean Energy Utilization and Energy Conservation of Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China;Key Laboratory of Ocean Energy Utilization and Energy Conservation of Ministry of Education, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China
Abstract:In this paper,Lattice Boltzmann Method (LBM) and generalized form of interpolation lattice Boltzmann method (GILBM) are applied to study the inclined cavity with a tilt angle of 45° lid-driven flow and fluid flow characteristics in Roach channel.The simulations are compared with the benchmark solutions.It is found out that for the inclined cavity with a tilt angle of 45° lid-driven flow,when the Reynolds number is small,the results obtained from the two methods are in good agreement with the benchmark solution.As the Reynolds number increases,the accuracy of simulation based on LBM reduces,while the accuracy of the consequence obtained from GILBM rises with good stability.In terms of fluid flow in the Roach channel,the accuracy of the two methods is related to complexity of the boundary and Reynolds number.According to the different requirements of the complexity of the boundary shape,meshing and accuracy,the two methods have some advantages and disadvantages respectively.
Keywords:LBM  GILBM  inclined cavity with a tilt angle of 45°  Roach channel  Reynolds number
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《计算力学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《计算力学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号