首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基本解方法与边界节点法求解Helmholtz方程的比较研究
引用本文:姜欣荣,陈文.基本解方法与边界节点法求解Helmholtz方程的比较研究[J].计算力学学报,2011,28(3):338-344.
作者姓名:姜欣荣  陈文
作者单位:河海大学,工程力学系,工程与科学数值模拟软件中心,南京,210098
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(10672051)资助项目.
摘    要:基本解方法和边界节点法是基于径向基函数的两种重要无网格边界离散数值技术。针对Helmholtz方程,本文比较研究这两种数值方法在不同计算区域问题上的计算精度、插值矩阵对称性、病态性及计算成本。数值试验结果表明,两种方法都可以有效求解边界数据准确的Helmholtz问题。在数值离散过程中,两种方法都可以通过调整配置点的位...

关 键 词:基本解方法  边界节点法  径向基函数  Helmholtz方程
收稿时间:2009/11/13 0:00:00
修稿时间:9/2/2010 12:00:00 AM

Method of fundamental solution and boundary knot method for helmholtz equations: a comparative study
JIANG Xin-rong and CHEN Wen.Method of fundamental solution and boundary knot method for helmholtz equations: a comparative study[J].Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics,2011,28(3):338-344.
Authors:JIANG Xin-rong and CHEN Wen
Institution:Department of Engineering Mechanics, Hohai University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210098;Department of Engineering Mechanics, Hohai University, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210098
Abstract:Both the method of fundamental solution (MFS) and the boundary knot method (BKM) are RBF-based boundary-type meshless methods. This paper makes a comparative study of these two numerical methods in solving the Helmholtz equation under various regions, in terms of accuracy, symmetry, ill-conditioned interpolation matrix, and computational cost. Numerical results show that both methods can effectively solve the Helmholtz problems. In the discretization process, both methods can reduce the condition numbers by adjusting the location of the source points and collocation points. It is noted that the BKM interpolation matrix is symmetric while the MFS one is not. In addition, the BKM demands less CPU time than the MFS and requires a half memory of the MFS.
Keywords:method of fundamental solution  boundary knot method  radial basis function  Helmholtz equation
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《计算力学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《计算力学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号