On two distinct types of drag-reducing fluids,diameter scaling,and turbulent profiles

Two distinct scaling procedures were found to predict the diameter effect for different types of drag-reducing fluids. The first one, which correlates the relative drag reduction (DR) with flow bulk velocity (V), appears applicable to fluids that comply with the 3-layers velocity profile model. This model has been applied to many polymer solutions; but the drag reduction versus V scaling procedure was successfully tested here for some surfactant solutions as well. This feature, together with our temperature profile measurements, suggest that these surfactant solutions may also show this type of 3-layers velocity profiles (3L-type fluids).The second scaling procedure is based on a correlation of τ_w versus V, which is found to be applicable to some surfactant solutions but appears to be applicable to some polymer solutions as well. The distinction between the two procedures is therefore not simply one between polymer and surfactants. It was also seen that the τ_w versus V correlation applies to fluids which show a stronger diameter effect than those scaling with the other procedure. Moreover, for fluids that scale according to the τ_w versus V procedure, the drag-reducing effects extend throughout the whole pipe cross section even at conditions close to the onset of drag reduction, in contrast to the behavior of 3L fluids. This was shown by our measurements of temperature profiles which exhibit a fan-type pattern for the τ_w versus V fluids (F-type), unlike the 3-layers profile for the fluids well correlated by drag reduction versus V. Finally, mechanically-degraded polymer solutions appeared to behave in a manner intermediate between the 3L and F fluids.Furthermore, we also showed that a given fluid in a given pipe may transition from a Type A drag reduction at low Reynolds number to a Type B at high Reynolds number, the two types apparently being more representative of different levels of fluid/flow interactions than of fundamentally different phenomena of drag reduction. After transition to the non-asymptotic Type B regime, our results suggest that, without degradation, the friction becomes independent of pipe diameter and that the drag reduction level becomes also approximately independent of the Reynolds number, in a strong analogy to Newtonian flow.