首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

工作电压对N36锆合金表面微弧氧化涂层磨蚀性能的影响
引用本文:李正阳,刘睿睿,张伟,杨忠波,崔学军,蔡振兵.工作电压对N36锆合金表面微弧氧化涂层磨蚀性能的影响[J].摩擦学学报,2021,41(6):880-889.
作者姓名:李正阳  刘睿睿  张伟  杨忠波  崔学军  蔡振兵
作者单位:1.西南交通大学 摩擦学研究所, 四川 成都 610031
基金项目:国家自然科学基金重点项目(U2067221), 四川省高校科研创新团队项目(18TD0005)和西南交通大学优秀博士学位论文培育项目.
摘    要:通过微弧氧化(MAO)设备在锆(Zr)合金表面制备氧化陶瓷涂层. 研究工作电压对Zr合金表面MAO涂层形貌、硬度、粗糙度、元素分布和相结构的影响. 分析工作电压对Zr合金表面MAO涂层腐蚀和磨蚀性能的影响. 结果表明:MAO涂层表面具有典型的多孔和火山熔融特征,主要由m-ZrO2和t-ZrO2相组成. MAO涂层的粗糙度比基体高,且在电压为340 V时的粗糙度最高,达到1.36 μm. MAO涂层可分为内层致密层和外层多孔层,涂层厚度随着工作电压的增加而增加,厚度为5~9 μm. 电压为260 V的MAO涂层的结合强度最高,达到44.3 N. MAO涂层相比较于基体具有更好的耐腐蚀性能,电压为260 V的MAO涂层具有最高的自腐蚀电位(?0.205 V)和最低的腐蚀电流密度(6.24×10?9 A/cm2). 这是因为电压为260 V的MAO涂层具有最致密的结构,而内层致密层可以阻碍腐蚀液进入基体. MAO涂层的主要磨损机理为磨粒磨损和氧化磨损. 工作电压为260 V的MAO涂层的磨损率仅为Zr合金基体的1/4. 

关 键 词:锆合金    微弧氧化    磨蚀    磨损机理    腐蚀
收稿时间:2020-10-22

Effect of Voltage on Fretting Corrosion Behavior of Micro-Arc Oxidation Coating on N36 Zirconium Alloy
Institution:1.Tribology Research Institute, Southwest Jiaotong University, Sichuan Chengdu 610031, China2.National Key Laboratory for Nuclear Fuel and Material, Nuclear Power Institute of China, Sichuan Chengdu 610213, China3.School of Materials Science and Engineering, Sichuan University of Science and Engineering, Sichuan Zigong 643000, China
Abstract:The oxide ceramic coating was prepared on zirconium (Zr) alloy by micro-arc oxidation (MAO) equipment. The electrolyte was a silicate system, which was composed of 15 g/L KOH, 15 g/L Na2SiO3, and 3 g/L NaF. The oxidation time and frequency were 15 min and 300 Hz, and the duty ratio was adjusted to 30%. Effects of voltage (220 V, 260 V, 300 V, and 340 V) on the morphology, hardness, roughness, element distribution, and phase structure of MAO coating were studied by scanning electron microscopy combined with energy dispersive spectroscopy, white light interferometer instrument, and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Effect of voltage on the corrosion and fretting corrosion behavior of MAO coating on Zr alloy was analyzed by fretting wear test rig combined with an electrochemical workstation. The test solution was 1 200 mg/L H3BO3 and 2.2 mg/L LiOH. The fretting parameters were selected as the displacement amplitude of 100 μm, the load of 20 N, and the frequency of 5 Hz. The test time was 2 000 s for 10000 cycles. Before the fretting corrosion test, the sample was immersed for 500 s to obtain a stable electrochemical state. The results showed that the surface morphology of MAO coating presented typical porous and volcanic melting characteristics. With the increase of voltage, the volcanic melting gradually extruded and the size of pores in coating surface increased. The MAO coating was mainly composed of Zr, m-ZrO2, and t-ZrO2, and the high-temperature phase of t-ZrO2 existed in coating, indicating that high stress in coating stabilized the phase of t-ZrO2. The MAO coating presented a higher roughness and hardness than substrate, and MAO coating with 260 V had the highest roughness value of 1.36 μm. The increase of hardness in coating was caused by the high hardness of ZrO2 ceramics. MAO coating can be divided into the inner dense layer and outer porous layer according to the cross-section morphology and EDS line-scan results. The oxide layer had a very obvious distinction from substrate, and no cracks and defects at the interface between coating and substrate were observed. The corrosion resistance and fretting wear resistance of MAO coating were determined by the density of inner layer and the bonding strength with substrate. The thickness of MAO coating increased with the increase of working voltage, and the thickness was about 5~9 μm. The MAO coating with 260 V had the highest bonding strength of 44.3 N. Because MAO coating generated more cracks and defects under high working voltage, resulting in the decrease of bonding strength. Compared with the substrate, MAO coating had better corrosion resistance, and the MAO coating with 260 V had a highest corrosion potential (?0.205 V) and lowest corrosion current density (6.24×10?9 A/cm2). Because the MAO coating with 260 V had the densest structure, and the inner dense layer prevented the corrosion solution from entering into the surface of substrate. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy results indicated that the arc radius of MAO coating was larger than that of Zr alloy substrate. According to the phase angle, three time constants were observed. The high frequency regions were corresponding to the properties of solution, and the medium frequency regions was belonging to the outer porous layer, while the low frequency regions represented the inner dense layer. Open circuit potential (OCP) dropped sharply to a lower value when the fretting test began. Because the mechanical wear destroyed the stable electrochemical state of coating. With the progress of fretting test, the formation rate and removal rate of passivation film reached a new dynamic balance. As a result, OCP values for all MAO coatings began to stabilize. After the initial rapid rose, the friction coefficient value quickly reached a stable state. MAO coating with 340 V had the highest friction coefficient value. All the MAO coatings showed obvious furrow traces on the wear surface, and many wear debris with different sizes were non-uniform distributed on the wear surface. The main wear mechanism of MAO coating was abrasive wear and oxidation wear. The 3D profiles of all the wear scar showed obvious cave and the wear damage of Zr alloy was the largest. The wear damage of MAO coating was relatively slight, and the wear depth was shallow, indicating that MAO coating can significantly improve the wear resistance of Zr alloy. The wear rate of Zr alloy was 2.14×105 μm3/(Nm), and the wear rate of MAO coating with 260 V was only 1 / 4 of that Zr alloy substrate. 
Keywords:
点击此处可从《摩擦学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《摩擦学学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号