首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Algebraic multilevel preconditioning methods. I
Authors:O Axclsson  P S Vassilevski
Institution:(1) Department of Mathematics, Catholic University, Toernooiveld, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands;(2) Present address: Institute of Mathematics and from Center of Informatics and Computer Technology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
Abstract:Summary A recursive way of constructing preconditioning matrices for the stiffness matrix in the discretization of selfadjoint second order elliptic boundary value problems is proposed. It is based on a sequence of nested finite element spaces with the usual nodal basis functions. Using a nodeordering corresponding to the nested meshes, the finite element stiffness matrix is recursively split up into two-level block structures and is factored approximately in such a way that any successive Schur complement is replaced (approximated) by a matrix defined recursively and thereform only implicitely given. To solve a system with this matrix we need to perform a fixed number (v) of iterations on the preceding level using as an iteration matrix the preconditioning matrix already defined on that level. It is shown that by a proper choice of iteration parameters it suffices to use 
$$v > \left( {1 - \gamma ^2 } \right)^{ - \tfrac{1}{2}} $$
iterations for the so constructedv-foldV-cycle (wherev=2 corresponds to aW-cycle) preconditioning matrices to be spectrally equivalent to the stiffness matrix. The conditions involve only the constant lambda in the strengthened C.-B.-S. inequality for the corresponding two-level hierarchical basis function spaces and are therefore independent of the regularity of the solution for instance. If we use successive uniform refinements of the meshes the method is of optimal order of computational complexity, if 
$$\gamma ^2< \tfrac{8}{9}$$
. Under reasonable assumptions of the finite element mesh, the condition numbers turn out to be so small that there are in practice few reasons to use an accelerated iterative method like the conjugate gradient method, for instance.Dedicated to the memory of Peter HenriciThe research of the second author reported here was supported in part by the Committee of Science, Bulgaria, under Grant No. 55/26.03.87
Keywords:AMS(MOS): 65F10  65N20  65N30  CR: G1  3
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号