| 多指标决策的层次分析与模糊分析相结合的综合评价法 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 樊铭渠,刘嵬,等.多指标决策的层次分析与模糊分析相结合的综合评价法[J].运筹与管理,1999,8(4):70-74. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 樊铭渠 刘嵬 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东科技大学济南校区电系!山东济南250031(樊铭渠，唐林炜)，国家人事部人事与人才科学研究所!北京100101(刘嵬)，山东电力集团公司!山东济南250001(高健) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 心理测评中各项指标均带有模糊性,并且由于指标多,问题复杂,用这些指标来分析、评价人的素质、潜力等,基本上还是依赖专家逐个分析,得出评价结果。文章通过层次分析法来体现专家思维中的偏好信息,由贴近度来量度个体测试数据与理想区域的综合接近程度,并通过两者结合给出优劣排序,为专家决策提供一个综合的带有偏好信息的评价结果
|
| 关 键 词： | 多指标决策 层次分析法 贴近度 |
The Comprehensive Method with Both Analytical Hierarchy Process Fuzzy Analysis |
| |
| FAN Ming qu ,TANG Lin wei ,LIU Wei ,GAO Jian.The Comprehensive Method with Both Analytical Hierarchy Process Fuzzy Analysis[J].Operations Research and Management Science,1999,8(4):70-74. |
| |
| Authors: | FAN Ming qu TANG Lin wei LIU Wei GAO Jian |
| |
| Institution: | FAN Ming qu 1,TANG Lin wei 1,LIU Wei 2,GAO Jian 3 |
| |
| Abstract: | Because of fuzziness and complexity of psychometrics the evaluation of people's qualities and potential are usually carried out by individual specialists. In this paper AHP method adopted to reflect specialists preference and nearness degree is introduced to measure how close the individual test data and ideal ranges are. Finally a comprehensive ordering list, which includes preference data, will be brought out by the combination of the above two methods for the purpose of serving as the decision reference. |
| |
| Keywords: | multiple attribute decision making AHP closeness degree |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
