Quantum chemistry studies on the Ru-M interactions and the P NMR in [Ru(CO)3(Ph2Ppy)2(MCl2)] (M = Zn, Cd, Hg)

To study the Ru-M interactions and their effects on ³¹P NMR, complexes Ru(CO)₃(Ph₂Ppy)₂] (py = pyridine) (1) and Ru(CO)₃(Ph₂Ppy)₂MCl₂] (M = Zn, 2; Cd, 3; Hg, 4) were calculated by density functional theory (DFT) PBE0 method. Moreover, the PBE0-GIAO method was employed to calculate the ³¹P chemical shifts in complexes. The calculated ³¹P chemical shifts in 1-3 follow 2 > 3 > 1 which are consistent to experimental results, proving that PBE0-GIAO method adopted in this study is reasonable. This method is employed to predict the ³¹P chemical shift in designed complex 4. Compared with 1, the ³¹P chemical shifts in 2-4 vary resulting from adjacent Ru-M interactions. The Ru → M or Ru ← M charge-transfer interactions in 2-4 are revealed by second-order perturbation theory. The strength order of Ru → M interactions is the same as that of the P-Ru → M delocalization with Zn > Cd > Hg, which coincides with the order of ³¹P NMR chemical shifts. The interaction of Ru → M, corresponding to the delocalization from 4d orbital of Ru to s valence orbital of M²⁺, results in the delocalization of P-Ru → M, which decreases the electron density of P nucleus and causes the downfield ³¹P chemical shifts. Except 2, the back-donation effect of Ru ← M, arising from the delocalization from s valence orbital of M²⁺ to the valence orbital of Ru, is against the P-Ru → M delocalization and results in the upfield ³¹P chemical shifts in 4. Meanwhile, the binding energies indicate that complex 4 is stable and can be synthesized experimentally. However, as complex Ru(CO)₃(Ph₂Ppy)₂HgCl]⁺5 is more stable than 4, the reaction of 1 with HgCl₂ only gave 5 experimentally.