Role of 2‐oxo and 2‐thioxo modifications on the proton affinity of histidine and fragmentation reactions of protonated histidine

A combination of electrospray ionisation (ESI), multistage and high‐resolution mass spectrometry experiments was used to compare the gas‐phase chemistry of the amino acids histidine (1), 2‐oxo‐histidine (2), and 2‐thioxo‐histidine (3). Collision‐induced dissociation (CID) of all three different proton‐bound heterodimers of these amino acids led to the relative gas‐phase proton affinity order of: histidine >2‐thioxo‐histidine >2‐oxo‐histidine. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations confirm this order, with the lower proton affinities of the oxidised histidine derivatives arising from their ability to adopt the more stable keto/thioketo tautomeric forms. All protonated amino acids predominately fragment via the combined loss of H₂O and CO to yield a₁ ions. Protonated 2 and 3 also undergo other small molecule losses including NH₃ and the imine HN=CHCO₂H. The observed differences in the fragmentation pathways are rationalised through DFT calculations, which reveal that while modification of histidine via the introduction of the oxygen atom in 2 or the sulfur atom in 3 does not affect the barriers against the loss of H₂O+CO, barriers against the losses of NH₃ and HN=CHCO₂H are lowered relative to protonated histidine. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.