|
|||||
|
|
Osteomyelitis: Sensitivity of 0.064 T MRI, three-phase bone scanning and indium scanning with biopsy proof |
|
| Authors: | Michael R Williamson Ronald W Quenzer Robert D Rosenberg Andrew J Meholic Brian Eisenberg Mary C Espinosa and Michael F Hartshorne |
| Institution: | a University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Albuquerque, NM 87131-5336, USA b University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Albuquerque, NM 87131-5336, USA c Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Department of Radiology, 2100 Ridgecrest Drive SE, Albuquerque, NM 87108, USA d Virginia Mason Clinic, 1100 9th Avenue, P.O. Box 900 C-5S, Seattle, WA 98111, USA |
| Abstract: | We compared the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a 0.064 T permanent magnet, three-phase bone scanning, and indium-labeled white blood cell (111In-WBC) scanning, to diagnose osteomyelitis. Twenty-three patients underwent biopsy. All patients were examined at presentation with all three modalities. Sensitivities for each modality were calculated using biopsy as a gold standard. The results were 72% for MRI, 68% for bone scan, and 45% for 111In-WBC. Specificities were not calculated because of lack of negative biopsies. MRI was as sensitive as bone scanning in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis. All modalities had lower than previously reported sensitivities for imaging osteomyelitis. |
| Keywords: | Author Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging Radionuclide imaging Comparative studies Osteomyelitis Bone infection Indium radioisotopes Technetium radioisotopes Indium-111 Technetium-99m |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ | |