{2, 3}‐perfect m‐cycle systems are equationally defined for m = 5, 7, 8, 9, and 11 only |
| |
Authors: | E M Li Marzi C C Lindner F Rania R M Wilson |
| |
Abstract: | An m‐cycle system (S,C) of order n is said to be {2,3}‐perfect provided each pair of vertices is connected by a path of length 2 in an m‐cycle of C and a path of length 3 in an m‐cycle of C. The class of {2,3}‐perfect m‐cycle systems is said to be equationally defined provided, there exists a variety of quasigroups V with the property that a finite quasigroup (Q, , \, /) belongs to V if and only if its multiplicative (Q, ) part can be constructed from a {2,3}‐perfect m‐cycle system using the 2‐construction (a a = a for all a ∈ Q and if a ≠ b, a b = c and b a = d if and only if the m‐cycle (…, d, x, a, b, y, c, …) ∈ C). The object of this paper is to show that the class of {2,3}‐perfect m‐cycle systems cannot be equationally defined for all m ≥ 10, m ≠ 11. This combined with previous results shows that {2, 3}‐perfect m‐cycle systems are equationally defined for m = 5, 7, 8, 9, and 11 only. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
| |
Keywords: | m‐cycle system {2 3}‐perfect equationally defined |
|
|