Bell’s Theorem,Many Worlds and Backwards-Time Physics: Not Just a Matter of Interpretation |
| |
Authors: | Paul J Werbos |
| |
Institution: | (1) Quantum, Molecular and High Performance Modeling program, Engineering Directorate, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The classic “Bell’s Theorem” of Clauser, Holt, Shimony and Horne tells us that we must give up at least one of: (1) objective
reality (aka “hidden variables”); (2) locality; or (3) time-forwards macroscopic statistics (aka “causality”). The orthodox
Copenhagen version of physics gives up the first. The many-worlds theory of Everett and Wheeler gives up the second. The backwards-time
theory of physics (BTP) gives up the third. Contrary to conventional wisdom, empirical evidence strongly favors Everett-Wheeler
over orthodox Copenhagen. BTP allows two major variations—a many-worlds version and a neoclassical version based on Partial
Differential Equations (PDE), in the spirit of Einstein. Section 2 of this paper discusses the origins of quantum measurement
according to BTP, focusing on the issue of how we represent condensed matter objects like polarizers in a model “Bell’s Theorem”
experiment. The backwards time telegraph (BTT) is not ruled out in BTP, but is highly speculative for now, as will be discussed.
The views herein are not anyone’s official views, but this does constitute work produced on government time. |
| |
Keywords: | Bell’ s theorem Local realism Many worlds Retrocausality Quantum measurement Klyshko SPDC-2 Markhov random fields |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|