Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer |
| |
Authors: | Shiteng Suo Xiaoxi Chen Lianming Wu Xiaofei Zhang Qiuying Yao Yu Fan He Wang Jianrong Xu |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Radiology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China;2. Global Applied Science Laboratory, GE Healthcare, Shanghai 201203, China |
| |
Abstract: |
PurposeTo evaluate the non-Gaussian water diffusion properties of prostate cancer (PCa) and determine the diagnostic performance of diffusion kurtosis (DK) imaging for distinguishing PCa from benign tissues within the peripheral zone (PZ), and assessing tumor lesions with different Gleason scores.Materials and MethodsNineteen patients who underwent diffusion weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging using multiple b-values and were pathologically confirmed with PCa were enrolled in this study. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was derived using a monoexponential model, while diffusion coefficient (D) and kurtosis (K) were determined using a DK model. Differences between the ADC, D and K values of benign PZ and PCa, as well as those of tumor lesions with Gleason scores of 6, 7 and ≥ 8 were assessed. Correlations between parameters D and K in PCa were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. ADC, D and K values were correlated with Gleason scores of 6, 7 and ≥ 8, respectively.ResultsADC and D values were significantly (p < 0.001) lower in PCa (0.79 ± 0.14 μm2/ms and 1.56 ± 0.23 μm2/ms, respectively) compared to benign PZ (1.23 ± 0.19 μm2/ms and 2.54 ± 0.24 μm2/ms, respectively). K values were significantly (p < 0.001) greater in PCa (0.96 ± 0.20) compared to benign PZ (0.59 ± 0.08). D and K showed fewer overlapping values between benign PZ and PCa compared to ADC. There was a strong negative correlation between D and K values in PCa (Pearson correlation coefficient r = − 0.729; p < 0.001). ADC and K values differed significantly in tumor lesions with Gleason scores of 6, 7 and ≥ 8 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively), although no significant difference was detected for D values (p = 0.325). Significant correlations were found between the ADC value and Gleason score (r = − 0.828; p < 0.001), as well as the K value and Gleason score (r = 0.729; p < 0.001).ConclusionDK model may add value in PCa detection and diagnosis. K potentially offers a new metric for assessment of PCa. |
| |
Keywords: | Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion Kurtosis Non-Gaussian Prostate cancer |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|