Hydrogen‐bonded assemblies in the molecular crystals of 2,2′‐thiodiacetic acid with ethylenediamine and o‐phenylenediamine

Carboxylate molecular crystals have been of interest due to the presence of hydrogen bonding, which plays a significant role in chemical and crystal engineering, as well as in supramolecular chemistry. Acid–base adducts possess hydrogen bonds which increase the thermal and mechanical stability of the crystal. 2,2′‐Thiodiacetic acid (Tda) is a versatile ligand that has been widely explored, employing its multidendate and chelating coordination abilities with many metals; however, charge‐transfer complexes of thiodiacetic acid have not been reported. Two salts, namely ethylenediaminium 2,2′‐thiodiacetate, C₂H₁₀N₂²⁺·C₄H₄O₄S₂²⁻, denoted Tdaen, and 2‐aminoanilinium 2‐(carboxymethylsulfanyl)acetate, C₆H₉N₂⁺·C₄H₅O₄S⁻, denoted Tdaophen, were synthesized and characterized by IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopies, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In these salts, Tda reacts with the aliphatic (ethylenediamine) and aromatic (o‐phenylenediamine) diamines, and deprotonates them to form anions with different valencies and different supramolecular networks. In Tdaen, the divalent Tda²⁻ anions form one‐dimensional linear supramolecular chains and these are extended into a three‐dimensional sandwich‐type supramolecular network by interaction with the ethylenediaminium cations. However, in Tdaophen, the monovalent Tda⁻ anions form one‐dimensional zigzag supramolecular chains, which are extended into a three‐dimensional supramolecular network by interaction with the 2‐aminoanilinium cations. Thus, both three‐dimensional structures display different ring motifs. The structures of these diamines, which are influenced by hydrogen‐bonded assemblies in the molecular crystals, are discussed in detail.