Study of the Efficiency of UV and Visible‐Light Photocatalytic Oxidation of Methanol on Mesoporous RuO2–TiO2 Nanocomposites

Mesoporous RuO₂–TiO₂ nanocomposites at different RuO₂ concentrations (0–10 wt %) are prepared through a simple one‐step sol–gel reaction of tetrabutyl orthotitanate with ruthenium(III) acetylacetonate in the presence of an F127 triblock copolymer as structure‐directing agent. The thus‐formed RuO₂–TiO₂ network gels are calcined at 450 °C for 4 h leading to mesoporous RuO₂–TiO₂ nanocomposites. The photocatalytic CH₃OH oxidation to HCHO is chosen as the test reaction to examine the photocatalytic activity of the mesoporous RuO₂–TiO₂ nanocomposites under UV and visible light. The photooxidation of CH₃OH is substantially affected by the loading amount and the degree of dispersion of RuO₂ particles onto the TiO₂, which indicates the exclusive effect of the RuO₂ nanoparticles on this photocatalytic reaction under visible light. The measured photonic efficiency ξ=0.53 % of 0.5 wt % RuO₂–TiO₂ nanocomposite for CH₃OH oxidation is maximal and the further increase of RuO₂ loading up to 10 wt % gradually decreases this value. The cause of the visible‐light photocatalytic behavior is the incorporation of small amounts of Ru⁴⁺ into the anatase lattice. On the other hand, under UV light, undoped TiO₂ shows a very good photonic efficiency, which is more than three times that for commercial photocatalyst, P‐25 (Evonik–Degussa); however, addition of RuO₂ suppresses the photonic efficiency of TiO₂. The proposed reaction mechanism based on the observed behavior of RuO₂–TiO₂ photocatalysts under UV and visible light is explored.