On effectively computable realizations of choice functions: Dedicated to Professors Kenneth J. Arrow and Anil Nerode

Let X be a compact, convex subset of R_n, and let $\text{〈R(X),}\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{R}}\text{〉}$ be a recursive space of alternatives, where R(X) is the image of X in a recursive metric space, and $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{R}}$ is the family of all recursive subsets of R(X). If $\text{C:}\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{R}}\text{→}\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{R}}$ is a non-trivial recursively representable choice function that is rational in the sense of Richter, we prove that C has no recursive realization within Church's Thesis. Our proof is not a diagonalization argument and uses no paradoxical statements from formal systems. Instead, the proof is a Kleene-Post reduction style argument and uses the Turing equivalence between mechanical devices of computation and the recursive functions of Gödel and Kleene.