| Abstract: | The behaviors of rac‐CH2(3‐tert‐butyl‐1‐indenyl)2]ZrCl2 ( 1 ) and Cp2ZrCl2 ( 2 ) activated by methylaluminoxane in ethene/1,4‐pentadiene copolymerization are compared. In the presence of 1 , inserted methylene‐1,3‐cyclobutane units, a large number of crosslinks, and a small number of methylene‐1,3‐cyclohexane units are obtained. Differently, a polyethene containing only 1,3‐cyclohexane rings is achieved with 2 as the catalytic precursor. Polymer microstructures are compared with those obtained with 1 and 2 in ethene/1,6‐heptadiene copolymerization, which leads only to polyethene containing cyclohexane rings. A tentative rationalization of the experimental data is reported. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 5525–5532, 2006 |
