Theoretical studies on 2‐(5‐amino‐3‐nitro‐1,2,4‐triazolyl)‐3,5‐dinitropyridine (PRAN) and its derivatives

In this work, a set of derivatives of 2‐(5‐amino‐3‐nitro‐1,2,4‐triazolyl)‐3,5‐dinitropyridine (PRAN) with different energetic substituents (?N₃, –NO₂, –NH₂, –NF₂) have been studied at the Becke, three‐parameter, Lee–Yang–Parr/aug‐cc‐pvdz, Becke, three‐parameter, Lee–Yang–Parr/6‐31G(d), Becke, three‐parameter, Perdew 86/6‐31G(d), and Becke three‐parameter, Perdew–Wang 91/6‐31G(d,p) levels of density functional theory. The gas‐phase heats of formation were predicted with isodesmic reactions and the condensed‐phase HOFs were estimated with the Politzer approach. The effects of different functionals and basis sets were analyzed. –N₃ and –NO₂ greatly increase while –NH₂ and –NF₂ slightly decrease heats of formation. An analysis of the bond dissociation energies and impact sensitivity shows that all compounds have good stability. The crystal densities (1.82–2.00 g/cm³) computed from molecular packing calculations are big for all compounds and that of the –NF₂ derivative is the largest. All derivatives have higher detonation velocity and detonation pressure than PRAN. Compounds 3 and 4 (R = NO₂ and NF₂) have better performance than hexahydro‐1,3,5‐trinitro‐1,3,5‐trizine and the performance of 4 is quite close to that of 1,3,5,7‐tetranitro‐1,3,5,7‐tetraazacyclooctane, they are promising candidates of high energy compounds and worth further investigations. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.